Forum Topics DUR DUR News

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

17-Oct-2024: Duratec's newsletter, InSpec, their Spring edition has been emailed to me today - here's a link to the online version: The spring edition of InSpec is here!

It's interesting, and gives some insight into some of the things they do. I sold my DUR here earlier this week and no longer hold them IRL either - not because I'm bearish on them, just because they no longer look like one of the best opportunities across the market for me to make money at current levels.

I bought DUR in April at between 99 cps and $1.23, then sold some in August at $1.30, then sold the dividend shares at $1.415 last month, and the rest at $1.64 two days ago - I see better upside in LYL right now. DUR is still good, but they were a lot better at around $1/share to $1.25/share. DUR has been rising, and they look relatively fully valued to me here for where they are and their current order book, and if they can keep growing that revenue and their earnings, I may well jump back onboard in the future.

Meanwhile, Lycopodium (LYL) has been dropping, as they often do when they go ex-div and don't release any news, and that's something that LYL shareholders need to expect - they do not have promotional management - they do not blow their own trumpet, to the point of not even providing percentage increases on their increased revenue and earnings every report - we have to calculate that ourselves - as you can see I have done in my "valuation" for LYL.

Anyway - this may explain my thinking at this point:

924406f0bb76b93f1240d8d240081b4b91dbf2.png

Same sector; not exactly, they are very different companies, but generally these engineering & construction and mining services contractors get lumped in the same basket despite their significant differences. Point being, DUR has been in an uptrend since May when they briefly dipped below $1/share, and LYL is in a downtrend that started in late July and accelerated after they went ex-div on September 19th for their 40 cps fully franked dividend, as I expected would happen.

This is fine.

4ecf6324c9157409643d7e477702b019de6c62.png

No really, it is. Lycopodium has no debt, and they have a reduced free float due to high insider ownership.

de3f227ce3a0024d5b95459d9e67d699590ee0.png

That was their insider ownership a year ago - in November 2023 when I last broke it all down. 36% of the company owned by their Board and Management and another 25% held by insto's, so their free float is less than 40% of the company, being the only reason they haven't been added to the ASX300 index yet.

Anyway, what am I doing, this straw isn't even about them - it's about Duratec - DUR - a good company, but... in my humble... NOT the best use of my investment dollars at this exact moment in time, particularly when I have LYL as an option.

So, yeah, nothing wrong with DUR, just not one I'm holding right now.

Karmast
Added a month ago

Thanks for sharing @Bear77 and I always like to hear the inversion story on companies I hold.

My view is that Duratec is showing the ongoing signs of being a high quality compounder. If you trust the 10 years of history they shared as a private company before listing, they compounded EPS at 32%p.a.and then in the 4 years they have been a listed company they have compounded EPS at 35% p.a.

So we have about 15 years now of really impressive performance and they still only have single digit market share across their sectors.

From a valuation point of view, if I add some margin of safety, dropping EPS growth for the next 5 years by half to 16% p.a. and leave them on a PE of 13 (which is in the bottom third of their history to date). Then factor in a dividend payout ratio of 45% which is a bit lower than their history, I still project around a 20% p.a. return for the next 5 years based on this years expected EPS.

Of course any of those assumptions could be wrong but on this basis I get the same kind of return I'd get in LYL (which I agree looks good right now too although I don't own it).

For me DUR is perhaps less risky as it's not as exposed to mining ups and downs as LYL is, given their other divisions like defence.

13

mikebrisy
Added a month ago

@Karmast and @Bear77 I agree with this (@Karmast ) assessment.

While I was delighted to pick up $DUR around $1.00 at the start of its recent run, I don’t see it as anywhere near being overvalued. It’s one I’d like to hold for a long time, understanding of course, that it’s fortunes will ebb and flow as is nearly always the case in this sector.

I have a modest 5.5% stake and am happy to let time do its thing here.

That said, I am also in accumulation mode for $LYL. These are two very different companies, but both appear to have excellent capabilities and management in their respective sector.


11
Shapeshifter
Added a month ago

@Bear77 A important difference between Duratec and Lycopodium in my humble opinion is Duratec has a much more diversified customer base and provides better market cycle protection. Also Duratec has a strong CAGR record.

Lycopodium gererates most (I couldn't see exactly on a quick scan of the annual report) of it's income from the resource sector and over half of it's income comes from Africa. This may have an impact on the multiple the market is willing to pay for it.

