Top member reports
No meetings
Consensus community valuation
XXXXXX
Average Intrinsic Value
XXXXXX
Overvalued by
The consensus valuation is for members only and has been removed from this chart. Click for membership options.
Contributing Members
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
Valuation of $4.85
Added 2 months ago

Skip to the bottom for the latest update.

Early 2019: My original $1.80 price target has already been exceeded. My next valuation of $2.15 - which was based on their various new contract announcements - that we have already seen, and assuming there is more to come, and that the FAL project issues don't hurt NRW very much - has now ALSO been exceeded. Based on their 1HFY19 report + contracts already awarded, I'm lifting my target price to $2.77 now. I am factoring in some new contracts - which would be normal conversion of their tender pipeline into WIH. Just a few sub-$100m contracts over the next 6 months. Any larger $100m+ contracts will likely see another upward revision of this price target.

17-Apr-19: Bugger - they've just passed my new revised, revised, target price. SLOW DOWN NWH! This time, it was on the news that they're entering the ASX200 on May 3rd (replacing TME). I sold some at $2.82 and then some more at higher levels.

17-Nov-19: The new contract announcements for NRW (ASX:NWH) have slowed down somewhat, however they are very busy with a heap of existing contracts, and their FY19 full year report in August was solid, with no surprises. No reason to change my valuation, so I'm leaving it at $2.77.

28-Nov-2019: The BGC Acquisition is another very positive one for NRW IMHO, and is highly EPS-accretive, so I'm raising my valuation accordingly - initially to $2.97, but probably higher still once we get some more news, such as earnings guidance upgrades and/or further new contract announcements.

19-Mar-2020: OK, things have changed somewhat. NWH is down to $1.14 today. Bugger! Or is that a bad thing? Looking at what NWH do, which is contract mining and construction, and what their clients do - many of them are actually gold miners - and that NWH are involved in a number of infrastructure projects for various Australian state Governments now as well, and we should see some fixed-asset infrastructure spending (think: transport infrastructure, particularly train tracks and roads in NWH's case) as part of the stimulus needed to get the economy moving again (once the worst of the medical crisis has passed), and that only a small number of NWH's clients are likely to be seriously challenged by this situation (in terms of whether they can continue on as a going concern or not I mean), NWH has clearly been oversold. They were trading at over $3 in Feb ($3.18 on Feb 21), and they're now down to $1.14. They raised capital recently at $2.85 and that raising was 200% over-subscribed. And now they're $1.14. This is where we can see the effect of fund redemptions. ETFs and other index tracking funds have to sell stock as people cash out, and they have to sell those stocks indiscriminately. It presents some great opportunities, and this is clearly one of those. NWH aren't going broke. No chance. When this situation normalises, even if it takes a year or two, NWH (NRW Holdings) are going to be trading a lot higher than $1.14.

16-Sep-2020: Update: NRW (NWH) are actually a bigger and better company now than they were when they were trading between $2.70 and $3 in April and May last year. They're also the same company that they were when they were trading above $3 in January and February this year. COVID-19 hasn't hurt them. They are doing very well. I am a happy shareholder. $2.97 still looks like a good PT to me. Should get there within 12 months, but I'll give them 18 for a margin of safety.

One thing which people perhaps don't realise is that they do a lot of infrastructure construction work OUTSIDE of the mining and energy sectors, particularly rail line construction, but also roads. If the massive infrastructure stimulus that has been tipped to be in the forthcoming federal budget is indeed there, NWH could well be one of the many beneficiaries of that government spending on infrastructure. Particularly if it involves new rail. Downer EDI is another obvious winner in that scenario, and I also hold DOW. I've been waiting for years for a federal Treasurer and/or an Australian Prime Minister to get serious on big new infrastructure project spending across Australia, and COVID-19 might be the excuse they need to get it across the line this time... hopefully!

18-Mar-2021: Update: Still good. $2.97 is fine. Been above that in Jan and early Feb, and will be back up there again. Might take a little bit of good news to push them past $3 however. Very high quality management team in my opinion. I hold NWH in two of my RL portfolios as well as on my Strawman.com scorecard.

16-Sep-2021: Update: $2.97 is still OK. They had a ripper FY report (in August) - and rose +17.42% on the day (from $1.665 to $1.955) but they've given some of that back, closing at $1.815 today. My $2.97 PT is around +64% higher than where NWH are today, but they were trading at over $3/share in that December-to-early-Feb period (just prior to my last update), and I would argue that they are actually a better company today than they were then, and are worth at least that much. Their prospects certainly have not diminished. It's simply a sentiment thing, and the mining services sector has very poor sentiment around it currently. That will change. $2.97 within 12 months, so by mid-September 2022. I hold this one in two RL portfolios as well as in my SM portfolio.

12-Nov-2022: Update: $2.97 is still OK, and they have been moving up towards it recently. I've been trimming my NWH positions recently too, but I still retain significant exposure to them in my main real life portfolios.

155deacd2d4d550f407216146d0cf8b7c815a8.png

f4995697c9c4089b6f2fd1efd16e42a70c7f6f.png

28b798ced1c380f75f7f078d063b33ed8c9aab.png

d874f2cd50eb0771b11394b02b2349b4313177.png

86d6b6ef183d5da4551a6bdc5f91a936b1e0b6.png

Source: NRW-2022-AGM---CEO-Address--Presentation.PDF

9b584bbf840583f436f745bdf1f647e23c5358.png


Friday 26th May 2023: This one was marked as "stale" so I've reviewed it, and it's fine, I'm still happy with a price target of just shy of $3. The company's SP rose above $3 briefly at the end of January (2023) and I did trim my positions at those levels, because this is a company that tends to trend up and down for months at a time, so they will give me more opportunities to load up at lower levels.

I believe that there is still significant demand for the metals and minerals that NRW's (NWH's) clients produce, and that demand is going to increase for the most part, over time, not diminish. As one of Australia's leading mining services contractors, as in companies that do the actual mining on behalf of the mine owners, NRW is well placed to continue to benefit from that demand.

Additionally, due to some very smart and well-priced acquisitions over the past 5 years they have succesfully expanded across to Australia's east coast (through Golding, who were already well established in the east) and they now work right across Australia. And they have a division that does EPC and EPCM work (Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and project Management), as today's announcement highlights: Primero-awarded-NPI-contract.PDF

This means they are now directly competing with companies like Monadelphous (MND) who are an engineering and construction company with a maintenance services division. Mono's used to be one of the larger companies in the sector, however NWH's m/cap is now just over $1 billion, and MND's m/cap is only $1.25 billion, so it's certainly conceivable that NRW (NWH) could become larger than MND, because MND are basically a mature company, and NRW are a growing company.

Part of that growth is via acquisitions, which have so far been well targeted, strategic fits, and they have not overpaid, but NRW have organic growth as well. MND sometimes struggle to replace work as it runs off, with new work of the same value. MND rarely make acquisitions and the few they have made over the past 10 years have been tiny compared to their own market cap, and the extra revenue derived from those small acquisitions has NOT been particularly material.

MND tend to win some of the largest EPC contracts on some of the largest projects, but those wins don't come around every year, so their E&C division often has lumpy revenue and earnings from year to year. MND's Maintenance and Industrial Services (MIS) Division IS growing, and MIS does have far more predicatable revenue and earnings, but their E&C (Engineering and Construction) division can drag down their results every now and then.

I have noticed that more recently, and today's announcement (link above) is a classic example of this, that NRW is winning contracts from some of the larger miners (like RIO in this case) where both MND and NRW already work for those miners with various ongoing contracts and both companies have a good history with those miners. I can't imagine that MND did NOT bid for that non-process infrastructure (NPI) work at RIO's Western Range mine site; they both would have bid for it for sure, but NRW won the contract, which says something I reckon.

One of the biggest mistakes that these companies can make of course is tendering for contracts at prices that are so low that while they might win the contracts, they might also struggle to make a profit on those contracts, particularly if things turn don't go exactly to plan; things like Covid outbreaks, tradespeople shortages, wages and salary pressure resulting in unexpected cost increases, material shortages, freight delays, weather events, and cost overruns for any other reason.

NWH made some of those mistakes in that 2009-2011 period, and they almost went broke in 2015, but they learned a lot from that experience and they are a different company now. They don't ALWAYS make a healthy profit on EVERY contract, but their losses are generally few and far between, not usually very material, and for the most part have been either unavoidable, or due to circumstances that could not reasonably have been foreseen. Point is, they are a lot more sensible with their tender pricing these days, and they allow for contingencies, and this includes having their clients share the risks of cost blowouts. These contracts are now structured so that the contractor doesn't have to wear these cost increases alone - the client shares the pain in most cases, or covers a lot of these increased costs. Companies who don't structure contracts in this way usually don't last too long.

I hold shares in both MND and NWH, but I am more excited about the future of NWH, because they are the one that is growing.

Here are some other recent announcements by NRW (ASX:NWH):

27-March-2023: Acquisition--METS-contract-awards.PDF

08-March-2023: NRW-2023-Rottnest-Conference-Presentation.PDF

27-February-2023: NRW-awarded-contract-by-Bellevue-Gold.PDF

16-February-2023: NRW-Half-Year-Results-Announcement.PDF

and NRW-Half-Year-Results-Presentation.PDF

Here's an excerpt from page 1 of those H1 FY2023 Results that they announced in Feb:

b6f2314f56259d6b9b3cdc77b4832f91ff1ec0.png

They'll be back up and over $2.97 soon enough. And their dividends have been increasing too, which is a nice bonus.

cec5d34a2c6e2fdbd86076186755870ca15ec1.png


Update: 19-Jan-2024: They keep coming back up to my $2.97 PT.

0e109e0fbff6a199f0e6d1c1f2d9f1c60502b8.png

I'll likely raise that after their half year results are released in February - they keep on performing. They're the quiet achievers in the mining services space - and they are getting more and more work outside of mining now - as today's announcement shows: NRW-named-as-Preferred-Proponent-for-Reid-Hwy.PDF [19-Jan-2024]

Margins aren't high in the sectors in which they work - engineering, construction and mining services - but they have been excellent at risk management in recent years and they have a LOT of work on. NRW (NWH) are now a $1.2 Billion company, so they're a decent sized company, and as I mentioned above, their dividends have been increasing every year since 2018.

Their revenue and earnings can be lumpy because they have a mix of recurring revenue (multi-year maintenance and operations contracts as well as mining services contracts) and one-off revenue (E&C: Engineering and Construction, project work), and their shares on issue (highlighted below in orange) have been growing due to both acquisitions and staff remuneration, however the overall trajectory of their EPS (earnings per share) has been increasing, as shown below, and they have been growing their book value (per share) and their NTA (per share).

977a5dd71e171a4ca274b9f4f9e98aed94fd05.png

Source: Commsec [on 19-Jan-2024]

Other positives are their double digit ROE (second last line above and the graph at the top right (linked by that blue line on the right) which is decent for the industries that they operate in, and their revenue growth. They have grown their revenue every year for the past 7 years and their EPS has been lumpy but trending up (as shown above, top left).

Their gearing (debt level) is low, and they tend to pay down their debt quite quickly, however they do use debt to partially fund strategic acquisitions (they use both equity and debt) so their debt levels can increase when they make acquisitions, but they always pay that debt down at a good clip in years when they haven't acquired anything.

The main two things I like about the company is the growing earnings per share, so despite the growing share count, each share is earning more profit each year, on average - i.e. based on the overall trajectory of their EPS (as shown above) AND their disciplined approach to M&A - every acquisition they've made has been smart and they have not overpaid for any of them. 

As I have said previously, high debt levels almost sent the company broke in late 2015/early 2016, and their share price was trading at around 5 cps in early Feb 2016. This was at the time that the last big mining boom went bust, and NWH had geared up big time for not only all of the work they were winning, but also for a heap more work they expected to win in future years. Back then they were buying earthmoving equipment outright (using debt), thinking the good times were not going to end any time soon. These days, they use equipment leasing a lot more. They have learned a lot of valuable lessons from that period, and they show no signs of making the same mistakes again.

They are now very disciplined with how they use debt, and they always pay it down quickly when the have any (they are often in a net cash position) - and they have intentionally diversified their revenue across more sectors, as well as targeting more recurring revenue through multi-year contracts for either mining services or for operations and maintenance of infrastructure and other assets.

So I love the growing EPS and the strategic and disciplined M&A, and I also love the growing dividends, and the strong balance sheet. I also like the fact that they tend to stay under the radar of many fundies and retail investors, despite them being worth over $1 billion now. They tend to keep a low profile, and that can be a good thing. This is a company that almost went broke 8 years ago and is just out there proving that they're not going to do that again. They operate differently now, as I have explained. And they are letting their runs on the board do the talking.

The company is also trading at an undemanding PE ratio - as highlighted there in dark blue, not as cheap as they were a year ago, but still reasonable value IMO. However I'm not buying up here - I like to buy them at closer to $2.50 or below - and they were down there between March and July this year - so they do seem to provide opportunities to enter or top up positions reasonably often as sentiment waxes and wanes. 

Many people either don't follow them or don't know about them, but if you don't mind the sectors that they operate in (mining services, plus engineering and construction across a variety of sectors such as mining, infrastructure, governments/transport, specialising in rail, roads and bridges) then they are right up there as worthy of serious consideration.

313ae622d627267e684353569946c5d795d369.png

dbdaa2fa76bfabab412d738f04d819ad70e73b.png

d16069a1c5bf84ab441c7b80258ef436fe8657.png

39ceec5e329f1a68c537ff33d2f8709a197016.png

86ecfb3d3870411581c279a0c43f45af44ab0e.png

65e5cbd79f771f0260dde18bc41e3b057a1f2b.png

5352c7c419f909bf6e3509c9857c3c2b2f1430.png

0566904817367d593b8789dfa5e0b8aab56854.png

24ff43c266dc223864f3d3e995d1f7342b9e75.png

221a69d1043400ef0f929b37640d7dd584a7dd.png

FY23 Full Year Presentation (nrw.com.au)

The 9 images above all have links behind them, so you can click on them to go to different sections of the NRW Website.

1d5d4f8e3d54785a47565cfbc8f6decfc54d6c.png

(21) NRW Holdings: Overview | LinkedIn

nrw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NRW-Holdings-Annual-Report-2023-Digital.pdf

I hold this company my two largest real money portfolios as well as here.

15-Aug-2024: Update: FY24 Full Year Results:

b3392c062b20fb8c56b53544c996a9fd447ffd.png

Have to use a screenshot there as my computer is not allowing me to save Paint 3D images again after I edit them. If you can't read that, NRW (NWH.asx) reported today and made a new decade high price this morning (of $3.53). For context, they have been above this level only once before, a very brief spike above $4/share in 2012 during that big mining boom, but they had expanded rapidly using debt and bought a heap of gear and when the boom went bust they almost went into VA - with their share price getting down below 5 cents/share at the end of 2015 and the start of 2016. They scraped through by the skin of their teeth and are now a much stronger and better company than they were back in 2012. The main difference is that they have a very solid balance sheet, and they lease a lot of equipment instead of buying it all outright, so they are not leveraged to the gills like they were then.

This company was a staple of my largest real money portfolio - which I sold up in June, and they remain a core position in my SMSF - having been in there for years - and I hold them here on SM also. Here are the highlights of today's results for the full year:

NRW delivers another record result in FY24 and expects continued growth in FY25.

