Company Report
Last edited 3 months ago
PerformanceCommunity EngagementCommunity Endorsement
ranked
#33
Performance (40m)
-3.0% pa
Followed by
43
Price History

Premium Content

Last edited 3 months ago
Valuation

Premium Content

Notes

Premium Content

Straws
Sort by:
Recent
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
#FY24 Results
Added 3 months ago

Objective Corporation released their FY24 results this morning. From their presentation:

e8ae36ecbac5e827d34a2faffcd910bac6af20.png

Overall a solid result headlined by a very strong cash flow compared to FY23. On my numbers FCF came in around $37.5m compared to $20m in FY23.

Remember that OCL changed their accounting policy to only expense 50% of R&D in the P&L which makes the comparison of NPAT between the 2 periods a bit misleading. However, on a like for like basis, I have NPAT using the old method of accounting of around $27.2m which is still 29% higher than FY23 ($21.1m).

In his letter to shareholders, CEO Tony Walls indicated that although they did not quite reach their targets of 15% growth in ARR, they were also more efficient in deployment of their services which in term lead to a decrease in costs. They attributed this miss to a softening in economic conditions in NZ. They do think that going forward, a 15% growth in ARR is the target.

Disc: Held IRL and on Strawman.

#1H FY 24 Results
stale
Added 9 months ago

Objective Corp reported last week. From their presentation:

f858d8d82e66233d8c37b743e521f4e04f55d0.png

Remember that OCL changed accounting policies in terms of expensing R&D. Changing from expensing 100% to 50%.

In 1H FY24, total R&D spend for $13.557m with $7.2m being expensed through the P&L. On a comparative basis, NPBT would have been around $13.3m compared to $10.7m in 1H FY23 had the R&D expense been expensed in the period. NPAT would be around flat only due to an increased tax expense in the current period.

Personally I thought this result was pretty good although I think it will be better to wait until the full year results for a better comparison given the seasonality of OCL's customers (public sector customers usually pay during the 2H).

In the shareholder letter from CEO Tony Walls, the outlook provided was strong with management targeting ARR growth of 15%. They also provided an update in regards to potential acquisitions with them having done some due diligence on a few potential candidates but ultimately deciding to focus on building the business organically.

Disc: Held IRL and on Strawman.


#1H FY22 Results
stale
Added 3 years ago

Forgot to do a Straw for the results which came out a few weeks ago and saw no one else had done one either.

Another solid HY result for OCL. Results from their presentation below:

d4c3256d82bef02bf94a7e3f34c8e762a89242.png

NPAT came in slightly above what they guided for in January but this was excluding $1.4m which they had to pay as part of a NZCC Settlement so reported NPAT was around 8.6m which is only a 20% increase compared to PCP.

I am willing to maintain my valuation from January of $12.30 as I believe this is a high quality company that is still growing its top and bottom line at good rates however the current price is still a bit rich for me so am waiting patiently for a good entry point.

Disc: Not held