2536b6a05e8a4117422fc8ef51a24289bcef5e.png

12

Bear77
Added a month ago

Thanks @Karmast , @mikebrisy and @Shapeshifter for that excellent analysis. I think for me it simply comes down to conviction, and I have the highest conviction for LYL because I have followed them for years, held them for most of that time with different weightings in different portfolios, and watched them closely enough that I have a very high opinion of their management, their high insider ownership informing their capital allocation decisions (positively), and most importantly their ability to manage risk when working in some very risky countries - although the risks seem to be higher for the mine owners and operators when the mine is running and clearly profitable than when it and the associated processing plants and infrastructure are being built. I agree that they usually trade at a discount, and one of those reasons is because of where they operate and the high percentage of their revenue that is derived from West Africa. Another is the reduced liquidity because of the reduced free float. I think those things provide me with opportunities to load up at lower levels and trim at higher ones, and collect superb fully franked dividends along the way.

So, for me personally, LYL ticks so many boxes, they provide me with a steady income stream AND capital growth when looked at over any decent time period, like 3, 5, 7 or 10 years. I even hold them in my one-stock portfolio that I manage for our two kids - who are now both adults. And for all of those reasons - great total shareholder returns from a superbly managed company with an excellent industry position and who currently have a number of strong tailwinds, the record gold price being the main one. And they do work across a wide variety of industries including food manufacturing, health (CSL has been a customer) and basically decent-to-large-scale industrial processes where their diagnostic and engineering/design skills can be utilised to improve things or build better plants, but I won't go on - that's all in my stuff over under LYL.

I liked DUR at around $1.20 to $1.25, liked them even more when they got down to $1, bought some here as well as a small position in a real-money portfolio, and made money from selling them at higher levels, and I'm not saying they're expensive now, I'm saying that to me, with what I know about the company, which is a LOT less than I know about companies like LYL and GNG that I have followed closely for over a decade, DUR look fully priced, or to be clearer, reasonably priced. For what they are reporting now. If they can live up to the potential that you have outlined very well there @Karmast then they will look cheap at current levels with the benefit of hindsight when we look back in a few years.

In an ideal world, I would hold DUR for that potential, but I can be a slow learner sometimes, and I have too often made paper profits on companies that I have done "some" research on, and then lost those profits in a New York minute when the company releases an underwhelming update, or lowers guidance, or announces something negative such as losing a major customer or being in dispute with someone over a major contract. Happened with GNG recently after they announced the impact to their revenue of BHP mothballing West Musgrave, which was GNG's largest ongoing EPC contract at the time, but I saw that one coming and used it to load up on GNG during that period of share price weakness.

So my level of conviction is usually correlated to my level of research as well as the time I have been following the company, as long as they haven't done anything that worries me, or are in an industry or situation that worries me. DUR hasn't put a foot wrong, I just don't have the conviction (yet) that they can keep rising as they have over the past 5 months - it's been a strong uptrend, and the nagging thought in the back of my mind is to take some profits when a company has had a run like this, and because it was a relatively small position for me anyway here, I just sold out, with the thought that I may get the opportunity to buy back in at lower levels if they do fall again, but if not, that's also fine. In my real-money portfolio, I sold out in June because I had to liquidate that entire portfolio because it was in a trust structure that needed to be wound up and the proceeds split up, and I didn't buy back in (in July/August) purely because I wanted to greatly simplify my investments - including reducing the number of positions I held - and DUR didn't look like one of my best options at the time - again, purely because I liked some other opportunities more.

My circumstances have changed again in recent weeks - now that my TPD claim through my super fund insurance has been approved and paid - so DUR remain on my watchlist. I do like companies like this, but I do not have a great feel for their management yet, and while their MD has plenty of skin in the game (owning 9.64% of the company), the other three directors have small shareholdings of between 20,000 and 83,000 shares (their MD has almost 24 million shares). There are other Duratec founders or insiders with skin in the game as we have discussed previously, but I would like to see the other three board members eat a little more of their own cooking. But that's not a major issue. DUR is fine, just not one of my highest conviction buys at current levels.

9

Karmast
Added a month ago

Thanks @Bear77 and that all sounds very sensible as an overall Portfolio approach. Like you, if I don't have real conviction I don't want to own a company and you can't get that conviction off someone else!

5