FY24 record results summary:

  • Revenue $2.9 billion, up 9.2% on FY23.
  • EBITDA(1) $334.8 million, up 15.9% on FY23.
  • EBITA(2) $195.1 million, up 17.4% on FY23 at a 6.7% margin.
  • NPATN(3) $123.8 million, up 18.6% on FY23.
  • Cash holdings of $246.6 million, 94.9% conversion.
  • Normalised EPS(4) 27.3 cps, up 17.7% on FY23.
  • Strong order book of $5.5 billion, (inclusive of repeat business).
  • Pipeline of near-term prospects is very solid at $16.4 billion, with $5.5 billion of active tenders.
  • Fully franked final dividend of 9.0 cents per share, total FY24 dividend 15.5 cents per share up 11.1% pcp (on a comparable franked basis), 57.0% payout ratio.
  • Dividends have been raised every year for the past 6 years (since 2018).

Notes:

  1. EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation of acquisition intangibles and non-recurring transactions.
  2. Operating EBIT / EBITA is earnings before interest, tax, amortisation of acquisition intangibles and non-recurring transactions.
  3. NPATN is Operating EBIT less interest and tax (at a 30% tax rate).
  4. Normalised Earnings per share (Normalised EPS) is EBITA less interest and tax (at a 30% tax rate) over number of shares.

Their 6.7% EBITA margin isn't stellar, but they are a steady earner - not shooting the lights out, but getting on with it. The days of massive margins for mining services companies are done and dusted, those are in the past, the best mining services companies now have low margins but their advantages are that they have a LOT of work (so volume) and it's consistently profitable, and they are VERY good at risk management.

And NRW (NWH) have good management that manage risk very well, are very disciplined and strategic with their M&A (buy well, and always earnings accretive acquisitions that make strategic sense and strengthen the overall business), and are looking after their shareholders with excellent TSRs.

They are no ProMedicus, but they are a consistent company that does what they do well, and keeps growing and providing good returns for their shareholders, since 2016.

At this point, before their share price rise today due to these excellent results, my return here on SM for the NWH shares that I hold here has been +51.77 p.a. - so a return over 50% per year over 6 years - I added them here back in June 2018.

That compares to my +54.41% p.a. return on my PME which I added in Feb 2020 @ just over $20/share.

These returns are money-weighted total shareholder returns, so they include the value of the dividends, but not the value of franking credits. There are different ways to make money - you don't have to jump on a rocket that shoots to the moon (PME) - although that's certainly a good ride when you manage to do it - you can also do it through low-profile, boring, companies that have mediocre margins but just keep making more and more money on more and more revenue, and increase their dividends along with those increased earnings.


28-Oct-2024: Update:

Raising price target to closer to $4, however once they break through $4 with conviction they could go to $4.50 I reckon, but they might take a couple of attempts to break through $4.

Nothing has changed with NRW Holdings (NWH.asx) except that their share price has risen, so they don't look as undervalued as they did a year ago.

Or three years ago:

b733a22e8ceb112479a1b0575d0616836aa03a.png

Plenty of liquidity - $3m worth of shares traded today, being 2,763 trades, and 822,378 NWH shares changed hands.

Nice rise, but I do note that we saw a retrace in 2022 when they went over $2, then again in 2023 when they went over $3 - almost back to $2 again before rising up to $3/share at the end of 2023, but it took 3 attempts to break through $3 with conviction, i.e. they broke through and went on with it in June this year after trying to break through $3 in December '23 and March '24 and failing both times.

There's something about these whole dollar amounts that seems to slow the momentum or makes the market second guess the valuation at the time perhaps.

But look at what they've done since June - $3 to $3.80 in 4 months - plenty of north east momentum at this point.

But they could still have a couple of goes at breaking through $4.

They're a good size now - they're a $1.72 Billion company, so not a microcap any longer by Australian standards, and one of the best run mining services companies in terms of companies that actually do the contract mining, drill & blast, crushing, loading, etc. MinRes is bigger - at $6.7 Billion - and the parts of MinRes (MIN) that are mining services - rather than mine owners and operators - are bigger than NWH, however MinRes is complicated - there are a lot of moving parts - and NRW is both a simpler and more straightforward business in terms of getting your head around it and valuing the business, as well as having superior management to MinRes, in my opinion. So NRW is my main mining services exposure both here on SM and in my real-money portfolios.

NRW also do E&C (engineering and construction), so that division of NRW could be considered to be competing with two of my other larger positions, being Lycopodium (LYL) and GR Engineering Services (GNG), however I don't view it that way, as LYL & GNG tend to specialise in certain types of industrial processes, such as gold mills and other industrial processes where chemical engineering is required as part of the design (engineering) element, whereas NRW are competing more with companies like Monadelphous Group (MND) who do structural engineering and construction along with electrical and pipework. The stuff that LYL and GNG do is more complicated and has higher margins.

So, yes, NRW have skinny margins, but they have a LOT of work, and there are a few different ways to make money; you can do a small amount of high margin work, or a large amount of lower volume work, and still make the same dollars in profit, or more.

Despite their skinny margins, NRW reported FY24 NPAT (Operating EBIT less interest and tax) of $123.8 million, up 18.6% on FY23, on FY24 Revenue of $2.9 billion, up 9.2% on FY23. So their NPAT growth was double their revenue growth - I like that a lot!

Plus June 30 cash holdings of $246.6 million, Normalised EPS (EBITA less interest and tax over number of shares) of 27.3 cps, up 17.7% on FY23, a strong order book of $5.5 billion, and a pipeline of near-term prospects valued at $16.4 billion, with $5.5 billion of active tenders (as at June 30, 2024). 

They have a 57.0% payout ratio and have been raising their dividends every year for the past 6 years (since 2018).

As with all contractors, it all comes down to execution and risk management, which includes building contingencies into contracts so that the contractor doesn't have to wear cost blowouts that are not their own fault, and only chasing profitable work, not lowering prices to almost breakeven levels just to keep busy, and NRW has become a LOT better at that stuff than a few years back when they almost went broke and their share price got down to 4 cents - because most people expected them to go into VA at the time - I can't see that happening to them again - a great number of things would all have to go very badly for them for that sort of scenario to repeat - because their contracts are structured a lot better, they pay their debt down quickly whenever the use debt - usually for EPS-accretive bolt-on acquisitions - and are often in a net cash situation - their net gearing was 12% at June 30.

It's hard to go broke with low or no debt, when you remain busy and profitable.

Commsec has their ROE at 20.4%, so not too bad. That's the highest it's been for 10 years, so that's another positive sign. They are actually getting more profitable as they grow. MND have been going the other way.

That'll do. Nothing much to add since their August report but I managed to waffle on for a few paragraphs regardless. I blame the shiraz.

Disc: Yep, holding NRW Holdings (NWH.asx) shares.


29th May 2025: Update:

No change to my $3.94 PT for NRW despite them trading at around $2.80 or just below this week and recently having traded below $2.50/share.

e4e7ca398857f93c72b5723579f273e3c62de3.png

Much of that SP fall from around $4/share to below $2.50/share in recent months can be attributed to uncertainty and conjecture over whether NRW Holdings (NWH) are going to get paid all, some, or none of the $113 million that the then-Sanjeev Gupta controlled OneSteel in South Australia owed to NRW before OneSteel was forced into Administration by the SA Government over millions of dollars owing in state royalties and fees including a very large unpaid bill from SA Water.

I've written a fair bit about that saga in a straw here and also in an attached forum thread which you can find here.

I note that at 3:32pm (Sydney time) this afternoon, MQG (Macquarie Group) lodged a new "Becoming a Sub" notice for NWH which has a Securities Lending Agreement on page 59 suggesting that those shares probably have been or could be lent to shorters, which prompted me to check the latest shorting data for the company:

e027b5530551e128adc3829a35fe68416ac139.png

Interesting that there was a sharp spike up in the first half of April, albeit to just under 1% of NWH's SOI sold short (0.98%) but that immediately fell back down to 0.3% and then on May 15th when NRW released this: NRW-Response-to-Proposed-SA-Govt-Whyalla-Legislation.PDF ...the short level immediately dropped further, from 0.27% right down to 0.07%, which is almost nothing. The last recorded short position was 0.08%, as at 23rd May 2025, as shown above.

NRW is a $1.3 Billion company these days, and they're in the S&P ASX 200 Index, so they are widely held and can easily be shorted, so it's interesting that the short interest hasn't even risen up to 1% during this period - and is now almost nothing.

As I said elsewhere, that $113 million, if it had to be fully written off as a bad debt that was not recoverable, is less than 4% of NRW's FY2024 annual revenue, which is very manageable, and that's the worst case scenario.

There is one scenario that's possibly worse still, which is that NRW take legal action against the SA Government - who are proposing to introduce a law in relation to the Whyalla Ports and associated assets which would effectively strip away NRW's first ranking security over the shares of Whyalla Ports and certain assets of Whyalla Ports which they were granted by OneSteel last year to provide NRW with some assurance that they would get what they were owed from OneSteel - and that having taken legal action, NRW then lose that case and have costs awarded against them.

I think that's a low probability. NRW haven't taken anything off the table and say they reserve the right to take any action they deem appropriate, including possible legal action, to get what they are owed, but if they were to take such legal action, they would have strong legal advice beforehand and I would think it unlikely they would have costs awarded against them if they lost such hypothetical legal action, but it is still a possibility.

Another possibility is that they take a haircut but get some of that money. Another is that they have insurance to compensate them for some of the losses that can result from clients being forced into Administration by a third party and NRW not getting paid all of what they are owed.

But, yeah, no change to my price target for NRW (NWH). They do have that temporary setback, but nothing structural, and while it might take them a year or two to get back to just under $4/share, they should get there sooner or later.

I continue to hold NRW Holdings shares both here and in my real money portfolios.


30th August 2025: Update post-FY25-Results:

OK, NRW (NWH) have now written off the full amount of $110.5m that was still owing to them on June 30th, of the $113m owed to them by Sanjeev Gupta's OneSteel or another Gupta-controlled entity when the SA Government forced OneSteel into Administration earlier this year over millions of dollars of state taxes and SA Water bills not paid by OneSteel.

As I pointed out a couple of times here around that time, it represented less than 4% of NRW's FY24 annual revenue, so it was NOT a major deal or a company killer, and the market took the impairment (write-down) in its stride, probably happier now that there's no further downside financial risk from that matter, apart from possible legal fees, but I don't think NRW are going to spend much money chasing that written-off debt now that the SA State Gov have effectively stripped NRW of their Whyalla Ports assets via new SA state government legislation.

As I understand it, at some point in the past there was an agreement between the SA State Gov and OneSteel for OneSteel to manage the Whyalla Port because they were the main users of the port, but that it always remained available for others to use also, and NRW were convinced by Sanjeev Gupta or somebody within one of his companies that OneSteel was in a position to sign over the Whyalla Ports assets to NRW as security over the $113m that NRW was owed by OneSteel at the time, in December (2024), so after ceasing work at OneSteel's iron ore mines due to not getting paid by OneSteel, NRW agreed to return to work after having those Whyalla Port assets signed over to them by OneSteel.

Then in the past couple of months, after forcing OneSteel into Administration, the SA State Gov has pushed through a new piece of legislation that made it retrospectively not possible (or not legally possible) for Gupta's OneSteel or any of his companies to have owned Whyalla Ports in the first place, because the SA Gov say it should always have always remained a government / public asset, not a private asset.

This severely disadvantaged NRW but made the Administration process at OneSteel a lot simpler for the Administrators apparently. NRW then moved to have Whyalla Ports placed into Administration also, and that has now been done, different Administrators to OneSteel, who have KordaMentha; Whyalla Ports have Michael Brereton, Sean Wengel, and Rashnyl Prasad from William Buck, who were appointed on June 6, 2025.

This ABC News article covers it well:

Administrators reveal staggering debts of Whyalla Ports with at least $194 million owed

By Arj Ganesan, ABC North and West SA, Thu 19 June 2025.

9f03271f533086767002bbad5634aa669ab100.png

The Whyalla port has been the subject of an ownership dispute in the Federal Court. (ABC News: Che Chorley)


In short: 

William Buck, the administrator of Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd, revealed the company owed at least $194 million to creditors. 

The figure could be higher with administrators still awaiting key financial documents from the company. 

What's next? 

It is understood that the company will more than likely apply for a deed of company arrangement (DOCA) at its next meeting.


The administrators of Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd have told creditors the company owes at least $194 million, but the true amount is still unclear.

Accounting firm William Buck held the first creditors' meeting for the company on Thursday, revealing $25 million was owed to trade creditors with a further $63 million listed as a lease liability.

The largest slice is owed to Golding's and its parent company NRW, a key mining contractor, with a secured debt of $106 million.

However, administrator Michael Brereton said they were waiting to receive financial records from Whyalla Ports directors.

"One of the first things we did on our appointment was to issue a notice to the directors to complete what's called the report on company affairs and property," Mr Brereton said.

"That was issued immediately … [and] we have yet to receive those from the directors, so we don't have all the financial information.

"[I] think one of the problems they face is that the company operated on the basis that it held the port.

"Based on the litigation and the legislation that's been passed, it's become apparent that maybe the company didn't have control of the ports.

"So I suspect they're having some problems trying to work through 'What are the financial records of the company?'"

How did this happen?

382547a21f4abefc6b173b16a6a771808402de.png

Whyalla Ports owes at least $194 million to various creditors. (ABC News)


In early June, the ports became another casualty in the ongoing fallout since the Whyalla Steelworks was tipped into administration by the state government.

The company, Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd, was involved in a Federal Court case launched by Whyalla Steelworks administrators KordaMentha, which wants control of the port so it can sell the steelworks as an integrated asset.

Parent company GFG Alliance said when the state government passed new laws to "clarify" that the port was [never] owned by OneSteel, it was left with "no option" but to push the port into administration.

KordaMentha has since abandoned the legal action it began. However, a counterclaim from GFG Alliance is still being pursued over the ownership of some assets.

During Thursday's meeting, Mr Brereton said a lease agreement between OneSteel and Whyalla Ports was terminated on March 27.

"The company was not trading on our appointment," Mr Brereton said. 

"The company was dispossessed of all its plants and equipment at that time and its right to provide services to customers."

Law changes concern creditors

One Whyalla creditor, who wished to remain anonymous, previously told the ABC they were owed between $100,000 and $200,000 by Whyalla Ports.

They said they feared they may never receive the money due to the dispute over the port's ownership.

f8f4eeea909f4526435e7fd875e509a834144f.png

Sudel Industries CEO Kevin Moore. (Supplied: Kevin Moore)


CEO of Sudel Industries and creditor Kevin Moore said he was owed roughly $20,000 from Whyalla Ports. 

"Basically, I've already written that money off. I don't think we'll see it."

Although the paperwork has not been filed, it is understood that the company will more than likely apply for a deed of company arrangement (DOCA) at its next meeting.

--- ends ---

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-19/whyalla-ports-creditors-meeting-reveal-debt/105435952 [19th June 2025]


So NRW are still weighing up their options but they've made the sensible decision to book an impairment for the full amount still owing ($110.5 million) in their FY25 full year accounts.

So, looking at their actual FY25 results:

e3fcad5f4d623d23acd0d7452447cf72fba5c5.jpeg

Underlying Revenue and Earnings growth, and still booking a statutory profit - and paying a final dividend - despite the significant write downs (impairments) as detailed below, however $27.7m NPAT in FY25 is a big drop from the $105.1m NPAT they made in FY24.

14bc8129c053f985df6443c12627d0616f6c0b.jpeg

Some Positives:

5641ee13e04488df3ed1c2bfd233141aa35646.jpeg

And Some Negatives:

0d984a4e03c922f28953d2d8833fd7f59f79fc.jpeg

However they aren't down to the bones of their arse yet:

6f4a8c76b47e987ca5e346d3974f85a25ea989.jpeg

They have plenty of liquidity. They are after all an ASX200 company with a $1.76 Billion market capitalisation. They still have over half a billion ($595.2m) of available liquidity and only $145 million of net debt ($411 million of total debt including lease liabilities and $266 million of cash and cash equivalents).

