Straws are discrete research notes that relate to a particular aspect of the company. Grouped under #hashtags, they are ranked by votes.
A good Straw offers a clear and concise perspective on the company and its prospects.
Please visit the forums tab for general discussion.
$50M Market Cap, $16M Cash, $5M in investments.
$8.6M in operating profit - including equity accounted investments.
Ongoing gross Divi yield (excl. special) of about 16%.
So many warts but so cheap.
Get your deckchair & popcorn to watch the action over at SEQ.
A 249D action likely to get up, but not without an ugly stoush, with ASIC now involved.
Chair resigning to the back benches, then resigning totally. Key staff frog marched out of the office.This one has got it all.
A likeable, but highly promotional CEO (that's code for big promises & vision, though shallow to low execution) to get rolled by good old shareholder apathy. When you only need 50.1% of voters, a highly organized shareholder group can succeed. Goodness knows what they are going to do about filling the CEO role.
Got to be spooking all their licensees and advisers. Have been a holder in the past - happy to watch the firecrackers go off. SP likely to fall.
News of a loosening of laws relating to financial advice.
This will allow banks, and super funds to offer financial advice.
Garry Crole bought ~ $31k shares on-market.
Overview Comment:
Selling out of position as I have lost conviction for Sequoia to execute well over the short term and potentially longer, will be happy to jump back in if I see the core business continue to improve from the current downturn but I cant convince myself this is the case. Summary of my issues:
General notes:
Positives:
Negatives:
Has the thesis been broken?
What are you expecting and what do you need to see over the next reporting season or generally into the future?
I don't know that this creates opportunity. SEQ was a large holding of mine and I have done exceptionally well out of it yet I have to say I am totally disappointed in it as well. I like GC and in fact I would call him a friend - I am no longer sure he calls me one. I have mostly sold out a few lying around but not material at all. Our experience was great and yet bad. Each has to make their own decisions, but over the period of our investment we felt that GC was over optimistic and that each year the presentation looked different. In one aspect GC was right and we were wrong and that was Morrisons - we could not see how this fitted into a (well what is SEQ - A wealth management business, a financial planning business or a technology business or a legal compliance business) Certainly in our opinion it wasn't a financial reporting business and we hated FNN and then GC went and bought Share Cafe etc.
I suppose this became the overwhelming feeling we had - That GC would put anything into it as there was no real planned business model. I don't think we blamed him it seems to be a mantra of most financial planning and advisor businesses at this moment. After the Royal Commission and the exit of banks and the older planners retiring the industry doesn't seem to know how it will unfold. I really thought that GC had the vision. So at first it was advisor numbers. Then it was compliance companies , including a training company and a family office etc. Right now I have no idea what to measure.
The other noise we suffered was a substantial shareholder arriving on a cheap entry after Sargon imploded and then the slow bleed of that stock into the market.
The best and biggest thing to happen here was for someone to come and offer what in my opinion is a huge price for Morrisons and after asking around I get the understanding that it is as much the technology and systems that Morrisons have as the brokerage firm. GC sold 80% of this for double my entire valuation of it. It is at a low because Brokers are doing it a lot tougher at the moment. so valuations should be lower.
My view is that as I understood it we were supposed to get or buy more advisor firms to become 800 planners we did not do that. There was and still is a logical move for CAF, DVR and WTL to look at how they can merge or even CUP. My view is that there are too many CEO's and not enough shareholders driving this right now so no-one seems to see that size does count.
So you are now left with GC and co and a lot of money. Do they spend it wisely. Based upon past performance we decided not to take that risk. Without the Morrisons deal there would have been a lot of blood on the street...
Add to that that the Share Cafe deal has not worked as I see it
One of the most unusual statutory presentations of FY23 results by SEQ, and one which has being unappreciated by analysts.
For starters, the company elected to display the Morrison results on one line - basically as net profits from disposed of division’.
so when you read the actuals presented by Refinifiv and others, it totally distorts a number of key indicators - such as rev, EBITDA increases or decreases etc.
