Straws are discrete research notes that relate to a particular aspect of the company. Grouped under #hashtags, they are ranked by votes.
A good Straw offers a clear and concise perspective on the company and its prospects.
Please visit the forums tab for general discussion.
Notes on today's AVH 2QFY24 Investor Webinar, and then I think I am done with AVH for this Q!
TLDR SUMMARY
Nothing new as most of the content was released as part of the 2QFY24 results last week
What was very useful, however, was the detailed insights and colour to (1) the step change introduced by the RecellGo devices and the impact of this (2) the position behind the New Account numbers - a bigger than run-rate jump is expected in Q3 (3) approach to the globalisation strategy (4) positioning of Regnity in the Continuum of Wound Care strategy and the product selection process and (5) update on how profitability will play out.
Clear reiteration that with the current growth trajectory with RecellGo, there is sufficient cash to get to profitability without having to draw down on $25m of upcoming debt tranches.
Even if AVH meets the lower end of revenue growth guidance it still expects to reach the break-even goals as AVH is now setup for sequential QoQ growth.
Very apparent that Jeff and David are still very sore with the drop in the 1QFY24 results and the impact this will have on FY2024 - declaring that it really was “self-inflicted” and they have owned that. But AVH is now poised for growth and “is in a good place to make this happen”.
My thesis is absolutely playing out and am very bullish as the various pieces for sustainable growth previously discussed are now in place. It is now all about delivering against the playing field that AVH has created in the coming quarters ....
Discl: Topped up this morning in both SM (assuming closed) and IRL (to 3%) to move AVH into a medium conviction holding in my portfolio. Intend to top up another 1 to 1.5% if the price weakens from here.
THE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT OF RECELLGO
I think I finally grasped the step change that RecellGO brings over Recell v1.0. This table is my layman's summary based on the pictures above:
NEW ACCOUNTS UPDATE
Q2 internal target was 46 units to new accounts which includes orders - landed short at 31 New Accounts + 6 VAC approved but no orders yet
Expect further improvement in Q3 as AVH has fine-tuned the new account process - 89 is in the pipeline vs 50-70 if maintained current run rate
Sales organisation is full staffed now, from 30 previously to 100 today
One of the early challenges was that some of the new accounts were seeing RecellGo for the first time and being positioned as the 1st in class in trauma centres causing process bottlenecks as most wanted to see trials being conducted first etc - have modified approach to overcome this.
GLOBAL COMMERCIALISATION STRATEGY
Countries on AVH’s radar met 3 internal criteria (1) Health Care systems must be able to leverage the Recell technology (2) have the ability to pay (3) has sufficient population size
Current new-country approach of expanding via local 3rd parties is to leverage off the partner’s knowledge of the local healthcare system
At the last step for CE mark certification in 3Q FY2024.
WOUND CARE STRATEGY
Reiterated that Recell has no competitor - if AVH gave away the IP to someone, it would take 2 PMA cycles over 4-5 years to get the requisite approvals from scratch - this is the lead time runway that AVH has to embed Recell as the standard of care for burns and FSTD indications.
Reiterated that the AVH strategy is to define and sell the suite of products across the full Continuum of Wound Care around the Recell spray-on.
There are many products in the Dermal Matrix space, but AVH had 3 specific criteria, which Regenity met the best:
Deal ensures that AVH gets more rights and improved margins as each clinical study gets approved - this is good skin in the game without having to develop a product from scratch
AVH is very excited at the prospect of a Regenity-Recell combination enabling AVH to define a 1-step standard of care/procedure vs the current 2-step approach of stabilising the wound in the Dermal Matrix followed by the Skin Graft procedure - this will be the focus in the planned clinical trials after PMA approval for Reginity has been obtained
FINANCIALS
Enough cash to get to profitability given current revenue growth trajectory.
