Straws are discrete research notes that relate to a particular aspect of the company. Grouped under #hashtags, they are ranked by votes.
A good Straw offers a clear and concise perspective on the company and its prospects.
Please visit the forums tab for general discussion.
Another on-market purchase by Damien Banks of around $120k.
Director Damien Banks buying ~$120k worth on market. Bullish.
Kitchen sinking it ahead of the new CEO's arrival, but making all the right moves especially cauterising the Tutorfly wound.
Kip McGrath provides FY25 Trading Update (unaudited) and USA announcement
24 June 2025 : Kip McGrath Education Centres Limited (ASX:KME) today provides a trading update (unaudited) for FY25
and announces it is ceasing funding for and subsequently will exit from its USA Businesses.
Kip McGrath’s Executive Chair, Mr Damian Banks, said “Today we are announcing an underlying FY25 trading update as
well as a number of non-recurring charges to be taken during the half. We are also announcing that we will cease
funding and will therefore exit from the USA operations of Tutorfly and closure of our Frisco tutoring centre effective 27
June 2025. The expansion of the Kip McGrath business into the USA has proved to be uneconomic and likely to remain
so even if persevered with by the Company.
The Tutorfly business that was acquired to spearhead the USA expansion has not proved to be a sustainable business
model. Under the weight of operating losses (circa A$1.4m in FY25), the Board has decided against investing further
capital. We are grateful for the support of the students, parents, schools and our staff who have partnered with us.
As a consequence of this decision the USA operations will be reported as a discontinued business and our investment
and deferred tax assets will be either fully impaired or written off. In addition, we will recognise the exit costs as part
of the discontinued business.
The company has recently announced our new CEO, Melinda Smith will commence in the second half of 2025. The
company will be recognising the contractual entitlements, and legal and recruitment costs of the changeover of CEO as
outside of the underlying results.
Finally, the Company having transferred its registered office from Newcastle to Sydney, will recognise the vacated
Newcastle premises as an onerous lease, outside of the underlying results presented.”
The man with his (dad's) name on the door has been shown the door. Seems sudden, if not a long time coming due to questionable capital allocation. Let's see what tomorrow brings, could be a positive refresh long term, but doesn't bode well for immediate future (has there been some poor performance or transgression). Look forward to any insights from the straw people.
Kip’s best half for a while has me thinking the turn-around is on…..why?
Healthy operational cashflow for the half, after leases about 2.6m (about 10% of market cap). Bearing in mind 1st half is usually the weaker in terms of lesson volumes.
Profits masked by high depreciation - but the capex cycle appears to be over, with only 900k of investing cash flows for the half, down on what has typically been well over A$2m per half lately. Great news, as long as it doesn’t mean they are failing to invest in the business. I think its likely just better capital discipline…..
New Chairman has come in and appears to be implementing this discipline
Debt paid down
Return to a small dividend, I think they could have gone higher, if for example in the next half, when they don’t need to pay down debt there’s another 1.3bn that could go into dividends, somewhere between 2-3c per share. It’s possible the low dividend keeps the turn around under the radar for another half
The US is obviously a regret, however they’re making good cash in spite of likely losses there. With the discipline not to throw good money after bad, I only see it as adding to future performance, maybe one or two more halves to go until rock bottom, but in the medium to long term view I think its nearly as bad as its going to be over there - again - assuming ego’s remain in check and disciplined investment only!
They are consolidating into their better centres, and taking better margins per lesson and per centre. As long as there is enough on the table for franchisees - they need to keep them happy - then this is also positive for the turn-around.
AI yet to have an obvious and meaningful impact on their revenue - they are spinning it as a positive in terms of cost reductions (automated lesson summaries etc). Remains a long term threat for sure.
On the balance of probabilities, I can see Kip easily generating enough cash over the next say 3 years to pay average dividends (annually) of 4cps (this is only about 2.0m in dividends - so I think I’m being conservative especially if they avoid another capex cycle!). If we assume a yield of about 5%, then market cap could sit around 40m, which is near enough 50% upside on today’s price, with a ~8 or 9% dividend on buy price.
Would love to hear others opinions - am I getting giddy?
I have been doing a bit of work on KME, just because they have started reporting a bunch of metrics they previously did not. While I think reporting contribution margin is important, there's two issues: Firstly, KME is a far more complex business than it was pre-covid when it was just a high margin franchisor and secondly they have an issue with expense escalation. I think the new metrics are probably designed to try and give a better understanding of thinking about the business, although I think management still does quite a poor job of explaining what's going on under the hood.
So my way of thinking about KME is to push some of the opex into the COGS line and then get a "gross profit" that is franchise revenue + the GP of the corporate centres and TF (there are some assumption here around what % KME keeps). It at least gives me some basis to compare to 2019. As you can see the issue is that while revenue has grown strongly, the change in the nature of that incremental revenue – high margin franchise to low margin student lessons – has not been able to support the opex cost escalation. Granted, part of that is they have had to invest through front ended expenses in the p&l. But I think most investors (and the SP) would agree the main issue here has been quite undisciplined expense control.
So my interest here is that with a bit of cost discipline, like from say a new chairman, there is potentially a lot of latent operating leverage that could flex over the next 12-18 months. The AGM trading update was positive but more interesting to me was the outlook of focussing on ROC, expectations of reducing capex spend and potentially some margin expansion.
I'm still not convinced about TF, it seems like a massive distraction for a business that brings in ~$500k or so, but maybe they take a view that it is part of the expansion into the US. The franchise business seems to have a lot of potential, it is low capex and high ROIC given they already have a presence in AU/UK, I would see it as a positive if they decided to try and juice that a bit more rather than try and crack the US. But down here, I think the odds are in my favour and they really only have to not do stupid things and the SP should do quite well. The test will be watching what happens to the gross profit, opex cost jaws.
KME provided an update for the first 4 months of trading of 1H FY25 - Looks Good


