Top member reports
Consensus community valuation
The consensus valuation is for members only and has been removed from this chart. Click for membership options.
Created with Highcharts 5.0.2Apr 2024May 2024Jun 2024Jul 2024Aug 2024Sep 2024Oct 2024Nov 2024Dec 2024Jan 2025Feb 2025Mar 20250.10.20.30.4
Contributing Members
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
#Projects list
Last edited a month ago

With thanks to the 'research assistant', Perplexity.

Projects Microba is working on

1. MetaXplore™ testing

Objective: Commercialize gut disorder diagnostics.

Milestones:

  • 195% YoY sales growth in Australia (Q2 FY25)
  • UK Early Access Program launched (Q1 FY25)

2. MetaPanel™ testing

Objective: Launch metagenomic pathogen diagnostics.

Milestones:

  • NATA accreditation and Sonic Healthcare partnership (Q4 FY23)
  • First sales in Australia (Q3 FY24)
  • US commercialization plans (Q3 FY24)

3. Inflammatory bowel disease program (MAP 315)

Objective: Develop MAP 315, a novel bacterial therapeutic for ulcerative colitis.

Milestones:

  • Phase I trial completed (Q4 FY23)
  • Preparing for Phase II trial with IND submission (Q1 FY25)
  • Partnering activities for non-dilutive funding (Q2 FY25) 

4. Immuno-oncology program

Objective: Improve response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using microbiome-based adjuvants.

Milestones:

  • Preclinical data showing tumor reduction in melanoma models (Q4 FY23)
  • Dataset expanded to 5,500+ patients (Q2 FY25)
  • Collaboration with PrOSPeCT study for clinical samples (Q3 FY24)

5. Autoimmune disease program

Objective: Discover microbiome-based therapies for lupus, psoriatic arthritis, and autoimmune liver diseases.

Milestones:

  • Completed Stage 1 screening (Q4 FY23)
  • Stage 2 functional screening 70% complete (Q3 FY24)
  • 6 leads validated for anti-inflammatory/antifibrotic activity (Q1 FY25) 

6. Allergy program (with IFF)

Objective: Develop microbiome-based allergy treatments.

Milestones:

  • 6 lead species isolated (H1 FY25) 
  • Safety/manufacturability assessments completed (Q2 FY25) 

Actual and potential business partners

1. Sonic Healthcare (ASX: SHL)

Role: Distributor for MetaPanel™ in Australia.

Milestones:

  • Launched nationally (Q3 FY24)
  • Presented at Australian Gastroenterology Week (Q1 FY25

2. Invivo Clinical (UK)

Role: Base for UK microbiome testing.

Milestones:

  • Acquired in Q3 FY24
  • MetaXplore™ Early Access Program launched (Q1 FY25)

3. Ginkgo Bioworks (NYSE: DNA)

Role: Autoimmune drug discovery partner.

Milestones:

  • 2-year discovery program (Q4 FY23)
  • Stage 2 screening completed (Q1 FY25)

4. International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE: IFF)

Role: Allergy therapeutic development.

Milestones:

  • Lead species isolation (H1 FY25)
  • Custom assays underway (Q2 FY25)

5. SYNLAB/Genova Diagnostics/G42 Healthcare

Role: International distribution partners.

Milestones:

  • 14 countries operational (Q4 FY23)
  • Brazil partnership (Q4 FY23)

6. Clinical Microbiomics

Role: Acquired Microba’s Research Services (Q1 FY25)

Milestones: Up to $3M potential revenue over 4 years

7. PrOSPeCT study (Omico)

Role: Immuno-oncology clinical data collaboration.

Milestones: 3,500+ samples collected (Q3 FY24)

Key observations:

  • Therapeutics Focus: MAP 315 (IBD) and immuno-oncology programs are advancing toward clinical trials, with partnerships critical for non-dilutive funding.
  • Testing Growth: MetaXplore™ and MetaPanel™ are scaling in Australia/UK, with Sonic and Invivo as key enablers.
  • Strategic Exits: Research Services transferred to Clinical Microbiomics to prioritize diagnostics.
  • Pipeline Depth: Autoimmune and allergy programs offer long-term potential but are earlier-stage.

Microba’s partner network spans diagnostics (Sonic, Invivo), biotech (Ginkgo, IFF), and global healthcare distributors, positioning it for commercial and clinical growth.

Read More
#Seasonality
Last edited 2 months ago

I'm rather proud of the below graph so kindly excuse the labelling errors.