AVH will not be eligible to draw down $25m tranche of debt which will become available as will not meet FY24 revenue threshold of $75m, this also means the 2nd tranche of $25m in FY25 will lapse - not an issue as AVH never expected to have to draw down these 2 tranches anyway - these is sufficient cash
Comments around profitability:
This confirms my commentary in the 2Q results that operational leverage could already be in play
David explained the rationale for the downward guidance in FY24 revenue - need to re-listen the webinar recording to capture the detail of this comment
David also said that even if AVH meets the lower end of revenue growth guidance, it still expects to reach the break-even goals as AVH is now setup for sequential QoQ growth
Very apparent that Jeff and David are still very sore with the drop in the 1QFY24 results and the impact this will have on FY2024 - declaring that it really was “self-inflicted” and they have owned that. But AVH is now poised for growth and “is in a good place to make this happen”
Super pleased that in the just concluded AVH Q2 Investor Webinar, my question on how AVH views PNV's NovoSorb, whether it was a direct or indirect competitor and if a competitor, how was it addressing that competition, was the first question, was read in full and I think, answered in full ... it was about 42 mins in.
This was my first crack at asking management a direct question as a super-small-fry retail investor outside of SM management sessions, so am still digesting the fact that I CAN ask questions and get answers ....!
I need to re-listen the recording as Jeff went into some medical explanation which I could not comprehend quicky enough but immediate points I picked up:
For me, this means that I can look at PNV as a standalone and different product to Recell, but operating in the same burns/trauma centre space, same customers etc.
Discl: AVH held IRL and in SM, evaluating PNV as a side-by-side addition
Worked through AVH's announcement last Thurs on the new addition to its wound care portfolio, Regenity. The more I understand this, the more AVH's strategy makes sense. Have re-organised the points in the press release to make better sense of the deal. Have to say that my enthusiasm and conviction in AVH might just have gone up another notch.
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
THOUGHTS
This is another way for AVH to win, targeted for 2025
End game objective is to define a new standard of care for FSTD wounds by using both Regenity and Recell in a single procedure, from the current 2-step procedure.
Each one of these adjacent bolt-on products not only expands AVH revenue opportunities, but it also changes the scope of, and tightens AVH’s moat around (1) RECELL and (2) AVH’s customers in the Burns Treatment world as it strives to define the new standard of care for burns wounds using a multi-product approach strategy
I am thus thinking that AVH's moat is rapidly morphing into (1) Defining the new standard of care using a suite of wound-care products across the full skin thickness (2) establishing the synergies and benefits of using the products in conjunction with other other, rather than a single product (3) monopolising the rights to market, sell and distribute the wound care products suite. which make up the new standard of care.
This is a significantly more robust go-to-market strategy vs a single Recell product approach, which only solves one of the many problems in a burns wound.
Overview of the Regenity Deal
Defining the New Standard of Care Using Regenity and RECEL in a Single Procedure Instead of The Current 2-Step Procedure
Commercial Terms
Did a more detailed review of the AVH Q2 results. The AVH price in the US spiked 20% on Fri, which has not happened for quite some time. Looking forward to Monday for a change!
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
TLDR SUMMARY
Very pleasing result - very encouraging signs that short term challenges of slow increase in new accounts is being overcome with a tangible increase in New Accounts (31) and VAC Approved accounts (6).
QoQ Revenue up 36.8%, direct costs up 39.5% but Gross Profit was an impressive 36.4% - encouraging signs of operational leverage perhaps.
Flagged increase in Sales cost has kicked in with a 29% increase, but impact was softened by falls in G&A and R&D, leading to a 7.1% overall cost increase.
FY24 Revenue guidance has been reduced from between $78.8m to $84.5m to between $68.0m to $70m - not great, but this will mostly be from the poor 1Q result. Happy to let this go if positive Q2 momentum is sustained throughout 2HFY24.
Have increasing confidence in management credibility as things have panned out as they have explained and guided in this result - continued confidence will need to be continually earned!
Other pipeline projects - RecellGo Mini FDA certification, Vitiligo studies progressing as planned.
Key for Q3 is continued evidence of sustained momentum in (1) New Accounts (2) Revenue, including expansion of non-US revenue (3) overall operating cost containment to absorb higher S&M expenses.
