Top member reports
Company Report
Last edited one year ago
PerformanceCommunity EngagementCommunity Endorsement
ranked
#3
Performance (79m)
11.8% pa
Followed by
1346
Straws
Sort by:
Recent
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
#Henry Responds to Dick Move
stale
Last edited one year ago

23-Aug-2023: BHP's Henry responds to Dick move (MiningNews.net)

BHP chief Mike Henry says it will steer clear of new investment in Queensland after Treasurer Cameron Dick threatened to cancel leases (afr.com)

BHP's response to Queensland lease questions (australianmining.com.au)

Queensland asks BHP to invest in state or risk licence cancellation (mining-technology.com)

From the AFR article (link above - 2nd one from top):

BHP to steer clear of new investment in Queensland

BHP chief executive Mike Henry said the global miner would not make any new greenfield investment in Queensland after the state’s controversial new coal royalty regime made it too risky to invest.

While Treasurer Cameron Dick has threatened to cancel BHP’s mining leases in Queensland unless it continued to invest in the state, the BHP boss acknowledged the company would continue to expand its existing operations to take advantage of strong metallurgical coal prices.

425a64c022859124ac45af29516a83499d7e2d.png

Queensland Treasurer Cameron Dick said mining leases would be cancelled if not used. Photo credit: Jamila Toderas


The Labor government and the mining giant have been locked in a war of words since Mr Dick blindsided the resources sector when he introduced three new tiers of coal royalties in July last year.

BHP is in the process of selling two of its Queensland mines, Daunia and Blackwater, but has kept its most valuable coking coal mines, including Goonyella, Riverside, Peak Downs and Saraji.

Mr Henry said the challenge remained that Queensland’s royalty regime, which required BHP to pay another $700 million last financial year, made other states or countries a better investment destination.

“I don’t think we are saying anything particularly controversial; lower returns, higher risk means other investments become more attractive,” he said after BHP released its results on Tuesday.


“The only thing I would note is we are continuing to invest in these Queensland businesses. BMA [BHP Mitsubishi Alliance] is investing over a billion dollars a year in keeping these operations going because we do see the business as attractive.”

In its statement to the ASX, BHP said the coal royalty hikes had negatively impacted the “investment economics” of Queensland and increased sovereign risk.

“We will not be investing in any further growth in Queensland; however, we will sustain and optimise our existing operations,” it said.

Mr Dick continued his attack on the global miner on Tuesday, saying the Palaszczuk government would follow through with its threat if BHP did not complete its promised investments in Queensland.

He said BHP’s bumper profit of $13.4 billion showed the company had the resources to deliver on its mining leases.

“For all the complaints about progressive coal royalties, for coal, BHP’s underlying return on capital employed came in at a very healthy 47 per cent,” Mr Dick told state parliament.

24384dfab531069d02c348ee843b51748e6563.png

Queensland coal royalties delivered $15 billion into state coffers last financial year. Photo credit: Glenn Hunt


“The strength of BHP’s balance sheet and the impending windfall it will make from selling the Daunia and Blackwater mines shows just what BHP can achieve when it focuses on its core business.”

Mr Dick said BHP even acknowledged the new royalty regime may push up prices, which means more profits in the future.

But he warned that the Labor government expected big miners to follow through on promised investments or they could face financial penalties or have their leases cancelled.

“We want those companies to properly develop the leases that they have been granted by the people of Queensland. If they fail to do so without legitimate commercial reason, our government has the power to act,” Mr Dick said.

The new system introduces three tiers: a royalty rate of 20 per cent for prices above $175 a tonne, 30 per cent for prices above $225 a tonne and 40 per cent for prices above $300 a tonne.

The new tiers gave Queensland the highest-taxing royalty rate in the world and delivered a staggering $15 billion in coal royalties last financial year.

Queensland Resources Council chief executive Ian Macfarlane, who has vowed to fight the state’s coal royalty regime up to next year’s election, said Mr Dick’s latest threat to cancel BHP’s leases would further shake investor confidence in the state.

“We shouldn’t take for granted that Queensland will always have a strong resources sector to rely on if policies are introduced which make us less competitive and less attractive to investors,” Mr Macfarlane said.

“All Queenslanders will lose out if resources companies move their focus to mining projects in other states and countries because of growing uncertainty about the Queensland government’s attitude towards the mining sector.”

--- end of excerpt ---

Further Reading: BHP looks past China’s property woes to mining’s brave new world (afr.com)


Disclosure: I do not currently hold any BHP shares, however I do hold South32 (S32) shares IRL and they own the Cannington Silver/Lead/Zinc mine in Queensland. Interesting that the Qld Government chose to have a barney with BHP and not S32 (which was spun out of BHP a few years ago). However, this is all about coal, and BHP are still into coal, whereas S32 is moving away from coal and have already divested all of their thermal coal assets. The only coal that S32 have now is the Illawarra Metallurgical Coal mine in NSW, and the NSW Government has a far more collaborative approach to mining and mining investment than the combative approach that Queensland appears to be taking, particularly on coal.