Yes, Garry Croll covered these in his presentations and videos, along with a string of adjustments to get ‘normalised’ results (which I hate, particularly since this now appears to be an annual inclusion).
The results were lousy - we were prepared for that - and the future looks much brighter - but go back one year and GC was similarly optimistic. I like GC, I do, but he is now on watch to ensure the FY24 actuals back up the vision.
I do like his quirky invention of ROME - Return on Managements Estimates (of the value of the sum of the parts). Currently he sees the sum of the parts adding up to $135m against a market cap of around $70m
i did stump up and buy more in RL because of the value of the grossed up special dividend and the cash warchest following Morrison completion and his mentioning strong performances in the final months of FY23 and continuing into July and August. Plus increasing your pool of financial advisors by 5% when the industry lost 35% says they must be regarded highly..
But, I will be watching their approach to deploying the cash.
Expectations:
Questions to be answered:
next instalment fee for the Morrisons business due tomorrow by NQ. $15m transfer where SEQ will transfer 50.1% of the shares in Morrisons across to NQ. The market on higher-than-normal volume is selling down. There have been suggestions along the way that NQ would not have available funds do this acquisition of Morrisons. Will be interesting to see how this goes.
Disc - held IRL and SM
This company did very well for me. We still hold but recently sold a large chunk. Our reasons were as follows:"
We / I recently had to interact with 3 different financial planners (none are SEQ affiliated) One could not explain why the portfolio was almost 70% in cash when the person was 93 and had so much money that they could never have spent until death even if they llived to 110. Given they were in a home and that the planner could easily have set aside the annual costs for 15 years and started to move some of the cash into equity in anticipation of the death of the person to protect the inheritance of the children. The second was advise to a single woman in her sixties to keep her life policy as it would pay off the mortgage if she died - so how that helps a struggling sixty year old woman I don't know. The third was the bizarre portfolio that had little of the usual suspects - So no BHP . no CBA no ARG ...
I then went further to try to understand why SEQ is a dogs breakfast. What is with owning Share Cafe ... The Morrison deal is absolutely great and well done to Management. However when it got mooted we tried to do a valuation of Morrison's and could not get beyond $20 million. We looked at other planning businesses and WT looked good but low valuation then CAF and DVR. What shocked us is they all have little bits added that don't look logical. In the end we felt that they should merge and asked around and found that the view was that none thought it could happen as the personalities didn't sound like they would fit.
The fundamental question for us was that there must be a cost to change the behaviours that the Royal commission found and in our view these businesses would have to foot that bill. Customers seem to already have bad experiences and are no longer just paying the fees. Gone are the days that this was an easy business.
We concluded that it wasn't surprising that SEQ hasn't accrued the insurance claim and then that may add risk to a share investment. We still hold our lowest cost parcel.
Seems likely that SEQ is looking to get rid of Libertas (the consolidation they mentioned to reduce costs)
Link - Adviser Weekly Insights plus SMSF Statistics March 16, 2023 — Wealth Data
March 23
Conservative new valuation using sum of the parts after Morrison Securities divestment and accounting for a more negative outlook:
September 22
Using 12x the operating cash flow pre-tax but accounting for a 30% tax rate plus cash. Ie using a operating cash flow after tax of $10.3 mil:
12 times multiple used to account for the likely growth in earnings and balanced by the fact the market is unlikely to highly value this company.
interview with Gary about the Morrison deal. Key points were that it’s a win win for them regardless the outcome of the deal. They also hold 20% and Gary seems to think that the Morrison business with some proper funding can grow massively and they will be rewarded in the future if this occurs.