THOUGHT PROCESS
I am focused almost exclusively on understanding QoQ changes.
PcP changes are good to know, but significantly less important, as my view is that AVH has made step changes in the last 6M due to (1) RecellGo FDA certification (2) made clear moves in its transformation into a broad-based wound care company (distribution of Perma Derm, Regenity products alongside RecellGo) (3) upcoming RecellGO Mini FDA certification etc, which makes it a very different organisation than what it was in FY2023.
I am now thinking of AVH as not a single product, RecellGO-driven company, but as a broad-based wound care Company, which focuses on addressing all wound treatment issue around a central burn wound which is primarily treated by RecellGO - this pivot in thinking has been important to make sense of all the recent AVH moves and what is ahead.
I am desperately wanting to have clarity on where PNV’s NovoSorb sits in both this Continuum of Wound Care and Product Compatibility diagrams to understand how much of a competitor it is to AVH’s market position and strategy and/or whether it makes sense to open a position in PNV to ride on the NovSorb opportunity ahead - have asked the question for the AVH Investor Seminar next week.
Updated Continuum to Include Regenity
THE GOOD IN Q2
Tangible increase in New Accounts for RecellGo Full Thickness Skin Defects - the lack of progress in securing VAC approval for new accounts caused the 1QFY24 results to dive, expectations were reset, and there is now a tangible uptick in New Accounts and VAC approval. Q3 looks promising in terms of extending this new account momentum.
Revenue rose 36.8% QoQ to US$15.1m, at the top end of Q2 guidance of “between $14.3m to $15.3m”.
While from a very low base, good to see revenue increases in non-US markets as AVH focuses on expanding its RecellGo global footprint.
Cost of sales corresponding rose 39.5%, but Gross Profit rose 36.4%, which hints at improving operational leverage as the revenue increase was almost fully sustained through to gross profit margins. Need more evidence that this is sustainable but this is a really encouraging sign. It also lends credence to management’s explanation that the slowdown in 1Q revenue was primarily due to the challenges of navigating the VAC process in hospitals, which AVH had to learn from and fine-tune its approach to expedite the process.
Operating Expenses rose 7.1% QoQ, despite a clearly prior-flagged increase in Sales & Marketing expense of 29% as G&A and R&D expenses fell 16.1% and 5.9% respectively, to compensate for the increased sales cost. This is also encouraging as AVH appears to containing overall cost increase despite the sharp increase in Sales & Marketing expenses.
Cash balance increased $0.5m, or 3% and appears that operations now has a good cash-flow cadence. This augurs well for (1) the AVH objective of being cash flow positive no later than 3QFY25 (2) is likely to further improve as revenue momentum increases in the coming quarters and (3) keeps the risk of a operations-driven cash raise risk, low.
Other projects appear to be going well and on track (1) RecellGO Mini FDA approval (2) Vitiligo study.
THE NOT GREAT in Q2
Full Year revenue guidance has now dropped to between $68.0 and $70.0m from the initial FY24 guidance of $78.5m to $84.5m, but still a very respectable YoY growth of 37% to 41% over FY23 - much of this will be due to the poor 1Q result.
This is not great, but I am happy to let this go IF there is continued 2HFY24 momentum in (1) New Accounts (2) QoQ revenue and (3) improving non-US revenue contribution, as this blip will likely only be temporary. All bets will be off if 2HFY24 momentum falters!
EXPECTATIONS FOR Q3
THESIS UPDATE
Am working through the AVH's 2QFY24 results, which at first glance, looks good. The market certainly liked it!
It is a much-welcomed change from the recent bash-almost-everything-I-am-also-hurting mood across the market which I am desperately trying to tune out of ...
The AVH 2Q pcp improvement looks good, but what I am more focused on is tangible QoQ improvement to gauge sales momentum ...
In signing up for the Investor Webinar next week, I have asked the following question:
Could you please provide insights on how AVH view's PolyNovo's NovoSorb product. Where does NovoSorb sit in the AVH Wound Care Continuum? Does it compete with RecellGo, directly or indirectly, and if so, how is this competition being addressed?