I started reviewing quarterlies and now understand why the guy on HC was implying there was some cherry-picking. Anyway, nothing a bit of AI can't fix and it's forced me on a learning bender with Perplexity.

The first thing I wanted to understand was, is there seasonality at play? At this early stage it's believable. In which case H2 should organically kick up a bit all things being equal, which Luke seemed confident of.

The light shading is Invivo UK, post acquisition.

b9ccef08860cbf25f70f2c618c4039a24feea4.png

Read More
#UK business
Added 2 months ago

Invivo Healthcare

Towards the end of 2023, Microba bought a 2007-established UK business, Invivo, for $12m plus $8m in earnouts. The acquisition was funded by a $20m Microba capital raise and dilution equivalent to about 25% of pre-existing shares.

Invivo had H1FY24 revenue of $4.45m and was self-funded and cash-flow positive. For comparison, Microba had Australian revenue of $3.6m for H1FY24 (and was not cash-flow positive).

In H1FY25 the combined entity had $8m in revenue. So, no net growth yet. Underneath, it appears that Aust has grown while UK revenue shrunk a bit. There appears to be an explanation in the Microba strategy.

Reasons for the acquisition

According to Perplexity:

  • Strengthening Therapeutic Development: Invivo's expertise and proprietary technologies are expected to complement Microba's existing programs, particularly in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and immuno-oncology.
  • Additional R&D resources
  • Market Positioning.

I also thought it was about selling MetaXplore and MetaPanel into the UK. 

The existing business

After forming in 2007, Invivo self-funded their growth and have an established brand of ExologiX supplements and tests that are more broad-ranged than Microba’s, and reflect a slightly different culture. They are a B-Corp, and some of the products, the packaging and even the staff appear to be coming from the naturopath end. They might have been more local-market focused than Microba, who want to go global and like the word ‘precision’.

a4b60fe37eec783e4d909d563489a1ad9fa8fd.jpeg

Invivo maintain their own branding and continue to sell their supplements, which is a larger part of their business than testing and grew 9% in the last quarter on PCP.

c523c9846331fcdf96965a8edb14fc044091e0.jpeg

However, since being taken over by Microba their testing sales have gone down roughly 10%.

Repositioning for growth

Luke (Microba CEO) says that Microba has a strategy to let go of less productive UK clinician avenues while also carefully introducing the Microba testing products. They have just doubled the sales team and presumably there might be some culture shift being asked of Invivo.

Luke said that they have done some 'early-access' testing of Microba products that went well and are now confident to launch more broadly.

So Microba-brand growth in the UK will be something to watch.

Read More
#Sharewise September interview
stale
Added 6 months ago

I thought I'd add some points about the Microba story after watching a Sharewise interview with Luke the CEO. It covered largely the same territory as Andrew's far more engaging Strawman interview that @Scoonie has posted notes on.

The interviewer was not inspiring, but Luke powered through and some of his points grabbed me, especially after rewatching the Strawman one.

Microba are at the forefront of microbiome genetic testing and derived therapeutics trials.

A golden goose

Microba's goal is to prove itself to be a 'golden goose', and then, once proven, sell or partner for the eggs or even the goose. They have no intention of being a late-stage drug developer, they will look to partner once they have 'de-risked' any drug candidate ideally after stage 2 trials.

So, they have both a growing testing business, and the potential for golden egg therapies derived from the genetics databank that their testing allows them to develop.

Microba's drug development pathway may be clearer

According to Luke, Microba has in it's favour:

  • Their own genetic databank developed through their testing business
  • The lead on microbiome genetic testing and drug candidate discovery, and academic respect in the field
  • Well established partnerships with, and key shareholders in, Sonic Healthcare (to help them roll out testing) and Ginko Bioworks (helped them discover the most promising drug candidates from their databank)
  • Therapeutic candidates derived from healthy humans


On the last point, Luke noted that their drug candidate microba are derived from the microbiome of healthy humans (and observed to be less-established in people with some chronic illnesses). Because of this, he suggests they are less risky than novel exogenous drug candidates, and it would be easier to recruit trial volunteers for.

Of course, that doesn't mean that they will succeed in creating a therapy, it just means that their trials may be easier to set up.

What to watch for

Continuing organic growth of the testing business. Testing revenue increased by 50% organically last YOY, and they also acquired a UK business for a total of 125% revenue increase. They plan to win small markets, like 'Sydney', and then replicate a winning strategy in each small market. So they need to see repeat ordering and evidence of clinician buy-in and organic growth within markets as well as market expansion.

