Rectifier Technologies took a severe hit to the share price today, down 8.3% to 3.3cps in this morning’s trade, a 12 month low.

There’s been no news from RFT, which could be the problem, however it is more likely to be feeling Tritium’s liquidity pain and the sell off may be in response to the AFR article today titled “Tritium asks Queensland Government for up to $90 million Bailout.” I believe RFT relies on Tritium for about half its revenues (stand to be corrected). If Tritium were to fail this would have an immediate impact on RFTs profitability.

The AFR article is copied below:

Embattled Brisbane fast-charging company Tritium has asked the Queensland government for an equity injection of up to $90 million as it tries to deal with its dire liquidity issues.

While the company has warned it may be forced to close its Australian factory and move its headquarters overseas to ensure its financial survival, it is understood the request to the Palaszczuk government is unlikely to be successful.

Tritium chief executive Jane Hunter said she had been in discussions with all tiers of government to try to help the company, which listed on the Nasdaq in the United States in 2021 with a “double unicorn” $2 billion valuation but now has a market capitalisation of $US38 million ($59 million).

“It’s been extremely difficult in Australia to secure sources of capital,” Ms Hunter told The Australian Financial Review.

“To keep sovereign manufacturing capability, Australia will have to put money and legislation into it because just like [funding under America’s Inflation Reduction Act], that’s the only reason people are into factories over there.”

Ms Hunter said the Albanese government’s $3 billion National Reconstruction Fund that will start next year will be too late for Tritium, which has been issued a show-cause notice about its underperformance on the American bourse.

“We’ve had discussions with all levels of government. Unfortunately, the National Reconstruction Fund won’t be ready for us to access it. It will be too late for us,” she said.

“I think there’s a possibility that the CEFC [Clean Energy Finance Corporation] could come in, but we have to have a foundation investor and they have to be Australian.”

ENDS

Disc: Held IRL (0.8%) SM (3.7%)

I agree with the comments made, but thought I would put a bear case.

Bear case #1. No large follow-on orders, revenues drop to the previous average.

Bear case #2. Large order does eventuate, but requires setting up a manufacturing capability in the USA. This goes poorly.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if #2 happened, although perhaps someone here knows about the US government incentives that de-risk this?

Held

Rectifier Technologies (RFT) is one of my smaller speculative holdings (IRL), however I’ve been accumulating it at a steady pace this week both IRL and on Strawman.

Here we have a profitable $55 million microcap with EV tailwinds, that in FY23 paid a fully franked dividend of 2.3% (gross 3.3%) while reinvesting 90% of its earnings back into growth. And at least for now, there appears to be significant growth opportunities.

RFT has a history of extremely lumpy earnings as you can see below:

Source: Commsec

FY23 has been an exceptional year for RFT with NPAT of $6.46million and a ROE of 40%.

@Winiworked out in his Quck Maths straw that it is conceivable for FY24 NPAT to be in the vacinity of $5.25 million. This would be down on FY23, but still a solid result! if achieved, this will make today’s share price look extremely cheap.

This would put ROE at c. 32%. If RFT could sustain growth and a ROE of 30%, at the current share price of 3.7 cps the business should return investors 16% per year including the fully franked dividends. If the multiple were to expand from the current 8.5x FY23 earnings, investor returns could be significantly higher than this. This is highly likely if growth is sustained.

It will be some time before we know whether growth can be sustained, however I don’t think this will be a binary outcome. With RFTs technology having superior efficacy to its competitors and less waste heat generated from its units, there should be significant tailwinds for RFT in this thematic. I believe the future is asymmetric in RFT’s favour.

With the current share price under 4 cps (and continuing to weaken), I believe this is a unique opportunity to build a speculative position in a business operating in a forward facing thematic with an asymmetric probabilty for further growth.

Disc: Held SM, accumulating IRL under 4 cps.

2 plus 2 is 4, minus 1 that's 3, quick maths.

The normally tight-lipped RFT management provided some granular detail I didn't expect to receive in the recent annual report by breaking out how much of the contracts received from Tritium and i-charging had been delivered and what was remaining. 75% of Tritium's $20m USD order has been completed, and 37% of i-charging's $22m order has as well. That leaves ~$19m USD to deliver with management stating they were on track to complete by the end of 1H24.

