Company Report
Last edited 2 months ago
PerformanceCommunity EngagementCommunity Endorsement
ranked
#3
Performance (37m)
-9.6% pa
Followed by
212
Straws
Sort by:
Recent
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
#1H FY24 Results
Added 2 months ago

$ALU has announced their 1H FY24 results this morning.

From a quick reading, I've breathed a sigh of relief to have the $68.50 takeover price locked in, as I think the market would have reacted quite negatively to the result, given the SP run-up ahead fof the takeover offer.

For context 1H23 the eps growth was 29% and FY23 was 19.4%. So this morning's 1H 24 11.2% is a distinctly softer result, and below consensus (if I have done the FX correctly).

Within the softer number, sales in the enterprise segment grew 60% to $20.4m - albeit from a small base.

Nice to get the $0.30/share dividend, as a last hurrah.

Life's too short for a more detailed analysis. I just need the deal to complete.

Financial Highlights

18514dee128b420387a834d54b2cd0413c654a.png

Disc: Held in RL and not on SM

#Analyst Report
stale
Added 8 months ago

We sometimes discuss on here how useful or otherwise analyst reports are. Of course, such a general, sweeping statement blends and over-simplifies a wide range of very different products and authors. However, I recently clicked on a link to get some weekly posts of free analyst reports from a well-known local broker. This is presumably a marketing effort to cultivate me as a client. Now, I don't like shit-posting, so I won't name the house nor the author (they may be a member here, after all!), but when I read the report, I was stunned and thought I'd share (just to get it out of my system).

The report is an updated recommendation of $ALU published on 22-Aug, the day after $ALU posted its stunning result, which has been well-covered here on SM. For reference, the SP has risen 30% since the close of the day before the result, from $36.88 to $48.21.

OK. Now to the point of this straw.

Conclusions are: $40 PT (12 month); PT reduced from $42.50; HOLD

Key take-outs

  • Small beat in revenue
  • Small miss in EBITDA
  • Small beat in NPAT
  • Weaker than expected cashflow
  • Final dividend above our forecast

There is absolutely no reference to the annouced major enterprise deal, no reference to the trends in $/seat, growth of Pro and Enterprise sales over Standard, nor any comment on the trend in Octopart transaction values, nor is there any reference to the CEO's description of what is going on within the company that is driving these results, including the step-up in R&D, and how this is expected to play forward.

To be clear, I'm not complaining about the PT itself, (even though I think it will be outside my range of scenario valuations when I update my model, so I recognise my predisposition here.)

What irks me is that the recommendation appears to be driven entirely by some extrapolation of plusses and minuses of the last year's financials and a judgement on the FY24 guidance.

Wow. Wow. Wow. We've talked here about "time horizon arbitrage" but I don't often come across it so blatantly as this.

Someone who holds a licence and has passed financial analysis exams, is making an investment recommendation and providing a valuation based on this report, presumably signed off by a Head of Research, and under the brand of a well-known institution. And, moreover, this "Research" goes into the weighting of the market consensus, which many of us consider.

I think this is an even worse report than one I saw a few years ago that recommended $ARX over $PNV based purely on revenue multiples!

To be clear, I am not using this example to denigrate analyst research generally; some I find is very good. But a lot is demonstrably not.

So, its times like this that I am truly grateful for the SM Community. Any number of members here publish far more insightful research and analysis.

OK - rant over, back to work.

#Bull Case
stale
Added 8 months ago

Why I think yesterday's $ALU update was significant

I've always understood $ALU as one of several leaders in the market for software to aid design of PCBs, focused on the mid-market. This market is very large covering moderate complexity designs for PCBs used in a wide range of consumer and industrial devices, which typically have moderate to large production volumes.

However, in yesterday's results release and in the presentation CEO Aram made reference to a multi-year, multi-million dollar "enterprise deal" with Renesas Electronics, a A$45bn market cap Japanese chip and IC manufactuer to be their standard design software platform, signalling a more explicit targeting of the high value enterprise market.

This is significant because the enterprise market is characterised by high-end design solutions, with greater scale and complexity and reliability requirements (think aerospace, large-scale medical imaging systems, self-driving.) This is a market where $ALU's much larger competitors, like Cadence Design Systems (Market Cap $US60bn; Sales $US4bn), are more at home. For $ALU to become the design standard of a large enterprise customer is significant.