There were certain red flags as well
I could count the number of AI mentions. I hope Storm doesn't invest in some crazy AI idea now.
The migration of Silver Franchises to Gold Franchises is accelerating. Very soon, all Silvers will go, and then hopefully, KME can increase gold franchises or keep the existing ones and grow them.

Good to see the new chairman Damian Banks buying a few more, 139k shares ($60k), over the 3rd-5th September....and reporting it immediately (attn Storm :) )
Look like he essentially did all the buying over those 3 days, so hard to pick on him for not buying more. you couldn't call this a hot stock, but certainly a positive endorsement of value still to be had in the mid 40c range!
I have put together my thoughts in the article below:
https://arichlife.com.au/kip-mcgrath-education-centres-asx-kme-fy-2024-show-stronger-second-half/
Kip McGrath reported 1st half 2024 result today.
Main issue as i see it is ongoing investment in the business. It increased revenue by $2.5m but increased employee expense by $2.6m.

This increase in employee expense increase probably coming from corporate centers ( management flagged recent corporate center acquisitions incurred additional cost of $250,000.
It seems like it lost the Abu Dhabi schools' contract after AGM i.e lost $510,000 profit and it is the probably the reason why it subtly downgraded the full year outlook
From "Expect FY24 full year NPAT to exceed prior year" at the time of AGM in November to now " FY24 full-year profit is expected to align with the prior year result"
The market has lost patience and I am not sure how long current shareholders can keep faith in management.
Bag holder.
Here is an interesting chart.

KME is increasing its Revenue/Share but in the last 5 years, it has also invested heavily in corporate rollout / online shift / US expansion. Hence, increased Revenue/Share hasn't been contributing to an increase in earnings/share in the last 5 years. Hopefully, We are at the end of this investment cycle.
This morning KME published the AGM presentation as a generic announcement.
It did have Q1 FY24 updates and FY24 guidance - I am not sure why it wasn't a price-sensitive announcement.
There was no option to join AGM online so no idea what was discussed.
It seems like the company is increasing revenue and growing but also increasing investment at the same pace - It comes down to, do you have trust in the Management that the investment it is doing is effective or burning cash.
Don't think issue is of alignment - as Storm has significant personal wealth tied to the business...so questions just come down to his skill and ego etc. -- Your guess is as good as mine -- Revenue is growing so hopefully at some stage he will stop investment and cash will flow... or AI will eat its business ??
I like the progress KME is making so will keep on holding..
Kip McGrath released its FY23 report and the following are the graphs,
Revenue:

Customer Receipts:

Expense:

Operating Cash

No. of Shares

Geographic info ( USA is dragging the performance)

Revenue breakdown

Franchise fees are increasing because the Silver franchise is getting converted to Gold. Overall Student lessons are bringing higher revenue. ( at the end of the day that's the most important matric to see )
Some encouraging traction for Tutorfly

Corporate Center

Yes, Tutorfly is a drag but its a relatively small part of the business. The Franchise Network and Corporate Center are going in right direction. Hopefully based on the comments from the Annual Report, Tutorfly will come good in FY24. Overall happy with the result.