Their total gearing has increased from 12.1% to 23.8%, or excluding lease debt from 5.1% to 16.1%, so not terrible. Net cash would be better, but it's not scary debt levels, and they've been able to pay down debt rapidly in prior years.

e6ffea95a003b1c90492f37a8179f6f2900f6e.jpeg

718b485d6a41dde4487b3051f9c41576b69cad.jpeg

e5b91ca690e8b9cadc8134a0754deb68018f92.jpeg

bec5ace8c3da2443750c108b2d62eda6bc4ad0.jpeg

4697b387b3587ef1e90c3706b6dee9bc81baf3.jpeg

4e787b466aa841412cdee68e949edf3eab27c6.jpeg

86ef57b443c54ef9e2f28caeeb5ae49110b96d.jpeg

872f6a5dbc78de55a1275950ece8701036b83b.jpeg

Slide and Info Sources not otherwise credited are the following announcements on August 21st by NRW Holdings (NWH):

Appendix 4E & Full Year Statutory Accounts

Full Year Results Presentation

Full Year Results Announcement


3f194f8bb936d2a15afac8d9ac9dc1c6ca381b.jpeg

They've come back up to my $3.94 price target or close enough to it (closed at $3.91 on Wednesday 27th August after reporting on the 21st August) - so I'm raising my price target now to $4.45.

It was quite the drop they took from January through to their $2.21 low point in April, and I'm glad I was buying around $3 and below, but they're back up around the $4 mark again now, without that potential $100+ million write down hanging over their heads any more (because they've done it now - the impairment has been booked), and, as I was suggesting, it was more of a mole hill than a mountain, and the cyclone in the tea cup has passed now, so I expect NRW Holdings (NWH) to get back to some decent growth over the next few years.

Disclosure: Held.


8th October 2025: Update:

Raising my price target again, this time to $4.85, as NRW have made another excellent acquisition and have now upgraded their FY26 Guidance.

Previous FY26 Guidance (from August 21st):

6a70c5fd1da5015d31330938faff38d71109b0.jpeg

Source: NRW-Full-Year-Results-Announcement-(21-Aug-2025).PDF

And here's their new guidance:

3b286e6b69713100e212344be92698077cd01c.jpeg

Source: Fredon-Acquisition-completion--Guidance-Update.PDF [08-Oct-2025]

This guidance upgrade represents +17.6% more revenue and +16.6% more profit (earnings) than their guidance in August. As I said when they announced this Fredon Industries acquisition, it's another good one, and well structured, see below:

9ba4977f413faea7c5dbb444e804dfbb6d13c0.jpeg

Source: From page 1 of NRW-Acquires-Fredon-Industries-(02-Sep-2025).PDF

No shares were issued as part of this acquisition, it was 100% debt funded, so it's certainly another earnings (EPS) accretive acquisition, and they haven't overpaid either, incentivising the Fredon management to stay with the business to ensure that Fredon performs to expectations so that the vendors earn the "up to" $60m earn-out for CY25. The deferred cash component (up to $18m) payable in 2 years also clearly has some hurdles, hence the use of the words "up to", so, again, NRW are bringing the acquired company management across to NRW and incentivising them to keep working hard.

Having only $122 million of this up to $200 million acquisition as an upfront payment is another smart move by NRW (NWH) management in my opinion, on a number of levels. And who doesn't like a current year guidance upgrade?

So, they're continuing to get bigger and better, with both organic and smart inorganic (acquisitive) growth. I like what they buy and how they buy it. I like their risk management. I like their growth, including their growing dividends. The only thing I don't like is how much they pay Jules Pemberton, their CEO and MD, and the fact that they receive a strike on their Rem Report at their AGM every single year and that it doesn't bother them. So while I still hold NRW (NWH) shares in my SMSF - and here - the positions are not as large as they have been previously. I've been taking some money off the table and recycling it into other ideas.

But I still hold. They are certainly well run and have a good industry position.

Read More
#FY26 Guidance Upgrade
Added 2 months ago

8th October 2025: Fredon-Acquisition-completion--Guidance-Update.PDF

20b55ec36b8ab108bfa30e9dffe8e3fbfd4108.jpeg

3b286e6b69713100e212344be92698077cd01c.jpeg

Source: Fredon-Acquisition-completion--Guidance-Update.PDF [08-Oct-2025]


6a70c5fd1da5015d31330938faff38d71109b0.jpeg

Source: NRW-Full-Year-Results-Announcement-(21-Aug-2025).PDF


So they have now upgraded FY26 Revenue guidance from over $3.4 Billion to now over $4 Billion;

And they have upgraded FY26 Earnings (EBITA) guidance from between $218 and $228 million (midpoint of $223 million) to now between $255 and $265 million (midpoint of $260 million).

This guidance upgrade represents +17.6% more revenue and +16.6% more profit (earnings) than their guidance in August. As I said when they announced this Fredon Industries acquisition, it's another good one, and well structured, see below:

9ba4977f413faea7c5dbb444e804dfbb6d13c0.jpeg

Source: From page 1 of NRW-Acquires-Fredon-Industries-(02-Sep-2025).PDF

No shares were issued as part of this acquisition, it was 100% debt funded, so it's certainly another earnings (EPS) accretive acquisition, and they haven't overpaid either, incentivising the Fredon management to stay with the business to ensure that Fredon performs to expectations so that the vendors earn the "up to" $60m earn-out for CY25. The deferred cash component (up to $18m) payable in 2 years also clearly has some hurdles, hence the use of the words "up to", so, again, NRW are bringing the acquired company management across to NRW and incentivising them to keep working hard.

Having only $122 million of this up to $200 million acquisition as an upfront payment is another smart move by NRW (NWH) management in my opinion, on a number of levels.

And who doesn't like a current year guidance upgrade?

Disclosure: Held.

Read More
#M&A: Fredon Acquisition
Last edited 3 months ago

2nd September 2025: NRW Acquires Fredon Industries plus NRW - Fredon Industries Acquisition Presentation

The market liked it:

b9cc44e03df486b411ed52e6ffd93d040d688e.png

They hit a new 10 year high today (intraday) of $4.18/share before closing up "only" +6.3% @ $4.04.

They've only been up above that $4.18 level only once in their history, way back in April 2012, so more than 13 years ago, and only for a couple of days; they then followed that high with a fall right down to 5 cents/share in early February 2016, when that big mining boom went bust and NRW almost went broke due to having bought a LOT of debt due to having bought a heap of mining and earthmoving equipment instead of leasing it, thinking that the good times would just keep on rolling on.

bda94d5e6cb307f3ce5958b358a5d04a9b552c.jpeg

They ain't the same company now - they are much better - they've learned from their past mistakes and they now have more diversified revenue, more annual recurring revenue (ARR), a much stronger balance sheet, over half a billion dollars of liquidity - see my NRW (NWH) valuation update for the details of that - as shared by NRW last month in their FY25 full year report and their outlook plus guidance for FY26, they have better risk management, and they are just a much bigger and much better company; And their M&A track record has been a good one in recent years, and so far I can't see too much wrong with this acquisition either.

They're keeping the old management in place and incentivising them to perform, and the skill sets they are acquiring through this business are complimentary to what NRW can already do. It makes good sense all around, as I see it.

5bfe05df2ca0b38c250619b135e969c986a388.jpeg

b27ee6618aa4b5ec00eb48affae40f6dbd6380.jpeg

826432ba46e87cf6bfaf9e066c9519c6167f13.jpeg

8c080b0b32252b2e7b0977b2e7b963152a9f01.jpeg

bcb89bdf74cf08759ea985129e1ea309a38bef.jpeg


325b546f4fcb060c7fb256ddfb7ba59b2ff656.jpeg

3454c419d355dabd20ae29403de776e43ffcb7.jpeg

Sources: That lot above is all taken from their announcement today - to view their presentation, click on the image below.


6411204b72c0310207f122652518e31f6fc073.png


Disclosure: Holding. All good. I like this one.

Read More
#New Contract Awards
stale
Added 6 months ago

30-May-2025: NRW-Contract-Award-30May2025.PDF

Another new contract award by RIO to NRW's Primero division:

Contract Award

NRW Holdings Limited (ASX:NWH) is pleased to announce that its wholly owned subsidiary Primero Group Limited (Primero) has been awarded a contract by Rio Tinto for Hope Downs 2 Satellite & Bedded Hilltop Non-Process Infrastructure (NPI) Facilities. The contract forms part of the Hope Downs 1 Sustaining Project.

Under the contract, Primero will be responsible for the design, supply, installation, construction, testing commissioning and handover of NPI works required for the Rio Tinto Hope Downs 1 Operations in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.

The contract has an approximate value of $157 million. The contract is scheduled for completion in December 2026. Design and procurement work will commence immediately with site works expected to commence in Q4 2025, once all external approvals have been granted.

Primero’s Managing Director, Michael Gollschewski shared “This award represents the continuation of our long-term relationship with Rio Tinto through the delivery of world-class infrastructure projects.”

NRW’s CEO & Managing Director, Jules Pemberton stated, “This contract reinforces Primero’s reputation as a leading provider of engineering and construction services. We look forward to the successful completion of the project.” 

--- end of excerpt ---

Source: NRW-Contract-Award-30May2025.PDF


Disclosure: I hold NRW (NWH) shares. Good to see them winning repeat work from bluechip clients like Rio Tinto. It means that their clients are happy with their work, including the quality and timeliness of the finished work. As I have been saying, the OneSteel (Whyalla) issue is a temporary issue, not a structural one, and it's BAU for NRW. And business is good.

Read More
#New Contract Awards
Added 9 months ago

20-March-2025: NRW-Holdings-Contract-Awards.PDF

Some positive news there with the biggest new contract announced today being worth around $100 million; from RIO for NRW's wholly owned subsidiary Primero Group Limited (Primero) to perform work at Rio Tinto's Coastal Water Supply Sustaining Project. 

Under the contract, Primero will be responsible for the Structural, Mechanical, Piping, Electrical and Instrumentation (SMPE&I) Procurement and Construction works for the seawater desalination project at Parker Point, Dampier in Western Australia. This includes the seawater intake, treatment facility and conveyance piping. The Contract is scheduled to run for approximately twelve months commencing immediately.

And there are some smaller contracts announced in there as well.

NRW's share price remains well down from recent highs due to the issues around OneSteel and the Whyalla Steel Works, with NRW owed over $100m by OneSteel, which is now in Administration. I have covered this already here, so won't dwell on it except to say that because NRW had preemptively protected their position by becoming owners of (all of the shares in) Whyalla Ports and additionally have first ranking security over many of the Ports' major assets, and the Ports are used for more than just steel exports (they are multi-use Ports), NRW isn't going to have to write off the full amount owing from Gupta's OneSteel.

NRW may end up taking a haircut, but they'll get some and possibly all that they are owed; it just might take some time. NRW are still working those OneSteel contracts and are currently being paid by the OneSteel administrators for all work performed from the date of Administration, and that contract was due to finish up later this year anyway, unless it is renewed.

That OneSteel contract is just one of their contracts within one of their divisions, but the Market seems to remain very focused on it at this point, with NRW's share price likely to stay subdued until we get some positive news on that front.

I'm personally viewing that as an opportunity and have been adding more NRW (NWH.asx) to my two largest real-money portfolios as well as here on SM.

Read More
#Opportunity?
Last edited 9 months ago

08-March-2025: A week ago (on Friday 28th, the last day of Feb) I wrote here about NWH's H1 report and commented that because it was released after market close, I would have to wait until Monday (March 3rd) to see the market's reaction to it - and it could be interesting. It was.

2e4d451135d1088b7ef8fd3f7c37eb4d2974b3.png


Here's what they looked like at market close yesterday (Friday 7th March 2025):

a088ee30f45fabeaee2bf8f207cf0426a12150.png

I would argue (and I am) that they've been oversold, unless there are reasons other than OneSteel and a less positive iron ore price outlook for the sell-off. Firstly, this is not unusual, however, despite repeated drawdowns (or pullbacks), their share price has been on a north east trajectory if you zoom out and look at a 10 year chart:

7444e48b3150a4f18aa1c8ef1b7816453c0098.png

Here's that same 10 Year chart (below) using daily data points instead of the monthly data points used in the 10 Year chart above.

27e509b1bae624687b9520cc1f7ef3964e427b.png

That second one is not as clean, but the results are the same: If you are prepared to ride out the share price volatitlity they do eventually make up lost ground and go on to make new highs, although sometimes it can take a while, like 4.5 years for them to get back up to their $3.38 high point achieved on 20th Jan 2020, which they passed again in July 2024.

However they are increasingly compensating us for waiting, through increasing fully franked dividends:

252bbd5158acd59d42f936d611b44b3477bac0.png

Source: All of these charts and tables were sourced from Commsec today and tidied up by me. I've changed the Dividend yield above: Commsec had 5.8%, however based on 16 cps p.a. (the 7c div just declared plus the last final dividend of 9 cps) and a $2.81 share price, it's 5.69%, not 5.80%. I have also added their grossed up dividend yield which includes the full value of the franking credits.

So you've got that income to compensate you for a choppy share price.

But what about the risks? Yeah, there are risks, as there are with any contractor, and especially contractors who are exposed to commodities and commodity price movements, however it pays to remember that NWH aren't miners, they are mining contractors who are awarded multi-year mining contracts (recurring revenue), so the real risk is if their clients cease production or go broke and that work ceases prematurely, or if the client doesn't pay their bills as they fall due.

And many punters probably think that's what has happened with OneSteel, one of NWH's clients, in the past few weeks, however it's not that simple. OneSteel was put into Administration by the SA Gov after they ran out of patience with the parent company not paying their bills, including $17 million owing to SA Water, plus not paying their contractors including NRW who it turns out are owed $113.3 million by OneSteel for past work performed.

NRW are continuing to work for the OneSteel Administrators and are being paid from the date of Administration, but are having to pursue the $113.3 million for work done prior to that. NRW say they are confident that they will be paid and they have NOT declared any impairments (write-downs) in their H1 accounts related to money owed to them by OneSteel/GFG.

OneSteel is part of the GFG corporate group and is the legal entity that owns and operates the Whyalla steelworks and associated mines. GFG is controlled by Sanjeev Gupta and rather than me describing the man and his business practises, it is probably more instructive to watch a 7:30 report piece from ABC TV broadcast on Feb 13: https://youtu.be/ETNzD2BddFE which is titled, "Gupta approved to develop mansion as Whyalla and Tahmoor face uncertainty". It's not just Gupta's SA operations that are in deep trouble. The South Australian Government recognised where this was heading and moved to bring it to a head before the Australian federal election is called next month (April 2025) and hopefully giving themselves enough time to find a buyer and new long-term owner of the assets before the SA State election in March 2026.

I would argue that this particular situation has more to do with Sanjeev Gupta than it has to do with iron ore and steel prices and their respective outlooks, even though those outlooks don't look stellar in the short to mid term. Gupta can't make money in coal either, and in other areas throughout his global empire - and he just doesn't seem to like paying his bills, and part of that appears to be that he has too many fingers in far too many pies and is struggling to keep all of the plates spinning, to mix up some metaphors.

But what is NRW's exposure to GFG and OneSteel? Well, one of the things I like about NRW is their much improved risk management since our last really big mining boom went bust - and NRW almost went broke themselves, with their SP getting down to around 4 cps in January 2016. Even I wasn't brave enough to be holding them at that point - I thought they would go broke, but they pulled through, and haven't approached debt in the same way since, and are proactive now in securing their rights in situations like the OneSteel debacle. Here is the timeline, impact and current status of that one from NRW's POV, taken from their H1 results presso on Feb 28th:

0fb4eda320dfc4a18dfdb741486434454a4fc4.png


Note the third dot point in the timeline. Whyalla Ports is a multi-use port facility - not just used for steel exports - and NRW have first ranking security over all of the shares in Whyalla Ports and many of the Ports' key assets. Golding is a division of NRW by the way in case that wasn't clear.

