Forum Topics CAT CAT CAT a takeover target?

Pinned straw:

Added 12 months ago

Interesting article in Livewire today by Ben Richards of Seneca Financial. I hadn't heard of them before. It's a new fund but they have beaten the Small Ords over the past year that it's been running. Anyway, it's a decent read on takeover plays in Aussie small caps and he makes a thought provoking argument below for why Catapult is an attractive option.


Catapult Group International Ltd (ASX: CAT)

Catapult Group International is a global leader in sports technology and analytics, specializing in wearable devices and video solutions that monitor and analyze athlete performance. Its wearable GPS trackers, famously visible on players across sports like AFL, soccer, and rugby, provide critical data on metrics such as load management and fatigue, while its video solutions offer tactical insights for coaches and teams. By converting traditional intuition-based coaching into a data-driven approach, Catapult has become a must-have tool for professional sports organizations worldwide.

Catapult is poised for significant growth, supported by strong tailwinds in the professional sports industry. The global sports tech market is projected to grow at 17.5% CAGR to $40 billion by 2026, driven by increasing media rights values, the rise of sports betting, and growing fan engagement through social media and streaming platforms. With only ~21% penetration of an addressable market of ~20,000 elite teams, Catapult has ample runway to expand its user base and cross-sell products. Emerging trends such as the professionalization of college sports, rising investment in women’s sports, and integrated video-wearable solutions further amplify its growth prospects, positioning Catapult as a key beneficiary in the fast-evolving sports landscape.

We mentioned CAT as a buy to our Good Research subscribers when the stock was trading at $1.96 just 3 months ago. With shares now trading +88% higher today, and +53% since we wrote this article on Livewire, the thesis is still largely unchanged.

Synergies:

We see Catapult as a global sports tech platform that can be scaled up significantly into a large addressable market. Data is the new oil, and Catapult holds the key to professional athlete performance data.

Acquiring Catapult unlocks synergies through product integration and cross-selling. Catapult’s wearable technology and analytics tools can be combined with an acquirer’s platforms to create comprehensive solutions, while its global client base provides opportunities to cross-sell and expand into sports media, ticketing, or fan engagement markets. Integrating Catapult’s player data into broader ecosystems can enhance customer experiences and generate new revenue streams.

The acquisition offers cost efficiencies through streamlined operations and supply chain optimization, while a larger acquirer could scale up Catapult’s R&D budget to accelerate growth through new product development. Catapult’s data can also drive advanced AI tools for injury prevention, performance forecasting, and tactical insights. With a strong presence in elite sports and opportunities in grassroots markets, the deal positions the acquirer as a leader in sports analytics, strengthening their competitive edge and growth potential.

Scarcity:

Opportunities to gain exposure to the rapidly growing professional sports industry are exceedingly rare, particularly in public markets and even more so in Australia. In the US, assets in this sector are scarce and often held by private equity or billionaires as trophy investments. Catapult stands out with a strong, hard-to-replicate market position, underpinned by proprietary technology in wearable athlete trackers and video solutions for coaches.

Over the past decade, Catapult has built and acquired a comprehensive suite of software and wearables, establishing a robust network of professional organizations that would be difficult to replicate from scratch. Now entering a cashflow harvesting phase, CAT presents an attractive opportunity for financial investors seeking exposure to the professional sports sector.

Gettable:

CAT has an open register, with the board holding approximately 17% ownership. This substantial stake reflects strong alignment with minority shareholders and suggests that any potential takeover would likely require board approval, ensuring shareholder interests are well-represented.

Cheap:

CAT is currently trading at 4.9x EV/Sales, with a robust ~20% annual top-line growth and impressive 75% incremental profit margins. The business also offers significant growth optionality, with new products like the NCAA sideline video tools yet to be reflected in sell-side analyst models. Additionally, the potential to secure a major deal with the NFL represents a substantial blue-sky opportunity.

Given the valuation benchmarks for software companies, we believe any acquisition would likely occur at a multiple of at least 6-8x EV/Sales. Factoring in a reasonable takeover premium, this could propel CAT’s valuation to over $5.00 per share.