Monthly Newsletter_July_2023_Digital_230712_093419.pdf
Page 13 : Australasian Emerging Companies Fund comments

FY26 Revenue = 36m
FY26 NPAT = 4m
PE Ratio = 20
Market Cap = 80m
Shares on issue at FY26 = 61m
Share Price (FY26) = $1.32 discount it to FY24 $1.07
KME updated the market this morning with following are lower range of updates
Rev : 26.9m
EBITDA : 6.4m
NPAT : 1.7m
Now at Share price of 0.42 --KME's market cap is ~24m
That means currently it sits on PE of ~14
If you expect KME to grow and increase its market share from investment in the last 3 years, then it looks pretty cheap at this price.
If you expect KME services will be redundant through AI innovation then probably its value is zero. ( as everyone will use AI tutor and no one wants to use KME service)
My opinion is that AI innovation will add value to existing tutoring services as opposed to replacing it and as it stands today KME's online competitors like BYJU or CLUEY are not sure they would be around 2 years from now.
Nice article explaining current state.
https://www.edweek.org/technology/what-chatgpt-could-mean-for-tutoring/2023/05
Based on the reading it seems to me that tutors work will be assisted by AI. Tutor won't be replaced by AI completely but it will reduce lot of admin work for tutors and allow them to focus on main goal i.e students progress. and my thinking is that is good for KME as it will increase efficiency and ideally reduce operating expenses.
Now not every company will be able to create their own AI powered system so i expect some technology company bringing platform to provide that service to tutoring centers. It would be interesting to see how it pans out.
Tutorfly's performance was a major drag on Kip McGrath's performance in 1H FY23. with promising words about 2nd half in report.

Seems like the new revenue stream: drop-in tutoring" is working (https://www.dropintutor.com/)
https://gmcs.org/2023/01/free-on-line-tutoring/


KME Reported its FY23 report and the share price has gone downhill ( i.e no change after the result as it was going downhill before the result as well)
It seems that the market didn't like that NPAT has gone 29% down or it didn't like that revenue only increased by 9.2%.
Yes, the result wasn't great but to my eyes, It wasn't bad at all compared to what I was expecting or fearing that inflation will seriously hamper its tuition numbers.
Some of the bright spots in the results for me


So in nutshell, Yes company didn't had a great half but I think it has been punished way more than it should ( in my opinion - anyway) probably illiquid nature has to do with it. Hopefully, the same illiquidity will at some point act in shareholder's favor - I shall wait for such time.
Turning into a bit of a serial disappointer unfortunately.
The market saw this kind of tepid result coming months ago, with the price at 52-week lows well before the report came out.
Safe to safe this half did not meet expectations. It looks like Tutorfly is losing quite a bit as they supposedly invest for growth. I imagine this will not be looked on favourably by the market - at least KME has already fallen a lot. Not sure whether there will be something more positive in the investment presentation yet to be released but there has been a lot of investment and not much to show for it.
Currently a lot is resting on the second half - Storm and KME would be testing a lot of people's patience.
Looks to be a fair amount of consistent volume (compared to history - still illiquid) going through KME over the last few weeks. Wonder who is buying and who is selling.

Research report from CZZ updated - 221121_KME.pdf (mcusercontent.com)
BUY (TP=$1.85) KME for multiple upsides to our forecasts and US optionality Trading on 12x FY23 P/E and forecast to grow NPAT/NPATA at a 30/25% CAGR b/w FY23–27, we consider KME to be significantly undervalued. Our Target Price of $1.85 is based on a DCF (10% CoE and 3% TVGR) and reflects conservative corporate centre unit economics, SSSG, and silver to gold conversions.
As KME did their AGM only face-to-face and not provided online options ( I don't really know what was said in AGM)
I actually requested if they can provide an online AGM for someone like myself who is not Sydney based to attend - the response that came back was along the line of " KME is a small company and the cost for the hybrid meeting are prohibitive"
Well, I like the cost-conscious view but setting up a hybrid meeting isn't that difficult nowadays - in my opinion, but anyway...
There were some mixed comments on the presentation
Seems like the franchise is probably suffering in an unfavorable macro environment. but KME will sustain reasonable growth because of Tutorfly, the corporate center, middle east
Overall, I am not too concerned about it.

