Forum Topics KAR KAR Karoon Conundrum (8/4/26)

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

Riffing somewhat off @Goldfish's thread on “Timing the sale of oil and coal stocks,” as a holder of Karoon this is a pertinent issue for me. As a cyclical, the timing of when to buy and particularly when to sell is critical, unlike with growth companies where time tends to heal timing issues. With the price whipsawing on each Trump tweet, I need to have a well‑founded view on an exit price.

I continued to hold Karoon when it tipped over $2 about a year ago on valuation grounds, and that was at much lower oil prices. However, that was based on the premise that an oil price of around US$60–70/bbl at the time was at the low end of a range. So now that we are over US$100/bbl, why isn’t Karoon over $4 a share, and does that suggest I have missed something, i.e. that it is time to recheck the thesis and valuation assumptions?

What the new short‑ to medium‑term oil price “normal is” remains the ultimate question (welcome, captain obvious). My assumption is that it is above US$60–70 but could be anywhere from US$80–110, given the following factors:

  • Iran war: There are three key impacts from the war:
  1. Supply route blockage: The blocking of the Strait of Hormuz is bottling up roughly 20% of world oil supply, but unblocking is a matter of a decision that could be made at any time. This is therefore a short‑term impact that could disappear as quickly as it appeared.
  2. Iranian oil “tariff” on the Strait of Hormuz may be how it gets unblocked, which would potentially be a medium‑term impact on prices and would depend on how it is priced and structured.
  3. Gulf oil/gas infrastructure damage: This is the most significant risk to medium‑ and long‑term oil prices.
  • Ukraine attacks on Russian oil (Ukraine Ramps Up Attacks on Russian Oil, Aiming to Curb Iran War Windfall - The New York Times): Russia has probably been the greatest beneficiary of the war in Iran, which is rarely mentioned. Sanctions were eased to increase supply and higher prices are helping to fund the Russian war effort; the oil price probably would have hit US$150, as some predicted, without this extra supply. However, Ukraine is trying to offset that advantage by increasingly targeting Russian oil export lines and infrastructure. As with Iran, blocking a supply line is a problem only until a decision is made to unblock it, but blowing up infrastructure creates a problem that takes years to fix. So the price implications of this look likely to be lasting.
  • Global production response: Higher prices will certainly make more wells commercially viable and encourage drilling, but it takes time for this to occur. The Venezuelan oil situation is a good example: plenty of oil, but fixing/building the infrastructure to sell it is going to take time, and presumably many of the skilled people and required equipment are going to be deployed fixing facilities currently being bombed.
  • Acceleration to electrification: Another slow‑burn solution that is not going to move the dial in the short term, but one that will now be accelerated and will be more impactful in the medium and long term due to the Iranian war.

So, if oil infrastructure damage is kept to a minimum and the Strait reopens, a price around US$80 will probably be a reasonable expectation for the CY26 average. If the current ceasefire evaporates, the Strait remains blocked, and infrastructure damage ramps up, a price close to US$110 or even more could be on the cards.

Then there are company‑specific factors impacting value: the GoM purchase mistake, operating issues, a new CEO with technical skills, capital management improvements, production vessel ownership, and production output expectations. For the purpose of this exercise, I am going to remain neutral on these factors and assume oil sales/production remains around 10 MMbbl.

Below is a P&L scenario look for FY26 (note YE 31 Dec). I have applied the Brazilian government’s 12% temporary tax on 50% of revenue for the year, assuming it will be extended for the full year, which would see it apply to 75% of Karoon’s current production (ie 25% GoM excluded).

b99df4355f459c67ca6524ffef16a8bb11b0c3.png

So what to make of it?

FY26 is likely to be a good year and could be a great year. The PE is likely to be below 8 and maybe below 4, but what about further out, which accounts for most of the value? I view the US$80 price scenario and EPS of about A$0.28 as an achievable/conservative medium‑term expectation and a PE of 10 (ie value ~$2.80), which is well above historical averages of 4–8. The PE uplift is based on now having decent management and improved prospects in GoM leading to improve earnings quality, plus a possible upside oil price surprise may offer an exit around ~$3.00.

Just my totally unprofessional view and plan for KAR. I welcome hole‑pokers and other thoughts, any of which may lead to me changing my mind!