Also right at the end Gary (who I swear says way to much in interviews and gets stung when things don’t go to fruition) mentions they will be able to bypass the dividend strategy that was expected to grow to 70% over coming years and they will likely payout 100% if the deal goes through.
pretty impressive deal if they get paid.
disc held IRL and SM
Sequoia has announced the divestment of 80% of Morrison Securities. Sequoia will receive $40.5m in cash for the transaction and retain 20% of the business. The Morrison balance sheet will be debt free and have a net working capital of $10.5m at completion. Management believes that Sequoia balance sheet limited Morrison's expansion and the new ownership will allow the business to capitalise on opportunities. There had been several expressions of interest for Morrison Securities. The transaction will be completed in August 2023. If the deal fails to go through Sequoia will receive deposits made by the purchaser.
Overall, I think Sequoia has made a very good deal. Effectively the rest of the business had an EV of near zero based on the pre-halt price. Morrison and SSI represented only around half of EBITDA for FY22. I think the valuation of Morrison appears to be at least 10x EBITDA, it is hard to get exact profit/EBIT figures for just Morison Securities to be able to put multiples on the actual earnings. Sequoia maintaining a stake in case of any future growth is a good aspect of the deal as well. Market liked the announcement initially jumping from 50c to 62c after trading halt but slide back to 55c.
I have updated my valuation to 78c as a sum of the parts. See valuation straw.
Turned out the rumours were true. The company is divesting 80% of its Morrisons stake for $40m, and leaving $10.5m of working capital in the business. It looks like a good deal overall.
Morrison partial divestment. Assuming it all goes ahead.
I have adjusted revenue target, post Morrisons, for FY 2026 to $180M. They have ambitions above this number, but continually miss objectives. Sequoia Financial Group's vision is to be the premier non-aligned financial services licensee advice business in Australia. Sequoia consists of 4 divisions: Wealth Division, Equity Markets Division, Direct Investment Division, and Professional Services Division. Sequoia has had a chequered past, and experienced some growing pains in 2019, when their roll-up strategy unravelled, and their CEO departed. The present CEO has remained in place since that period, with the internal changes and cost cutting in FY2020 steadying the ship so to speak. Sequoia comprises somewhat of a roll-up business model, however, it is demonstrating some strong organic growth. Notably: 1) Morrison Securities (Equity Markets) has grown revenue 98% over the past 12 months - now being divested., 2) Licensee Services Division growing revenue at around 10% over the previous corresponding period. A slowdown, but exepcted in the current market. Sequoia have identified the following tailwinds for the business: a) Increased demand for independent financial advice. b) Banks exiting their vertically integrated businesses (selling off their adviser businesses). Long term objectives flagged: 1) Increase group revenue "towards" $300 M by end of FY 2026. 2) Increase licensees to 640 from current 355 by 2026. This is a downward revision from FY 2022. OK, in the SEQ's revenue growth rate has been 13% pa over the past 3 years. Management is aiming to grow revenue 38% per annum into FY 2025. I don't believe it is possible without wild, risky acquisitions. I think they can grow revenue at 10-20% pa, and there is evidence of organic growth in the businesses. Assuming they can achieve $180 M revenue, @ 4.0% NPAT margin, 10% pa growth in share count, I come up with an EPS of 7.1 cents per share. Given the quality of the business (roll up & key personnel risks), I have applied a discount rate of 16%, and a PER ratio of 15. DISC - I HOLD
Wealth management software business New Quantum is understood to have lobbed a bid for ASX-listed peer Sequoia Financial’s equities clearing business Morrison Securities.
Street Talk understands New Quantum – which burst into dealmaking spotlight last year with a bid for Openmarkets – is in talks to acquire the Sequoia unit which sells white-labelled clearing and stockbroking solutions to third-party institutional and adviser networks.
Sequoia requested a trading halt on Tuesday morning, saying it was in the final stages of negotiating a partial divestment of a subsidiary.
New Quantum’s interest comes after Morrison Securities’ revenues fell 7 per cent in the December half to $14 million amid a lull in trading volumes. It made $4.4 million gross profit.
Morrison pulled in 23 per cent of Sequoia’s $61 million group revenue for the half.
Updated: Mar 7, 2023 – 5.15pm. Data is 20 mins delayed.