Because of this and NRW working collaboratively with the OneSteel Admistrators (KordaMentha), I believe they'll get either all of their money or most of it, or else they'll end up with Whyalla Port assets they can sell to recoup some or most of that money owed to them. It's also worth noting that of NRW's major contracts, OneSteel (shown below as "SA Operations") is the one that was already scheduled to expire first, later this year, and their other Iron Ore mining contract (crushing and hauling) at Karara is due to expire next calendar year if not extended.

ad7162e19e5dc2894fb05653b301cbb52d4f06.png

Which would leave NRW's commodity exposure (via mining contracts) to Gold (through EVN's Mungari gold mine) and Met Coal.

It should also be noted that while Mining remains NRW's largest division and the mining sector is also their largest sector exposure, NRW's Civil Revenue was up strongly (+40.6%) in H1 and MET (NRW's Minerals, Energy & Technologies division) was also up by +15.6%, and NRW's EBIT Margins improved in both Civil and MET, with EBIT improvements of +75.9% and +25.3% respectively, being greater in percentage terms than the corresponding increases in revenue for those two divisions.

On the one hand, the revenue generated by Civil and MET combined now exceeds the revenue generated by Mining, AND the profit margins on Civil and MET are improving, but on the other hand it's worth noting that the EBIT that Mining generated ($63.7 million) is still significantly higher than the combined EBIT from Civil and MET ($48.5m), so the margins are still clearly better within NRW's Mining division, despite that Mining division EBIT margin slipping this half compared to the p.c.p.

So it's a trade-off - they are achieving further diversification of revenue, which is positive when the commodities outlook is so mixed, but that diversification is into other sectors that have so far had lower profit margins than NRW have been achieving in their Mining division traditionally, albeit those other sectors are exhibiting improving margins while their profit margin in Mining is slipping, so all things considered I'm happy enough as a shareholder with this progression - and that trade-off.

86fc2be3f38426b172b0305c65f68ed231f218.png

f9d52aa2637b55f845bab94d96ed93e4cf5d20.png


3a398e82afa315fe54bd48d09611dad61255b5.png


Their actual Revenue and Earnings (EBITA) for FY24 was $2.9 billion and $195.1 million (see NRW-FY24-Full-Year-Results-Announcement.PDF) so that guidance above for FY25 full year revenue of $3.2 to $3.3 Billion ($3.25 B mid-point) and FY25 full year earnings (EBITA) of $205 to $215 million ($210 M mid-point) represents improvements of +12% and +7.6% respectively over FY24, using those FY25 FY guidance midpoints, so overall they are guiding for a better year in FY25, but with a slight slip in margins overall (seeing as the earnings increase is forecast to be lower than the revenue increase in percentage terms).

I have written plenty here on NRW over the years, which you can access here: https://strawman.com/reports/NWH/Bear77

I topped up my NRW (NWH.asx) position in my SMSF yesterday and also added them to my income-orientated portfolio (outside of my super). I'll probably look to increase my NRW position here at some point also now that I've done it in my main real money portfolios.

I still don't like holding companies that look to me to have a share price that is more likely to go down than to rise in the near-term to mid-term, however that's not how I view NRW at this point - I see them as oversold and having an SP that could bounce at any time, just with a change of sentiment, a broker upgrade, and/or one item of positive news from the company. That's also my view on LYL, my largest position both here and across my real money portfolios, which is why I'm happy to hold both LYL and NWH during their current respective pullbacks. I fully accept that they might go further south before they recover, but I remain confident of that recovery, and I don't want to be on the sidelines when it happens, because it could easily be a decent and fast move back north, when they do start to recover. And it could happen any time, without notice.

- - -

Further Reading (while NRW were still in that trading halt, so before they released their H1 report and the info included above):

Whyalla steelworks fallout trips up $1.5b mining contractor

by Simon Evans and Phillip Coorey, AFR, Feb 23, 2025 – 12.23pm

NRW’s mining contracting business Golding is owed up to $120 million in the collapse of the Whyalla steelworks and the nearby iron ore mines that supplied raw materials to the Sanjeev Gupta-owned group.

Meanwhile, Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Sunday played down the prospect of the government taking an equity stake in the Whyalla steelworks, but flagged mandating quotas to ensure the plant’s product was used in government projects.

91050c8bceacd6ce20404d2cd8da23b2d6489c.png

Sanjeev Gupta’s Whyalla steelworks. Ben Searcy


“We’re looking at the procurement part. I think already 75 per cent of the steel out of Whyalla goes to things like railways in Australia, infrastructure projects, so there’s already a big opportunity there, and if there’s more we can do, more that we can think through on that front, we will do it,” Chalmers said on ABC’s Insiders.

The $1.5 billion ASX-listed NRW has asked that a trading halt be extended until February 28 while it hastily recasts its first-half financial accounts following the dramatic move by the South Australian government to force Sanjeev Gupta’s Whyalla plant into administration.

NRW’s Golding contracting business is the largest single creditor to OneSteel Manufacturing, the corporate entity pushed into administration that owned the ageing Whyalla steelworks and associated iron ore mines operated by another Gupta company, SIMEC, about 60 kilometres from the plant.

Two sources with knowledge of the situation, both of whom requested anonymity because they are not authorised to speak publicly, said Golding was owed around $120 million.

NRW did not detail how much money it is owed in an ASX statement on February 21 when it sought a trading halt extension.

It had been scheduled to unveil its interim 2024-25 result on February 20.

“NRW therefore requests a voluntary suspension until the company is in a position to provide the markets with an update to the SIMEC position and the timing of the release of the half-year results, expected to be no later than Friday, February 28,” company secretary Kim Hyman said.

NRW, which provides mining contractor services around Australia, has suffered a 20 per cent fall in its shares since November 19, when the stock was trading at $4 and it became apparent Gupta was struggling to refinance his global steel operation.

Golding had about 600 workers at three iron ore mines in the Middleback Ranges when the $600 million three-year contract was announced in early 2022, running until January 2025. The Golding workforce had been progressively pruned back over the past few months as Gupta attempted to cut costs and prepared to take mining back in-house.

KordaMentha was appointed as administrator of the Whyalla steelworks and the iron ore mines on February 19. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and SA Premier Peter Malinauskas collaborated on a $2.4 billion rescue package on February 20.

That included $292 million for buying railway lines to help underwrite production.

KordaMentha declined to comment on amounts owed to creditors, or the status of any specific creditor. The first creditors meeting is due to be held on March 3.

The SA government lost patience with Gupta over mounting unpaid bills that left the town of Whyalla, 380 kilometres north-west of Adelaide, reeling. Gupta’s unfulfilled promises about future upgrades of the plant angered many local businesses, and bigger ones too. ASX-listed rail freight operator Aurizon suspended hauling iron ore for several weeks because it was not getting paid.

Whyalla Mayor Phill Stone described the SA government’s move as a circuit breaker.

“It’s going to be a long, hard slog. There needs to be a regeneration, but it is going to take time,” he said. “But it has definitely lifted the town’s spirits, having a long-term injection of funds.”

SA government water utility SA Water is owed $17 million in the collapse. Malinauskas has diverted $600 million earmarked for a taxpayer-funded proposed hydrogen plant near the steelworks to the rescue fund for the steel plant instead.

--- ends ---

See Also: NRW-Half-Year-Results-Release.PDF [5:01pm, 28-Feb-2025]

And: NRW Half Year Results Presentation.PDF plus NRW Half Year Accounts.PDF [all released @ 5:01pm on 28-Feb-2025]


Disc: Holding.

Read More
#H1 of FY25 Results
Last edited 9 months ago

28-Feb-2025: NRW Holdings (NWH) released their results after the market closed this arvo. They were originally slated to release them last week but OneSteel in SA being placed into Administration by the SA State Government caused NRW to call for a trading halt which was then rolled into a trading suspension while they acertained the likely damage to their Golding division who were owed $113 million by OneSteel and it's subsidiaries/parent companies, and NRW used up all of their available time seeing as they lodged their report after the market closed on the last day of Feb (the final day allowed for these reports, being the last day of the second month following the reporting period end date).

In today's results announcement, Jules Pemberton, NRW's MD & CEO said:

As previously announced, on 19 February 2025 the South Australian Government appointed KordaMentha as Administrators over OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Ltd (OneSteel). We are owed approximately $113.3 million in trade receivables and contract assets. Golding previously obtained a guarantee and indemnity from both Liberty Primary Metals Australia Pty Ltd and Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd (Whyalla Ports), as well as first ranking security over certain assets of, and the shares in Whyalla Ports. We believe that the security has sufficient value to allow recovery of amounts outstanding. We have various options regarding the enforcement of this security and will make a decision on the path forward based on the best interest of our shareholders and other stakeholders. There has been no financial impact recognised during the period, with no specific allowance associated with amounts due, being recognised for the period.

-- end of excerpt ---

Source: NRW-Half-Year-Results-Release.PDF [5:01pm, 28-Feb-2025]

See also: NRW-Half-Year-Results---Conference-Call-details.PDF, plus NRW Half Year Results Presentation.PDF and NRW Half Year Accounts.PDF [all released @ 5:01pm this arvo, 28-Feb-2025]

Also, in their results presentation today (link above), regarding OneSteel:

8a5a0ce8358ac1d0d99f2b511f703eeb9fec3c.png


So NRW are saying today that they believe they can and should get paid the full amount ($113.3 million) considering their first ranking security over certain assets of Whyalla Ports and all of the shares of Whyalla Ports, plus the guarantee and indemnity they were given in December, as detailed above (slide 2 from today's NRW Half Year Results Presentation.PDF).

That could be their actual belief, or it could be positioning, because I imagine that if they had written down any of that $113.3 million owed to their Golding division by OneSteel in these accounts for H1 as bad/doubtful debts (which they have not done), that would have potentially signalled to the Administrators of OneSteel that NRW were amenable to talking a haircut on that figure (being paid less) and they do not want to signal that considering they took those steps in December to protect their position so as to not lose any of the amounts owing to them.

Regardless, they are saying today that they believe they can get paid the full amount, and if the outcome is different to that, they will have to write down any amounts not paid in their full year accounts in 6 months' time. No biggy.

I think they'll get the majority of what they're owed, or all of it, based on the security that they hold over Whyalla Ports.

OK, to the numbers that really matter:

e02c1088e0a566684d9459ae669512b23bca5f.png

Here's that a little larger:

b8a1de6a1f2f9609b40514c5a5d1aff5da0dc7.png

That NPATN is Operating EBIT less interest and tax (at the 30% corporate tax rate), and is up only +0.7% (58.4m vs 58.0m in the p.c.p.) as shown below. So NPATN is up, but only by a bee's whisker, while Revenue and EBITDA are both up by double digits (+15.8% and +20.1% respectively) as shown above. EBITA is +5.3% up and the dividend is all sevens; being a fully franked 7 cps div, up +7.7% on the p.c.p. (a good omen for me)

886f670399d1f6928be2c77c51ab57523483a8.png

Cash is also up, as shown below, however so is their debt, and their net debt has more than doubled to $159.3m, keeping in mind this is a company with a $1.5 Billion market cap, so their net debt is only around 10% of their m/cap. Their gearing ratio is now 23.9%, almost double their 12.1% gearing ratio 12 months ago, and their gearing excluding lease debt is now 16% (was 5.1% in the p.c.p.). It's getting up there, but not scary high for a company this large.

I would like to see that net debt reduce over the next 12 to 18 months, and preferably see them move back into a net cash position at some point soonish, like, in the next 3 or 4 years, if not sooner.

They have a good recent track record of using debt wisely - to pick up decent strategic acquisitions mostly, but also to gear up for large multi-year contracts - and then paying the debt off rapidly, and they have been in a net cash position a few times in recent years, so that's the pattern of behaviour I expect them to continue to follow.

f976d2de9ff9bebf96bcf5b5df72b8d4471022.png

8e13e4649a00a5d0b1f329f24a1eb762f8f197.png


I note there (above) that their NTA and their net asset value (including intangibles) have both increased while their intangibles (& goodwill) are essentially flat (down a smidge), so green ticks all 'round there.


a1b1f5b2f86d36c31e612bce79abd6c79c8e5c.png


3720e49d7c1786501bd0869fea06df2c9d7c9c.png


184aa25f83fdf42c9f12241b5c0154048b212e.png


Those three segments (above) are explained in the slide below. MET stands for NRW's Minerals, Energy & Technologies division by the way.

I note that while Mining division EBIT revenue was up a little, Mining EBIT was down -8.5% on the p.c.p. and Mining remains their largest sector exposure and division in terms of both revenue and profit, however Civil Revenue was up strongly (+40.6%) and MET was also up (+15.6%) and EBIT Margins improved in both Civil and MET, with EBIT improvements of +75.9% and +25.3% respectively, being greater in percentage terms than the corresponding increases in revenue for those two divisions.

On the one hand, the revenue generated by Civil and MET combined now exceeds the revenue generated by Mining, AND the profit margins on Civil and MET are improving, but on the other hand it's worth noting that the EBIT that Mining generated ($63.7 million) is still significantly higher than the combined EBIT from Civil and MET ($48.5m), so the margins are still clearly better within NRW's Mining division, despite that Mining division EBIT margin slipping this half compared to the p.c.p.

So it's a trade-off - they are achieving diversification of revenue, which is positive when the commodities outlook is so mixed, but that diversification is into other sectors that have so far had lower profit margins than NRW have been achieving in their Mining division, albeit those other sectors are exhibiting improving margins while their profit margin in Mining is slipping, so all things considered I'm happy enough as a shareholder with this progression - and that trade-off.

f9d52aa2637b55f845bab94d96ed93e4cf5d20.png


Next, the all-important Outlook & Guidance slide:

3a398e82afa315fe54bd48d09611dad61255b5.png


Their actual Revenue and Earnings (EBITA) for FY24 was $2.9 billion and $195.1 million (see NRW-FY24-Full-Year-Results-Announcement.PDF) so that guidance above for FY25 full year revenue of $3.2 to $3.3 Billion ($3.25 B mid-point) and FY25 full year earnings (EBITA) of $205 to $215 million ($210 M mid-point) represents improvements of +12% and +7.6% respectively over FY24, using those FY25 FY guidance midpoints, so overall they are guiding for a better year in FY25, but with a slight slip in margins overall (seeing as the earnings increase is forecast to be lower than the revenue increase in percentage terms).

In terms of commodity exposure within their largest division, Mining, NRW Holdings (NWH) do have significant exposure to coal, iron ore and gold, in that order:

e3ee34bb7fb9854cc93a94e38195e84b718f07.png

Interestingly, those are all multi-year contracts with the contract that is due to expire first being the OneSteel contract (SA operations) around the middle of this year, OneSteel being the company that went into Administration last week. The only other major iron ore contract is at Karara in WA - which is majority owned by China’s Ansteel Group – the Anshan Iron and Steel Group Corporation (52.16%) and Gindalbie Metals Limited (47.84%) - see here: https://www.kararamining.com.au/our-history/

Also worth noting that Mungari is one of the gold mines and mills owned and operated by Australia's second largest gold mining company, Evolution Mining (EVN), who are busy expanding that particular mine and extending its life using GNG (GR Engineering Services, a.k.a. GRES) as their main engineering and construction contractor there -

I hold NRW, EVN and GNG by the way; NRW and EVN in my SMSF, GNG in my larger portfolio outside of Super (alongside my largest position, LYL), plus NRW and GNG here on SM also.

Probably also worth noting that NRW's largest exposure is to Coal at various mines along Australia's east coast, but those mining services contracts are all Met Coal, there's no thermal/energy coal in there.

That's probably enough for tonight. I'm happy enough with this report - as a shareholder of the company. And we'll find out what the market thinks of it on Monday.