An acceptable balance sheet. They do not intend to force an early breakeven. They want to keep growing to maintain their market lead, and also invest in therapy development and trials.

Phase 2 trial announcements.

They have a solid team, great partners and a clear plan but a way to go before they prove they have a golden goose.

Read More
#Notes from Todays Strawman Int
stale
Added 8 months ago

Notes from interview of Microbia (MAP) CEO Luke Reid (LR).


What is MAP about?

MAP’s  vision: “In time we will be routinely measuring organisms in the gut and this will lead to therapeutic drugs.  This is what Microbia is about”.

Founding vision is about both microbiome diagnostics and therapeutics. Human genome is difficult to modify is hard  Microbiome much easier to do.

We do R&D and try to deliver value immediately from the technology.  Data bank had to be built by MAP – started back in 2017. People were demanding to understand their gut health in a scientifically rigorous way however typically the treatment prescribed was only a dietary modification.

MAP does:

  1. Diagnostic – Metapanel - gastrointestinal pathogens
  2. Therapeutic – Metaexplore. MAP looked at what is the biggest unmet needs. Hence MAP have 3 core programs
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Oncology
  • Autoimmune conditions.  

Test results are only useful if you can intervene with a therapy – hence the need for Therapeutics.

Therapeutics will drive the testing – ie testing no good if you can’t intervene to assist the patient.

What is MAP disrupting and how does MAP differ from competitors? 

 QPCR tests are the current standard of care. 95% of organisms are in the gut - this is a large and overlooked market MAP is addressing. Pathogen testing are done by Metapanel. 

In Gastrointestinal conditions: The first question is there a pathogen? Current standard testing only identify about 20% of gastrointestinal pathogens. QPCR test panel only picks up around 25 pathogens. MAP picks up 175 pathogen targets.  

MAP is doing next generational DNA sequencing. 

LR described MAP’s “unfair advantage” that being the genesis of MAP. This being the work of Professor Philip Hugenholtz and Professor Gene Tyson Gene. Both are among the top 1% of cited researchers in their field. Both came back to Australia for the US to the Uni of Qld – this is where MAP originated from.

How does work ?

From a fecal sample extract the DNA.  A QPCR test will take the material and amplify al little fragment of what you are trying to measure. this means there are limitations to the number you can do or “multiplex” – limited to about 25, though are getting better.

MAP is next generation DNA sequencing – MAP sequences all the DNA. Then it becomes a computational challenge. This the basis of Metagenomics that Phil and Gene pioneered in 2004. All patented + software trade secrets (software difficult to protect). “We see more than everyone else around 30% + more accurately”. This advantage will not be held forever. Everyone is trying to get to the biological truth. Others coming after it – however MAP is ahead and got there first and winning markets.

What is the revenue model?

  • Firstly: deliver a non-diagnostic test. This is a test that gives results but no diagnosis. GP then at least has the information. This was used to help build a data bank.
  • Now MAP have the diagnostics.
  • Research institutes have come to MAP and MAP partnered with them – this resulted in a couple of $million /yr + MAP got data.
  • People will pay out of pocket + MAP has a reimbursement plan focused on North America.   “MAP want to be the Natera of the microbia business.”  (From website:  Natera™ is a global leader in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing, dedicated to oncology, women’s health, and organ health. of the microbiome business”).


Who are the customers?

  • Metapanel (cost $345) then $520 for a further Metaexplore test, after a pathogen is ruled out. 
  • Traditionally patients will end up being diagnosed as having: “Irritable bowel syndrome” a diagnosis of exclusion. Another way of the GP saying: “I have no idea what is going on”. After 5 years 50% of sufferers get no resolution.  
  • Metaexplore – needs referral by GP. Currently an out of pocket cost. MAP is working to get its tests as a Standard of Care and reimbursed.
  • Irritable bowel syndrome, has 3 elements: Messaging to the brain + Condition of the lining of the gut + Structure of the biome. Biome is where Metaexplore comes in.


What is the process with the GP if you present as a patient with a gut issue?

Currently you get a Doctor referral – then you pay – then MAP sends kit (or gets kit from Sonic office) - sample goes to MAP lab. MAP do the tests in Brisbane.  Map also has a lab in the UK.

What is the current capacity of the test lab?

MAP want to grow to 1 million tests. Current lab can flex up to 1 million tests. Have ability to further scale at low cost. Main cost is in the equipment – MAP have the only Aluma(?) machine in Qld.  Qiagen and others come to MAP as thought leaders when testing new machines.