Hoping AVH will pick up the question and provide some insights, that I will share.
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
Very impressed with the planning and prep, deployment and execution of the RECELL GO. FDA approval was received on Thu 30 May 24, so 1st use was the day after.
The Joseph M. Still Burn Center at Doctors Hospital of Augusta is the first U.S. burn center to treat a patient using its RECELL GO™ System
A much-expected-but-good-to-finally-see-it FDA approval for RECELL GO was received by AVH overnight. AVH has been all set to launch to market the day it got FDA approval. This could well be the turning point for the rough past 6M.
In the United States, the Company will launch RECELL GO in its top burn treatment centers in June, and other existing accounts will be converted to RECELL GO throughout the year. New accounts will receive RECELL GO with their first order, eliminating the need for conversion.
My notes on AVH's 1QFY24 earnings and earnings call.
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Risks
Outlook
Action
NOTES FROM EARNINGS CALL
Financials
Guidance for 2QFY24
Have started building a small position in AVH.
PROBLEM THAT AVH IS TRYING TO SOLVE
INVESTMENT CASE
RISKS
WHEN TO EXIT
POSITION SIZE
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
My notes for the earnings call:
I’ll do a separate post in the analysis of the results and will redo my valuation then.
·
·
Dermal repair company $AVH has received the setback of a delay on FDA approval for their RECELL-GO device, which was under FDA review under the breathrough device 180-day review process, stopping the clock for 4-6 months while the company considers its response.
The SP has reacted sharply and is still down 19% at time of writing, taking it back to levels last seen prior to the approvals for full-thickness skins defects and vitiligo treatment earlier this year.
The RECELL-GO device, which operates with single use cartrdiges, promises to significantly expand adoption of RECELL in the US market.
$AVH have recently significantly expanded their sales and marketing footprint following the FDA approvals, hence most recent financial performance is not too great (a bit like $PNV), however, market consensus is for strong revenue growth in FY23 of $80m up from $51m in FY22, putting it on a similar trajectory to $PNV.
Given the sales momentum and the investment in sales force, as well as the likely temporary nature of the setback, there's probably a good short term trade to be done on this news. However, I'm not a trader, so its not for me.
Disc: I've held $AVH in the past, but my preferred stock in the rapidly growing dermal repair segment is $PNV. However a pullback like this is tempting, as its likely overdone.
Slight adjustments to previous:
2028 revenue : $193M (USD)
GP margin of 88% => 2028 GP: $170M
2028 Opex: $130M (80M this year x 10 % CAGR) => 2018 EBT: $40M
Assuming 140M shares and 20 P/EBT => 2028 SP: $5.70 (USD)
Using exchange rate of 0.7 and discounting back at 10% => 2023 SP: $5 (AUD)
Previous Valuations:
start with 2023 revenue of $50m USD (middle of their guidance)
Assuming a, significantly less than their guidance, CAGR of 30% implies 2027 Revenue $143m.
82% GP Margin -> Gross Profit of $117
Assuming Opex in 2027 of $80m -> EBT of $36m
Applying 6% growth in share YoY - > share outstanding of 166m
Using a 20 P/EBT -> 2027 price $4.30
Discounting back at 10% -> 2022 price $2.95 (USD)
=> 2022 price $4.20 (AUD)
I am more optimistic about them after the latest earnings call, but still cautious
This is another biotech name that has surged off its lows of just a few months ago, catalysed by a change in management primarily. With two pending FDA approvals expected soon that expands its TAM for burns treatment, the price has carved out a new 52w high today.
It is getting close to a zone of resistance now, but the momentum and price action it has demonstrated thus far has been very healthy, and the upcoming catalysts could well see it breach the wall of resistance it will be running into soon.
One to watch.
Disc. : Small position held IRL.
It looks like the shake up has begun.
I'm taking it as a positive that they have removed a middle manager (the COO) and have those teams now report to the CEO.
The fact that the CFO has left at short notice (perhaps as a protest, perhaps he was pushed) is unsettling...
