Forum Topics NAN NAN NAN valuation

Pinned valuation:

Added 4 weeks ago
Justification

Discl: Held IRL 2.43%

One of the points raised on Share Buy Backs on the Stocktake podcast flagged by @UncleWally is that a share buy back is a “good one” if the shares are undervalued. 

Knocked up a quick valuation for NAN to test that thought. Have taken a more conservative approach than what Chat is saying are analyst consensus. Have essentially used growth rates which are a notch lower than the suggestions ie Chats Base Case = my Growth case, Chats Pessimistic Case = my Base Case, which makes my Pessimistic Case that much more conservative.

With these more conservative parameters, the NAN price appears to be “in the zone” based on the price movements in the last 2 or so months. 

29afb05b974642e7c458f50da803da00a4bf90.png

INPUTS

023fb27bda9bc6bf1d4bb907a0cf25548dfa3c.png

EPS Growth from Chat

  • Nanosonics’ EPS jumped from approx A$0.043 to A$0.068 in one year (~59%) per one source.
  • Analyst consensus: about ~19.6% p.a. EPS growth over next few years.
  • Half-year result: revenue +18% in H1 FY25, with capital sales +11% and consumables/service +20% on year-ago.
  • P/E / valuation context
  • Current trailing P/E ~ ≈ 63–70×.
  • Industry benchmark for “Medical Devices / Instruments & Supplies” globally around ~30×.
  • Some commentary (Simply Wall St) suggests a “fair” P/E for NAN might be ~36× compared to current ~66×


So the company is growing rapidly (though from a low base) and the market is paying a high multiple relative to peers and industry average.

378ae97c6dc0180fabddf8c3efa5f3768f6f7a.png


TechBunny
Added 4 weeks ago

just flagging that i would not trust the "fair" P/E ratio as promulgated by Simply Wall St. It would be some quant formula producing that (for every company) and is more likely to be noise than signal.

21

jcmleng
Added 4 weeks ago

Fully agree @TechBunny. The only PE that is "real" is the current one and all historical PE's - any PE future looking is crystal ball gazing at best. I use the Chat inputs as a sanity check against the PE's that I end up using. The growth rates also rarely make sense.

Process-wise, I always start with today's PE and growth rate, then adjust from there.

16