Belated update post qtr report, strawman preso and their preso yesterday at the aussie micro conference.
Qtr report - face value 1Q25 looks weak but driven by one-offs, timing and seasonally weak. Does tell one that the inflection is going to be fully reflected in 2H. Ideally one would want to see 2Q25 be close to or above even.
From the recent presos, clear that the success of the inflection can be lucrative as it potentially places the company on a single digit multiple. The Straw and OZ Micros presos had additional "colour" on FY25 with guides of revenue +10% and total costs -10%.
FY24 gross revenue and costs were $8.6m and $10.0m respectively. Based on the guides, they would be $9.4m and $9.0m respectively, which implies a profit of +$0.5m. Given a fully expensed biz model with no D&A, I interpret this is effectively EBITDA/EBIT. It also implies a number higher than the very specific EBITDA of $301k in the sharewise preso so maybe I have the estimated grant or another figure slightly off to get a higher output. I do note that the R&D grant would be the difference between flat and the guided positive profit figure ultimately. But either way, the jaws are opening up and the business is on a trajectory of inflecting.
The current EV is $8.3m and using the above maths, implies an EBITDA/EBIT multiple of ~18x so not cheap at face value atm especially with 1Q25 report giving some concerns.
2H25 will be important as it will show the underlying profitability and an exit run-rate to work with as well a step up of profitability into FY26 could be. As in my prior straws, my graphs show what that run-rate and inflection into FY26 could look like on the current trajectory but to reiterate, there is reasonable scope that EBITDA/EBIT could be $1m+ (ex-grant) implying a multiple of ~8x. To get this in FY26, revenue has to grow 10% again whilst costs are flat as any opex increases are offset by another ~200k+ in reduced R&D spend as flagged in a prior preso.
Looking forward, 2Q25/1H25 results will be a big derisking catalyst for the inflection narrative in GLH as it will confirm (or not).
(Edits for spelling and incorrect EV figure, $8.3m not $7.4m)