Which gives us a nice platform to work off what the 1H result may look like. At a 65c exchange rate that gives us ~$29m AUD from those two contracts. I expect the remaining business to contribute it's usual $3m plus in FY23 there was $4m in non-Tritium/i-charging EV revenue which I am not sure how to account for looking forward but let's assume that is $1m in the current half.

Tally that all up and it comes to ~$33m revenue in 1H24, compared to $19m last year. EBITDA margins fell half on half last year from 25% to 23% as RFT takes a slight margin haircut on the large volume orders, so let's apply the 23% margin to get $7.5m EBITDA. I see no reason why ITDA would change much from it's ~$500k a half leaving $7m profit before tax. Apply a 25% tax rate and you get $5.25m NPAT for 1H24.

At a current market cap of $65m, $5m+ earnings in the first half would leave the business trading exceptionally cheaply especially given the growth. Of course, the big question is what does the 2H look like as those big contracts roll off. When he presented to Strawman, Exec Director Nick Yeoh noted that once their rectifiers are integrated into a customers product the decision to shift away isn't taken lightly. Given i-charging's Blueberry chargers are so new to market I can't see them shifting away and would expect some commentary on a further commercial relationship with them. Tritium is harder to peg given it's never been disclosed exactly what products RFT's rectifiers are in and there is a chance newer products have been designed without them.

I plan on getting down to the AGM in November and seeing if I can get some light shed on the big question of what does 2H24 and onward look like. Commentary from the annual report was positive, but no doubt the market would like the certainty of renewed contracts or supply agreements.

As the market looks forward to a record half year for RFT but has concerns over whether it is sustainable, RFT have posted this three days ago on LinkedIn, referring to their recent full year results -

As we celebrate this milestone, we remain focused on fostering sustainable growth and delivering exceptional value to our clients. We are confident that our strong foundation will enable us to thrive in the coming years.

Thank you to our incredible team for their unwavering dedication and passion. Together, we have achieved remarkable results and set the stage for an even brighter future.

View our official FY23 results here: https://lnkd.in/g8qEUMWS

Good update from Rectifier today especially around orders. Based on this update they have supplied 75% of Titanium's orders and 37% of I-Charging orders and expect the balance to be delivered in FY23. So we can expect them to achieve sales of at lease $29M AUD for this half year. That is very significant when you consider total revenue for last FY was $39.4m.

On the outlook they stated this -

"Long-Term E-Mobility Outlook: Despite near-term grid capacity challenges, the Company expects continued revenue growth in the E-Mobility sector due to consistent demand for charging modules.

In conclusion, the Company is strategically positioning itself for growth in the EV industry, focusing on innovation, automation, and customization to adapt to evolving market needs."

This bodes well for the future and based on these statements, I expect some pretty big order announcements over the next few months.

This statement is also very bullish from them and outlines the huge tailwinds if they are successful -

"RT22 Opportunities: The Company has identified new opportunities for the markets of the RT22 in conjunction with existing customers and new customers to sell the product into the USA Federal Government National EV Infrastructure (NEVI) $7.5b program by redesigning the RT22 for automated manufacturing in high labour cost environments."

Currently trading on a PE of 10x possible a lot lower if they can show reasonable growth this FY

Based upon a quick review of results and announcements of sales orders, Rectifier (RFT) seems to have two large EV charger customers

i-Charging (Blueberry chargers) - purchasing the RT22 50Kw module with announcement of USD22m PO 16 November to be fulfilled through 2023 … that’s AUD30m give or take. Presumably a meaningful chunk of RFTs $39m FY23 revenue.

• Its pretty hard to find out much more about iCharging as they seem to be privately held and according to Pitchbook were founded 2019 with Early Stage VC money.

Tritium - (the focus of my analysis)

• 28 April 21 - Exclusive arrangement with Tritium to End March 2022
• 25 Jan 22 - Continued arrangement with Tritium to End March 2023
• 9 Feb 22 - $20m USD Purchase order for a 35Kw rectifier (another AUD 30m give or take)
• 28 Sept 22 - Delays in shipping expect PO to be fully fulfilled by End of CY2023

Given the timing here, this could represent at least AUD$15-20m of the RFT revenue recognised in FY23.  