Read More
#SIMEC contract issues
Added 10 months ago

19-Feb-2025: NRW Holdings (NWH), which I hold both here and in my SMSF called a Trading-Halt.PDF this afternoon regarding their SIMEC contract in South Australia - for more details of that contract see here: https://www.australianmining.com.au/golding-and-simec-agree-to-600m-contract/ [02-Feb-2022]. Golding is a division of NRW (NWH).

When that contract was entered into, it was with OneSteel Manufacturing trading as SIMEC Mining. Not sure if the persistently low iron ore price is biting SIMEC and/or the US tariffs proposed on steel imports into the US.

SIMEC Group Ltd is a British international energy and natural resources business focused on resources, sustainable power, infrastructure, and commodities trading. It is part of the Gupta Family Group ("GFG") Alliance, owned by members of the Gupta family, which had a combined turnover of more than USD13 billion and combined net assets of more than USD2.3 billion. Its activities span renewable energy generation, mining, shipping, and commodities trading. (Source: Wikipedia).

According to Google, when I typed in: "Does SIMEC export steel to the USA?" the answer is "Yes, Grupo Simec, a Mexican steel company, exports steel to the United States. Simec is a major supplier of special steel in North America."

Also (from Wikipedia):

SIMEC Group in Australia:

In 2013, SIMEC Group refocused itself – mainly on to sustainable power, mining and infrastructure. Among many developments since then, in 2017 it acquired Arrium Mining and OneSteel operations in South Australia[4] for USD750 million.[1] The mining assets of the former company included iron ore (magnetite and haematite) mines in the Middleback Range[7][8] and a dolomite mine (to supply blast furnace flux) at Ardrossan, South Australia.[9]

In 2017, GFG Alliance purchased Arrium's Whyalla Steelworks in South Australia, announcing that a new AUD600 million investment would lift production to 1.8 million tonnes a year. In 2018 the company announced it would build a new steel manufacturing plant next to the existing one. It would be capable of producing 10 million tonnes a year – making it the largest in the western world – and have infrastructure to eventually double that capacity.[10]

SIMEC Mining acquired mining leases in 2018 for the Iron Sultan and Iron Warrior mines in the Middleback Range, 50 km (30 mi) south-west of Whyalla, reflecting the need for significant sources of iron ore for its expanding capacity.[10]

Another member of GFG Alliance, SIMEC Energy Australia Pty Ltd, acquired a controlling stake in South Australian renewable energy and storage technologies company, ZEN Energy Pty Ltd, in 2017 and formed a joint venture named SIMEC Zen Energy. Sanjeev Gupta said his company was investing in large-scale power projects to meet its own industrial requirements. Describing the high cost of energy for Australian consumers as "a crying shame for a country so rich in resources", he said "it has been a priority for us to take decisive remedial steps."[6]

References:

  1. a b John, Nevin (1 July 2018). "Stress reliever"Business Today. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  2. ^ "SIMEC Group"SIMEC Group. 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  3. ^ "About us"SIMEC Group. 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  4. a b "Our History"GFG Alliance. 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  5. ^ "Company Overview of Liberty House Ltd"Bloomberg. Bloomberg. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  6. a b "Whyalla steelworks owner Sanjeev Gupta buys majority stake in renewable firm Zen Energy". 20 September 2017. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  7. ^ "Arrium Acquired by GFG Alliance". 1 September 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2018. GFG Alliance has completed the acquisition of the Arrium Mining and Steel businesses ... the former Arrium Mining has been renamed SIMEC Mining and OneSteel re-branded as Liberty OneSteel
  8. ^ "Middleback Ranges"Mines and QuarriesGovernment of South Australia Department for Energy and Mining. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  9. ^ "Ardrossan Dolomite Operation" (PDF). Retention Lease Proposal. SIMEC Mining. March 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018 – via Government of South Australia.
  10. a b Hosie, Ewen (11 December 2018). "GFG Alliance drives SA iron ore sector with Whyalla steel expansion"Australian Mining. Retrieved 11 December 2018.


Expecting the announcement either tomorrow (Thursday) or Friday morning before the market opens.

It's not a thesis breaker because it's just one contract, but it should be interesting anyway.

Read More
#2024 AGM / Update
Last edited 12 months ago

27-Nov-2024: NRW Holdings (NWH) 2024 AGM Presentation

Also: Chair's-Address-to-Shareholders-(NRW).PDF

And: Results-of-Meeting-(NRW).PDF

Three of the five resolutions voted on today at NRW Holdings' AGM were carried with over 95% of votes in favour, but two were carried with around one quarter of votes cast against them, being the Rem report (26.18% against) and the re-election of Fiona Murdoch, a professional (career) company director who is also on the Boards of Ramelius Resources (RMS) and Metro Mining (MMI), and who succeeded Peter Johnston (who retired from the NRW Board this year) as chairman of NRW’s nomination and remuneration committee last year. Interestingly, it is assumed that proxy advisers have recommended voting against Ms. Murdoch's re-election as a protest vote again the remuneration that the company gives to their executives - as she heads the Rem Committee.

This article: Unparalleled seventh consecutive ‘strike’ for NRW Holdings despite record year, by Sean Smith, published on The West Australian news website today at 2:16PM, explains it in a bit more detail. It's behind a paywall, so if you don't have access, the gist of it is that despite NRW engaging extensively with shareholders and proxy advisers on their concerns, which have included but are not limited to the size of Mr Pemberton’s remuneration package and tweaking its pay policies while insisting it needs to pay “appropriate” money to reward and retain senior management, NRW has incurred a remarkable seventh consecutive strike against its executive pay policies despite a record all-round year.

Due to following proxy adviser recommendations yet again, some of NRW's larger shareholders have delivered an unparalleled, unbroken series of strikes against its remuneration report since 2017. This seventh strike - another “first strike” after the counter was reset again last year - resulted from NRW's pay report being opposed by 26.2% of voted shares, well down from the previous year’s 58.5% opposition but still above the strike threshold of 25%. However, the strikes could now be so commonplace that they warrant little attention from shareholders more concerned about the company’s performance. NRW chair Michael Arnett, who last year defended Mr Pemberton as a “best of class” chief executive, did not even mention this year’s strike at the AGM and it elicited no questions from the handful of shareholders in attendance.

Interestingly, despite the Rem report being voted against by 26% of voted shares, the resolution to grant FY25 Performance Rights to NRW's CEO & MD, Jules Pemberton, was voted up with 95.56% of votes "for" that resolution and only 4.44% against. Go figure!

c06080832cab9243455cf94d0c1d0d8d2a592e.png

NRW Holdings CEO & MD, Jules Pemberton. Credit: Rob Duncan/Kalgoorlie Miner


Shares in NRW Holdings, which celebrated its 30th anniversary earlier this month, are trading at record levels on the back of acquisition-driven growth as well as organic growth under long-time chief executive Jules Pemberton that has seen revenue, profit and dividends growing at a good clip.

The meeting started on a sombre note as the Chairman acknowledged the tragic death in October of Barry Breslin, an Irish subcontractor working on one of the Mitchell Freeway's southbound off-ramps who was either hit in the head by the arm of an excavator or had something fall on him - I have read both versions, but either way, he suffered severe head injuries and died in hospital later that day.

85587df6307062daeea98501a80b611dce5933.png

Barry Breslin, 35, from Donegal, Ireland, was killed after he was struck by an excavator at a worksite in Perth on Thursday 3rd October, 2024.

fc382d08e33a7879ecb176b2f9d84dc4ea5dc8.png

A photo posted by CFMEU WA shows the digger that is believed to have struck the 35-year-old man. Credit CFEMU WA/Facebook. 

CFMEU State Secretary Mick Buchan said the 35-year-old’s death was the 10th workplace fatality this year.

Source: https://thewest.com.au/news/disaster-and-emergency/mitchell-freeway-incident-man-dies-in-hospital-after-being-struck-by-excavator-while-doing-roadworks-c-16268460

And: https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/barry-breslin-gofundme-page-set-up-for-family-of-young-irishman-killed-in-workplace-incident-c-16306232

As far as NRW's FY24 financial results, we got those in August, and they were very good, so I won't go over those again. What I was more interested in was their guidance and division updates:

9edc3e8b58f399545ba8af007a7887974dc02e.png

8d7dcc3fdfaac64aa03726728df3b597de593a.png

The company has diversified away from mining services although mining still does account for a fair chunk of their revenue.

b47612468c720b04d52e89cd3b4c44773a3962.png

[I believe that Bunbury workshop photo above is in the old RCR Steel Fabrication shed, a very tall building on the old Bunbury ring road, close to the turnoff to Donnybrook, which was acquired by NRW when they bought that part of RCR Tomlinson (for next to nothing) from the RCR Administrators after RCR went into Administration a few years ago - My wife and I were living in Bunbury for a couple of years up until we moved to Adelaide 28 years ago so I used to drive past that shed most days.]

a500d1866ed884b16af5003ca38fa0cb990380.png

...and NRW provided updates today for each of those three divisions:

11f63eb064cf90c35981b31673c0735684ed2f.png

4180c1873d4b489186bf8a33e7a4a01351b354.png

a65c01456851cd09ef129c8f671e6227436b08.png

Here's a snapshot of NRW's growth through sensible and strategic acquisitions over the past 8 years:

da2e52df2f11d446a78d7f64a7f1ffc399cba9.png


NRW (NWH) started 2016 with a 5 cps share price (closing SP on 1-Jan-2016), and were 70 cps a year later. They're now $3.90/share, and recently made an all-time intraday high of $4.02 - I sold some here on SM @ $4/share that day, but it was a small trim, not an exit.

I'm a believer in taking profits as the share price rises significantly. NRW's SP has been on a good run for the past 5 months:


11976ac9515b3ea057e884bc9afa08e547a471.png

I don't see anything concerning in today's updates and FY25 guidance.

Apart from earnings being a bit lumpy due to the nature of contracting, particularly civil and structural engineering and construction contracts, this is a decent company that is growing at a good clip and making some excellent capital allocation decisions, in my opinion.

2f4b126d6c2f4f6a8ebbde8afed914533d0b9d.png


[held]

951645f7892a9c623b3dc059927c2e0082a0a9.png

1a49a07044f3236e4f28fd584b8346b6d1ed34.png


1f1088420fafcec94154aa5adac28eca5162f3.png

7ebeab4495e1b7a6172cb2c1c8af69b0945081.png

Further Reading: NRW Holdings (NWH) 2024 Annual Report

Read More
#Contracts
stale
Added one year ago

08-Oct-2024: NWH-NRW-awarded-Mungari-Mining-Services-Contract.PDF

Another decent contract announced by NRW (NWH.asx), this time at Mungari (gold mine) for Evolution Mining, with an anticipated value of circa $360 million, commencing November 2024 and expected to be completed by mid-2030. The project will average 150 personnel on-site.

NRW does mining services, including loading, hauling, drill & blast, plus engineering and construction work. This Mungari contract includes load and haul, drill and blast plus construction of site supporting facilities.

A feature of this announcement is the location of the project, located in the heart of the WA Goldfields, 50km northwest of Kalgoorlie and 40km north of Coolgardie, which they have said in their announcement today: is ideally situated to allow NRW to engage with local businesses and further develop the local community partnerships established by the Mungari Operations.

Not sure why that has been added, but possibly (a) to underline that this is not a remote location and that NRW can use local Kalgoorlie / Coolgardie people to fill many of the 150-odd roles, and/or (b) to perhaps appease the locals in the wake of all of these services being awarded to NRW - a Perth-based company - instead of any of it being awarded to Kalgoorlie-based companies. However, in fareness to Evolution, NRW have an excellent reputation in the industry and are reliable, large, and have economies of scale, and will not be going broke, and these things matter. Also, NRW will likely be sourcing materials and workers from Kal, and could also subcontract some local construction services companies to do some of the construction at Mungari.

Disclosure: I hold NRW both here and in my SMSF.

Read More
#FY2024 Results
stale
Added one year ago

15-Aug-2024: NRW-Full-Year-Results-Announcement.PDF

Plus: NRW Full Year Results Presentation.PDF

d7e6addfb15f4965ed9e6b71b87c60797b8f8f.png

d33c0f0b83414859ffe8cf5e8598462bfed342.png

6bb2be0d3a520f9237f900969295867078773e.png

b88e29d12ea3b31f350156d8e651d1d5ac61a3.png


Disclosure: I hold NRW Holdings (NWH) shares. They are up +30cps at this point in the arvo today on the back of these results - at $3.49 (+9.4%), but we still have 7 minutes to go...

Read More
#Director Buying
stale
Added 2 years ago

22-May-2024: Change-of-Director's-Interest-Notice.PDF

Let me set the scene - this $100K buy by David Joyce happened yesterday (Tuesday 21st May) - Here's what the NWH Board held prior to yesterday:

778cb336d3e2c262c953b41eea7cb9860d9d4f.png

Context is important here - the only two directors there that do NOT own NWH shares were both appointed to the NWH Board in the past 2 months - Ms Adrienne Parker just nine days ago - see here: Director-Appointment-Ms-Adrienne-Parker.PDF

...and David Joyce, two months ago (on 19-Mar-2024) - see here: Director-Appointment-David-Joyce.PDF

And David has just purchased $100K worth of NWH shares on-market @ $2.75 each.

But it gets better. He did it by the book. He waited until there was a positive Contract-Awards.PDF announcement yesterday - made prior to the open as it should be - and he bought on-market along with everyone else - in an informed market.

NWH closed at $2.72 on Monday arvo. The announcement was made pre-open on Tuesday. On Tuesday NWH opened at $2.74, traded as low as $2.71 and as high as $2.78, then closed at $2.74. David paid $2.75 each for 36,363 NWH shares during the day ($100K worth). That's not signalling. That's positioning. He's on the Board now and he wants a piece of the company.

I posted a straw here about that Contract-Awards.PDF announcement yesterday - see here: https://strawman.com/reports/NWH/Bear77?view-straw=26143

Note: Unless the issue has been fixed, that link will take you to my "valuation" for NWH instead of to that straw, and the straw will be below that "valuation", so you may have to do some scrolling. My "Valuations" are more price targets with some history and some bull case. If the link system has been fixed, then it will go directly to the straw.

Disclosure: Along with 83% of the NWH Board now, I also hold NWH shares.

Read More
#Contract Awards
stale
Last edited 2 years ago

21-May-2024: Contract-Awards.PDF

Over the years - particularly in recent years - I've held and sold contract miners like MAH, and E&C contractors like MND, but one company that does both that I've held throughout is NRW Holdings (NWH). And that's because they are quiet achievers who do not have a high profile, rarely blow their own trumpet (they don't have promotional management) and just keep steadily growing the business and improving it over the years, including through smart and strategic acquisitions, most of them small bolt-ons.

NWH don't announce every contract they win, but every now and then they put out an announcement like today's where they bring us up to speed with a whole bunch of recent contract awards.

Nice!

I hold NRW Holdings (NWH) shares in all of my major portfolios, including my SMSF, and I also own them here in my SM portfolio. They are one of those steady growers. They almost went bust under previous management with a different business model when the last big mining boom went bust - and they got down to around 4 cents per share. I was not holding them then because they looked like they would go broke, and they narrowly missed out on that fate, and since then they have really focused on risk management, proper tendering, improving margins, and targeting work strategically, as well as maintaining a solid (strong) balance sheet. They do use debt, particularly for M&A when they do it, but they have a recent track record of paying down their debt quickly and regularly being in a net cash position, which is what I like to see.

It was their misuse of debt during the mining boom that almost sent them broke - they were buying earthmoving equipment and other gear for contracts they were winning back when margins were a lot higher and it looked like the mining boom would go for a lot longer than it did, and then when the bust came they soon found themselves stuck with a huge amount of debt and most of their equipment was sitting idle so not earning them any money. So lots of asset sales, and they just scraped through.