In total I'm just gonna wait an see what happens from here (while still holding onto my bag)
DISC:HELD (for now)
About time Dr. Perry was shown the door given the woeful underperformance of the business for multiple years from a shareholder return perspective and unjustifiable board and management compensation, though the timing is abrupt.
New CEO announced, seems to be out of the blue (unless I missed something).
Wondering if it was Dr Perry wanting to step down or the board booting him for under performance...
The new guy seems to have the chops - lets hope he makes this happen!
DISC: Held
AVITA Medical Reports Full Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results
Second Quarter Highlights
~ Reported U.S based RECELL® revenue of $5.0 million in the second quarter of 2021 ended December 31, 2020, a 62% increase over the same quarter in the prior year
~ Reported total global revenue of $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2021 ended ~ecember 31, 2020, a 57% increase over the same quarter in the prior year
~Commercial metrics: o Procedural volumes were 487 in the second quarter of 2021 versus 496 in the prior quarter ended September 30, 2020 o Added 7 new accounts in the second quarter 2021 for a total of 93 accounts
~ Enrolled nine patients in the pivotal study assessing the use of the RECELL® System to treat stable vitiligo
15-June-2020: Redomiciliation Scheme Meeting - Chair's Address
AVITA Medical Limited proposed redomiciliation to the USA (to have their primary listing on the NASDAQ and a secondary listing on the ASX) Chair’s address to Scheme Meeting - click on the link above for the Chairman's script for today's meeting which explains the company's rationale for the move.
02-Jun-2020: AVITA Files IDE with FDA for Vitiligo Pivotal Study
AVITA Medical Limited (ASX:AVH, NASDAQ:RCEL), a regenerative medicine company with a technology platform positioned to address unmet medical needs in therapeutic skin restoration, today announced that it has submitted an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) supplement with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the initiation of a pivotal clinical trial to investigate the RECELL® System for the treatment of vitiligo.
“We are very pleased to have filed the supplement and look forward to advancing the RECELL® System into the clinic for treatment of vitiligo following acceptance of the application,” said Andrew Quick, Chief Technology Officer of AVITA Medical. “The data from the pivotal trial will form the basis of the FDA submission for consideration to expand use of the RECELL® System for repigmentation of depigmented lesions associated with stable vitiligo. In parallel, and as previously announced, we are also conducting a complementary and more scientifically-oriented feasibility study.”
“Globally, the RECELL® System is approved for additional skin applications, including vitiligo, which is supported by a substantive body of clinical evidence with patients internationally and in peer-reviewed publications, providing us with valuable experience and confidence in pursuing expanded labelling in the U.S.,” said Dr. Mike Perry, Chief Executive Officer of AVITA Medical. “The submission of this pivotal IDE is an important milestone as we continue to explore opportunities to expand the patient populations who can benefit from treatment with the RECELL® System platform.”
About Vitiligo
Vitiligo affects approximately 6.5 million people in the United States, rivalling the prevalence of psoriasis; however, there are limited treatment options available to patients to permanently restore skin pigmentation.
Vitiligo is a disease resulting in loss of color, or pigmentation, in patches of skin that impacts the quality of life for those living with the condition. There is currently no cure for vitiligo, nor a universally accepted method for limiting the spread of the disease. Although many treatments are being used for the management of vitiligo, they are often temporary with a high rate of recurrence.
Authorized for release by the Chief Financial Officer of AVITA Medical Limited.