These 35Kw rectifiers presumably would have been for the PK350 product line which is a Tritium product for Europe (https://www.tritiumcharging.com/product/pk-350/) and not available for sale in North America. Hence, presumably not going to take advantage of Tritium's big ramp up into NEVI manufacturing with its new Lebanon Tennessee factory. I suspect the big 20m purchase order announced in Feb 22 could have been associated with this product line. 

*** Tritium seems to have moved on beyond a 35Kw rectifier to a 50Kw module as they are rationalising their manufacturing to the new modular line ***

Tritium rationalising its Product Suite into two modular products RTM75 and PKM150 - January 2023 Investor presentation https://investors.tritiumcharging.com/static-files/c360767c-4c45-442d-bc81-a479179ba7e1

This could signal a sweet spot for the Rectifier RT22 50Kw module.

The RTM platform (stand alone chargers with 50Kw/75Kw) has two slots for rectifier modules which could indicate 1 x Rectifier RT22 50Kw module or some combo of smaller rectifier modules (but that would seem to defeat the purpose of standardising on a reduced set of component parts)

According to spec sheet the. PKM150 (charger cluster) has got 100/150 KW per charger with a standalone rectifier with up to 300Kw total (i.e. 6 x 50Kw Rectifier RT22's if that's what they are using). The PKM is for a cluster of chargers all running off a single rectifier cabinet.  

There is also a NEVI version of the PKM150 https://tritiumcharging.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/23-202-NEVI-brochure-v3.pdf being marketed for the US which just seems to be a bundle of 4 x chargers + 2 x rectifier units with 12 x 50Kw Rectifer modules. I'm guessing this is what Tritium is going to be manufacturing in its new American factory (no point tooling up the new factory to manufacture the legacy product lines)

According to Tritium's February 2023 Investor presentation https://investors.tritiumcharging.com/static-files/c360767c-4c45-442d-bc81-a479179ba7e1, they are gearing up for 11,000 total units for CY23 with the new factory in Tennessee eventually of scaling to 30,000 units per year in addition to the 5000 unit capacity they have in Brisbane.

However, Here is my concern

Are the Rectifier RT22's what Tritium is using moving forward?  

• If they are, then I can see a rosy future for RFT. Tritium's plans for ramp up in production should indicate a healthy pipeline for RFT and the build up of RFT's inventory could indicate they are gearing up towards this and I think can justify the RFT growth projections for the next few years (if they are the Tritium supplier).
• If they are NOT. Then I can't see how RFT can match this years revenue let alone deliver growth projections. Conspicuous in its absence are any announcements about renewal of Tritium/RFT arrangements beyond March 2023 and no mentions of any further purchase orders. These arrangements seemed to be preferred supplier arrangements all the way back to 2018 and exclusive supplier arrangements for the last couple of years … NOW CRICKETS.

Can anyone cast light on this?

DISC: Hold DCFC IRL (not on Strawman since its US listed) and seriously considering RFT.

Rectifier Technologies

RECTIFIER TECHNOLOGIES LTD

Market Cap $73.12M  

RFT stated this in their half year report and could signal that a new order is likely in the near future -

"The customised 'high-voltage input rectifier' project development is on track to provide prototypes to the customer in mid- 2023. The customer requires production to commence in early 2024. Our research and development team is in the early stages of investigating a customised liquid-cooled rectifier module development, once an agreement with the customer is signed, the project will commence in earnest."

Great result from RFT as a number of members on this platform eluded to -

Sales of $39.8m up 144%

Profit of $6.6m up 1212%

Market cap of just $73m and they have over $6m in cash

Inventories of $18.5m up $12.6m which is a great indicator that they still have a huge pipeline of order to fulfil following on from the announcement of USD42m in contracts announced over the last year.

Also very bullish commentary from the company indicating that they are becoming more investor focused with an added option plan for the staff.

Looking forward to a great full report from RFT for the following reasons -

• First half achieved sales of $19m and net profit of $3.7m
• Announced a purchase order for AUD 33m from I-Charging in November last year to be delivered by the end of this calendar year
• Nicholas confirmed that this order was on track in the recent interview on Strawman
• This is just one customer and doesn't take into account other orders/customers
• They increased their inventory by almost $4m in the first half of FY23 to almost $10m in order to fulfil orders.