They do it all differently now. They own some equipment but they mostly lease equipment rather than own it and although margins have reduced across the industry for mining contractors they tend to sign up alliance-type life-of-mine or longer term contracts with their clients, and unlike Macmahon (MAH) who do that also, NWH have managed to grow revenue AND earnings, while also expanding into E&C through some well-priced acquisitions. There are issues with some projects sometimes, as there always are, but they have the management and the risk-management experience and track record more recently to navigate through or around those obstacles.

If you want exposure to a sector like Mining Services and/or Engineering & Construction - NWH do both - and both have been on the nose for a while now, so there has been some value in those sectors - with a few companies starting to get positive re-rates in recent months - we highlighted SXE here recently and their positive re-rate by the market. It's happening, and NWH isn't a tiny company any more, they now have a $1.2 Billion market cap, so they're going to get on fundies' radars when they want some exposure to these sectors as they get re-rated.

NRW Holdings - NWH - not a sexy name, but worth a look if you're into that sort of thing.

Read More
#Broker Views
stale
Added 2 years ago

FWIW UBS have released an "Australian Engineering & Construction" research report which covers a number of companies in the space (ALS(neutral), DOW(neutral), MND(neutral), SVW(buy), WOR(buy), IMD(buy)) as well as NWH - note their "top picks" were Worley, Seven Group & Imdex


NRW Holdings

Buy rated. 12m price target A$3.15/sh

UBS View: We are Buy-rated on NRW, on the basis that we see the stock offering solid earnings leverage to the upcoming resource capex cycle (i.e. lithium/iron ore). This capex cycle underpins our forecasted +12% 3yr EPS CAGR, which we view as attractive given NRW is trading at a 1yr fwd P/E of 10x vs. LT average of 12x and prior cycle peaks of 16x. NRW and its subsidiary, Primero, have a proven win rate record on Civil Lithium iron ore projects, with the key focus remaining on successfully executing the large pipeline of resource investment

Key takeaways from the FY23 result:

FY23 result in line: NRW delivered FY23 EBITA of A$166mn, in line with guidance of A$162-172mn, and UBSe/consensus A$165mn. The Mining division was the standout (FY23 EBITA +26%) on the back of a strong margin delivery (FY23 EBITA margin 9.3% vs. 2H23 EBITA margin 8.0%). On the negative, the METS division saw an unexpected earnings deterioration in the second half. The division, namely, Primero, was significantly impacted by cost overruns on one of its last remaining fixed price construction projects (Strandline). This drove FY23 EBITA of A$31mn, -37% vs. UBSe

FY24 guidance: As expected, NRW provided FY24 earnings guidance, with revenues to be >A$2.8bn and EBITA of A$175-185mn (UBSe A$185mn). The company also noted that A$2.7bn of revenue is already secured for FY24 (and A $2.5bn secured for FY25, c.90% of cons.). We are forecasting FY24 EBITA of A $185mn, representing 11% growth vs. pcp

9284360f101dd750d8d084b27678142c5f33f0.png


DISC: Held in SM & RL


Read More
#Keeping Busy
stale
Last edited 2 years ago

17-July-2023: NRW Holdings (NWH), one of Australia's largest mining services companies, and one of my favourites (I hold them here and in my two largest RL portfolios, one of which is my SMSF), are keeping busy. Their latest announcement of new work (today) was: Golding-awarded-Toowoomba-Flood-Recovery-South-contract.PDF

6e4a8fc95b035df36d22284baf54917514c4df.png

$113m in revenue over 15 months. Nothing to sneeze at. And they've been delivering a steady stream of "New work won" announcements - see here: ASX Announcements - NRW Holdings Limited (ASX:NWH)

For anybody who isn't familiar with them, and can handle the mining services sector (I understand many avoid it), NRW Holdings (ASX: NWH) are worth checking out. They are gowing, mostly organically, but also via some smart (reasonably priced or cheap) and strategic acquisitions.

https://nrw.com.au/

Disclosure: I've held NRW shares for years, both here and IRL. They never let me down. Management are the "quiet achiever" types. Not into self-promotion very often, but they get the job done. And they are getting some insto's following them with positive views also now. Not many "Subs", but their market cap is over $1 billion now, so people can get decent exposure without buying 5% of the company. When sentiment towards the mining services sector turns positive again (it must do some day, surely!?!) I don't reckon NRW (NWH) will get left behind. And they've been doing OK even with the poor sentiment surrounding the sector.

They've got everything heading in the right direction. Their net profit margin is low, but that's the new winning business model in mining services these days, low to moderate margins on HEAPS of work. Volume of work is key, and volume is growing, and after a couple of years of dipping margins, NRW's profit margins were increasing again at last report, as shown below:

e514d0616e73a6e54ca889c65866bbb4ed0b93.png

81d525d42303ded6b5fa7ad03368af4d6bafa6.png

Oh, and did I mention, they are more than just mining services these days...

Read More
#Big New Contract for NST
stale
Last edited 2 years ago

03-July-2023: NWH-Primero-awarded-EPC-contract-for-KCGM-Growth-Project.PDF

79100a009b1491d7eabb966dbaef295c5217b5.png

That's a very nice EPC contract for NRW (NWH) to pick up, worth just under $1 billion ($973m), for NRW's Primero division (Primero being one of their smart acquisitions over the past few years). I have mentioned recently that NRW/NWH is my favourite mining services company that does the actual contract mining for mine owners, and one of the reasons why I like them (and hold them) is because of how they have successfully diversified their revenue into Engineering and Construction, including expanding into civil engineering, road and rail construction (they are big in rail construction here in Australia having done a lot of rail work for some big mining companies) as well as the design and construction of mining infrastructure such as this lot (in this announcement) for Northern Star (NST) - who I also hold shares in.

It's interesting that NRW's Primero division have spent a year and a half working through this with Northern Star (as explained in the second last paragraph of the announcement, as shown above) before finally being awarded the contract. That's taking ECI ("Early Contractor Involvement") to a whole new level! But I guess NST had to get Board approval and announce the positive FID (Final Investment Decision) for the $1.5 billion project before they started announcing contract awards.

With their "Drill and Blast" division, their large mining division, their engineering and construction division, their RCR Mining Technologies division, plus other divisions (see here: https://nrw.com.au/) NRW Holdings (NWH) are now Australia's largest mining services company.

Mineral Resources (MIN, aka MinRes) is a much bigger company, and Chris Ellison often describes MinRes as a mining services company, but the market regards MinRes now more as an iron ore miner (because they own a number of mines themselves) - with lithium assets - who also have a large mining services division. So, in terms of pure mining services, NRW, while being about one tenth the size of MinRes, are still regarded as Australia's largest mining services company, although I did read today that the merger between DDH1 (DDH) and Perenti (PRN) could potentially create a slightly larger mining services company than NRW (NWH). Perenti used to be called Ausdrill of course, and they acquired (or merged with) the formerly privately owned mining services company Barminco, and then changed their name to Perenti Global the following year, and now are just known as Perenti Ltd.

Disclosure: I hold shares in NWH, NST and MIN, but not PRN or DDH. DDH was on my watchlist, but I never pulled the trigger.

Back to NRW (NWH). Their fundamentals are encouraging. All are heading in the right direction:

e7a9db21a90dfdf2a7e66f781dce456a3cb61f.png

Their net profit margin WAS slowing, and isn't wonderful, but most contract mining is low margin work these days; they just need to compensate for the lower margins by having a LOT of work, i.e. more volume to compensate for the lower margins, similar to consumer staples retailers like Woolworths and Coles, except these mining services companies have a lot less customers to deal with, and the customers need a LOT of work done, usually for years, and sometimes over decades. NRW do have a lot of work, so that's a big tick. They are also working on increasing their margins, and we saw quite a good uptick in 2022, as shown above (after a few years of decreasing margins).

For those who may not know, KCGM stands for Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines, and their main asset is the huge Kalgoorlie Super Pit gold mine that sits on the edge of Kalgoorlie, and the associated mill and other infrastructure, plus surrounding tenements. A few years ago, KCGM was a 50/50 JV (joint venture) between the world's two largest gold miners at the time, Barrick Gold and Newmont GoldCorp (Newmont are currently acquiring Australia's largest gold miner, Newcrest Mining). Those two companies sold their stakes in KCGM to Northern Star Resources (NST) and Saracen Minerals (SAR) which was founded by and run by Raleigh Finlayson - who now runs Genesis Minerals (GMD). Saracen and Northern Star then merged, via the acquisition of Saracen by NST, so now KCGM is 100% owned by NST and they have recently announced they are going to spend around $1.5 billion to more than double the size of the Super Pit - check out my Monday 26th June post in the Gold as an investment forum for more on that. There's even more on that further down in the same post in the "Money of Mine (MoM) Podcast" update section. The MoM boys discuss the Super Pit expansion in their Thursday 22nd June podcast:

c5769558ca107c363ea91076ba145f83306261.png

Is it worth $1.5 Billion to Double The Super Pit? | Daily Mining Show - YouTube

This award by NST to NRW (NWH) of the $973m contract for the design, procurement, construction, and commissioning of the process plant facilities as part of the KCGM expansion over the next 3 years is the first major contract announced as part of this $1.5 billion Super Pit expansion, and is clearly the biggest contract as well, as it accounts for around two thirds of the project's total $1.5 billion cost (as announced by NST on the 22nd June).

I like it when one of the gold miners I hold awards a decent contract to another company that I also hold. Profits all 'round. That's certainly the plan anyway.

83b99a152c1907476a139a7823100331a7d663.png

2019 NRW Holdings Company video - YouTube

NRW Civil and Mining - YouTube

https://nrw.com.au/

Read More
#H1 FY2023 Results
stale
Last edited 3 years ago

16-Feb-2023: "It's all about managing expectations" - unknown, has been said by heaps of people.

NRW-Half-Year-Results-Announcement.PDF

bffd5324dcad3c6fb80ee2223099b264b7c928.png

996fb9944b56dc980d356c557f65e9b6517f02.png

NRW Holdings (NWH): Revenue up +15%, EBITA up +7.4%, Profit ("NPATN") up +3.9%, interim dividend up +9% to 8.5cps. Share price down -5.4% (or -16 cents) to $2.80.

Magellan Financial Group (MFG): Shocker, as expected, everything well down, but they didn't slash their dividend by as much as expected, and they are sounding reasonably upbeat about the future. MFG closed up +6.35% (up 60cps to $10.05). Announced a 46.9cps 85% franked interim dividend.

So it's all about market expectations and whether you underwhelm the market or exceed their expectations. Or just do as expected, like South32 (S32) - who also reported today, in line with expectations (which they have managed well) and they closed up +0.87% (or +4cps) in line with the market - the ASX200 closed up +0.80% and the All Ords closed up +0.81%. Not punished or rewarded. Expectations managed and expectations met.

But back to NRW (NWH): Their dividend is up 9% to 8.5 cents, but is unfranked. They said, "Future dividend payments until early 2025 are expected to be unfranked as the Group continues to access the ATO’s temporary full expensing allowance."

Fair enough.

UBS described it as a, "Slightly soft result. Focus will be on 2H23 tender outlook and pathway to cash generation improvement. We continue to believe NRW's outlook is favourable given the level of expected resource investment and that risks to earnings guidance and UBS' consensus for FY23 remain firmly skewed to the upside." While revenue and EBITA were both in line with guidance, and revenue slightly beat UBS' own estimate (which was $1.31 billion and NWH reported $1.33 billion in revenue), UBS said that, "1H23 EBITA c.2% below UBS' consensus although importantly FY23 guidance range reiterated."  

[Thanks @Remorhaz - see here: https://strawman.com/reports/NWH/Remorhaz?view-straw=21684].

Anyway, the market either wanted more, or else they were put off by the conservative commentary and cautious guidance, such as:

"Over the period we have extended a number of our long-term contracts, extracting additional value from the secured order book and have secured a number of new strategic contracts. We have maintained a very disciplined approach to bidding new work, which has meant that we have at times not won projects that we were well positioned to secure. Whilst disappointing to come second to a competitor, our people know the criticality of pricing our bids responsibly in line with current market conditions.

[Highlighting and underlining added by me]

Revenue and profits have increased relative to the prior comparative period, however margins have been impacted by the La Niña weather pattern, higher levels of overheads due to the delayed commencement of new work, longer tender cycles and investment in building capacity in Primero’s North American delivery capability to support growing client demand in Canada and the USA.

The Group’s cash balance decreased in the six months, which was expected, resulting from the unwinding of project advances received in prior periods, and the investment in working capital for the new long-term mining contract awards and extensions. This is expected to recover over the remainder of the year as these contracts mature."

And this:

"NRW’s total pipeline is $19.3 billion continuing the strong trend reported in FY22, and of this, $4.1 billion is submitted tenders. The value of work secured for FY23 is approximately $2.6 billion which is either in the order book or is expected as repeat business.

Guidance for the full year is reconfirmed with revenue expected to be between $2.6 billion to $2.7 billion and EBITA to be between $162 million and $172 million.

Tempering the positive near-term outlook is the macroeconomic environment where rising direct costs, together with high interest rates are delaying new project starts, particularly in the resources sector.

In addition, abnormally high rainfall levels in Queensland and some parts of Western Australia have caused delays on some of our current projects. This has impacted the results for the first half of FY23, which may carry over to the full year unless weather patterns return to long-term norms."

---

The bit I have underlined up there is a big tick IMO for NRW's management because they have learned from past mistakes not to bid too low and end up losing money on contracts. They would prefer to miss out on a contract win than to win the contract and then lose money on it. I like that discipline. SRG management also display the same sort of bidding discipline, and they reported today also, but didn't trade at all because SRG also called a trading halt this morning, announced another acquisition, and a capital raise (placement). They are a company that I still keep an eye on - even though I no longer hold - and I note SRG remain a top 10 position in Tony Hansen's EGPCVF portfolio.

I'm thinking NRW Holdings (NWH) are now the premier quality Australian mining services company - with MND (Monadelphous) being the best engineering and construction (E&C) company to the resources sector. NWH are the best contract miners with D&B (drill and blast) plus E&C capability as well. MAH are OK, but NWH are better.

The market sold NWH down -5.41% today, to $2.80, however, to put that into some perspective, they have had a good run-up into this result, and they were trading below $2.80 through most of December, and they closed at $2.79 on 03-Jan-2023. In my largest real life portfolio I'm still up +50% in capital gains terms on NWH (NRW Holdings), plus dividends, and their dividend yield based on my $1.87 average buy price is now 8.3%pa + franking (although there won't be any franking for a couple of years, as mentioned above). NWH have disciplined management who don't underbid just to win unprofitable work, and they have become very good capital allocators, with their recent M&A track record proving to be very good, similar to Codan's.

Codan (CDA) also reported today, and they were bid up +7.6% (+40cps to $5.66). I know a lot of people gave up on them when they went below $4/share, but Codan are a quality company with more than just one string ("metal detection") to their bow. And they announced another acquisition today - which is again immediately EPS-accretive - and is a small bolt on acquisition for their Zetron communications business - see here: CDA-GeoConex-Acquisition-Announcement.PDF

Codan are paying for that using cash. No capital raise required. Their Comms business is going very well, and their Metal Detection business will return to growth in future years with or without a return to normal conditions in Africa. Codan is my second largest position here on SM and the largest position in my largest real life portfolio. They are also the 4th largest position in my SMSF (behind NST, MIN & FMG, my miners have performed well for me).

The detour to Codan was really just to point out that sustained top-notch capital management by company management will usually see companies through the hard times and they'll come out the other side even stronger. Just like NWH will. They've had plenty to deal with, like the pandemic, the weather events in Qld and WA, plus significant headwinds around staff attraction and retention - due to the skilled labour shortage in the mining industry, especially in WA where NWH have a lot of work. And they are still putting runs on the board. They are calling out the challenges and the headwinds but that's what you want them to do. Underpromise and overdeliver in the longer term. They didn't manage to overdeliver with this result, but they delivered in line with the guidance that they had provided to the market, and that's a win in my book, given their headwinds.