Disc: I own RL.

Goldfish
Added 4 weeks ago

Likely another good day for KAR shareholders today, again courtesy of the orange muppet:


8ec959d5aff87b8d03a338d379918d724e55b2.png


Thank you for the comments in this thread. It has been helpful in trying to work out how to play this situation.

In terms of valuation, I still view KAR as undervalued. But high risk

4 factors IMO have mainly kept a lid on the share price increase, despite the oil price

  1. Lack of trust in management
  2. Operational risks
  3. The poor timing of maintenance (reduced production in the current HY, ramping up in the second half)
  4. The 12% extra Brazilian tax


In view of the above, I am still planning to sell down my still overweight position. But definitely not everything, given the upside potential that I believe still exists.

Today may well be the moment when the market finally starts pricing in a longer conflict. If so, I will probably sell down another 20% or so

And watch with interest what happens in the next few weeks

13
Goldfish
Added a month ago

Thanks for the post. Good thoughts

I still own a lot of Karoon. Sold down about 20% last week at $2.18. Would have sold more today if there was no deal. Pity that the ASX doesn't trade on Easter Monday like the US does.

KAR has been cheap for a long time. I think we both agree that it still is. If all goes well, there is still major upside. The problem is that operational risks are high and the market has (somewhat justifiably) lost faith in management.

My approach from here depends on what happens in Iran / Strait of Hormuz. If there is no further drama and the oil price drifts down, I will probably hold. But I think a more likely scenario is that there is still more trouble to come. Trump and the Iranians still seem very far apart, there is great potential for the war to flare up again. If that happens, I will look to sell some more KAR (and take advantage again of the cheap prices that will exist outside of the energy sector)

14

Tom73
Added a month ago

I think @Goldfish’s if KAR was an overweight position for me I would be doing what you have done and plan to do. However it’s an underweight position, hence I am happy to sit on my hands for quite a while and look for a significantly better exit opportunity. 

The risks in continuing to hold are probably more operational than oil price. I see the oil price volatility as an opportunity provided there is no pressure to exit within a set time period (the Iran/Straits of Hormuz may provide more opportunities yet). However, in the medium and long term it doesn’t matter how good the oil price is if operational errors result in a significant drop in production or increase in costs!

KAR is a low-cost producer which is why I bought it (and what I look for in any commodity company), this needs to be maintained, increasing volume can help a lot. If they looked like they were going to lose the low-cost producer status, that would be a red flag and signal the thesis is broken and it’s time to exit irrespective of price.

11

Arizona
Added a month ago

@Goldfish I hold KAR. It's been a disappointing ride for me, having bought at around current price levels.

With everything that has happened in the Middle East, my investment has essentially gone no where. Which makes me ask the question: Is this as good as it gets for Karoons SP in the short to medium term?

I received this in an email from Macro Charts, this morning. Thought it was relevant:

Yesterday WTI Crude Oil fell 16%, one of its biggest single-day declines in history, and the biggest since 2020.

Since the inception of futures trading, there were only two periods where WTI dropped this much from near a multi-year high: October 1990 (-16%) and March 2022 (-12%). In both cases Oil was rolling down from a major top. In 1990 Oil bounced for a few days to fill an upside gap, then rolled over and collapsed. In 2022 Oil fell another 15%, then traded in a topping range which ultimately collapsed.


9

Tom73
Added a month ago

This article in the AFR today provides a better picture of the situation and issues with oil supply currently and the short to medium term impacts: Australia’s energy sector likely to be ...ter Iran war, Strait of Hormuz closure.pdf

Sounds like I am in the same camp as you @Arizona on KAR price and disappointment to date. The macro chart information is interesting, thanks for sharing, as it talks to the Gulf War (1990) and Russian attack on Ukraine (2022), so conflict related shocks. However it only talks to short term price movements which are utter chaos currently reflecting the changing situation – which I would contrast to the previous examples in that as shocking as they were, they were driven by a consistent and mostly logical set of responses and outcomes that experts could work with – we now have the “Commander Insanity” running the show and the experts are as clueless as everyone on where it may go from here.

I will flag my general distrust of charting as a way to manage investments to state my bias, but acknowledge they can provide some indication on probable direction for very short intervals. However, I am holding KAR for a longer term and higher return outcome than price movements across ranges.