If they can achieve a similar result for the second half, then their full year result should come in at $7m plus net profit, putting the business on a multiple of around 9. This is too cheap for a fast growing business in the EV space. I believe a multiple of around 20 would be more reasonable.

Big thanks to @Strawman for the meeting and @mikebrisy for his thoughts.

My small spec position in RFT is largely based on waiting for a rerate based on their very good recent sales. Since they have been around for 30 years and profitable they seem pretty solid. Last half results seem to indicate that they can turn higher revenue into higher profit.

The plan, barring thesis creep, is to exit after a year or two following a share price lift. Seems to have a reasonable chance of coming off? I don’t think the upside is reflected in the share price.

This was a good meeting, hearing from a board member, long time employee and major shareholder. However, to be honest, I came away with mixed feelings. I need to watch the recording again and do some analysis.

I have little doubt that this firm will be well-managed as a sustainable, profitable business.

My concern is that it might not be well positioned for the massive industry tailwinds that are building up. In the words of Nicholas himself, there is a risk that "we get left behind".

On the one hand, they have matured the RT22 platform relatively recently, and it is well-positioned as a key component in the fast-charging segment.

On the other hand, Nicholas could not clearly articulate who their target customers are, nor their plans to monetise this platform in the next crucial phase of industry development.

I think that in order to understand this company properly and to understand its prospects, we have to understand the competition. I believe (or suspect) that there are a lot of estalished power systems players in the EV charger sector, alreeady making $100s of millions or $bn in annual sales. It is already a major market, and its growing very quickly. As well as the industry leaders, there are doubtless countless component suppliers, who are well-funded given the overall positive vibe for the industry.

According to the IEA, over 0.5m fast chargers were installed in 2021 - mostly in China. And its growing rapidly. Fast charger networks are being cited by the EU recently as a constraint to achieving EU EV uptake goals. I've seem similar stories in the US, who are much further behind (although not as far behind as Australia!).

With IRA and equivalent legislation in the EU, both are going to be catching up hard in the next few years.

My point it, the explosive growth is happening now, the big players are already there and RFT is talking about going to conferences and discussing standards, and being available to all customers, and questioning whether they might build US capacity to be in the game for IRA deals. It seems to lack conviction, clarity and substance.

I hold a position in RFT as a speculative stock. But I am not convinced.

Source: AFR

A nice fast charging market update from Tritium.

https://www.tritium.com.au/ev-charging-market-trends-in-2023-and-beyond/

A few key takeaways for me:

@Rick you post has reminded me of an AFR article i read last week around China's rapidly growing ev market. I'm a bull on RFT and chargers but found this swapping concept interesting and one to keep in mind. Not something I'd imagined, but seems obvious in hindsight. Say all batteries were charged this way you'd have much higher utilisation of each charger and in theory need less of them (although still a lot more than we have today)!

Don't have the link but excerpt below.....

The existential threat to Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel comes from China, not from net zero or from green deals in theWest. Chinese sales of petrol and diesel cars fell 20 per cent in absolute volume terms in February from a year earlier. Sales of plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) kept rising explosively and reached a record 32 per cent of the market for standard passenger cars. At the current pace, EV sales in China will hit 8 million this year, helped by the proliferation of battery-swapping stations. Rather than charging your own car, you do an instant swap. No need to wait. No need for chargepoints everywhere.

The introduction of Australia’s first emission standard will help to accelerate the uptake of electric vehicles in Australia. More electric vehicles will require more charging stations and Rectifier Technologies is likely to be a beneficiary of the new policy. Subscribers can find the full story in the AFR. I’ve copied part of the story below.

Disc: Held IRL (0.5%)

Labor launches Australia’s first emissions standard to boost EV supply

Jacob Greber, AFR

“Carmakers will be penalised for importing internal combustion engines under a federal plan to drive greater supply of electric vehicles into the Australian market and cut at least 3 million tonnes of carbon by 2030.

Labor on Wednesday morning announced what it described as Australia’s first national electric vehicle strategy to widen the range of electric vehicles available to consumers and encourage greater use of low-emissions models.

