thanks @neke86_ i will respectfully disagree!
“imagine taking 5,000 junk drones to a Brisbane barracks and then.. asking them to connect 5,000 grenades to them using chicken-wire..”
that would indeed be quite a thought. But that isn’t what I’m suggesting at all. I’m sure you knew that, it was just a “reductio ad absurdum” to bolster your argument.
Ukraine now has an endogenous drone industry producing low cost FPV drones with advanced capabilities. Here is an article outlining the future role of drones in warfare as seen by those actually using them in the field.
https://www.economist.com/interactive/science-and-technology/2024/02/05/cheap-racing-drones-offer-precision-warfare-at-scale
from The Economist
I have reproduced the most relevant section below.
One capability that drone pilots are keen on is autonomous object recognition, which would allow a drone cut off by jamming to complete the last phase of its attack autonomously. Object recognition is already available on expensive drones, like America’s Switchblade 300, which costs more than $50,000. Russia’s Ovod (Gadfly) FPV supposedly uses a similar AI-based “terminal guidance” system. But drone advocates argue that this too can be done on the cheap. The Ukrainian Scalpel drone, for instance, costs $1,000 and can lock onto a target designated by its pilot. So does the AirUnit, a prototype drone whose final version aims to be cheaper still. A recent FPV video claims to show two Russian Pantsir air-defence systems being destroyed using autonomous guidance.
in the current situation in Ukraine the ability to maintain the rate of production of munitions is paramount. Expensive and complex is out and cheap and quick is in. Plus there is no point spending a couple of million to send a patriot to take out a shaheed.
Small drones are increasingly seen as disposable single use smart artillery shells. And should be priced as such.