Pinned straw:
After thinking some of The Economics of AI through, see prior post here – https://strawman.com/forums/topic/12732#post-42017
I was surprised and pleased to see that KYP seem to have done / be doing exactly this. Their new Product Kinatico Compliance (KC) is effectively an AI native product and while they are coming from a legacy business model with a legacy product (CV check), they are running hard into this new AI reality.
Their business restructure is more of a hybrid approach though, where they are getting their people trained up and tooled up and confident on AI (88% so far they claim, sounds good, not sure what this is worth).
So this does not put AI at the centre of the business to leverage the low cost, high speed, high accuracy prediction capability from AI being augmented with human (or AI agent) judgement to make better decisions.
I expect this sort of fundamental business transformation would be too difficult for all but the most fervent AI acolytes.
In any case they were at pains to point out that their KC product is effectively AI native, so if this works out as The Economics of AI suggest it should, it should provide a nice little case study of how other businesses can harness an AI first approach within / alongside their existing business.
Will be interested to see how this plays out. Interesting enough for me to take a position and stay tuned to how this evolves.
It also feels a little de-risked as they have plenty of cash in the bank, are FCF break even, have a slowly melting legacy business that will not go to zero any time soon, have a fast growing (~50% pcp) SaaS / AI product (not seat based), mission critical solution (compliance reg tech) for their sticky customers (0% churn on SaaS product), incumbent is manual (MS XL) inhouse solutions, Mgmt are aligned with almost 10% held across Directors and KMP, Their SAM (Servicable TAM) just increased by 3x as a result of KC launch, they are now providing an enterprise grade solution to SMB’s with good initial take up and pipeline uptick, it doesn’t screen cheap due to legacy business drag on growth and profitability (this should diminish quickly in the coming years).
Disc: Held
I know we're probably in a new paradigm right now when it comes to SAAS software, but this one seems like it's getting into the good value territory if they can execute with the opportunity in front of them.
Quibbling about a slight lack of operating leverage is fair, but surely the bigger story here is since launching Kinatico Compliance, their sales pipeline has grown from it's usual $5m-$7m up to $10m in a short space of time.
If revenue growth inflects upwards again in H2 as they're projecting I think this will catch a bid pretty quickly.
Cheers to @Tom73 for the great notes on the 1H as well
Thanks @Rick for sharing. I have a similar view on Kinatico as Bells, but I was disappointed by the HY numbers. They have an improving EBITDA and net profit margin, but I was expecting there to be more operating leverage. Direct costs and employee costs aren't showing that leverage kicking in. And if you look at the increase in SAAS revenue (close to $3m improvement), it didn't drop it to the bottom line fast enough for what I was thinking. Or put another way if the SAAS contribution should have mostly gone to the bottom line, what is going on in the legacy business? It wasn't clear, and maybe it's been a long reporting season already and I'm getting grumpy...anyway, thesis still in tact, just...
Held IRL and SM.