While companies that disappoint are being smashed, and companies that give cautious or no guidance are also being sold down hard, I have noticed that some of those companies are starting to recover as investors process it all and realise that declining to provide firm guidance in the current environment - or providing cautious guidance and calling out obvious headwinds - is not the end of the world. Nick Scali Furniture (NCK) rose +3.15% (+32c) today. When you've got a company of NCK's quality and track record who have just delivered yet another cracking result, lack of full year guidance is but a minor inconvenience, if that. I have been accumulating NCK in my largest real life portfolio from last Thursday through to yesterday, at an average price of $10.11. NCK closed today at $10.47 and I reckon the sell-down is probably over, or the worst of it at least.

I hold NRW (NWH) here, and in my SMSF, and in my largest real life portfolio. They are my favourite mining services company at the minute, and I liked their report today considering what they've had to deal with during the period reported on.

I like to buy them at around $2 or below, and trim the position up around $3 or above. As a mining services company, they will tend to trend well along with sentiment, both positive and negative sentiment, so they are reasonably easy to trade around a core position.

Very well run company these days, and it wasn't always so. They almost went broke a few years back, and I can't see that happening again. I didn't hold them then, because they weren't a quality company then, but they are now. They have quality management now anyway. As far as being a "quality company", that is rather subjective and depends on your personal preferences and point of view I guess. They're not for everybody, sure, but I like them a lot.

And they do stuff in other industries also - other than mining, such as roads, rail and other infrastructure.

95502f8a02b4380ad7a2545814e897427e0c3f.png

Read More
#2022 AGM Presentation
stale
Last edited 3 years ago

09-Nov-2022: At around midday today, NRW Holdings (NWH) is up by around +4% (or +10 cents to $2.53) on the back of their AGM and AGM Presentation - which you can view here: NRW-2022-AGM---CEO-Address--Presentation.PDF

Here are some of the key slides, which give you an idea of why this company is one of the few Australian mining services companies whose share price is actually increasing, and they're one of my favourite companies, and a core position in all of my main portfolios.

155deacd2d4d550f407216146d0cf8b7c815a8.png

f4995697c9c4089b6f2fd1efd16e42a70c7f6f.png

28b798ced1c380f75f7f078d063b33ed8c9aab.png

d874f2cd50eb0771b11394b02b2349b4313177.png

86d6b6ef183d5da4551a6bdc5f91a936b1e0b6.png


That's a nice pie-chart on the right showing how diversified their revenue is now. They do a lot of work now outside of mining, including infrastructure work such as rail line construction, roads, bridges, airstrips, etc. They are also diversified across mining, from actual mining, to earthworks, to drill & blast, through to processing plant engineering and construction. They picked up the RCR Mining Technologies business from the RCR Administrators for next to nothing, and they did not overpay for any of their other acquisitions either.

One of the things I admire most about their management is how disciplined and strategic they have been with their acquisitions. Every business they have bought has enabled them to move into a new area with a company that has already carved out good market share within that area and has lots of experience and a good reputation within that industry - or industry segment. It's not only a lot quicker, it's also a lot safer, than trying to expand into a new area with very little experience and no track record. And the areas that NRW have expanded into have been complimentary to their existing business divisions, so every acquisition has made good strategic sense - because it's the old 1 + 1 + 1 = more than 3; the value of the whole package is greater than the sum of the parts. There is packaging and cross-selling that is available across their client base, and many clients would much prefer to deal with a single company that can provide multiple services than with a number of different companies.

This is a company that got down to about 4 cents per share and almost went broke due to high debt and reduced work in prior years - during the bust that followed the last really big mining boom. But they have REALLY turned that around. They have not made those mistakes in recent years. They now have $219.3m in cash holdings, a record $5.2 BILLION order book and a $19.8 billion pipeline of tender opportunities (work they either have tendered for or are planning to tender for), and they are profitable, having made $97.4 million of net profit on $2.4 billion revenue in FY22. And guiding for between $162 and $172m in earnings (EBITA) on between $2.6 and $2.7 billion of revenue in FY23.

Yeah, there's a lot to like about NRW Holdings (NWH) these days.


9b584bbf840583f436f745bdf1f647e23c5358.png

Read More
#Confirms MACA Approach
stale
Added 3 years ago

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

18 August 2022

NRW Confirms Non-Binding Indicative Proposal To Acquire MACA Limited NRW Holdings Limited (ASX: NWH), confirms that on 11 August 2022 it approached the board of MACA Limited (MACA), with a confidential non-binding indicative proposal under which the two companies would merge through a combined cash and share merger by way of a scheme of arrangement (Merger Proposal).

NRW’s Merger Proposal was to acquire all MACA’s shares for an implied consideration of $1.085 per share1

. NRW views the Merger Proposal represented a compelling value proposition for all MACA shareholders, valuing the equity of MACA at $375 million2 (Consideration). NRW’s Merger Proposal was subject to certain conditions including completion of confirmatory due diligence to the satisfaction of NRW (expected to be completed over a two-week period), finalising finance arrangements, entry into a scheme implementation agreement and a unanimous recommendation from the MACA Board that MACA shareholders vote in favour of the Merger Proposal in the absence of a superior proposal.

NRW’s confirms it has received a letter of interest to underwrite an acquisition finance facility from its financiers.

In NRW’s view, the Merger Proposal was capable of being a superior proposal to the current conditional Thiess takeover offer of $1.025 and warranted further investigation by MACA.

NRW has today received correspondence from MACA that it does not consider the Merger Proposal as superior to the current conditional Thiess takeover offer and does not propose to engage in further discussions in respect of the Merger Proposal in the form presented.

NRW Managing Director Mr Jules Pemberton said:

“We are disappointed that the Board of MACA has indicated that it is not willing to entertain our compelling proposal. “NRW believed it was uniquely positioned to offer attractive value for all MACA shareholders and, importantly, the benefits of continued exposure to MACA’s business as part of a larger and diversified provider of contract services to the resources, infrastructure and energy sectors across Australia.” 

Read More
#Media Speculation
stale
Added 3 years ago

Both NWH and MACA (ASX:MLD) have gone into Trading Halts citing "Media Speculation".

They will both come out of their trading halts on Monday 22/8/22.

M&A???

Read More
#FY21 Results
stale
Added 4 years ago

Reported EBITDA of $266.M and net cashflow from operations of $147.4M. Increased labour costs in WA Pilbara did impact the results, but most work in that State have now concluded and new contracts have priced in the increased costs. If borders do open and costs come down this could improve margins on recently signed contracts. In a hard sector managment has done extrordinary well in building out services enabling NWH to bid on bigger contracts. A final dividend of 5 cents per share fully franked a 3.6% yield on the closing price. This was only ever a trade and will be taking profits over the next few days if the share price continues to run. 

Read More
Valuation of $2.20
stale
Added 4 years ago
Mining services so deserving of a low multiple, but soon to be debt free, booming mining sector with infrasturucture contracts. Risk from increase input costs with employee salaires in WA but risk/reward seems to be to the upside leading into the finacial report.
Read More
#Equipment Sales/Debt Reduction
stale
Last edited 4 years ago

12-July-2021:  Boggabri Mining Contract Mobile Plant Sale

NRW Holdings (ASX: NWH) was up just shy of +12% today on the back of this announcement (up 18.5 cps from $1.545 to $1.73).  It's off a low base, but it's a start.  Basically one of the coal miners that their Golding division does work for (BCO: Boggabri) is opting to buy the equipment used at their minesite off NRW for $81m (to be settled by the end of this month), of which $61m will be applied to reduce NRW's equipment (asset) financing debt, leaving NRW in a net debt position of only $34m - down from circa $115 million as at 30th June 2021 (which was made up of interest bearing debt of $260m less cash of $145m), and it shouldn't take too long to knock off that other $34m of net debt either, as it reduces as their cash balance rises, and also as they actually pay down the debt.  NRW have a recent history of paying down debt reasonably quickly, after taking on debt to fund acquisitions - which are always earnings accretive acquisitions - coz I keep a close eye on that (I hold NRW/NWH shares).

The loss of the mining services work at Boggabri (that utilised that equipment that will be sold to BCO) will reduce NWH group pre-tax earnings by circa $1.8M per annum, which is nothing really for a company their size.  Golding will continue to perform maintenance services on site at Boggabri across the 38 major mobile mining assets that are being sold/transferred from Golding to BCO, plus another circa 50 pieces of major mining equipment, engaging a workforce of over 150 personnel on site.

It's a good deal for NWH.  The market liked it too.

Additionally, back in mid-June, they made this announcement:

18-June-2021:  NRW - Letter of Intent for Karara Mining

While that is so far just an LOI (letter of intent), once an agreement with Karara Mining has been agreed and signed, the anticipated value of the contract is circa $702 million over five years with a project workforce averaging around 250 personnel.  They also announced in late April the award of a $27.2m contract for NRW's wholly owned subsidiary RCR Mining Technologies division to Design and Construct a Primary Crushing Plant (PCP) at Fortescue Metals Group’s (ASX:FMG) Cloudbreak mine.  

They said at the time, "After successful delivery of the previous Hopper 9 Crushing Facility at Fortescue’s Cloudbreak mine in early 2020 this award is strategically significant for the business as it showcases our engineering led delivery of innovative solutions. RCR is partnering with Primero Group [another NRW division] who will provide engineering support and construction services. This project will be complimentary and concurrent to the Solomon Hub Conveyor and Crushing plant we are currently delivering for Fortescue Metals Group, announced earlier this year. NRW subsidiaries, RCR Mining Technologies and DIAB Engineering, together with Primero, bring a very strong Design, Manufacture and Construction capability to this project with an engineering led philosophy of solutions and innovation."

On the same day (29-Apr-2021), NRW also announced that its wholly owned subsidiary Primero Group had been awarded a new contract for the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) of the Coburn Minerals Sands project for Strandline Resources (ASX:STA).  The project includes the delivery of both the Wet Concentrate Plant (WCP) and the Minerals Separation Plant (MSP) to beneficiate a heavy mineral concentrate and be followed by a dry separation process utilising conventional electrostatic separation, gravity and magnetic fractionation to produce saleable premium quality final products, including chloride ilmenite, rutile, zircon and zircon concentrate. The award follows a successful ECI process awarded in Q3 2020, which was then converted to Front End Engineering Design (FEED) to further optimise the project, with finalising of contract terms and pricing coinciding with Strandline completing funding requirements for the project to proceed. Project completion is planned for Q4 2022, with construction peaking through 2022 employing approximately 180 site personnel to deliver the project on site.

These are just some of the new contracts they have announced in the past few months.  NRW is an interesting company, with a market cap of over $700m (and over $1 billion last year before their share price halved from over $3/share to under $1.50/share), they are part contract mining (like MAH and MLD), and part E&C (engineering and construction, like MND, GNG, LYL), and always busy.

Disclosure:  I hold NWH, MAH, MLD, MND, GNG and LYL shares.

View Attachment

Read More
#Broker (UBS) Views
stale
Last edited 5 years ago

19-Feb-2021:  UBS have upgraded their coverage of NRW Holdings (ASX:NWH) after NRW's H1 results release yesterday:

UBS - 19/02/2021:  Buy, Target: $3.00  (Gain to target $0.71 or +31%)

First half results were below UBS estimates, amid larger-than-expected impacts from the pandemic on staffing, which affected productivity.

The implied margin signals the performance, outside of pandemic-affected contracts, would have been tracking ahead of UBS estimates.

The broker envisages a significant opportunity over the medium term and retains a Buy rating. Target is reduced to $3.00 from $3.15.

Target price : $3.00  Price : $2.29 (19/02/2021)  Gain to target $0.71 (31.00%)

(excluding dividends, fees and charges)

Previously...

UBS - 25/11/2020:  Buy, Target: $3.15

NRW Holdings has announced an off-market bid for Primero Group ((PGX)) at $0.55 a share. UBS observes the proposal builds on the recent acquisition of DIAB Engineering and RCR Mining Technologies, representing a further diversification of the strategic platform.

Primero is a vertically integrated business providing engineering, design, construction and operating services to the minerals, energy and infrastructure sectors. Buy rating and $3.15 target retained.

--- end of broker note summary ---

Citi are the only other major broker covering NRW (NWH) according to FNArena.com and Citi have not updated their clients on NRW since August when NRW presented their full year numbers for FY2020.  Back then (on 21-Aug-2020), Citi had a "Buy" call on NRW and a $2.75 price target.  Since then, NRW have acquired PGX (Primero) and we've had the NRW H1 FY2021 results released yesterday.

NRW (NWH) already owns over 98% of PGX (Primero Group) and are compulsorily acquiring the remaining <2%.  Their previous 3 acquisitions have been very good, all earnings-per-share-accretive, and they do not appear to have overpaid for any of them.  There were some insto's (including Perennial Value Management and Credit Suisse) who got involved in this latest (PGX) takeover, which caused the process to drag on for about 4 months, however NRW remained disciplined and did not raise their offer price at all, so in the end (as in last Friday) those insto's ended up selling their 18% of PGX to NRW at the original price offered by NRW.  Quality management at NRW and they are a quality $1 billion plus m/cap company, in as much as contractors can be quality companies.  Revenue tends to be fairly lumpy at various times.  Clearly oversold yesterday, hence I purchased more here on Strawman.com and also in one of my other RL portfolios. 

NRW had increased revenue (by +45% over the pcp) but had much lower margins due to increased costs due to COVID - which were mostly higher labour costs and lower productivity due to high employee turnover - also due to COVID - with their WA workforce often confined to local labour only.  NRW do a lot of work in WA, including all three of the major iron ore expansion projects in WA's Pilbara, South Flank (BHP), Eliwana (FMG) and Koodaideri (RIO).  They also do a lot of contract mining around WA.  The strict quarantine rules there - which included regional quarantine zones within WA - were very disruptive and basically stopped people from travelling to jobs from outside of the local area in many cases - at various times. 

There was also a big $19.1m one-off write-down due to Altura Mining going to the wall last year when the lithium price tanked (one of the reasons I'm wary of lithium - there is a LOT of supply that can come back online very quickly once increased demand drives the price back up to suitable levels).  That $19.1m write-down was partially offset by the Gascoyne Resources (GCY) recapitalisation which meant that NRW received $16.5m that they had previously written off (in the prior 12 month period).

Positives:

  • NRW were still profitable during the half, just -13% less profitable than the pcp ($29m vs $33.4m profit after tax);  
  • Their revenue was +45% higher at $1.138 billion vs $784 million for the prior corresponding 6 months period (ending 31-Dec-2019). 
  • They have reduced their debt and gearing (gearing now < 20%);
  • They've increased their NTA/share from 72cps to 87cps;
  • Their interim dividend has been increased from 2.5cps to 4cps (and they've outlined a more generous dividend policy going forwards);
  • They have a very healthy Order Book (WIH), and have provided a good revenue guidance range of A$2.2B to A$2.3B for the full year - with the low end of that range already covered with secured work;
  • Their Tender Pipeline has now increased to A$14.1B, of which NRW has current submitted tenders of circa A$5.0B;
    • Additionally, Primero have announced secured work for the second half of FY21 of circa A$130M and holds preferred contractor status for over A$1B of projects;
  • Growth is expected to continue as a result of increasing expenditure on infrastructure projects at both a state and federal level; and
  • Demand for commodities remains strong.

