Schrole have their own in-house software development team which means all “Development” expenditure is reported on the “Product manufacturing and operating costs” line.
The June ‘19 quarterly flagged “major upgrades to the Advantage platform” to provide a user-interface redesign, additional search and filtering capacity. The Dec ‘19 quarterly reported the introduction of the “school group functionality”. This delineates a clear attempt to target the “70 international school groups that consist of 10 or more schools, representing 2000 schools”.
The plan here is similar to the strategic direction of PushPay. Let’s focus our sales team on the big fish and net 10+ schools in a single sale. I like it for the same reason I liked it with PushPay. It should reduce CAC but also add slightly more reliance on those key relationships. We will really notice an uptick in churn should one of these schools ‘groups’ choose to leave.
Product manufacturing and operating costs from March '18 to Dec '19:
$186,000 - 64,000 - 144,000 - 1,215,000 - 249,000 - 1,176,000 - 687,000 - 1,531,000
As you can see, expenses have been steadily increasing. What is difficult is we have to extrapolate from this data how much is going towards product development in comparison to other expenses, but we can make good guesses. Dec ‘18 saw the integration of ISS and Advantage. Jun ‘19 was the UI overhaul, Sep ‘19 was Verify and Dec ‘19 was the group functionality. I can also see from the App Store that ‘Schrole Cover’ App was last updated in Oct ‘19.
The variability in this line will directly correlate to negative or positive cashflow quarters. I’m not concerned about a negative quarterly like Dec ‘19, as long as it is because of an uptick in product development rather than a faltering top line.