Overall it was a solid update from Smart Parking last week with strong topline growth and decent cash generation being partly offset by unfavourable FX movements and increased overheads.
The key driver of the results is, as always, sites under management and on this measure they continue to deliver. The Group held 984 sites at the reporting date, which was up from 839 sites six months prior. They were keen to highlight that they've since exceeded 1000 sites, although you could argue QLD sites should be backed out of that number. Although the 1000 site target has been replaced by a 1500 site by June 2025 target, longer term holders will remember that 1000 sites by June 2023 was an earlier target and it deserves mention that they have beaten this. On the earnings call they reaffirmed the 1500 site target and I asked them to clarify if that meant ex-QLD, which they confirmed was the case.
Revenue was up 18% vs pcp, but up 25% from a constant currency perspective. UK growth is impressive given its relative maturity but the real driver is APAC, half of which we now know is - at best - on pause. Germany doesn't yet make a material contribution and will be on watch going forwards to ensure it does do so.
At the same time operating expenses appear to have jumped significantly and permanently. They strike me as a little sensitive about the investment in Germany relative to the return they're getting and I'm not fully on board with their practice of backing out Germany's costs from Adjusted EBITDA. However, it's all fairly transparent so you can rework it as you see fit. Overall a reasonable level of explanation was given to the cost uplift but going forwards I'd like to see that increasing at a lower rate. I have asked for clarification about what the disclosed monthly exit opex rate of $1.7m includes as it's not entirely clear, but that equates to a six month number of $10.2m - not too much higher than the disclosed half yearly opex cost, suggesting that opex growth may have slowed.
Free cash flow was strong but again it should be noted they are excluding Germany's costs from their definition of this. It's all very transparent though so choose your own adventure on what you do there. It also doesn't include Growth Capex (almost all of their capex isn't ongoing). I'm ok with that, others won't be. The balance sheet continues to look good and they have flagged a continuation of their share buyback (which they announced to the market they had started acting on a few days later). They've also started talking about dividends. I assume they will be unfranked given their overseas operations so I don't much see the point of that unless they've completely run out of ideas, but it is another indication that they do seem to act in alignment with shareholders.
Kudos for them holding an investor briefing. One of the themes I felt this reporting season has delivered is somewhat less of those and credit goes out to management who front up when the news isn't necessarily all good. Based on the attendees they do seem to be getting a little more insto coverage, although some of the questions seem to suggest the analysts hadn't had alot of exposure to the business yet.
In summary
The good:
- Site growth is the key driver and is tracking nicely. I haven't even mentioned the Technology segment of the business here as it's become an increasingly immaterial part of the business.
- As expected Revenue growth is following sites under management. Previously the CFO has said they could deliver $70-75m at the topline with 1500 sites. My model also supports this, albeit at the bottom end of that range. At that kind of number and given their propensity to gush cash, they'll be hard for the market to miss.
The not so good:
- Germany isn't yet shooting the lights out but it's early days. @Wini highlighted an Aldi win they'd had in this market some time back and they disclosed they now manage two Aldi stores, in deals signed off at the northern Germany region head office. According to Wikipedia Aldi Nord is the bigger of the two Aldi regions and has 2298 stores.
- I think the market was a bit disappointed to see the Cost base jump as it did. It's fair to say I was a bit too and this is on watch going forwards.
The ugly
- I think the prudent thing to assume is Queensland is not coming back and be pleasantly surprised if it does. I asked management on the investor call what learnings they took from this and someone asked something similar on the Strawman call. Both times they highlighted the lack of a Code of Practice in Queensland that does exist in other markets they operate in and that this would prevent a recurrence. I think the fact they were blindsided like they were suggests they and the peak body didn't do nearly enough work with the government to advocate/educate/put a code in place etc. and being proactive should be a key learning.
Overall I'm still happy to hold. I took a little profit at higher levels but it's still a larger holding and I think closer to a buy than a sell given it's pulled back a bit and should be supported by the share buyback if that continues.