Forum Topics WTC WTC AI

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

As I continue to digest and assess the content of last week’s $WTC Investor Day, while much of the press attention has focused on the implementation of the New Commercial Model, the session that impressed me most was the discussion on AI implementation.

I’ve decided to pull out a separate straw on this, because I think it may be of interest not only to those following $WTC, but also to the wider community interested in how firms are deriving value from AI.


$WTC’s AI philosophy

WiseTech’s AI strategy is built around narrow, specialised agentic AI, deeply embedded into CargoWise workflows, rather than broad, general-purpose models. Guardrails and human-in-the-loop verification are core design principles.

$WTC is scoping many potential AI agents. However, three are already “live” and can be accessed via the new Value Packs with 100% transaction-based pricing:

  1. Document ingestion (data entry automation)
  2. ComplianceWise – Export Controls
  3. Customs Classification Assistant


Each of these was described in detail at the Investor Day and provides evidence of how $WTC’s massive proprietary dataset, combined with LLMs’ ability to structure, process and reason over text-based data, can materially reduce the high labour content in existing freight forwarding, import and export processes.

Let’s look at each in turn.


1. Document ingestion

AI-native document ingestion replaces manual data entry and OCR-based bolt-on tools.

Example impact:

  • Commercial invoice ingestion reduced from a ~5–6 minute manual task to near-zero
  • At a global freight forwarder level, ~10 million commercial invoices per year equates to ~95 human years of data entry


Accuracy is high, driven by:

  • Targeted models tuned to specific document types
  • Uncertainty explicitly flagged to human operators
  • Accuracy described as materially higher than OCR


From the Q&A discussion: accuracy is improving while labour is being removed, and this improvement is not being traded off against risk.


2. ComplianceWise – Export Controls

Across global jurisdictions, numerous controls restrict parties, locations and categories of goods.

AI agents assess export risk across:

  • Parties (denied / sanctioned lists)
  • Locations (embargoes, restricted destinations)
  • Goods and end-use (dual-use items, munitions)


The AI effectively acts as a virtual compliance officer: jurisdiction-specific, always-on, and capable of scanning all available information against known restrictions and risk factors, flagging issues for human review.

Performance achieved:

  • ~96% precision (low false positives)
  • No missed red flags relative to expert human reviewers


3. Customs Classification Assistant

A core role of freight forwarders is ensuring goods are correctly classified. This task is exceptionally complex due to:

  • The sheer number of codes
  • Non-intuitive classification structures
  • Jurisdictional differences


As a result, classification remains one of the most labour-intensive parts of the process.

$WTC’s AI agent is now able to complete ~90% of the classification work, leaving brokers to verify and submit (human in the loop).

Industry benchmarks:

  • Human-based classification accuracy ranges from as low as ~20% to ~80%
  • ~80% is typically considered a strong human benchmark


Pilot results: customers using the $WTC AI agent are reporting ~90% accuracy.

Importantly, narrow agent design and embedding regulatory data from $WTC databases (e.g. BorderWise) materially reduces the risk of AI hallucinations.

Richard White gave an illustrative example of a UPS business unit with 19 human classifiers and 1 supervisor. The AI agent is capable of performing the work of the 19 classifiers, leaving the supervisor to check and verify outputs as the only future required labour for this process.


Other AI applications

As with many enterprise software firms, $WTC is also developing AI-based customer service agents. The WiseTech agent is called ACE, supported by content from the WiseTech Academy.

Although ACE is only one month old (“a baby”, in management’s words), it is already being trained on ~20,000 historical support tickets where humans previously sent specific training materials to customers. Management estimates this could free up the equivalent of ~18 product managers currently involved in this work, allowing them to be redeployed into product development.

Finally, $WTC is also using AI internally to assist with code writing and testing.

These latter applications have quickly become ubiquitous across enterprise software, so there was little basis to assess whether $WTC is meaningfully ahead or behind peers in these areas.


Overall takeaways and management view


Richard White believes that rolling out AI agents within CargoWise and related products has the potential to reduce customer labour requirements by ~50% over two years. This is a bold claim - characteristic of RW’s visionary style - but the examples demonstrated so far lend it credibility. Time will tell.