It’s one of the business’s four units divisions: direct investment division, professional services, licensees services division and equity markets division. Sequoia had a $69.6 million market capitalisation.
Interestingly, New Quantum’s tilt at Openmarkets in 2022 was said to have failed amid concerns around the acquirer’s funding capability.
SEQ is in a trading halt pending an announcement of a partial divestiture.
The murmurs are it is Morrisons. We'll just have to wait and see.
SEQ came out with their 1HFY23 Investor presentation after market close.
The summary is weak top line growth, salved in part by improving margins. The "abnormal" items (flagged previously) however resulted in a weak NPAT result of only $600k for the half. The market, in its infinite wisdom, was already anticipating numbers like this with the shares hurtling towards their 52w lows.
Management is forecasting a much improved second half, so it comes down to how much trust the market places in that prognostication. Given the recent track record though, some jitters won't be surprising in the least.
Overall, this is a thesis-weakening result, though not a thesis-busting one.
Trading update released today was negative overall. Only positive was increase in the dividend. To me again this shows management thinks the business won't grow as much as they had hoped. These issues have mostly already been flagged in previous announcements.
Drop in EBITDA due to the following factors:
Positives:
Earnings downgrade - CAS10211831 3477-6340-2528 (markitdigital.com)
Some of the factors had already been flagged in recent months but still tough when they're trying to build market confidence.
A raise to the upcoming dividend is the sole consolation at the moment reflecting Mangement's confidence in the future.
Overall, a negative outlook for the 1HFY23 results. Not so much expected so the company will have to be on watch as a result, do not buy more shares as a result.
Interesting takeaways:
Key view still see themselves as undervalued, 59% owned by insiders so difficult for any outsider to takeover.
Open to selling part of the business to realise sum of the parts valuation - subject to price.
Didn't answer my question on the buyback on why it isn't more aggressive though.
Interesting re ASX dropping blockchain replacement to CHESS.
Morrisons (SEQ) I believe invested to prepare so hopefully can get a rebate as indicated below:
Per AFR
ASX is considering providing rebates to customers who have invested in building the replacement CHESS project.
ASX managing director Helen Lofthouse again apologised for the disruption, saying that the company is cognisant of the work customers have done on the project.
“One of the approaches you’ve seen us use when there are issues for our customers is we absolutely have gone through rebate processes from time to time to address customer issues.
“That’s certainly an approach that we’ve used in the past in this kind of situation.”
Looks like Acorn Capital is building up their position and probably who is driving the recent uptick in traded volume.
Not sure which vehicle but their listed LIC has an interesting mix of stocks, I dont know too much about them. Look to have okay performance longer term but not outstanding. Latest fund updates don't have anything on SEQ so maybe next quarter.
This has to be the most frustrating buyback, they start buying back at $0.57 but the share price falls a further 10% and they stop buying back shares despite using less than 7% of the facility. Do they see value in their own shares or not?
We may have seen the worst of the industry exits with growth last week for the first time in a while:
Key Adviser Movements This Week:
Pleasingly SEQ also saw growth -
"A good number of licensee owners (35) did manage net growth this week. Sequoia via Interprac gained the most at 5 with six appointment and one loss. Two of the advisers came from Nextplan and two from a now closed licensee. Castleguard via its licensee Lifespan was up net 3, which included picking up two advisers from AMP.
Three licensee owners were up plus 2, these being Fortnum which included one PA, Findex and a new licensee with advisers moving away from Crown Wealth. A long tail of 30 licensee owners up net 1 including Chris Brycki of Stockspot fame, and Shartru gaining an adviser from FYG Planners."
Reporting on the struggles of the financial advice industry - The profit struggles of financial advice licensees laid bare - Financial Newswire. I know for a fact that many publicly listed companies are trading at lower than private market multiples making the typical rollup strategy untenable.
SEQ announced FY22 results today
mixed bag really and I think the market certainly was unsure at first as I was.