Lets hope some sanity prevails for all our benefits – the share prices impacts to us all are less consequential and important than the global fallout already and lets hope it’s limited to just the damage done to date.

9

Arizona
Added a month ago

@Tom73 Thanks for the article.

I feel markets are understating the potential downside risks here. I know I am not alone.

I am also convinced that Trump and his mates are toying with the markets, that market manipulation is rife in many sectors. Those on the inside have the playbook for when to buy and sell and the market jumps around to the tune of social media posts. Manipulation is nothing new of course, but the blatant TACO, on again off again B.S. has surely never been so open and visibly on display.

The rules have changed and we investors need to be aware. If only to block out the noise.

These are not unique thoughts on my part, I know. But these manipulations make for an extremely noisy environment.

All this to say that your long term view on KAR is probably the way to go. Having said all that, a long term view is probably always the way to go. Trump or no Trump. And I have come full circle.

Incoherent rant over. Back you your usual programming .....

9

Arizona
Added a month ago


It would appear that the futures markets have well and truly diverged from the spot price of oil.

@Tom73 Like you I hope the conflict ends ASAP.

300fe104b4b2bc1c2d1d45cb7fca2bae72e3d2.png

14

Goldfish
Added 4 weeks ago

US markets back near record highs overnight. Oil price down to $95US

I don't get it

The Strait of Hormuz is still closed. The US is blockading Iran's oil. There is no agreement between Iran and the US. The rhetoric from both sides is not encouraging

Maybe there will be a miraculous peace treaty announced tomorrow. I have no idea.

But it seems to me the market is discounting the prospect of a prolonged or escalated conflict

14

Arizona
Added 4 weeks ago

@Goldfish I don't get it either.

There are a lot of moving parts to all of this and a lot of game playing.

What's the saying: "The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" or something like that.

Its perplexing. In some areas, I am naturally a pessimist (something I'm working on) it seems to me that large portions of the population ignore the down side, which seems to work out much of the time.

11

tomsmithidg
Added 4 weeks ago

@Goldfish , I reckon that there is a lot of money trading on announcements hoping to get in (or out) early. I don't reckon there is a lot of consideration of fundamentals or reality in the market movements, particularly around oil, at the moment. In the mean time I'm focused on maintaining a 'volatility = opportunity' mindset and trying not to sweat how illogical the movements all seem to be. I'm much the same as you @Arizona but I prefer to consider myself a realist.

e19ae6dd306f9ef6709924ccb6eae631dab888.png

10

Longpar5
Added 3 weeks ago

Hey @Tom73 and others, good to read through the thread.

I'm not a expert on Karoon but a couple of factors I'd point to in your strawman spirit of encouraging "hole-pokers"!

I get the sense you didn't really want to use a PE ratio to value Karoon and I really don't think you should. Only when oil companies get really big can you start thinking like this, otherwise you need to be across the assets individually. In Karoons case, they only had, as of last reserves statement, 47M barrels of proven reserves, about 3/4 of those being developed and the rest are going to cost you capital. Anyway, if you're producing at 10m barrels per year you might have 5 years left (natural decline will stretch this out, but it will be a lower rate and profitability, so let's keep it simple)! So using a PE, even one of 10 is kind of silly.

The other thing about Karoon which will always hold it down is they really only have the one decent producing asset, Bauna. There's a lot of risk in that. If they have an operational, political or reservoir issue at that field then the whole company could be on its knees. You don't have this exposure to the same degree with a company with a larger diversified portfolio, so again, you need to know your assets.

This says nothing for the quality of Karoon's undeveloped asset portfolio, maybe its legitimately worth a lot and the share price will gradually rise higher as they derisk those projects. But it's likely a lot of capex in the hands of a small company.....and that usually ends badly, I'd rather see them explore then farm down to say a Shell or BP to reduce that risk. I really haven't researched it but if I was to make an investment, this is what I think you need a view on....otherwise but ExxonMobil is my view, honestly.

Hope that is coherent! I'm not an expert on the company, but a couple of pointers as to why it might struggle to achieve the kind of PE ratios we'd see elsewhere in the market, or even the O&G sector.

11