Forum Topics SDR SDR Bull Case

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

We are finally getting to a price where Siteminder looks attractive (and not ridiculously overpriced as I previously lamented).

H1 FY26 offered continued validation in the bull case and helps demonstrate, at least partially, that the Smart Platform is starting to drive operating leverage.

I won't repeat the key metrics, because other members have covered this nicely but I am starting to nibble at these prices.

Metrics continue to track in the right direction while they are increasingly nearing break even point -- with cash in the bank and no debt.

Trading on a P/S of around 3.5x, with a forward estimate of under 3x, there is value here in my opinion (provided they continue to grow and scale well, of course). The risk/reward is appealing.

jcmleng
Added a month ago

Held: 3.83% IRL and in SM

@Rocket6 fully agree! The chart position is playing out as well, with price falling nicely to $2.85 ... I forgot to change my unfilled order from yesterday to Good for Day and annoyingly had it fill at $2.91 today.

8828b808118a729548fb0fb9e9a3b53a5c00fd.png

15
Batman
Added a month ago

The risk to SDR is probably more about sentiment compression and multiple pressure in the short term due to the war, rather than any specific issues with the business.

17

Foxlowe
Added a month ago

The price is getting more interesting, but the core question for me hasn’t changed: can SDR convert its strategic moat into actual economics?

Revenue is growing, but cost‑to‑serve, R&D intensity and support overheads are still keeping margins negative.

Until operating leverage shows up in cash flow rather than presentations, the valuation debate is mostly about sentiment, not economics.

If they can demonstrate real margin expansion, the upside is obvious. But that’s the part they still need to prove.

17

mikebrisy
Added 4 weeks ago

@Rocket6 @jcmleng @Batman @Foxlowe I agree that $SDR is looking good here.

Of course, across software, the market has fundamentally rebased terminal values, and I think that reset is likely to persist; at least until individual companies (or specific business models) can earn back the right to higher exit multiples.

Agentic AI has shifted the paradigm from:

“capital-light, cloud software wins by default”

to:

“nothing is structurally guaranteed, show me the cash flows.”

On top of that, $SDR is pre-profit, so in a world where inflation has re-emerged and interest rates remain higher for longer, it is disproportionately impacted with the bulk of its value still tied to future cash flows.

Finally, as a travel-exposed business, there is an additional Gulf War overlay. As we saw during COVID, travel demand doesn’t disappear, but it reconfigures, often toward domestic or perceived “safer” destinations.

Taken together, $SDR has effectively been hit from all angles.


Operating Leverage - I Have a Different Perspective

Where I diverge somewhat from @Foxlowe  is on operating leverage. Yes, $SDR remains in a heavy platform investment phase, and free cash flow has been impacted by ongoing product development, and the expansion of its global footprint (leases for hubs and sales offices).

However, I think operating leverage is already emerging, which was a key reason I initiated a position last year.

Cash flows tell the story. First annual cash flows.

8cc7c73a23eb52ffd8991b995551a64ac17884.png

Looking at annual cash flows:

  • Operating Cash Flow has shown a clear and steady progression toward positive territory
  • Investing Cash Flow (excluding movements into deposits) has increased only modestly


Importantly, growth in capex has been materially slower than growth in operating cash flow.

This is reinforced by capex (PPE + intangibles) as a % of revenue:

  • FY22: 20%
  • FY23: 16%
  • FY24: 13%
  • FY25: 12%


So while SDR continues to invest in its platform, it is doing so using a declining share of revenue and, more importantly, a declining share of operating cash flow.

Will FY26 continue this "trend"? I believe it will. And we can push out the cash flow analysis based on 1H results another year, as shown below:

ccdd5b999d5eff62acecbf607a25c9f999a79d.png


Based on 1H FY26:

  • Investing cash flow did step up
  • However, the increase was still only ~33% of the uplift in operating cash flow


On that basis, I think it is reasonable to conclude $SDR is demonstrating operating leverage on a cash flow basis.


