As posted about by @Straman & @Gavco, I will try and take more of a cynical view on the news.
Assumptions/factual information;
- $40-$45m price for the acquisition. (20m cash & the rest in performance shares that will be escrowed for 12 months)
- $35m Insto raise & $5m via SPP.
Having a look at SGB, it seems like a perfect fit acquisition for CAT, considering the SaaS products that SGB offer. It now allows for CAT to expand and cover a new industry in motor sports as well as a greater focus on soccer/football.
SGB are a profitable business with 89 customers. THey produced 1.3m EBITDA on $4.5m of revenue, which tells us a few things.
The purchase price of $40m is;
- 8.9 x sales
- 30.8 x EBITDA
- 50 x FCF
Which translates to fucking expensive in qualitative terms.
I think the acquisition is nice from first principals, but the price paid for SBG reflects this ten-fold.
My instinctive reaction was "Oh shit, here we go again". For those that don't follow CAT, they have had a poor history of financial management and strategic decision making.
Shadowing @Strawman's comments on the new CEO, he has impressed me since coming in and focused the business on becoming self-sustaining in recent times.
I do own CAT shares in my real-life portfolio and for context I purchased at an average price of $1.50.
I would consider my investment thesis broken very quickly if this acqusition burned any more cash than indicated in the presentation.