Forum Topics OCC OCC Capital Raise

Pinned straw:

Added 2 months ago

$OCC have concluded their $30m institutional placement at $1.30 for 23.076m new shares, adding to the existing 247.863m shares - a dilution of 7%.

I'll overlook the usual irritation that there is no opportunity for retail holders to participate, and that the new shares at $1.30 are offered at lower than my weighted average RL cost of $1.35,

There are in addition some 24m options on issue, as well as 4.65 million retention and performance rights. To these, more are added today: Canaccord Genuity were issued 1.5m options, at strike prices of $1.625 (0.5m) and $1.95 (1.0m) as part fees for being Lead Manager.

ASX Announcement

As we speculated here earlier, the funds create the capacity for $OCC to accelerate its development on multiple fronts. They've cited the following areas:

  • accelerate the US roll out of the Company’s flagship nerve repair product Remplir
  • undertake clinical studies to commercialise the use of Remplir in the significant prostate cancer surgery market
  • advance commercialisation of pipeline products in tendon and ligament repair
  • expand capacity at Orthocell’s existing manufacturing facilities
  • invest in new applications and technologies in the regenerative medicine sector.


There is no reference to the Remplir expansion being to new markets (I had speculated Japan and EU/UK), so it will be worthwhile clarifying the approach at the forthcoming AGM. That said, in my view USA and Canada represent more than enough to be getting after, and there is merit in seeing what traction can come from these markets before going even wider.

With well over $50 million in cash now, and FY25 FCF of -$9,2m set to increase now (I expect) in FY26, if the company pushes ahead on all fronts, by my reckoning, the strengthened cash pile should give the firm 3-4 years of runway, by which time operating cashflows from Remplir in North America should be material.

There are arguably only two new elements in the announced program:

1. Expansion of Manufacturing Facilities: I am slightly surprised that expansion of manufacuting facilities has been flagged. With current capacity of around 100,000 units pa, by my reckoning that sufficient capacity for $50m - $100m annual sales, which is still some years off. Of course, this is a relatively capital light business, and it is as well to have expansion plans developed and in progress well before they are needed. For example, if the product goes gangbusters in the US, it would not be a good thing to be caught short!

2. Clinical Studies on use of Remplir in the Prostate Cancer Surgery Market: Following the earlier reported promising results of using Remplir in post-prostate cancer surgery nerve repair, it is no surprise that the company will formally pursue this indication for Remplir in a clinical trial. It will be good to hear more about this in due course.

I also hope we will soon learn more about the product development in tendon and ligament repair, and also the ideas being explored in the R&D program.

My Overall Assessment

While dilution is rarely cheered, it makes sense for the business to ensure it is well-resourced at this pivotal stage in its growth. Its technology platform offers the promise of many valuable products, with both Striate and Remplir already available in multiple markets globally, and building a promising track record, with strong y-o-y revenue growth.

Despite all these moving parts and potential opportunities, for me, the key driver remains what Remplir can achieve in North America. For my thesis to remain intact, I want to see strong revenue in North America, and the two indicators of this will be 1) sustained strong growth trajectory in the now established ANZ markets to indicate the kind of penetration that might be possible and 2) early leading indicators in the US (# surgeons using, # procedures conducted, # account approved, replishment volumes from distributors).

For now, I will continue to HOLD my current position (RL 2.9%) and await evidence of successful execution.

I have been continuing a deep dive into $OCC and will in the coming weeks post some findings, including a better stab at valuation. (I think my current placeholder is probably a bit too optimistic!)

Disc: Held in RL and SM

Schwerms
Added 2 months ago

Interesting this one, went from we are fully funded etc etc to raise out of nowhere.

If they expect a big revenue ramp in the US over the next 2 quarters they could have let it run longer and raised at a higher price if needed after all they have only used 40 units of the 2000-4000 they shipped.

Understand it's somewhat of a global rollout and they need to increase capacity but aren't they currently nowhere near full production capacity?

Going from 100,000 to 400,000 obviously forecasts big expectations for sales.

HC are in a tither about the investment they are making privately in that WA company that they have interest in already.

Overall I am happy they are going to progress the prostate surgery trials and think it's all still in a good place, be interested to see what new US institutional investors were added.

But I'm filthy about the no raise we have lots of cash fully funded, runway to profitability, don't need to raise ......surprise raise.

At least anyone can add at the CR price now after yesterday's drop, I have a pretty good allocation already,might see if it goes into the low 1.30s to add more.

Disc held IRL and SM

17

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

@Schwerms I agree with you, in that I am not happy that they appear to have flipped their decision on a dime.

It is a common thing with Boards that when asked "are you going to raise capital?" they appear to have a default position of "we have no plans..." and "we are fully funded to [achieve X]" right up until the point that they decide to raise capital.

I'd much rather they said something like ... "we have no immediate plans to raise additional capital, as our funds are sufficient, however, we regularly review our plans, market conditions, and the opportunities to increase our rate of investment if we believe it will create shareholder value. And so, while we have no plans today, you should not be surprised if our plans evolve in future as the Board is always considering what is in shareholders best interests."

This has happened so often, in so many companies, that I tend to treat with great scepticism statements like "no, we are fully funded, and do not need to raise capital."

So like you, I feel a bit mislead, but I actually don't mind the decision, particularly if they are going after the prostate indication. The new factory capacity won't been needed for years. I reckon they will do some early planning, but I don't expect them to build anything for years.

And if the US goes well, then I want them to push a lot of intentory to their distributors. That would be a great problem to have. And that's actually the evidence I am waiting for to increase my position. Remember ANZ went from (roughly) $0.5m sales in year 1 to $1,0m in year 2. US is 15x the size of ANZ, and so even with only 40% market coverage, there is a strong opportunity here if the distributors really get on to it.

Like you, I have a large enough position for such a high risk business not to add more now. All this cap raise event has done is give a first strike towards making me less trustworthy of what management say, and to bias me towards not giving the benefit of the doubt. My past experience says, that sometimes ends badly. So I will be cautious.

17

Nnyck777
Added 2 months ago

Good discussion @mikebrisy and @Schwerms . I hold Occ on SM but have waited to pull the trigger IRL. I hear your irritation at management but the share price has had a quick rise so as an onlooker I thought this was a possibility. Honesty and trustworthy Boards and management has been going to the top of my list recently when trying to find investment grade companies. There are so few businesses where I can say that I have complete faith in management. Jon Pilcher is my number 1 most trusted CEO on the asx. No hype, no bluster just quite consistent execution.

Some days I am tempted to stay stuff all this research and just go 100% into NEU. But that would be silly and the whole Trump factor could easily derail that plan.

Any other Straw people who can add to my list of trusted CEOs and Boards?

17