It is arguably also necessary. As we appear to see Moore's Law flattening (pending the commercialisation of quantum technology), the design process is becoming more integrated, to optimise the design from the chip right through to the integrated assembly in its end application.

I'm not a microelectronics engineer and I've never used Altium Designer, but it would seem to me unlikely for $ALU to be able to win the Renesas deal without the ability to apply itslelf to these more complex design, simulation and verification challenges.

Aram reinforced this in saying "Of course, we would like to be more competitive against Cadence in the higher end and we have been doing a lot of work that can't be seen but I expect us to do better in the enterprise against Cadence in years to come."

More generally, it was impressive to hear on the call reference to a number of imipressive customer logos including Aram rattling off:

"We closed large multimillion dollar deals with customers such as Tesla, SpaceX, Texas Instruments, Bosch, Acuity and Xylem and many other significant deals with leading brands such as Mercedes, Meta, Amazon, Rivian, Lockheed, Volvo, TE Connectivity, Magna, iRobot, Hitachi, Infineon and Thales. These enterprise accounts and many more provide us with plenty of opportunity to grow our enterprise business in years to come."

Although the PCB design market is also having its slowdown, this is in the context of an industry that is forecast to achieve compound annual growth from 2023 to 2032 of 11-12%. The software market for PCB design is worth >US$4bn globally, and the broader market for design from the chip to more compex systems is materially larger.

I found it very encouraging that $ALU continues to be well positioned to ride this growth not only in its natural mid-market home, but increasingly in the enterprise space. This indicates that we will continue to see double digit growth in "seats" but importantly continuing strong growth in the value per seat.

The value per seat has risen strongly over recent years and in Q&A Aram made clear that this wasn't from price increases as such, but because designers are accessing increasing functionality, which drives revenue. Altium Designer is being made progressively more capable - again, supporting the story of now positioning for the enterprise market.

The next question for which Aram put markers in the sand yesterday, is the extent to which $ALU can get its customers to migrate more of their related workflows (beyond just the IC design) into the $ALU ecosystem,... think procurement and manufacturing. The building out of Octopart is key to that part of the strategy, and Aram gave us the markers to track that progress over the near term when he said:

"We're investing in bolt-on M&A for Octopart and 365, we will expect second half to be the beginning of the upswing and '25 and '26 when we will be hopefully seeing the same effect going from transformation to performance mode, which we've seen with our mid-market and recently with enterprise, and this is the third front I'm expecting for us for this transformational move of having Octopart and 365 connected to not only drive their value up significantly, but also we're going to be getting more volume of traffic."

The "upswing" he is referring to, is arresting the decline of Octopoart, which shot upo during the pandemic, when everyone had to redesign their IC's to get around chip shortages, and where Octopart was being used actively to source scare chips.

I will be interested to see how the analysts consider yesterday's results. But for me, the overall communication was strongly supportive of the thesis.

Disc: Held

#FY23 Results
stale
Added 8 months ago

$ALU have just released their results, with the investor call at 5:00pm.

Their Highlights

fbd7f7669630c23310f3baa07638dd58e2d744.png


My Quick Analysis

Top and bottom lines generally advancing around 20% marks a solid year.

Results vs. Market consensus were:

  • Revenue: US$246m consensus vs. US$263m result
  • NPAT: US$0.49 consensus vs. US$0.504 result


So a minor beat on revenue and a very minor beat on eps.

The strength of the result lies in the outlook. $ALU are holding to their long-standing FY26 $500m revenue goal, but the kicker is that they are now forecasting that this can be achieved with only 75,000 of the 100,000 aspirational seats, due to increasing value of subscription seats AND that they are holding to the aspirational seats target (upside? - need to hear what CEO ARAM says in the presentation.)

In line with this goal, FY24 revenue target is 20%-23% growth, and they are holding to an EBITDA range of 35%-37%.


My Key Takeaway

Overall - a rock steady performer. (Slow-down? What slow-down?)

SP is just under consensus, so depending on what NASDAQ does overnight, could see a modest lift tomorrow.

Time to go on the call.

Disc: Held in RL (3.8%) not on SM