@jcmleng great notes ... thanks!
A couple of extra comments:
- Running costs are generally fixed - higher the sample volume, higher the revenue, higher the profitability of the unit
- $3.7-$3.8m capex to build 1 unit
>>> This was pretty handy info as I think I have been running on about 4.1 to 4.2m per machine.
- 20 year lifespan - refurbishment is expected after 10 years, and is depreciated over 10 years - aligns to very long life of a mine site
>>> Interesting they are fully depreciating over 10 years. I wonder what the potential cost of the refurb will be???
TOTAL ADDRESSABLE MARKET
- 610 TAM is the ACTUAL addressable market, made up of 2 parts
- Labs that run a Fire Assay business with volumes at least that of 1 PA unit - 200 customers, hub-and-spoke approach
- Mining companies which can benefit from equal or better economics from use of PA technology, onsite - 410 mines
>>> I thought that this was great information and goes some way to explaining the decline in percentage of Additional Assay Charges. It would be good to be able to break out the overall install base between labs (generating AAC) and the large mines themselves (which sound like they have less opportunity for revenue upside). I've just been basing all of my calculations on Minimum Monthly Charge which makes my modelling more conservative by leaving AAC out.
SCALABILITY
- “Clustering Strategy” - position the units as close to each (200-300km) other to optimise the support team for that location to support other deployed units in the area
- Headcount trajectory - based on 3 scenario’s:
- Open New Region - most complex, need headcount to establish
- Open New Country - need country-specific administration support for payroll, tax etc.
- Incremental growth, each additional unit in established country - 1-2 direct FTE per unit, maintenance engineers
- Trends move from headcount growth related to the number of units to incremental growth for everything else, apart from the growth per unit
- Do not expect to double headcount this FY, but expect fair amount of increase in headcount still because of increase in manufacturing capacity
>>> I really like the clustering strategy ... be cheaper to set these field/support engineers up with a Hilux rather than continuing to increase HC.
MACRO INFLUENCES
- Mining exploration has trended upwards, influenced by the price of gold, exploration volume has increased
- Exploration spend in Australia is trending upwards again after contracting about 30% in the last 18 or so months - despite this, PA sample volumes have grown via increased PA adoption above and beyond the amount that industry spend has contracted
>>> I managed to find the ABS data that he referred to about exploration ... looks like expenditure tailed off a little bit but is picking up again. It would be interesting to see what proportion of this expenditure gets spent on Assay.
>>> I also managed to find an overview of where in the world gold is getting produced which should give an indication of where the target rollout clusters should be and how much headcount they might need to take on to service the geographic distribution of customers. https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data/gold-production-by-country
>>> Having looked this up, I wish we could have asked him about prospects in China (not always the best at respecting IP) and Russia (politically a bit on the nose at the moment) and whether they were after that 20% of the market. I like your observation about potential areas with less stability.
KEY TAKEAWAY THAT MARKET STRUGGLES WITH
- Market struggles to wrap its head around the longevity of the units deployed, the creation of a 20-year long-term annuity revenue stream for each of the deployed units - ~$2m profit per unit deployed per annum over 20 years step increase
- Essentially becoming an infrastructure asset post deployment, but earning very good returns on those assets
>>> I liked this way of looking at things, but when you apply a 10% Discount factor to these numbers which I interpreted as Gross Profit (accounting for cost of money), the current market cap looks much less compelling. Applying 10% discount rate on the 2m number gives me about 12.3m over 10 years (for the 20 already installed machines) which comes down to 8.6m after deducting the up front capital cost of the machine (for the next 18 machines). Therefore with 20 existing machines deployed x 12.3m + 18 more x 8.6m that would value the future 10 year GP at about 400. Even if we bumped that up to the 49 contracted machines it would be 500m GP (but that's not taking into account the operating costs which haven't started to level out yet). Given EBITDA seems to be around 20% of GP give or take then we are 100m EBITDA over that period. So the leap of faith required here to get to the 600m market cap is the ability to drive continued rollout success (growing contract base 5 to 6x which is approximately half of the identified TAM).
DISC: My small holding IRL is at about $3.88 (an investment that was made with far less rigour than what is in here). I still really like the company prospects, just not today's share price.