Who might buy it?

Private equity firms, such as Silver Lake (City Football Group, New York Knicks), CVC (rugby leagues, Formula One), and TPG (tech/media interests), are likely contenders, drawn by CAT’s market-leading wearable technology, recurring revenue streams, and opportunities for operational efficiency and bolt-on acquisitions. With CAT under-geared and trading on just 5x EV/Sales, private equity buyers could leverage its strong market position to scale growth and enhance profitability.

Global technology giants like Apple, Google, or Microsoft might also see strategic value in Catapult’s player-tracking and analytics capabilities. Integrating this technology into their health, fitness, or AI ecosystems could enhance their platforms and deepen their reach into professional sports. Similarly, sportswear and equipment manufacturers like Nike, Adidas, or Under Armour could embed Catapult’s solutions into their wearable products, offering athletes and teams a complete performance ecosystem.

Additionally, media and entertainment companies such as ESPN, DAZN, or Fanatics could utilize Catapult’s analytics to enrich broadcasts and fan engagement platforms. Whether through data-driven insights for viewers or enhanced performance metrics for athletes, Catapult represents a scarce, high-value asset in the growing sports technology landscape, making it attractive to a wide range of strategic and financial buyers.

Why now / what's the catalyst?

CAT's profitability is inflecting, and it's entering an attractive cash flow harvesting phase, demonstrating strong operating leverage in its recent financial performance.

The key metric to call out from CATs recent 1H25 result was its exceptional incremental profit margins. The company achieved an impressive 75% incremental margin in the first half of FY25, well above its medium-term target of 30%. This reflects strong profitability from newly signed teams and product sales. Notably, this performance builds on incremental margins of 43% in FY24, a significant improvement from 19% in the first half of that year, underscoring CAT's growing operational efficiency and ability to capitalize on revenue growth.

A key catalyst for CAT is its looming inclusion in the ASX200 index. With its market cap now at $1.0 billion, CAT is nearing the ~$1.2 billion threshold for inclusion in this premier index, tracked by passive ETFs and institutional mandates. Such an event could drive significant upside, as seen with other high-performing ASX-listed technology shares like Pro Medicus (ASX: PME) and Wisetech (ASX: WTC), which have re-rated to P/E multiples of 204x and 97x, respectively. These stocks benefited from strong capital flows and their scarcity as tightly held, high-quality tech shares on the ASX, particularly following the exit of Altium after its takeover (~50x EV/EBITDA).



This is the link to the full article if you're interested - https://www.livewiremarkets.com/wires/the-4-common-traits-of-small-cap-takeovers-and-our-top-8-targets-for-2025?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Trending%20on%20Livewire%20-%20Wednesday%204%20December%202024&utm_content=Trending%20on%20Livewire%20-%20Wednesday%204%20December%202024+CID_d3a295bfd0e137ce6b1c2dcb34f0da8f&utm_source=campaign%20monitor&utm_term=ACCESS%20THE%20INSIGHTS

jcmleng
Added 12 months ago

@Karmast , thanks for posting! Love the stuff that Ben has been smoking ... he needs to share it around a bit ... Absolutely never say never for me, especially after the ALU deal which took business size out of the equation!

I pulled up this slide from yesterday's CAT Investor Preso which is a one I haven't seen recently. Says the somewhat blatantly obvious in terms of who uses the CAT platform today, but it is a good graphic of the different day-to-day operational stakeholders. What has always excited me about CAT, more so with video, is that the platform (1) in the absolute heart of every team (2) the entire team organisation uses it (3) it has significant broader direct leaque, media, fan impacts.

I used this slide to think about the possible acquirers that Ben put forth.

879149718f2007d092870ade031fb071366313.png

Private Equity Firms - for those with deep pockets, absolutely makes sense.