Had to tweak the cost base in my KME model, the business has frontloaded more employee costs than I expected to service the growth of the corporate centres expected to come through. There is some concern that 2H corporate revenue was flat on 1H but the run-rate exiting FY22 is strong and momentum suggests strong growth into FY23.
On rough numbers KME should do around $5m NPAT, 20x is $1.80. Based on commentary there is probably upside to these numbers, but best to be conservative after I got a little ahead of myself last time...
Nice to see Tutorfly already profitable.

With all the pieces falling into place FY23 looks like the year for KME.
Simple valuation of about A$90m based on 53m shares on issue.
Summary
I think there is limited downside risk in KME at current prices aside from any irrational market sentiment against which the company is pretty well protected. Backed up by recent director, KMP purchases.
Growth potential in revenue and margins with US expansion and transition to online. This could deliver a good return in terms of share price.
What I like
Owners name on the door, family run business. Good insider ownership in a long standing business. To me this minimizes risk around corporate governance and practices.
Growth plans in the US via tutorfly as foot in the door. Growth globally by purchasing back franchises. I think franchising is becoming less relevant this century due to vastly improved communications and online meaning you can run multiple businesses all over the world from one place more easily.
Directors and KMP recently buying on market ~$1/share
What I don't like
Tutoring should be a competitive industry. Not ever likely to create super high margins. While KME have brand name and some IP I have capped EBITDA margins at 30%. ie. not expecting a 10 bagger.
Bit harsh to put this under don't like.......balance sheet is ok but not super strong (19m net equity, 21m of intangibles). No real borrowings, 8m in cash at HY22 but this is mostly offset by final payments for tutorfly and owings to franchisees. I normally like to see more buffer and an acquisition or black swan type event could see them raising capital. Some people might just consider this a fit or lean balance sheet.
Model Assumptions (~A$90m value)
Simple DCF model, only for indication of value.
Revenue growth of 20% initially, reducing this decade and a terminal revenue of A$72m in 2030. This represents a risked view for me and has to be organic.
EBITDA margins growing from 20% upto 30% - fairly conservative
NPAT margins ending at about 15% - generous, I should form a stronger view on capital requirements, R&D and therefore depreciation.
Discount rate 10% - I know this is standard but I would say conservative, but reflects higher inflation and interest rates in the next 0-5 years.
No further dilution of share count - this is generous.
Note. Instead of DCF, in terms of a price target, I'd go with about 100m mkt cap, ~$1.90 per share, in the next couple of years based on $5m NPAT and 20x PE (moderate growth company in interest rate world of ~4%).
KME has provided guidance so the following is what I am expecting

Things I want to know in FY22 reports
Valuation $1.27
Base Case Assumption at this year AGM Revenue Tracking 21% than previous year (FY22 Revenue ~$23.1M) I worked on achieving Revenue of $28.1M in FY26. (Seems others maybe forecasting higher amounts?, am I Missing something). Achieving EPS in FY26 of $0.082 apply PE 25 discount back I get $1.27.
One of the online learning platforms Cluey released its half-yearly result today.
Revenue has increased significantly from the previous period but I am not sure if the model is going to survive longer.
The way I read it, They had to spend 4.5m in marketing to get 15.7m revenue.
15.7m revenue required 7.2m cost to generate 8.5m gross profit
To increase gross profit, they increased their marketing 15 times, Admin roughly 10 times, and employee expense 10 times.
Most of the employee expense is also the cost of sales for this business as without tutors there is no classes. [ so in fact gross margin would be very less if you factor that also in]









