Key Notes on Half Year Result (to complement @shivrak & @Slats notes):
The Good:
· Gross Margin improved from 68.2% to 68.7% (PcP) - small but powerful change. Due to subscription revenue (92% margin) increasing from 27.9% to 29.2% of revenue and a small tick up in Processing margin.
· Annual Revenue Retention Rate over 110% average for last 5 years maintained.
· Free Cash Flow of US$30.6m is 32.7% of sales, the highest it’s been, up from 31.6% FY21 and 30.8% PcP. Debt of US$90m was added for the Resi acquisition of which US$7m was paid back in the period and net cash position was -US$75.3m debt, but the business is producing cash at an increasingly fast rate so this should easily be paid back in 2 years.
· Customers grew 29% and products 43% but mostly due to addition of Resi. Without Resi products were up 10%, I couldn’t see how many unique customers Resi added. ARPC increased 7% if you exclude Resi, but down 8% in total due to lower ARPC for Resi customers
The Ok:
· Revenue up 9% to US$93.5, up 7% if you exclude the Resi Media addition.
· NPAT of US$19.1m up US$5.7m or 43% PcP. Note FX gains/loss favourable variance of US$5.6m is the key difference.
· Total Processing Volume of US$3.5b was up 9% PcP of US$3.2b, but down on prior half of US$3.7b. Due to the seasonal nature of giving, the drop on the prior quarter is fine. Note Q1 volume was disappointing but Q2 recovered strongly. Margin on Processing up fractionally from 58.6% to 58.8% and Revenue as a % of TPV was also constant at 1.9%.
· EBITDAFI US$26.9m up 12%, but EBITDAFI% down to 29% from 31% PcP and 34% for FY21 (for some reason this was not highlighted in the announcement… but note “Underlying EBITDAFI” was 32% up from 31% PcP – due to Resi acquisition costs and government grant variances).
The Bad:
· Outlook downgrade to EBITDAFI of US$60-65m down from US$64-69m with commentary highlighting continued uncertainty from Covid impacts – market no like!
· Operating expenses increased to 40% up from 34% H2 FY21 and 38% H1 FY21. Excluding Resi transaction costs it was consistent with PcP at 38%.
· Months to recover CAC of 24.3 is up massively from 15.4 (PcP) reflecting the higher marketing spend as well as a higher proportion of sales to smaller customers in the period.
· staff costs have increased higher than originally anticipated, as we respond to the competitive environment. Headcount up 24% to 547 but would have been down 17 without Resi additions.
Quotes on COVID impact:
Despite pressures that have been felt globally from the COVID-19 environment, Pushpay has not seen any material change in digital giving reverting to non-digital means, indicating that our Customers in the US faith sector may have undergone a fundamental technological shift as a result of the current environment.
We have also seen ongoing impacts from the COVID-19 environment, with consolidation of some churches, particularly in the small segment, and slower decision making on new subscriptions, particularly over the US summer holiday period
Conclusion: The market has punished the share price due to the earning downgrade and a lack of conviction in management commentary about even reaching the downgraded figure. I had hoped for stronger growth and will have to pull back my valuation forecast which is clearly overly optimistic with a back of the envelop adjustment to $2.33 down from $2.72 due to FY22 sales variances.
It’s still a great long-term hold in my view, the cash generation and long-term growth focus of the business underpins its value but on a PE of 52 on the H1 result (yesterday’s price) you have to have a lot of faith in it’s growth to see the value.
Disc: I own PPH (RL)