Its a family firm, with the 2 0f the 3 Hazouri brothers running the business as Executive Chairman and Executive director. The third brother Sam is on the board. There is high inside ownership: fully 70% of the company is owned by these three.
While this aligns interests with shareholders, I wonder whether this introduces risks of nefarious activities that a wider spread of executives might prevent.
An example of this might be issuing options, or paying themselves too handsomely:
And indeed nearly a million options were exercised at a price of 0.58c by one director and there are another 3million outstanding with an exercise price of 0.75. This (combined) represents 10% of the float. The annual report states: "Options issued to directors are approved by shareholders at annual general meetings." Clearly, with the Hazouris owning 70% of shares, they can approve whatever they want.
This concern is partly allayed by the fact there has been a consistent increase in EPS and no further granting of options for the last 3 years or so. But when those 3 million options land, EPS will no doubt take a hit.
Secondly they do pay themsleves well: $576k and $275k.
The combination of these two findings has been a red flag too big for me to ignore. I owned back at ~85c a share when it yielded 10%, but sold due to these concerns.
Since then, I have watched the dividends slowly increase and the SP more than double with record result after record result. So, whilst these fundamental issues have not resolved, the rewards to shareholders have not been impacted over the last 4 years that i have been watching.