Article on the tailwinds. Not sure of the applicability for Australian market but likely to be relevant.
https://www.economist.com/international/the-pandemic-will-spur-the-worldwide-growth-of-private-tutoring/21805216
KME reported a 221% increase in online lessons to 654000 (over 295000 in FY2020). That averages out at 54500 month / 12576 week. This is substantially more than the last update stated (560000 year / 46666 month / 10769 week).
It looks like there has been another large increase in online lessons. Perhaps the increase is linked to a return to lockdowns. Maybe a general realisation that online lessons are a new normal, and a return to pre-covid norms is less likely.
Face to face lessons consistant at 1440000 year.
Held IRL
The online lessons part of the business looks to have prompted the recent share price spike. The half year report stated, “KME delivered 290,000 online lessons for the half, an increase of 800% with gross revenue at the student level of $16.1M, compared to $1.7M in the previous half year”.
KME reported the following relating to online lessons...
On 23/9/2020, KME announced 46000 online lessons per month vs 3200 for the same period last year). This is when the share price started to spike. By my calculations: 46000*12 = 552,000 lessons per year AND 552000/52 = 10,615 weekly).
This was confirmed on 17/11/2020 as 11,000 average weekly online lessons (since March 2020 lockdown), compared to CY 2019 with 450 average weekly online lessons. My calculations: 11000*52 = 572000 per year AND 572000/12 = 47,666 per month).
The half yearly report and accounts, on 23/2/2020, showed 290,000 online lessons for the half. My calculations: (290,000*2)/12 = 48333 per month AND (290,000*2)/52 = 11153 weekly.
The investor update on 1/3/2020 shows 280,000 online lessons for the half. My calculations: 280000*2 = 560,000 per year AND 560,000/12 = 46666 per month AND 10769 weekly.
I feel like I’m back at school trying to complete a maths test.
Announcements titled “company update” and “letter to shareholders” were not a general update on the company, or a general letter to shareholders, but related to center acquisitions.
KME's financial reporting over the above period appears randomly labeled, fragmented, and inconsistent. I really hope the lessons they provide to students are easier to follow than their financial reporting.
It looks like the increase in online lessons is being maintained but after the first large jump (reported in september), there has been little further acceleration over 6 months. In fact the most recent numbers indicate a small decline (unless they used the wrong number in the report - or are not entirely sure of the exact number). Perhaps there is a small decline (in online lessons) due to some students preferring face to face while not in lockdown.
I own a small holding - in real life.
Hi Alpha18, not sure how to directly respond to your straw. I think the slide recently is mainly due to the lockdown as the centre's will be shut again (they can do online of course) but there will be some lost revenue. It's illiquid so doesn't take much in the way of selling to push the price down.
Just been looking into KME and noticed it's down about a third from its peak. I looked at the recent price sensitive announcements and couldn't find there. Does anyone know the reason for the slide? I know it's illiquid stock, is it just the case of a fund manager selling down heavily that has moved the market or something else I'm missing?
Disc: Not held, buy order in on Strawman portfolio
KME is a leading provider of tutoring services to K-12 students, primarily in Maths and English. The business was founded by Kip McGrath in 1976 and has expanded from one tutoring centre in Maitland to 524 centres in 11 countries largely through a franchise business model. It is currently managed by Kip’s son Storm, with the father and son duo still owning ~30% of the business between them.
The core business model is charging franchisees a percentage of revenue which is collected per student, per lesson. KME offers two levels of franchise fees, Silver and Gold. Silver franchisees pay 10% of their revenue and receive access to the KME brand, learning materials and basic administration support. Gold franchisees pay 20% of their revenue and in return outsource more back office functions to KME such as accounting, human resources and marketing which frees time to focus on students and on average Gold franchisees generate more lessons and revenue than Silver franchisees.
In a few paragraphs, I expect KME can sharply grow lessons over the next few years with pent up demand as parents look to ensure their children have not fallen behind in their learning with the disruptions from Covid.
As online lessons maintain their penetration between 20-40%, more franchisees shift to Gold status as they become more confident in the future.
A conservative and aligned management team continue to make strategic purchases of franchisee centres and grow the corporate network over time, which also allows for further penetration of online lessons into new regions previously not serviced with more salaried tutors available.
Finally, margins should grow strongly on increased revenue from higher margin sources and general scale over fixed corporate costs. With large investment in Kip Online brought forward by Covid and an expanded executive team now in place, this should happen quickly.