It is difficult to overstate the complexity of freight classification and compliance. In another Investor Day session, Anthony Hardenburgh (Product Portfolio Leader, Global Trade Management) noted that across markets and products, $WTC handles ~73 million regulatory and data updates annually, all of which must be incorporated into its systems. This scale is far beyond what humans can manage alone and is precisely the type of problem suited to AI. It appears $WTC is leaning into this opportunity in earnest.

$WTC’s approach centres on carefully scoped, narrowly defined AI agents, tightly integrated into workflows. Management described a common AI agent architecture with an abstraction layer that allows A/B testing of different LLMs and rapid swapping as models improve and leap-frog each other.

Early labour reduction from AI is expected to occur primarily in lower-skill roles, many of which logistics firms have already offshored to shared-service centres. Remaining staff, employees of $WTC’s customers, will become more skilled and more valuable as supervisors of AI agents.

There was discussion around whether customers could build their own AI layers and bypass $WTC’s products. Management acknowledged this was possible and that some customers might see benefits. However, CEO Zubin emphasised that software development and workflow integration are WiseTech’s core expertise, and that embedding AI directly into CargoWise should deliver superior outcomes, because only $WTC has access to the source code and databases. That confidence seems reasonable, though real-world results will ultimately decide.


My assessment


AI adoption across large enterprise SaaS companies has become a central part of the investment thesis for my technology holdings over the past few years. The use cases showcased by $WTC are exactly the types of applications I was hoping to see, and it is encouraging that early solutions are now "live" with customers - particularly the 95% of largely small customers who have gone "live" on the new Value Packs, potentially a strong incentive for the LGFFs to follow quickly!

It will be particularly interesting to track adoption and realised benefits over the next one to two years.

This also underscores why $WTC had to move from “seat plus module” pricing to per-transaction pricing. Despite the noise surrounding the transition, there was really no alternative. Labour hours per shipment are about to be materially reduced, while shipments-per-seat should increase dramatically as these capabilities are adopted by customers. $WTC had to get ahead of that curve.

Overall, I was very impressed by the presentations, the examples, and indeed the presenters themselves. I was glad to see that $WTC are indeed doing what I expect them to be doing. It was good to learn the facts, rather than just hold the thesis!


Disc: Held

lankypom
Added a month ago

I'm still working my way through the recording of the investor day, but I agree it was a great confidence building exercise, particularly demonstrating that the new CEO Zubin Appoo is totally across the Wisetech business model and strategy, and a worthy frontman for the company.

The other takeaway for me was that WTC remains a zealous advocate for change in the global logistics industry, and is not afraid to invest considerable time and money to bring about its vision of joined up end to end supply chains with inefficiencies (of which there are many) eradicated at every step.

This remains a very long term play. It looks like Container Transport Optimisation is still at least a year away from any meaningful monetization, assuming a successful pilot in Australia before attacking the much bigger US market. And the integration of e2Open ” to build a unified, multi-sided global logistics marketplace, connecting freight forwarders (WiseTech's core) with cargo owners and carriers (E2open's strength) for end-to-end visibility, removing disconnected processes, driving efficiency, expanding product offerings, and establishing a comprehensive operating system for global trade" is several years away.

Still holding in RL, and resigned to a few years of underperformance before WTC regains it's ascendancy.

29

mikebrisy
Added a month ago

@lankypom totally agree with your point about CTO.

Some of the analysts have this badly wrong for FY26, and so while 1H is covered (undemanding overall) there is scope for disappointment for the FY. E2Open cost out will beat soft guidance, but I can’t see there being a material CTO contribution. (I recall reading one analyst has $20m (dreaming) although some others are more realistic.)

I was also impressed with the depth and range demonstrated by Zubin. Of course, he has the legacy knowledge, and he also is a great communicator.

More generally, I was really impressed with most of the speakers. I wonder if RW/ZA will appoint CP as permanent CFO? She’s done quite a bit over the last year, and comes across as super competent IMO.

I also agree with you in that you have to take a long term view on $WTC. I have ever since 2016!

The AFP/ASIC investigation will remain a cloud, potentially for a year or two, before resolution one way or other. Most investigations don’t lead to charges and fewer still lead to conviction. Given RW’s stated sell-down strategy, I’d have thought it almost impossible to prove beyond reasonable doubt, without some very clear email “smoking gun” or similar. Insider trading is hard enough to prove at best of times. But the others might not have such clear, well-publicised cover. So there is room for more disruption. Another reason why you have to be prepared to take the long term view here.

$WTC remains one of my largest positions in RL.

33