They are also now in the final steps of securing 100% of PGX.  They have worked alongside Primero on some projects already and are already being awarded new work which will involve both Primero and NRW's "RCR Mining Technologies" division working together to deliver the projects.  Primero’s business and its competencies are complementary to NRW’s compelling strategic delivery platform and will enable NRW to provide a broader client service offering - Primero is a vertically integrated engineering group that specialise in the design, construction and operation of resource projects.  NRW’s newly renamed Minerals, Energy & Technologies division will include Primero and offer clients continuity of services across the whole lifecycle of resource projects - from early planning, design, development, construction to operations and maintenance.

While yesterday's H1 results were not what the market had hoped for - particularly in terms of the lower margins and lower earnings/profits for the half (due to COVID, as explained above), those issues are temporary, not structural, and they're back in the "buy" zone for me now.

[I hold NRW (ASX:NWH) shares.]

Read More
#H1 FY2021 Results
stale
Added 5 years ago

18-Feb-2021:  NRW Half Year Results Media Release   plus   NRW Half Year Results Presentation

Also:  Half Yearly Report and Accounts

Record First Half Year Revenue

Highlights

  • Revenue up 44% to A$1,168M; first half of FY20 (pcp) $808.7M.
  • Earnings (EBITDA) increased to $132.8M up 28% compared to $103.8M* pcp.
  • Margins on Pilbara projects impacted by resource availability due to continued resource constraints related to COVID-19 measures
  • Cash balance at $171.4M and net debt reduced by $43.2M to $96.5M
  • Gearing sub-20% (including Lease Debt)
  • Bank debt fully repaid – Golding acquisitions and Corporate Notes
  • Order wins in excess of $1B, including two major infrastructure projects
  • Interim dividend declared of 4 cents per share and updated Dividend Policy advised
  • Strong cash conversion – expected repayment of contract advances the major movement in first half working capital
  • Net result includes non-cash expenses related to the amortisation of acquisition intangibles ($9.0M) and tax expense ($11.2M) offset against prior year losses
  • Primero (ASX:PGX) takeover - moving to compulsory acquisition - delivers a step change in scale and diversity to NRW’s Minerals, Energy and Technology (MET) pillar. MET secured its largest project to date to deliver a Primary Crusher and Overland Conveyor for the Queens Project at the Solomon Hub for Fortescue Metals Group. Led by RCR Mining Technologies and supported by Primero, NRW Civil and DIAB Engineering demonstrating the end to end delivery capability of the enlarged group.

Note: (*) For comparative purposes, prior period EBITDA is adjusted to reflect application and finalisation of AASB 16.

Commenting on the performance of the business, Jules Pemberton, NRW’s Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director said:

“I would once again like to begin my commentary on the Company’s performance by recognising the significant contributions made by the NRW workforce in delivering these results in what remains a continuing challenging environment presented by COVID-19.

Our entire workforce has continued to work hard every day around the nation despite the different challenges we have faced state by state through the consequences of full lockdowns and partial lockdowns, but in particular the border closure impact which has limited our access to resources through what has probably been the busiest six months in NRW’s history.

Despite these restrictions the Company has delivered a record first half revenue, increased earnings and maintained its fiscal discipline by once again delivering a strong cash conversion.

Our strong first half performance has allowed the Board to update our Dividend policy, commented on below, which will deliver an interim dividend of 4 cents per share, up 60% on prior comparative period.

I am also pleased to report that despite the ongoing issues related to COVID-19 we have been able to provide entry-level employment and upskilling opportunities through apprenticeships and trade upgrades. We have also taken on graduates and vacation students in disciplines aligned to our key activities.”

Outlook

The business has delivered significant growth over the last four years due to both sustained growth in the Company’s core markets and the successful acquisitions of Golding, RCRMT and BGC Contracting.

NRW Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director Jules Pemberton said:

“Growth is expected to continue as a result of increasing expenditure on Infrastructure projects at state and federal level, demand for commodities remaining strong and as a consequence of the recently announced Primero acquisition.

Working closely with the Primero team since the acquisition announcement has confirmed the opportunities to expand our Minerals, Energy & Technologies (MET) specialised capabilities which will provide leverage for the combined expertise to pursue new business initiatives across a large pipeline of opportunities.

The addition of Primero to the MET business represents a further diversification of our strategic platform to offer clients continuity of services across the whole lifecycle of resource projects – from early planning, design, development, construction to operations and maintenance.

In addition, our exposure and now strengthened capability to participate in the future energy minerals and renewables sectors is also set to grow through Primero’s existing client base and significant future opportunities.”

The Order Pipeline remains strong with the potential for further Infrastructure projects to be accelerated as part of joint federal and state priorities to address the economic consequences of COVID-19. The Pipeline of tenders and prospects expected to be awarded in the next 12 months has increased to $14.1B of which circa $5B are currently submitted tenders. Order Intake in the half was just over $1B generating an order book at the end of December of circa $2.8B. Primero has an order book of circa $165M and holds preferred EPC contractor status across multiple projects totalling around $1B.

NRW is maintaining its forecast revenue of between $2.2B to $2.3B for FY21. The lower end of this range is now covered with secured work.

Interim Dividend and Updated Dividend Policy

The Board of Directors has agreed an updated dividend policy which recognises that the Company whilst delivering on its growth objectives through a number of strategic acquisitions has at the same time demonstrated continued strong cash generation. The Board has concluded that in future the dividend payout ratio will be 40% to 60% of Normalised Net earnings, (Net Earnings excluding non-cash amortisation of intangibles and non-recurring transactions). In establishing this policy, the Board has reserved its position to direct available cash to meet strategic investments if the capital structure of those investments is best met from own funds.

Given the importance of the BGC and Primero acquisitions over the last 12 months priority was given to ensuring appropriate liquidity to support both growth from the acquisitions and organic growth.

The Directors have declared an interim dividend for the six months ended 31 December 2020 of 4 cents per share which compares to 2.5 cents per share declared in the prior comparative period. The dividend will be fully franked and will be paid on 8 April 2021.

--- ends --- 

[I'm a happy holder of NRW (ASX: NWH) shares across my main 3 portfolios, and they are also on my Strawman.com scorecard.  It's been a brilliant turnaround since they got down to 5 cents per share on 1-Jan-2016 due to high debt and reduced work at that time.  Their management have been a lot smarter since then, and their acquisitions have been very well chosen - and they have NOT overpaid for any of them.  I contacted Kim Hyman, their company secretary this morning to point out that in their original dividend/distribution notification announcement today they put 100% as the corporate tax rate instead of 30% (top right on page 4).  He emailed me back within 5 minutes to thank me for the heads up.  Another tick in my book.  NRW (NWH) are not a small company any more (m/cap=over $1 billion now), but I have always been able to reach out to management when I have a query or comment, and they always reply promptly.]

Read More
#H1FY21 Results
stale
Added 5 years ago

Record First Half Year Revenue Highlights

  •  Revenue up 44% to $1,168M; first half of FY20 (pcp) $808.7M.
  •  Earnings (EBITDA) increased to $132.8M up 28% compared to $103.8M1 pcp.
  •  Margins on Pilbara projects impacted by resource availability due to continued resource constraints related to COVID-19 measures
  •  Cash balance at $171.4M and net debt reduced by $43.2M to $96.5M
  •  Gearing sub 20% (including Lease Debt)
  •  Bank debt fully repaid – Golding acquisitions and Corporate Notes
  •  Order wins in excess of $1B, including two major infrastructure projects
  •  Interim dividend declared of 4 cents per share and updated Dividend Policy advised
  •  Strong cash conversion – expected repayment of contract advances the major movement in first half working capital
  •  Net result includes non-cash expenses related to the amortisation of acquisition intangibles ($9.0M) and tax expense ($11.2M) offset against prior year losses
  •  Primero (ASX:PGX) takeover - moving to compulsory acquisition - delivers a step change in scale and diversity to NRW’s Minerals, Energy and Technology (MET) pillar. MET secured its largest project to date to deliver a Primary Crusher and Overland Conveyor for the Queens Project at the Solomon Hub for Fortescue Metals Group. Led by RCR Mining Technologies and supported by Primero, NRW Civil and DIAB Engineering demonstrating the end to end delivery capability of the enlarged group

DIsC: I hold

View Attachment

Read More
#M&A: Primero Takeover
stale
Added 5 years ago

16-Feb-2021:  NRW to proceed to compulsory acquisition of Primero Group

plus:  NRW Half Year Results - Conference Call details - Thursday 18-Feb-2021

As I mentioned yesterday, I expected NRW to quickly move to compulsory acquisition of the remaining (less than 2%) of Primero Group (PGX) shares that they do not already own, and today they announced exactly that.  They have also given details of their conference call that will accompany their results release on Thursday (18-Feb-2021).  Links to both announcements are above.  [I hold NRW (ASX: NWH) shares.]

Read More
#M&A: Primero Takeover
stale
Added 5 years ago

15-Feb-2021:  NRW Holdings (NWH) closed at $3.09 twelve days ago - on 03-Feb-2021 - after hitting an intraday high of $3.19 that day.  On Friday they had slipped back to $2.67/share, after extending the closing date for their takeover offer for Primero (ASX: PGX) once again, having only managed to acquire 80.35% of Primero (as of Thursday 11-Feb-2021).  There were a few substantial holders holding out for a better offer it seems.  Credit Suisse was even buying PGX shares on-market during January (increasing their holding from 5.4% to 6.73%) while the offer from NWH for PGX was open.  Those substantial holders have all now agreed to sell their shares to NWH it seems, because today (15-Feb-2021) NWH updated the ASX (and the market) that they had moved from owning 80.35% of PGX to now owning 98.39% of PGX, which is a HUGE increase in a single business day.  Obviously, because they own over 90% of PGX, NWH can now move to compulsorily acquire the remaining PGX shares, in this case being less than 2%.

The way I see this as having played out was that NWH have made some really smart and earnings-accretive acquisitions over the past 2 years, and this looked like another one, hence the initial positive market reaction when NWH announced the acquisition originally back on 24-Nov-2020, almost 3 months ago.  NWH (NRW Holdings) shares closed at $2.59 the day before that announcement, and were up to $3.03 by 10-Dec-2020 (17 days, or 13 trading days later), a +17% increase in their SP in just over a fortnight.  They've waxed and waned since then however as the offer has dragged out a lot longer than many might have expected - due to those substantial shareholders holding out for a better offer that did not come.  The offer remained the same ($0.275 cash plus 0.106 NWH shares for each PGX share held) throughout the entire offer period.  It was not increased and it was not going to be increased. 

As with previous offers (for other companies), NWH remain very disciplined and were prepared to walk away if their offer, which they considered fair and reasonable, was not accepted by 90% plus of PGX shareholders, which it now has been.  Of course, they could not really just "walk away" when they owned 80% of PGX, as they did last Thursday, but what I'm trying to say is - that the remaining substantial holders have now finally realised that the offer was final and there wasn't going to be a better one, and that's why they've sold their PGX shares to NWH (since Thursday).

I see this as another positive development.  I believe NWH are going to report very well this month, and I believe this paves the way for another positive market re-rating of the company - another leg up.

[ I hold NWH shares in three of my four RL portfolios, including my super, and they are also on my Strawman.com scorecard.]

Read More
#GCY outcome
stale
Added 5 years ago

22-Oct-2020:  Gascoyne Update

Update in Relation to Gascoyne Resources Limited

Leading Australian Resources and Infrastructure contractor NRW Holdings Limited (ASX: NWH) is pleased to provide an update on the agreements reached with Gascoyne Resources Limited (ASX: GCY) (or “Gascoyne”) following their successful recapitalisation process.

The key elements of our agreement are

  • Mining Contract – NRW has agreed binding terms with GCY for an extension of both Mining and Drill & Blast services for the full life of mine at the Dalgaranga Gold Project which increases the overall contract value by circa $180M.
  • Recovery of all pre administration debts:
    • NRW has received $7 million in cash as foreshadowed in the recapitalisation agreement, and;
    • NRW received 24 million GCY shares (post consolidation) valued at $12 million at the issue price of the equity raising.
    • A further $13.7 million will be paid linked to ounces produced and the gold price.
  • NRW also exercised its rights as part of the Entitlement Offer and now holds in total 36.9 million shares in GCY (post consolidation) valued at $19.6 million based on the GCY closing price on the 21st October 2020.

Commenting on the work undertaken with Gascoyne and FTI as administrators Andrew Walsh NRW’s CFO noted:

“We have worked closely with the teams in both Gascoyne and FTI to support the recapitalisation plan recognising that a viable Dalgaranga project was critical to the success of that process. Output from the project has been consistently above 6,000 ounces a month for most of this year which has provided the basis for a great solution for both Gascoyne and NRW”

“Recent announcements on potential additional resources will provide opportunities for NRW to provide additional services beyond the current Life of Mine Plan”

 

[I hold NWH shares, but not GCY shares directly.  However, as a NWH shareholder, I now also have indirect exposure to GCY via NWH's 14.72% substantial shareholding in GCY.]

Read More
#Response to media article
stale
Added 6 years ago

20-Mar-2020:  Response to media article

Yesterday I updated my commentary (reasons) around my valuation for NWH (NRW Holdings) and said that they were certainly worth a great deal more than the $1.14 that they were when I was typing that update.  They closed at $1.095, but I imagine they'll rise today.  I knew that they had debt, but very manageable debt levels for a company their size and in their position (within their industry). 

This morning they have released a "Response to media article" announcement (link above) which discusses why their debt is NOT going to bring them undone, and that the majority of it is related to equipment leases, with much of that equipment being able to be returned with no penalty (i.e. the leases can be cancelled at any time with very little notice, and are only applicable while NRW retains use of that equipment, and they retain the equipment only when it is being used to generate income for them).  This equipment is mostly earthmoving and mining equipment. 

NRW Holdings (NWH) have expanded rapidly in the past couple of years - since their near-death experience after the mining boom went bust - and they have learned from that.  One thing they do now that is different to the prior mining boom is that they don't just go out and buy equipment outright to service new contracts.  For the most part, they lease the equipment instead, so that when circumstances change, they can simply return the equipment, rather than being stuck with a lot of expensive machinery that is sitting idle and not earning them any money (during the down/lean years). 

The new AASB16 accounting guidelines mean that ALL current lease obligations (including equipment leases) need to be included in their current debt numbers, which was not previously the case (in FY19 and prior to that the numbers would have looked very different).  Today's announcement not only breaks their debt down and explains what it all is, but also gives you a repayment schedule for the next couple of years showing how quickly they are going to pay it off, and what contingencies are in place should circumstances go south on them.  

The final paragraph is, "NRW is continuing to support its clients and their projects. We have not experienced any material impact to our operations and equipment utilisation remains consistent with our activity expectations. We are working closely with clients to monitor the health and well being of site personnel and to ensure continuation of all operations and projects."

So business as usual for NWH (NRW Holdings) as I suggested yesterday should be the case.  I would like to see more companies release information like this that is so comprehensive with regard to their debt situation.  It would certainly help to ease speculation about which companies might be in danger of going under.

Read More
#Company Presentations
stale
Added 6 years ago
Read More
#New Contract Awards
stale
Last edited 6 years ago

03-Jul-19:  This one is not a new contract award, but instead a variation to an existing contract to provide additional trucking capability at Stanmore Coal's Isaac Plains East coal mining operation, which will result in additional revenue being paid to NRW by Stanmore (SMR). 

This is as a direct result of Stanmore Coal buying a new 600-tonne class excavator which will increase overburden removal productivity rates and reduce average unit overburden costs.  The acquisition of the new excavator will maintain ROM (run-of-mine) coal volumes from Isaac Plains East in the short term and allow accelerated ramp-up of the Isaac Downs Project once the approvals are granted.  It all means more work for NRW as they provide all of the haulage (ore transport) there for SMC.

NRW's Announcement:  Isaac Plains East - Additional Capacity

SMR's Announcement:  SMR: Stanmore Coal investing in open cut efficiency

 

Disclosure:  I hold NRW (NWH) shares.

Read More