“Transport is the third-largest source of emissions in Australia,” the government said in a statement.

“This Strategy will help cut our emissions by at least 3 million tonnes of carbon by 2030, and over 10 million tonnes to 2035.”

The announcement foreshadows the biggest shakeup in Australia’s car market in decades, and will raise concerns motorists will be forced to pay more for some of the biggest selling, but higher emitting, vehicles currently available.

It would also align Australia with the world’s biggest car markets, including Europe, and comes just days after the US Environmental Protection Agency announced pollution limits that would mean EVs account for up to two-thirds of passenger vehicle sales by 2032.

Labor insisted on Wednesday that the strategy would ultimately pave the way for Australians to buy more efficient, low emissions vehicles.

By introducing a fuel efficiency standard, carmakers will need to ensure the average emissions of all the cars they sell in a given period fall below a certain threshold. That would force manufacturers to prioritise sales of EVs and potentially drive up the cost of high-emissions models that dominate the current sales charts.”

I was a little late to this party. I thought I should RECTIFY that, but when I arrived I found @Wini, @shivrak, @Noddy74 , @mikebrisy and a heap of other Straw folk all Fully CHARGED! The Liquid was running low, down to a trickle, and I only managed to pick up a few loose electrons today before the leakage stopped altogether! :)

Seriously, great work to @Wini and other Strawfolk who had the foresight to get in on Rectifier Technologies so early. I hope you are all doing very nicely.

Since reading Wini’s latest straw and valuation, I have taken a closer look at RFT, and I totally support Wini’s valuation of 10 cps.

I also agree that sales and profits should be sustainable following on from the Tritium contract.

I watched the YouTube video @mikebrisy shared about the RT22 50KW EV Charger Module. It would appear that this is ‘state of the art’ technology in an industry with tremendous tailwinds. Looking at the forecasts, we are on the cusp of a five fold increase in EV charging demand over the next 8 years, with growth compounding at 28% per year (Statista.com). I think RFT has a good foot hold in this market.

See the chart below.

“An electric vehicle charging market forecast by Next Move Strategy Consulting projected the market to reach around 128.13 billion U.S. dollars in 2030. EV charging was worth around 14.5 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, and is expected to have a compound annual growth rate of 28.21 percent between 2022 and 2030”

I have added the probable FY23 results to the Commsec chart below to get some perspective on what this looks like in comparison to historical data. I am particularly excited about the return on equity (ROE). Based on the lower end of Wini’s FY23 NPAT expectations of $7 million, the ROE is likely to be upwards of 53% ($7 million NPAT / $13.3 million equity).

Source: modified from Commsec data

I don’t know if RFT can sustain a ROE of 53%, but if they can you could pay 5 cps and expect a 24% annual return with all profits reinvested into growth (McNivens formula). If you paid Wini’s valuation of 10 cps you could still expect a 16% annual return. However, this all depends on whether RFT can continue to win contacts, grow sales, maintain current margins, and reinvest 100% of their earnings back into the business at a 53% ROE. I don’t think I will be chasing RFT up to 10 cps, but I’ll certainly be on the look out for any loose electrons! :)

Disc: Added IRL today

27/2/23 Half Yearly Report and Accounts

A fantastic result from RFT, revenue of $19.3m was not only a record for a half year but eclipsed any full year in the company's history. Margins held up better than I expected as well with NPAT of $3.8m leaving the business well placed to smash my $4-5m target going into FY23.

While all segments improved, it was the supply of rectifiers for electric vehicle chargers than drove the result. Revenue in the EV segment grew from $4.5m to $15.7m and EBITDA margin improved from 9.6% to 29.5%.

The big question from this result is whether it is sustainable. As I have outlined before the near future is underpinned by some large EV contracts with Tritium and i-charging for $20m and $22m USD respectively. It is hard to gauge exactly how much of this result came from those contracts (and how much remains in the pipeline) but considering the i-charging contract was only signed in mid-November and in late September RFT updated the market with delays to the Tritium contract with only "part" of the order fulfilled I would think they have yet to contribute meaningfully. Even if the full $15.7m from the EV segment came from those contracts, it would still leave $47m in the pipeline to sustain strong profit results like this for the near future.