So What - Portfolio Context and Investment Timing Considerations

I currently hold a relatively small position in $SDR (around 4% RL), and have been weighing whether the prospective upside from here is sufficiently compelling, particularly relative to other high-risk holdings, to justify reallocating capital. What gives me pause is the degree of near-term uncertainty, especially around how current conditions may affect new property signings and transaction revenues through the second half of FY26. These factors are likely to shape market perception when the FY26 result is reported in August.

At a macro level, the travel backdrop is clearly becoming more complex. Middle East holiday and transit demand has fallen sharply, with knock-on weakness across the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. At the same time, regions that rely on Middle East hubs for connectivity, including parts of Asia and APAC, are experiencing disruption. While flights can be rerouted, this is creating capacity bottlenecks and higher airfares, which in turn are likely to dampen long-haul demand.

That said, this is not a uniform downturn. Some regions are clear beneficiaries of demand reallocation, particularly Western Europe and the Americas incl. Caribbean. More broadly, rising fuel costs and heightened security concerns may shift travel behaviour toward domestic or shorter-haul trips, rather than eliminating demand altogether. The key question for $SDR is how these shifting patterns translate into Gross Booking Value and transaction volumes across its network.

The downside scenario is that these pressures compound. If elevated costs and geopolitical uncertainty begin to weigh more heavily on consumer behaviour, there is a risk of softer global travel demand, particularly for long-haul routes. In a more adverse outcome, such as a broader macro slowdown or recession, this could flow through to lower GBV and potentially slower net property additions, which would directly impact SDR’s growth trajectory.

My sense is that the current share price is already discounting a meaningful portion of these risks, to the point of an over-reaction based on fundamental. However, it is not yet clear that the full extent of the disruption has played out. The longer the conflict persists, the greater the likelihood that what are currently short-term, reversible effects become more embedded and longer-lasting.

On that basis, I am not inclined to add to the position at this stage. There is a credible possibility that further volatility lies ahead, and that more attractive entry points may emerge if near-term earnings or sentiment weaken further.

That said, I am seriously considering that this "current episode" will offer a great opportunity to acquire a larger position in $SDR at a very favourable price.

Disc: Held (RL 4%)

29

Rocket6
Added 3 weeks ago

Sorry all, late reply here. Work keeping me busy.

I agree @mikebrisy (and largely disagree @Foxlowe), costs as a percentage of revenue are decreasing, while the company continues to grow strongly. Mike has articulated this in detail. My thought process looks at this slightly different, but ultimately arrives at the same conclusion.

H1 FY26

  • Revenue 131m
  • Total costs 135m

H1FY25

  • Revenue 104m
  • Total costs 118m

Since the previous H1 (as above), costs increased 14% while revenues increased 26%. This is evidence of operating leverage, but we need it to continue. SDR have previously shown signs of operating leverage – between H1s in FY23 and 24 for example, revenue growth was significant nearing 30%, while costs only increased by 10%. The next year then saw similar increases in % terms for both revenue and costs. The big difference is they were running a significant loss back then – this is no longer the case. They also aren’t ridiculously priced like they previously were, so on both accounts they are looking more attractive today.

Orange flags going forward will be significant increases to marketing or sales staff, possibly indicative of slowing growth. I see a lot of similarities here with Smart Parking though – ultimately my thesis is the benefits to the customer driving sustainable, organic growth into the future. These guys are now close to an inflection point. It genuinely makes sense for a customer/property to adopt the Smart Platform and this is being validated by the numbers they are reporting. Even prior to the Smart Platform, SDR has typically grown properties served by 5k YoY. They are on track to do so again in FY26.

Your reservations about an impact to the travel sector, and consequently SDR @mikebrisy, are fair. What this looks like and the impact to their growth over the next 6-12 months is unclear. But I don’t need this to outperform over that time (an advantage we have over fundies and the like); and I think on the other side of this, travel will resume to normal and SDR will continue to be well-placed to grow properties serviced.

21