#Q4/FY22 Report
stale
Added 2 years ago

19-July-2022: BHP-Quarterly-Activities-Report-Q4-FY22.PDF

Commentary: Strong BHP performance undermined by Qld coal royalties - Australian Mining

Plain text link: https://www.australianmining.com.au/news/strong-bhp-performance-undermined-by-qld-coal-royalties/

Strong BHP performance undermined by Qld coal royalties

July 19th, 2022. By Ray Chan, AustralianMining.com.au

70ca4bd334b1df17ebb188049b6db9e573ca75.png

BHP's Olympic Dam operation in South Australia.


A strong fourth quarter has capped off a year of significant progress for BHP, with iron ore leading the way, generating record sales volumes for the 2021–22 financial period.

BHP sold 284 million tonnes of iron ore across the 12 months, as South Flank’s ramp-up to full production capacity (80mt per annum) tracks ahead of schedule.

An average rate of 67mtpa was achieved at South Flank in the June 2022 quarter, contributing to record production from the Mining Area C (MAC) hub and record lump sales.

BHP produced 253mt of iron ore in FY22, with the Western Australia Iron Ore (WAIO) operations making up 249Mt of that and Samarco the remaining 4mt, in line with BHP’s iron ore production from the 2020–21 financial year.

The company said the performance had been underpinned by safe, reliable operations and firm demand for its commodities.

Chief Executive Officer Mike Henry said the year was once again fatality-free and BHP continued to improve safety issues, which included addressing sexual assault and harassment, racism and bullying. 

“We delivered record full-year sales volumes at our iron ore business in Western Australia as a result of reliable operational performance and the South Flank project,” he said.

“In copper, Escondida in Chile had record material mined and near-record concentrator throughput, while Olympic Dam in South Australia performed strongly in the fourth quarter after planned smelter maintenance.”

Henry said Queensland metallurgical coal delivered strong underlying performance for the quarter in the face of significant wet weather.

As well, BHP is assessing the impacts on BMA economic reserves and mine lives as a result of the increase in coal royalties by the Queensland Government.

“The near tripling of top end royalties has worsened what was already one of the world’s highest coal royalty regimes, threatening investment and jobs in the state,” he said. 

“Also during the year, we merged our petroleum business with Woodside, completed the sales of BMC and Cerrejón, and decided to retain New South Wales Energy Coal until the cessation of mining in 2030 subject to relevant approvals.

“We also unified our corporate structure, and added to our global options in copper and nickel. 

“Broader market volatility continues and we expect the lag effect of inflationary pressures to continue through the 2023 financial year, along with labour market tightness and supply chain constraints.

“Over the year ahead, China is expected to contribute positively to growth as stimulus policies take effect, however, the continuing conflict in the Ukraine, the unfolding energy crisis in Europe and policy tightening globally is expected to result in an overall slowing of global growth. Our strong focus on safety, operational reliability, cost control and social value will help us navigate these challenges and continue to deliver for all of our stakeholders.”

--- ends ---

dc60235412d2aea2b777cb3ec985b05085b7ff.png

About Ray Chan

Editor of industrial titles and mastheads with Prime Creative Media. Publications include Rail Express and Australian Mining (web content). View all posts by Ray Chan →

-----

Disclosure: From Bear77: I don't currently hold BHP shares, although I do sometimes hold them. I currently prefer FMG for iron ore exposure and S32 (which was spun out of BHP) for base metals and silver exposure.

#Covid-19 in WA
stale
Added 3 years ago

1:24pm, 01-Feb-2022: There have been some isolated cases of Covid-19 in WA's mining industry, and BHP is one of the companies that has been affected.

COVID cases isolate dozens of WA mine staff - Australian Mining

At this stage, the management of all of the affected mines are saying there have been no material impacts to production. It does however feed into the skilled worker shortage that WA is experiencing. There are now even ads on Adelaide buses spruiking WA as a place with PLENTY of work, so worth considering a move over there. Seems out of step with their refusal to open their border and allow people in though.

I'm thinking that these conditions are very positive for a company like Mader Group (ASX: MAD) as long as they can keep their own workers Covid-free. Mader provide fitters and other skilled workers - especially heavy duty mobile and fixed plant mechanics - to various industries, but the mining industry is their bread and butter, with earth-moving/construction also providing MAD with plenty of work. My brother is one of those (HD plant mechanic) and he's working at S32's Worsley Alumina refinery (which was majority owned by BHP before the South32 spin-out/demerger). He doesn't work for Mader - he works for another labour hire company that also provides workers to the mining and minerals processing industries. Those labour hire companies are doing very well at the moment, especially in WA, and remember that WA only has a small fraction of people with Covid-19 compared to the eastern states and SA. If the Covid problem gets worse there, I reckon the labour hire companies are only going to get busier. They already have rising metals/materials prices as a tailwind, which is resulting in further activity in the sectors they operate in. I think Mader provides the purest exposure to that and I do hold Mader shares, and S32 shares - but not BHP at this point.

aaaec45510d4fd637587e386c51e04237d7d65.png

ed523a249b6981cdf768ca76420c859b11b0db.png

#The UK effect?
stale
Last edited 3 years ago

20-Aug-2021:  For Rick - just to add to your "UK Effect?" straw - I read this on FNArena this morning - by Greg Peel - it was written yesterday - Thursday 19th:

"Following the sudden drop on Wall Street, yesterday morning the futures had suggested a -34 drop for the ASX200 and indeed, in the first five minutes the index was down -40 points. An hour later, it was up 17.