No doubt moving forward profit results will be lumpy, there is a lot of operating leverage in the business but I think the pipeline is strong enough to sustain growth moving forward.

Read recent straws by @Noddy74 @shivrak and @Wini for the details leading to my decision today to establish a small position in $RFT. (0.3% RL and 1.5% SM).

With a healthy contract backlog and profitable operations combined with easing supply chain, @Wini called it that FY23 and FY24 could be the breakout for RFT. Today gave support to that heads up.

I've had them on my watch list for 3 years and, although I prefer not to buy on "good news" when the market gets excited, today I dipped my toe in the water. No doubt, there will be plenty of opportunity to add more at cheaper prices, and I would like to get up to my usual position size for a speculative stock of 1.0%.

Just back of envelop, if H2 looks like H1, then the p/e would be about 9. And it generated cash this half! Of course, that is no way to think about this company, as it positions itself to provide "picks and shovels" into the global EV market. There are many competitors for this huge market, but $RFT are in the game with deep capabilities. It has all the credentials for a speculative position in the portfolio.

$RFT has been around for 30 years, and they have deep expertise in power systems engineering. For those intrested in going deeper on the technicals and also seeing and hearing about the RT22 50KW EV Charger Module, have a look at this video.

The whole video is interesting for those with an appetite for getting into some of the electrical engineering details of EV and Battery technology. The R22 bit starts at around 57: 30.

Disc: Held

The half yearly report came out after close and it's a monster. Revenue was up 194% to $19.3m. Profit after Tax up 834% to $3.9m. Free cash flow of 'only' $3.1m as inventory is up - but overall this is the break out result investors have long waited for.

We probably shouldn't have been surprised given the orders the company had previously announced but the lack of shareholder engagement and supply chain delays had meant many weren't going to believe it until they actually saw it. Now that it has come - and given there's still so much of just the existing orders to fulfil - it's going to be very interesting to see what the market thinks of it tomorrow.

For me this is the standout result of an admittedly disappointing reporting season.

@Wini is likely to be sitting back with a brandy in one hand and a pipe in the other tonight!

[Held]

25/11/22 AGM Presentation

Some fantastic details in the RFT AGM presentation from a management team normally light on them. The company now has a tremendous backlog of work to fulfill after winning another $20m+ USD contract from i-Charging, but after delays with servicing the existing Tritium contract the market is wary on the short term outlook.

Management conceded chip supply chain issues remain, but are doing what they can to substitute components and hired a dedicated supply chain manager. However the most important piece of news is how quickly they are ramping up production at their existing facilities. There is 140 current staff members in the manufacturing arm, with plans to grow to 180 by the end of this year and 205 by mid-2023. With no anticipated production capacity constraints it could lead to a very strong FY23.

There was also some great insight into future developments. Megawatt charging is a focus as member of the CharIN industry group. At scale the technology would be a gamechanger delivering 3000kW of power compared to current high powered chargers maxing out at 350kW. Management also committed to V2G technology but conceded it was still too early for commercialisation so the Highbury remains on ice for now. Finally the RT21 was announced with minimal details other than focusing on the defence industry and looking to commercialise next year.

RFT has been a much maligned stock after a few false starts (with the stock price more so than the business) but if they can get a clear runway on the supply chain issues which have hurt them since Covid FY23 could shape up to be a company making year.

Annual Report - Confirms my belief that RFT will have a strong future in our electrification transition

Highlights

• Diversity of EV orders, Driven by RT22 module. Interestingly they are going for further certifications on units ?
• V2G not forgotten about...
• RT21 Commercialization 2023/24
• Megawatt charging system development
• Generally company looking much more transparent than previous reports
• Segment revenue shown
• R&D spend increasing
• Balance sheet stable

Rectifier Technologies Hiring - Great news, especially as there have not been any significant releases lately...

RFT was up 9% today with no official news from the company. The pop appears to relate to Tritium (listed on the NASDAQ) announcing a contract with BP to supply 1000 EV fast chargers across Australia and New Zealand. The market is assuming that RFT, which is a supplier to Tritium, will benefit from this arrangement.

Trading halt - Tritium related ??

