FPH released first half FY23 guidance. See here
They are comparing numbers to pre-pandemic. So if we look pre-pandemic the company was CAGRing earnings approx. 14% per annum. If we were to hypothetically assume covid never happened and continue that rate of growth through to now, their first half would be $844m. If we compare that to what they just guided to $670m, its under 7% CAGR. Then based off this you would think that the shares should trade on a lower multiple to account for the lower growth. So the pre-pandemic first half they are comparing to company was trading over 40x earnings, now its on about 29x earnings. The market is pricing in this lower growth to continue. What shareholders need to work out is if the lower growth is due to a pull forward of demand and eventually, once this cycles through, we return to historical growth levels? Or is the company now a mid-high single digit grower? Your individual opinion on that question will determine whether current pricing is cheap or not.
My personal opinion is this is not really super cheap now for the risks, but not expensive either. Which means, I will be doing nothing in my real life account, but selling in my Strawman account (because of the limited capital nature of strawman). I can see a world where it returns to 14% growth, but can also see its plausible it might just stay a high single digit grower.
Reasoning being I believe there is somewhat pulled forward and growth will return once stock levels of consumables get used. Their OSA business is still growing nicely and should keep becoming a larger portion of revenue and there is large tailwinds in the future for that general industry - this is be a growth driver. They are also in the midst of a CAPEX cycle where they are building out manufacturing plants. Once these come online the margins should be better than they were historically adding a boost to earnings.