Forum Topics NAN NAN Trophon Business without R&D i

Pinned straw:

Added one year ago

Nanosonic added more details about Trophon's business performance by excluding operating expenses related to the development and commercialization preparation of CORIS.

bf601c4adfa6b467f42e6027346d2c88bd4fc7.png

Why is this given now?

7235220b8f5ea3589936a92d87c9bce35fa1de.png

Valueinvestor0909
Added 2 months ago

This is reversing

a492da552f44c232b093b3daead602f45e9ca4.png

17
Solvetheriddle
Added one year ago

@Valueinvestor0909 good pick up, sculpting the c suite bonus imo not a good look

16
mikebrisy
Added one year ago

Has someone calculated they are going to lose a lot of personal value if the new product timeline gets extended and it is going to cost a lot more? Does the Board have the power to do this without shareholder agreement? (Presumably so.)

On the face of it, this is poor governance. I would understand having a COO's incentives de-tuned from R&D performance, but not the CEO and CFO.

Innovation performance should be tied to long term inventives. I think this is very odd.

Disc: Not held but on watch list.

29

lowway
Added 2 months ago

Wow, as a share holder IRL & SM, I definitely find this disconcerting. Thanks @Valueinvestor0909 for the heads up

8

RhinoInvestor
Added 2 months ago

The whole thing seems a bit backwards … you would think that R&D investment should be tied to long term incentives and operational profitability for what’s in market now should be tied to short term incentives. (Or maybe it just me reading this backwards)

DISC: HELD IRL and SM

10