The recording on the interview with Tom Spurling is now up (see members page), and you can access the transcript here: Nova Eye Transcript.pdf
I guess my initial takeaway is that this is a fairly clean thesis as far as med-tech goes. Nova Eye is post-commercialization with strong sales and revenue traction, albeit off a very small base, in its key US market. They have achieved a 40% CAGR over the last six halves while holding only a tiny percentage of the addressable market, which is around 3.5%. Tom noted they would be doing $60 million in revenue at 7% market share, a level he thinks they can capture in the medium term. There are also significant opportunities in other geographies, such as China where they have received clearance recently.
With the business apparently still on track for EBITDA breakeven this current half and no major CAPEX or cost increases evident, we should see strong growth in profits in the coming periods as 70% gross margins drop pretty much straight to the bottom line.
It is also nice that this is a relatively low-cost, quick turnaround surgical procedure without a huge price tag for the patient. There are plenty of potential patients given the high prevalence of glaucoma.
That said, the cash balance does not give them a lot of wiggle room, representing about seven to eight months of runway at the last half-year run rate. However, a working capital facility and recently reaffirmed guidance probably mean they will not need to raise cash. Tom gave the impression that profitability and cash flows were a major focus, even if that meant pursuing slightly slower growth than they could otherwise achieve.
Lastly, as has been noted by others, including Tom, the value of an established sales team that's generating good momentum and with a growing network of references is worth noting.
I have scheduled a call for us to talk through this business on Wednesday the 18th of February at 6pm AEDT. Keep an eye on your inbox or just check out the Meetings page. I am really keen to hear what others think, especially those who can emphasise some of the risks.