--- end of announcement ---
ABOUT AVITA MEDICAL LIMITED: AVITA Medical is a regenerative medicine company with a technology platform positioned to address unmet medical needs in burns, chronic wounds, and aesthetics indications. AVITA Medical’s patented and proprietary collection and application technology provides innovative treatment solutions derived from the regenerative properties of a patient’s own skin. The medical devices work by preparing a RES® REGENERATIVE EPIDERMAL SUSPENSION, an autologous suspension comprised of the patient’s skin cells necessary to regenerate natural healthy epidermis. This autologous suspension is then sprayed onto the areas of the patient requiring treatment. AVITA Medical’s first U.S. product, the RECELL® System, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2018. The RECELL System is indicated for use in the treatment of acute thermal burns in patients 18 years and older. The RECELL System is used to prepare Spray-On Skin™ Cells using a small amount of a patient’s own skin, providing a new way to treat severe burns, while significantly reducing the amount of donor skin required. The RECELL System is designed to be used at the point of care alone or in combination with autografts depending on the depth of the burn injury. Compelling data from randomized, controlled clinical trials conducted at major U.S. burn centers and real-world use in more than 8,000 patients globally, reinforce that the RECELL System is a significant advancement over the current standard of care for burn patients and offers benefits in clinical outcomes and cost savings. Healthcare professionals should read the INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE - RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (https://recellsystem.com/) for a full description of indications for use and important safety information including contraindications, warnings and precautions. In international markets, our products are marketed under the RECELL System brand to promote skin healing in a wide range of applications including burns, chronic wounds and aesthetics. The RECELL System is TGA-registered in Australia and received CE-mark approval in Europe. To learn more, visit www.avitamedical.com.
--- click on link at the top for more, including their "Cautionary Note regarding Forward Looking Statements" and their contact details ---
Disclosure: I don't current hold AVH shares, due to the fact that they are in the process of moving their primary listing to the NASDAQ and making their ASX listing their secondary listing. AVITA Medical are already a US-based company soon to have a primary US-listing, despite being originally formed here in Australia. I tend to avoid those companies personally, not because they don't make good investments, but just because I prefer to invest in Australian based companies directly, and leave my US and other global exposure to my LICs and LITs such as MGG & WQG (and PAI for Asian exposure) or via ETFs.
That's just a personal preference and is in no way supposed to infer that I don't think AVITA will do OK. They have wonderful tech (and IP) and I both hope and expect that they will do very well, particularly after they move their primary listing to the US (via the NASDAQ) and get onto the radar of so many more investors and fund managers. To give some context, I also like Resmed (ASX: RMD), but I likewise don't hold RMD shares directly because their primary listing is in the US, and they are headquartered in the US, with a secondary listing on the ASX, despite originally being an Australian company when they first started out. That doesn't mean they won't do well either. They've done pretty well so far. But you can't pat all the fluffy dogs, and it's a personal preference for me to invest directly only in ASX-listed companies and to gain exposure to other companies via ASX-listed LICs and LITs (listed investment companies/trusts) - or ETFs.
23-Apr-2020: 7:43pm: Just to answer some of @Hackenbacker's questions in relation to AVH's intention to move their primary listing to the NASDAQ and have a secondary listing on the ASX. Reading through their documentation - like pages 2 to 4 of this announcement - it sounds like the Australian listing will be not shares but CDIs - which are explained here and here.
CHESS Depository Interests (CDI's) are shares of international companies traded on the Australian exchange markets. This allows investors to receive the same ownership in foreign companies as holding them on the international exchange, but instead these CDI's are traded here in Australia on the ASX. Companies which are incorporated overseas cannot transfer their shares through to the ASX. CDI's open up more opportunities for Australian investors as they can access products which are not available in the local market. For example, News Corp (NWS) is incorporated in the US and only trades in the US. However Australian investors can own shares in NWS via CDI's. My understanding is that Resmed (RMD) "shares" on the ASX are also CDI's. These are often scaled differently to the shares listed on the primary market (Resmed and News Corp both have primary market listings in the USA). RMD CDI's on the ASX are scaled 10:1, so ten of our RMD CDIs are worth one NASDAQ: RMD.
There are some differences between CDI’s and ordinary shares. You can not vote at a company meeting like you would with ordinary shares unless laws from the country where the company is domiciled allow you to.