Highlights included
As I suggested above when I first saw the result I was really disappointed, as was the market. Sure SEQ beat revenue but I thought given historic information that EBIDTA would have been the top end of guidance or even beat it. Some large investments within the company were made to upgrade technology and service uplift.
The other notable inclusion that really surprised me was the longer term revenue target for FY26 which was reduced from 400m to 300m. At first it was a concern however quite quickly I took this more of a realistic and achievable task that would reduce risk. To make the 400m SEQ would most likely have to make some really risky acquisitions and it was always a bit of a worry for me. I feel now the 300m will reduce that risk and still maintains a good growth trajectory. Gary (CEO who is a large part of my thesis) suggested that given the current share price he does not believe it is a good idea to acquire other businesses on higher multiples that would include Shares and therefore has reduced his longer term outlook as some acquisitions that may have been in eye are now not worth the expense. I am content with this outcome
projections include
Overall we saw growth in all 4 segments. I am not going to go over each segment but the investor webiner went through the longer term growth outlook and expectations moving forward and I am very comfortable to continue to hold. Key focus is on improving margins of the licence service division and equity market division to 10+%. Gary is. conservative and bascially suggested he would hope to see % margins in these sectors much higher in future.
I think a lot of the acqusitions moving forward will be within the professional service division and direct investment division where margins are 26.4% and 37.8% albeit on lower total revenue. So certainly some work can be done here to expand. Professional Service division grew 55.8% to $11m from FY21 and are hoping for margins closer to 30%.Direct Investment division the expectation is thatrevenue will move to $15mil ($2.6FY22) by FY2026 with gross margins currently at 37.8%, so this is quite attractive growth.
I like listening to Gary speak, he is always comparing the business to "the tortoise not the hare" suggesting we are going to grow at a slow but good rate and get it right. He is very conservative and has mentioned that advisory is his absolute passion and what he was put on the earth to do. The passion is evident. He owns a good number of shares and is aligned to shareholders.
Lastly the Share Buy-back was put on hold because results were out so no buy-backs have been occuring now for some weeks. Gary did say he plans on commencing this straight away and given he sees the share price as cheap, I suspect that some buying will be back on the cards. This will at least hold the SP where we are at a minimum so I am content to continue to hold.
DISC- hekd IRL and SM
Going to be very conservative given the business quality and how the market prices this type of business.
10x FCF so about $100M.
Divided by the 136.3M shares on issue to give $0.73 per share. Still very cheap.
Not taking into account the cash which is sizeable ableit some of it is held for regulatory purposes and some of it is clients cash.
This is not a company that I thought I'd like. It's given us every reason not to. Poxy prior results, low (often no) margins, bitsy, complicated financial statements and with 30 businesses under the hood there's a lot to get your head around. But actually this is an interesting turnaround story that still has a long way to play out and is only partially reflected in the improved share price. If this business does only half of what management are targeting it will be a multibagger.
The catalyst for the turn around in this company I attribute to the appointment of a new CEO three years ago and has been reflected in improved financials for the past two years.
Without going into the details of what all 30 businesses under the Sequoia banner do essentially the business is focused on providing offerings to the financial services industry (Financial Planners/Analysts etc.). It is split into four divisions – Wealth, Professional Services, Equity Markets and Direct Investment. It's worth calling out one of the businesses separately which is Morrison Securities under the Equity Markets division. I’ll come back this.
What I like:
- Financial trajectory. Of course this is only good for as long as it lasts put all metrics appear to be heading in the right direction. Revenue was up 38% in FY21 vs pcp and 51% in FY22 HY vs pcp. Margins are growing and the business is consistently profitable.
- The CEO. In company presentations the CEO is very clear about what the company is (and isn’t) and targets that they should be measured against. He likes to quote Warren Buffett, for which he gets an immediate tick. He owns approximately 10% of the business and was buying recently at the current share price. Here is a link to a Sharecafe presentation he did (from 19 minutes) - Note the way he speaks to the disclaimer slide. Overall he gives the impression that he is working in the interest of shareholders.