Tech Giants - Apple, Google, Microsoft - this thought bubble perhaps overly focuses on the wearables. Integrating this technology into their health, fitness, or AI ecosystems could enhance their platforms and deepen their reach into professional sports. Err, chalk and cheese. The existing Apple/Google wearables market etc is so distant from CAT's pro-wearable that I can't see the synergies at all. Quite different from Google buying Fitbit - thats significantly more adjacent. But Google buying CAT means it has to chew a hell of a lot more than just the wearable synergies ... I can't quite see the angle from either of these. Microsoft is probably wanting to focus on the bigger AI pie, which is its core expertise and impacts the entire global business world. If there are limited adjacent synergies, I can't quite see the sense in going deep in the sports sector to attempt to further monetise the data given that CAT has already positioned itself smack bang in the middle of everything team-centric.

Media Companies - possible, but this is only one aspect of CAT. The rest of CAT, ie sports and team management is quite far remote from the core expertise of media companies.

If I think of all the big acquisitions of the companies I used to own, from a product perspective, they all essentially had a single-ish product use within the customer's environment - ALU was PCB design licenses, PPH was around church collections/management, NEA was high-res maps, ELO was HR software. CAT doesn't quite fit this mould, but maybe I am just too biased ..

Again, absolutely never say never ... but I just think what CAT does and how embedded it is across the different operational stakeholders day-to-day and I struggle to see how the Tech Giants and Media could add further value and/or further monetise what CAT has already done to make a huge buyout sensible.

Discl: Held IRL and in SM


18

jcmleng
Added 12 months ago

@RhinoInvestor , completely agree! Sports rights is definitely one tailwind for CAT in terms of providing the leagues with the data that they need to increase fan viewership and engagement, in the first instance, and simultaneously/therafter increase the value/monetising of the sports rights. Which is why I think CAT has got it right in terms of how it plays and rides this tailwind.

But for the media companies to buy CAT for this end still seems a stretch ...

19
mikebrisy
Added 12 months ago

Great note @Karmast. Several of the industry references align strongly with the current GS podcast series I am listening to on the pro sports sector as an asset class.

I’ve been finding it quite hard to value $CAT, because the upside and its timing is hard to get a good handle on. As @Strawman pointed out in our discussion at the recent SM meeting, they’ve long touted the value of the platform for enhanced viewer interaction. But there is often a big gap between the idea and its successful execution. But because there is a serious blue sky upside, I’m holding on tightly to what I have, even if I’m not adding here.

With a RL position now at 4.3%, I’d contemplate a larger position, but not at these prices.

There is a lot of private money in pro sports and it’s not a stretch to see one of the tech platforms making a move on $CAT. So the M&A idea is very credible in my view. And the potential multiples, well the evidence is there in oversea tech acquisitions. As for $5,…I’m very happy to let the market be the judge of that.

:-)

Thanks for posting.

Disc: Held in RL and SM

22

GazD
Added 12 months ago

@Karmast @mikebrisy I’d be disappointed to see this taken out even at $5. I see this business as a long term compounder I’d hope to hold for 10 years plus.


20

Strawman
Added 12 months ago

Nice one @Karmast -- love to see more fundies getting behind the business.

Still, if I'm honest, I hope they don't get taken over. But at $5/share it wouldn't be a total tragedy! ;)

18

Strawman
Added 12 months ago

haha, snap @GazD -- I'm with you. Just saying a juicy premium would be nice if it were to happen.

16

nessy
Added 12 months ago

@Karmast great write up. Interesting podcast on Equity Mates 26th Nov with Luke Laretive, also from Seneca. He really talks the talk with his stocks! Did pump CAT significantly.

One thing I would like to point out is the potential depth of use in the US. I have seen some of the hype around college and high school sports and in Australia we just simply cannot understand or believe the size of it. Here in Victoria if Melbourne university made the amateurs footy grand final they might get 3000 in the crowd (might). The number of colleges that have THEIR OWN football stadium (not borrowing an NFL ground) that can seat over 80,000 people and fill it week in week out is totally crazy. High school games can get 5 - 10000 spectators. I went to the NCAA basketball final which was held in a football stadium. Yes, a football stadium - 78,000 spectators at a basketball game. Coaches at colleges get paid in the millions per season. So to spend $20k on player tracking with CAT devices is a drop in the ocean.

Plenty of runway here still!

Nessy

21