Initially you would receive 5 Avita US CDIs for every 100 AVH.ASX shares that you currently own, and these should, all things being equal, be worth roughly 20 times what they were trading at here, so if it happened today, theoretically, if you held 1,000 AVH shares currently trading at $0.44 (44 cents each), you would instead own 50 Avita US CDI's which would still trade on the ASX, but at about $8.80 each. Currently, AVH has a secondary listing on the NASDAQ under the code RCEL - these are ADS's (American Depositary Shares which are foreign stock issued in the US and registered in the ADR system - the American Depositary Receipt system) - their equivalent to our CDI's - which are currently trading at around $6.12.
AVH have proposed a way for those people who currently hold NASDAQ-listed RCEL ADS's to have those swapped for Avita US shares, and they say:
"Therefore, shareholders in eligible jurisdictions and ADS holders (on the Record Date), upon receiving Avita US CDIs or Avita US Shares, will hold an equivalent proportional interest in Avita US as they held in the Company prior to implementation of the Redomiciliation."
In other words, nobody will be better off or worse off, regardless of whether they owned ADH shares on the ASX or RCEL ADS on the NASDAQ before the reorganisation.
In local terms, you'll own one twentieth of the number of shares you held before, but they'll be worth around 20 times as much, so the value will be unchanged.
In reality, it depends on the local sentiment. When News Corp did this - moved from a primary listing on the ASX to a primary listing in the USA, their share price went down, but they were a big company and some fund managers here were not allowed to continue to hold them (because they were no longer an Australian-domiciled company) and so had to sell. That would not be such an issue for AVH, I would think. However, there still might be shareholders who would rather own shares in companies whose primary listing is here in Australia on the ASX rather than the listing being a secondary listing here for a US-domiciled company.
Liquidity: AVH are a reasonably liquid company here, with over 12 millions shares (over $5m worth) being traded most days, and often up to 60 million shares ($25 m) or more traded on a busy day. That may change, but they're already dual listed; they're just proposing to change their NASDAQ listing into their primary listing and their ASX listing into their secondary listing. I would expect that would increase the liquidity on the NASDAQ, but it's hard to say if less Avita US shares would trade here on the ASX. Liquidity could well reduce, but it would be unlikely to dry up altogether. Resmed has their primary listing on the NASDAQ and their secondary listing on the ASX and it hasn't hurt their liquidity. They are clearly a lot bigger, but Avita is no minnow. At 44 cents/share Avita are a one billion dollar company.
This is not advice, but if I held AVH shares, and I currently don't, I would not see this as a reason to sell them. I think the opportunity remains the same, regardless of where they choose to be domiciled and where their primary sharemarket listing is. As a US domiciled company with a primary listing on the NASDAQ, I imagine that, like RMD, they will attract a lot more investor attention globally, particularly in the USA, and that will be good for the company - and ultimately for their share price.
20-Apr-2020: 7:30pm: AVITA Announces Intention to Redomicile to the USA
AVITA Medical Announces Intention to Redomicile to the United States of America
Intention to establish primary listing on NASDAQ with continued (secondary) listing on ASX
Valencia, Calif., USA, and Melbourne, Australia, 20 April 2020: AVITA Medical Limited (Company) (ASX: AVH, NASDAQ: RCEL), a regenerative medicine company with a technology platform positioned to address unmet medical needs in therapeutic skin restoration, announced today its intention to redomicile the Company and its subsidiaries (Avita Group) from Australia to the United States of America by way of a scheme of arrangement under Part 5.1 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Redomiciliation).
To implement the Redomiciliation, the Company has entered into a Scheme Implementation Agreement dated 20 April 2020 with AVITA Therapeutics, Inc. (Avita US), a newly-formed company incorporated in Delaware in the United States. A copy of the Scheme Implementation Agreement is attached and will be available on the Company’s website.
If the Redomiciliation is implemented:
The Redomiciliation is subject to regulatory and court approvals, as well as approval by the Company’s shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting which will be convened to address the Redomiciliation (Scheme Meeting).
Reasons for the Redomiciliation
After carefully considering the advantages, disadvantages and risks of the Redomiciliation, the directors of the Company (Board) are of the unanimous view that the advantages of the Redomiciliation materially outweigh its disadvantages and risks. In particular, the Board believes that the Redomiciliation will:
--- click on link above for more ---