Top member reports
Company Report
Last edited 2 months ago
PerformanceCommunity EngagementCommunity Endorsement
ranked
#184
Performance (38m)
9.5% pa
Followed by
14
Straws
Sort by:
Recent
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
## Lithium Market Overview
Added 2 months ago

An Overview of the Lithium Market - Why Prices Needed to Fall

Author(s): Daniel Ortisi

Date: 8 February 2024

An Overview of the Lithium Market – Why Prices Needed to Fall

Much has been said about the rapid rise and fall of lithium. It was the hottest sector on the Aussie market from 2020 to the peak in November 2022, driven by an incredible 600% increase in lithium prices. We saw developers such as Liontown Resources (#LTR) go from a penny dreadful 10c stock to one of the largest takeover stories for a pre-production mining company in years, at an eye-watering $6.6 billion valuation (which was torn apart by Gina Rinehart). The country's largest hard rock lithium mine, Greenbushes, made (almost) the same profit as Commonwealth Bank (#CBA) in FY23 at over $10 billion. One operating asset making more money than a nearly $200 billion behemoth bank is truly incredible.

The Cyclicality of Commodities

But as quickly as commodity prices rise in times of mania, they fall in times of desperation. The response by mining companies was to increase output as quickly as possible to take advantage of mania prices, no matter the cost. Analysts at Wood Mackenzie suggest that the supply grew 45% in 2023, putting the market into surplus. It gets bleaker once you look at the supply forecasts produced by the investment banks. Goldman Sachs believes the lithium market will be in surplus until 2030. If true, we cannot expect lithium prices to rise above current levels. However, we should consider that mining and mineral extraction is a tough business and relies on variable factors such as:

  • The ability to obtain project finance (take a look at Liontown’s recent updates)
  • Government and ministerial permitting, approvals and regulations (~5 years in Aus, ~10 in Canada)
  • Ability to mobilise large machinery and equipment (constrained by availability and cost)
  • Sufficiently trained workforce; and
  • Infrastructure is needed to transport material from the mine site to the end customer (spodumene is a bulk material).

In my view, it would be almost impossible to generate the level of anticipated supply growth as the forecasts suggest over the next 5 years, particularly in geographic locations that may lack the required level of infrastructure (Africa, South America) or lack geologically gifted orebodies (China lepidolite). Therefore, if demand continues to rise and prices do not appreciate meaningfully, the industry will not experience anywhere near the anticipated supply growth. Hence, the cure for high prices has been high prices, and the cure for low prices in time will be low prices. This may spark a commodity price rally sometime within the next 12 months, so long as the demand for lithium ion batteries continues to grow.

The risk to this thesis is that:

  • The supply of lithium remains robust and ahead of demand.
  • Demand for electric vehicles slows and remains in line with lower supply estimates or
  • The lithium-ion battery chemistry is displaced by new technologies such as sodium. It is a genuine possibility and something to follow closely.

 

Source: JPMorgan estimates

Where Are the Opportunities

Higher-cost producers and small-scale operators are being forced to turn off operations. In my view, these represent the most significant risk of financial deterioration and should not be considered investment grade (#SYA, #CXO).

Lithium explorers and developers will struggle to raise finance at reasonable terms and hence may suffer dilutive capital raising or be forced to sell their projects to larger companies. Betting on a buyout is a highly speculative method of stock picking and not a part of our methodology at Stock Doctor.

Finally, the large producers with sufficient balance sheets and excellent assets who continue to make profits will be the best placed to take advantage of a weak market (consolidation, growth, minimal dilution).

Stock Picks

My top pick has been Pilbara Minerals (#PLS), who have a warchest of $2.1 billion in cash, a mine life in excess of 30 years and 100% project ownership to drive their own outcomes. Its valuation has been more resilient than its peers, but it should trade at a premium given its history of operating performance.

Secondly, Mineral Resources offers investors a diversified company underpinned by one of the highest-quality mining services businesses on the ASX. Its operations may have higher costs and come with lower project ownership. Still, the market should have faith in a management team that is highly aligned with shareholders and has a history of excellent dealmaking and flexibility.

Arcadium Lithium (#LTM) exposes investors to the lowest-cost form of lithium extraction in brine operations. The merger, at this point, remains a black box. Still, the company has an asset portfolio that can support a 200% increase in output over the medium term, which means the stock will likely have the highest leverage to recover lithium prices.

Finally, IGO Limited (#IGO) has had a terrible news flow in the past 6 months. Its 25% interest in Greenbushes is the jewel in its crown, but its minority ownership means the business may not have its interests aligned with its larger partners. Tianqi and Albemarle are reducing their spodumene offtakes and forcing the asset to stockpile ore likely until a recovery in market conditions. It is very unusual for a world-class asset to act like a marginal cost producer, which has been to IGO's detriment. At this point, long-term investors should be willing to be patient as the new CEO clears the decks and market expectations are revised. The quality and value of Greenbushes is worth a pretty penny, and it is the sole reason we retain its Star Stock status at this point.

#Broker View
Added 3 months ago

The core to the investment thesis for MIN is the rapid growth occurring across its iron ore and lithium mines, which result in significantly higher mining services volumes. Unlike traditional mining companies, MIN benefits from having an integrated mining services company which scales with volume growth – and hence has less reliance on commodity prices to earnings. Given iron ore price strength in the near term, I view MIN as one of the highest quality growth companies to play commodity (whereas BHP, RIO and FMG have miniscule growth) while maintaining diversification.

The market does not understand MIN's business model well in our view, in particular how MIN continues to recycle capital from asset ownership to volume expansion (i.e, build, sell down, operate)– chasing the highest return profile possible and reducing reliance on commodity prices.

Longer term, MIN has ambitions to expand into the energy market with the discovery of the Lockyer Gas project in Western Australia. Whilst awaiting a formal investment decision, some analysts suggest the project is capable of delivering over $400m in annual earnings.

#Broker View
Added 3 months ago

Publish Date: 25 Jan 24

Research Analyst: Daniel Ortisi

Diversified miner and services company Mineral Resources (MIN) provided a 2Q24 update. Overall, production volumes and shipments look slightly ahead of expectations however this is offset by lower realised pricing for lithium concentrate. No changes were made to FY24 production or cost guidance.

Importantly, management commented that its lithium operations remain profitable (before growth investments) despite the low pricing. We are seeing evidence of lower costs and higher throughputs at Mt Marion and Wodgina which is a major factor in our investment thesis.

Analyst View:

The thesis for MIN remains intact and we are confident in its long term growth prospects. Short term volatility is anticipated to continue given its large debt profile (due to growth expenditure) and low lithium prices.

Quarterly Summary:

  • Mining services volumes 72mt, up 9% QoQ
  • Iron ore shipments 4.8mwt, up 23% QoQ
  • Mt Marion SC6 shipped 60kt (50%), up 54% QoQ
  • Wodgina SC6 shipped 63kt, up 162% QoQ
  • Wodgina chemicals sold 6.4kt, up 50% QoQ