Another Contract Extension with Tritium - Encouraging news, Tritium has now listed on the Nasdaq and are expected to announce a USA factory shortly...

I still only see upside in the company with minimal downside .....

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02478804-3A585892?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

I used the recent, abrupt spike in the share price to sell my small position. There is still a lack of transparency with regard to the company's strategy, even though they are a good leveraged play on the EV thematic. The recent spike beyond 7c made for a full valuation too.

The Federal Government's announcement for a "Future Fuels" package seems to have lit a fire under the Rectifier Technologies share price (ASX:RFT) -- up 47% at time of writing.

It's a paltry investment from the feds -- about 2.5% of the fossil fuels subsidies paid out last year -- and I'll try to avoid opining on this Government's green credentials (or lack thereof), but it does seem to bode well for a company like Rectifier. It will see approximately 1000 public sites, 400 businesses and 50,000 households fitted with fast chargers under the scheme.

Well done to shareholders, and looks like wini's valuation is well within striking distance!

V2G Podcast - "Trailblazers with Walter Isaacson - 16.The electric grid: keeping the lights on"

Really enlightening podcast on the changing electric grid, touch's on V2G opportunity.

RFT:ASX provides listed Australian opportunity to this market, Im very interested to understand when the RFT solution comes to market

VW to enables bi directional charging on all EV's on MEB platform starting next year 

 

https://chargedevs.com/newswire/vw-to-enable-bidirectional-charging-on-all-evs-on-its-meb-platform-starting-next-year/

26-Feb-2021 (after market close):  Rectifier Technologies Half Yearly Report and Accounts

Not good.

• Revenue down -37.45%
• Profit down -55.26%
• No interim dividend
• NTA down -8.32% from 0.661 cps to 0.606 cps
• Share Price so far steady this morning at 4.0 cps.

One positive is that their gross margin improved from 48% to 54%, however that did not translate into a higher NPAT margin because their NPAT for the 6 months was $593K, being 8.8% of revenue vs $1.326M in the pcp (6 months ending 31-Dec-2019), being 12.3% of revenue, so their NPAT margin has declined by -28.5%, from 12.3% to 8.8% of revenue.  That's still a reasonable profit margin, but they do look overpriced when their was no growth in the half, material declines in revenue, profits and NTA, no dividend, and their share price is 6.6 x their NTA.

31-Aug-2020:  Rectifier Technologies Announces 0.1c Fully Franked Dividend   plus   Preliminary Final Report

Recently:  04-Aug-2020:  COVID-19 Update

In summary:

• Total revenues decreased by approximately 11.33% to $16.7 million compared to $18.9 million in the previous reporting period.
• The decrease in sales during the year to 30 June 2020 was due to the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Governments in each of our operating jurisdictions have imposed restrictions on movement to protect the safety of the general public, particularly in Malaysia where our factory was shut down in the middle of March, resumed operating with a limited capacity in April, and was fully operating from May onwards.
• The Company reported a profit before tax of $3.1 million compared to a profit of approximate $3.3 million in the previous reporting period - despite the negative global economic impact of COVID-19.  The Company was able to report a profit due to support from the Governments in each operating jurisdiction, financial institutions, key stakeholders and our own reserves.  The effective plan enables us to mitigate risk exposure.
• The Company expects sales from our legacy market and electric vehicle charging market to continue improving in the 2021 financial year.

--- click on links above for more ---

I've cleaned that up quite a bit - it was clearly written by someone for whom English is not their first language - the original can be read here (first page).

[I don't hold RFT shares.  They've been on my Strawman.com scorecard for a trade, but I reckon I might roll that virtual money into something else shortly.]

I think it is very hard for anyone to accurately predict on a macro level how long the current downturn lasts for and the long term effects of it. What we can and should do though is look at individual businesses and assess the impacts to them from the coronavirus, positive or negative.

Unfortunately for RFT it seems as though they will receive the biggest impact from companies in my portfolio, with confirmation that their Malaysian factory was forced to close. The company is trying to seek an exemption to supply products to essential companies (most likely power supply) but are awaiting approval.

The Melbourne (R&D) and Singapore (Sales) offices remain open so hopefully the manufacturing delays can be sorted out in short time and sales quickly picked up.