What is the biggest costs?

R&D is MAP’s biggest cost. Last quarter completion of Ph1 for MAP315 + large program with Ginkgo Bioworks (located Boston + NYSE listed) accounted for large part of spend.  MAP (had 10 -15 people in Boston) with Ginkgo worked on a data driven platform then honed-in on 200 organism that they thought might have impact on autoimmune disease. Ginkgo did it in Boston – they had 3 million data points and got 6 therapeutic leads.  Finished at end of this financial year.

What next with Ginkgo?

Ginkgo – the results conversation with big pharma is active. When is the right time to partner? Currently looking at.  MAP is moving the program along and are putting the results into animal models now to test.  Gingko – continued active engagement in what we do next together with maybe with a Pharma partner.

Does MAP compete with GSS in pathogen testing?

MAP does not compete with them.  QPCR – GSS play into this space with their 3 base technology. GSS do this QPCR test better. Clinicians can utilise GSS testing – then go to Metapanel. If MAP covered by an insurer (planned by MAP in time) then just go straight to MAP’s Metapanel .  

Luke believes the market will eventually go to next generational DNA testing as provided by Metapanel.   LR gave example of testing expectant mothers for genetic abnormalities. Once there was a test for specific mutations, now a test is done that covers a range of genetic abnormalities at once with next generation DNA testing.

(Scoonie comment: GSS raised $30m in June 24 to launch their FDA approved pathogen test in the US. Luke Reid insinuated their product will be superseded). 

Lack of awareness of GPs? 

Leveraging credibility of world class partners – Synlab (Europe’s largest medical lab testing) + Sonic (20% stake) – both key partners.

Targeted marketing:  KOLs MAP working hard on these + publishing. LR believes this will then set up MAP for reimbursement and as a standard of care treatment.

LR indicated MAP had a unique opportunity – such is the deficiency in Standard of Care that sufferers will pay out of pocket. Large amounts of real world evidence data.


How much will you eventually get for your products?

Metaexplore, currently - $500. However when they get to North America will charge more. Metagenomic test for sepsis in blood – got priced in the US at $2,000 per test. Expect US pricing will be between $500 and $2000.


LR asked about cash burn generally:

A balance is needed between growth and adoption and cash burn. This is a key Board discussion going into each financial year. We are very careful. MAP is proving it out in distinct markets – eg Metapanel is just being tried out in the Sydney metro market.  Once get this market right, MAP will replicate this elsewhere.  Also have heavy weight partners – logistics not needed – have Sonic o board.  Sonic also has significant sales people -  but need to control own destiny.

Sensitive question asked (as best it could be) about will be cash flow positive?

In relation to the cash burn and a financial inflexion point LR said: “We can see it”.    Decision MAP has to make: – run at breakeven quickly or go for growth. Don’t want growth at all costs: “Somewhere in the middle”. 

If not careful MAP could miss US opportunity and create mediocre business in Australia if it goes for cash flow positive. Australia is the test market.  Where we can we leverage non-dilutive funding or work with a Partner.


AP asked, what have we missed?

LR: Where does it all go? What does success look like? In a position to be the first company to medicalise microbiome testing – this should be a “ginormous opportunity”. Cited two large US listed biotech companies that were bought out.

On therapeutic side – develop and validate drug products – full clinical trials – attractive assets for big Pharma.   MAP thinks we have a goose that lays golden eggs – have some eggs in our hands – MAP now need to demonstrate they are golden eggs and Phase 2 results will do this. Cited recent sales of inflammatory bowel drug. Prometheus with a Phase 2 drug sold to Merck for $10b. This was for a 40 person company.  

The opportunity is huge.


Comment from Scoonie (for what it is worth):

MAP appears to be putting some genuine science around gut health, in an area of medicine still loaded with quackery . It will be a long haul.  

It might take 3 to 4 years before investors see the sort of multiple of current market cap returns most are expecting. MAP has a m/cap of around $70m and for the 12 months to the 30/6/24 lost $17.5m.  Cash sits at $21m. No doubt there will be cap raising/s along the way.   

However there do appear to be a number of very strong positives:

  • Looks like world leading (for now) technology + first mover advantage (as much as I dislike that term),
  • Tie ups with ASX listed Sonic (20% shareholder) + Synlab and Ginkgo (3% shareholding)
  • Luke appears a very competent CEO backed by some smart people.

Nothing is certain in this life, however for the patient you could eventually do well out of this.

Read More