- Morrison Securities. This is an ASX Clearing House similar to Open Markets or Finclear. The CEO states it’s of a similar size to Open Markets, more profitable and growing as fast. Last year Open Markets did a pre-IPO roadshow and was proposing to list at an implied value of $160.8 million. The market cap of the entire of Sequoia is approximately $79 million, which suggests that the market values the whole as a lot less than the sum of its parts.
- Cash. At the half year they disclosed cash approaching $36m, half of this is client funds (not a bad model in a rising interest rate environment) and they are also mandated to keep a buffer for the Morrisons business. However this still leaves a warchest to go out and acquire more businesses.
Not so much:
- The CEO. If he leaves chances are so will I.
- Margins. A 10% margin is OK but doesn't leave a lot of margin for error if things go balls up.
- Acquisitions. Great when they work not so much when they don't.
- Predictability. At the AGM in mid November they forecast half year revenue to be $63m. Six weeks later they actually delivered $79 million. I like management who under promise and over deliver but that's a big variance. So much so it's either borderline incompetent or a very difficult business to forecast, maybe in either direction. Something to watch out for in the future.
What it boils down to:
Let's say they missed their FY25 target of $400m and instead deliver $300m. Let's say they achieve their EBITDA margin target of 10% because of scale benefits and because they actually did better than that in the second half of FY21. Let’s say that EBITDA is a proxy for free cash flow. What would you pay for a business that is growing quickly and delivering $30m free cash flow. I would say as an absolute minimum you'd pay 12 times. Ignoring dilution (let’s say its minimal) that implies a market cap of $360 million and a share price approaching $3. I’d take that.
Great write ups by @Dominator @LifeCapital and @Rapstar on the companies page.
[Held]
Today's market update, reaffirming Sequoia's FY22 guidance confirms to me my thesis is on track. The positives/negatives I take out of this announcement and recent acquisitions announced are:
I currently have a full position in SEQ in my RL portfolio and will likely over the next few months to be looking to move to an oversized position.
I think this acquisition (March 29) by SEQ is strategically very smart. Effectively, it buys a large base of individual investors via Share Café and it will marry them with its full suite of products and advisor network. The ‘lifetime value’ of these customers can be massive with so many products/services to cross sell.
Plus, I like the thought of working all sides of the investment ‘carcass’. That is, providing advice to investors whilst moving them into the SEQ ‘revenue chain’ at a low cost of acquisition, services to advisors, and marketing and awareness strategies to listed entities. Preservation of independence will be crucial though, as we all know the worth of the research reports produced by the ‘guns for hire’ analysts.
The informed investor acquisition, in particular, will really assist with the advisor network as the product looks relatively sticky.
Overall, I am impressed by Garry Croll the MD, he goes quietly about his business whilst executing a very smart strategy, he is transparent and cogent in what he says, and he is working his cash surpluses brilliantly.
This deal has been struck at 5X FY23 EBITDA – okay - and I believe with just a 10% organic growth over likely FY22 results, plus this acquisition will see FY23 EPS at around 6c to 7c and growing. His combo of shares and cash is okay by me because it ensures the vendors are roped in for at least two years to bed down the acquisitions. Plus, they are impressive people to have onboard.
Sequoia has been in a trading halt for the last couple of days pending an acquisition announcement. This morning they announced they were acquiring three business, including Sharecafe, which I'm sure some of us have used as an ideas generator/validator. These businesses will fall under Sequoia's Direct division. The release gives a decent explanation of each business and interestingly it spends some time talking to the credentials of the key personnel who are staying on with Sequoia, including Tim McGowan who will now head up the Direct division.
The price seems reasonable without being outstanding. It is largely script based though and is perhaps a little disappointing as the CEO made a point of saying right up until recently they weren't interested in diluting shareholders in acquisitions at the current share price. The share price hasn't really moved on the news and I would say that's a lot more reflective of what we're seeing more broadly in the market - compared to last year - where it now recognises both the opportunity and the risk that comes with acquisitions.