The session was complicated by a -7.1% fall for BHP Group ((BHP)), which in the wash-up was worth -33 index points, so take that out and the index implicitly rose 24 points on the day.

BHP’s fall had nothing to do with its profit result – that was a cracker – and nothing to do with the dividend – that was better than expected – nor anything much to do with the petroleum merger – that had already been priced in. It was all to do with dual-listing arbitrage.

It’s all very complex, but suffice to say BHP Oz has always traded at a premium to BHP UK, and also to the BHP Group ADR listed in the US, which is directly fungible with BHP Oz (and not an additional listing per se). Now that the dual listing is being “collapsed”, which basically means BHP Oz buys out BHP UK, that three-way arbitrage (complicated by exchange rates) has to close.

And traders did not muck around. Such volatility was anticipated as soon as BHP made the announcement in yesterday’s aftermarket. The dust will settle, but unlike a stock plunging after going ex-dividend, which is zero-sum, BHP Oz has indeed de-rated.

The materials sector thus fell -3.0%, and Rio Tinto ((RIO)), which is also dual-listed, dropped -2.3% just in case. And the iron ore price has plunged again, down -4%.

While the index did peak out around 11am following the announcement of another step-jump in NSW cases, again it does not appear the market has the delta blues. The index simply drifted off a bit following responses to the day’s earnings results."

Makes sense and backs up your own thoughts Rick.

#Results
stale
Added 4 years ago

18-Aug-2020:  BHP Results Presentation for the Year Ended 30 June 2020

and Preliminary Final Report

The results are prepared in accordance with IFRS and are presented in US dollars.  

Revenue and Profits:

Revenue from continuing operations: down 3% to US$42,931m

Revenue from discontinued operations: N/A

Total revenue: down 5% to US$42,931m

Profit after taxation from continuing operations attributable to the members of the BHP Group: down 8% to US$7,956m

Loss after taxation from discontinued operations attributable to the members of the BHP Group: N/A

Profit after taxation attributable to the members of the BHP Group: down 4% to US$7,956m

For the year ended 30 June 2019, revenue from discontinued operations was US$851 million and loss after taxation from discontinued operations attributable to the members of the BHP Group was US$342 million.

Net Tangible Asset Backing:

Net tangible assets per fully paid share were US$10.21 as at 30 June 2020, compared with US$10.11 as at 30 June 2019.

Net Tangible Assets includes right of use assets with a carrying value of US$3,047 million as at 30 June 2020.

Dividends per share:

Final dividend for current period (record date 4 September 2020; payment date 22 September 2020): US 55 cents fully franked

Final dividend for previous corresponding period: US 78 cents fully franked.

--- click on links above for more ---

[I do NOT hold BHP currently, but have done previously.  I currently hold and prefer South32 - S32 - who are more advanced in their efforts to divest their thermal/energy coal assets than BHP are.  I also prefer the commodity mix that S32 have, rather than the mix that BHP has.]

#Struggling to sell Mt Arthur
stale
Last edited 4 years ago

20-7-2020:  https://www.australianmining.com.au/news/bhp-coal-exit-stalled-by-mt-arthur-bids/

BHP coal exit stalled by Mt Arthur bids

by Nickolas Zakharia

BHP is reportedly struggling to find a suitable offer for the sale of its Mt Arthur thermal coal mine in New South Wales.

The Mt Arthur coal mine is the largest coal mine in New South Wales’ Hunter Valley region and is expected to be worth around $1 billion.

It is forecast to have production of between 15 and 17 million tonnes for the 12 months ended on June 30.

BHP hired Macquarie bank and JP Morgan to sell the thermal coal mine last year, sources said. However, offers from Yancoal Australia and Adani have allegedly been rejected due to offers not meeting valuation.

“Yancoal considers acquisitive growth opportunities as they arise, such as BHP’s thermal coal assets, and is committed to only acquiring appropriately priced assets of genuine future value,” a Yancoal spokesperson told Australian Mining.

The sale of the mine follows suit with many major miners turning away from coal assets to improve their emissions targets.

Adani declined to comment on its interest in acquiring the mine.

--- ends ---

--- South32 (S32) have already found a buyer for their own South African thermal coal assets, and that sale is due to complete later this year.  While it is certainly positive to see that BHP are attempting to offload their own energy (/thermal) coal assets, they are probably asking too much for them in the current environment, which is why they can't find any buyers. ---

[I hold S32, not BHP, and I think there is significant downside risk associated with any company that derives a substantial percentage of their revenue from energy/thermal coal at this point.  While coal does represent a relatively small percentage of BHP's overall group revenue, I still believe that they become a better investment without thermal/energy coal.]