Yes @thetjs It was definitely risk related - I got the info from @mikebrisy actually - I'll hunt up where he posted it...
Found it - it's a few posts down in this thread: https://strawman.com/forums/topic/10537 and Mike added the post after joining / attending the Lycopodium online conference / results call for analysts and investors about their FY2025 H1 results and their reduced dividend:
Here's the post from Mike (6 months ago), after LYL's H1 results; I've highlighted the relevant bit in bold, which is right at the start of the post:
@Bear77 @Slomo I'll just add a few brief points from the call.
CEO Peter De Leo, when questioned about the guidance downgrade attributed this to them not going ahead with two major Barrack (Cu?) projects. He explained that they weren't comfortable with the contractual terms from a risk perspective. That kind of decision is music to my ears, because it is the taking on of too much project risk which ultimately leads to this sector generating poor returns. I'd rather they take the hit on growth and avoid a couple of train wrecks any day.
We also got some further insights into why management consider the Saxum deal to be transformational. First, Saxum has leading expertise is several engineering disciplines, including structural and mechanical which will complement $LYL's process engineering strength. This is exactly the kind of skill synergy you want to find in a deal like this. So, big tick.
Second is Saxum's capabilities in cement and established track record and relationships delivering cement projects for ALL the global cement majors. Comibine this with $LYL's footprint in Africa. Now just have a think about how global population demographics are going to evolve in the next couple of decades and then think about where all the roads, bridges, runways, and structures are going to be buit. Yep. Africa. So, this is a very future facing deal. (I think I'd completely missed that when we commented on the deal last year.)
Peter also mentioned the excellence of engineering education and workforce in Argentina, as well as America's footprint (which we did discuss last year). Engineering talent is a key constraint for engineers, so it makes perfect sense.
I think Peter was a bit peeved at today's SP reaction. As well he might be. On a comparable basis $LYL is once more cheaply priced in its sector, and that for a company which is more diligent and risk averse than many. He said today might be a good time to buy!
Today's result and the SP reaction will just be noise in the journey of this business IMHO.
Have we ever tried to get Peter along to a SM Meeting? @Strawman @Bear77 ?
Happy to hold and be patient with this one.
Disc: Held RL (3.5% - maybe it should be more?) and SM
--- ends ---
Also the following forum threads on LYL here are worth reading for background and context:
https://strawman.com/forums/topic/10190
https://strawman.com/forums/topic/10444
https://strawman.com/forums/topic/11548
https://strawman.com/forums/topic/9647