Overall I think it's a nice little announcement in line with their overall strategy for both organic and acquisitive growth, that gets them that little bit closer to their FY25 $400m revenue target.
[Held]
Overall Comment:
Very good result for Sequoia. Above management guidance/expectations. Appear to be executing on the growth strategy. SEQ is a high conviction holding that I believe is undervalued by the market. Investors are getting a well-run business with a free option on planned growth at current prices.
General Notes
Positives
Negatives
Has the thesis been broken?
Valuation
What are you expecting and what do you need to see over the next reporting season or generally into the future?
Sequoia Financial Group provides products and services for ASFL holders, accountants and financial advisors. The company is split into four divisions:
CEO is an ex-financial advisor. Very passionate about non-conflicted advice. Sequoia does not sell any financial products (such as funds) to clients they only provide services to the financial advice industry. SEQ has been growing rapidly in recent years with CEO’s plan to continue this growth through organic means and acquisitions of businesses at 4-7x PE using the cashflows of the business. The four different segments of the business create the ability to cross sell all the different products that SEQ produces.
The value proposition of SEQ is that they are the "picks and shovels" for financial services industry. They provide products that enable financial planners and accountants to be able to provide advice services at a cheaper price or saves them time.
For valuation see valuation straw.
The CEO re-iterated the medium term goal of achieving $400 M revenue by FY 2025.
This is significant growth, and even if they significantly miss this goal, say achieving just $260 M by FY2025, Sequoia will be a significantly larger business than today.
DISC - I HOLD
Management have provided guidance for the HY to Dec 21:
1) Revenue up 20% to $63 M for HY 2022.
2) NPAT of $2.1 m, up 23.5% for HY 2022.
Overall guidance given for FY2022 is for EBITDA growth of more than 15%.
Trading on a forward PER of 13, assuming NPAT growth holds over FY2022.
DISC - I HOLD
@Rapstar
In reply to your #2022 Growth Outlook for SEQ
I just got off the webiner. I am feeling more confident as time passes with this growth story.
CEO was very bullish on the growth outlook basically stating that 15% organic revenue growth was an absolute minimum. I suspect over the year we will get some good trading updates. He also alluded to the fact that this does not count acquisitions. As you mentioned any business acquireed would be at 3.4x EBIT multiple and that any acquisition would exceed 15%EPS, with the goal of pay back period of 1.2 yrs. Any acqusition should add 500K to 1mil EBITDA. Would use back up cash therefore not increasing share count. Appears that acquisitions have been identified and discussions are taking place so we should see some announcements in coming months.
Key growth segment:
1. Sequoia Direct. Revenue is currently 2 mil and they are aiming for 10mil in 2 years. CEO mentioned the platform and its infrastructure is very god and they aim to market this now. They built this during the last year and it was impacted by COVID.
2. Professional Services:
3. Equity Markets:The morrisons business which had significant growth appears extremely strong and maintains good retention. This is not like the SWF platforms which is more day trading rather this is advice and long term financial planning. Appears they are getting good numbers through the doors in the "boomer" category as they look for advice leading in to retirement. Simply they are winning business and not losing clients.
4. Wealth MGMT:
Lastly I was pleased to hear that top 100 share holders have not sold and continue to hold even through the last year where SP has risen somewhat sharply.
DISC: held
Tranche 3 of performance rights have the following performance hurdle:
Tranche 3 will vest if the Company’s 90 Day VWAP up to and including 30 June 2021 is at least $0.55.
Will be interesting to see if this performance hurdle drives a good news cycle form management over the next month or so, as they are well short of the hurdle ATM.
Management Medium Term targets from their September Presentation. They have lowered the 2024 goal from 1200 to 1000 advisers recently, but are ahead 2021 target.
If this is what success looks like, then SEQ could easily have a market capitalisation over $400 M in 3-4 years. I would be happy if they get to $250 M by 2024.
SEQUOIA FINANCIAL GROUP ANNOUNCES 1H21 RESULT
1H21 Highlights