Finally had the chance to work through the EML 1HFY24 results after all the excitement with the Sentenial sale. I prefer HY-o-HY instead of PCP comparisons, so reworked some of the numbers to give me that view. It also helped that EML management is now focused on the Core business segments, so they have taken pains to focus on, and publish, H-o-H performance.
Summary of the key Group numbers, green shows growth, orange are flat to down
In summary, and the rationale for my top up of 0.25% IRL and in SM today:
- The underlying EML business in the last 18M has been growing nicely across the key metrics, stripping out the impacts of the PCSIL and Sentenial remediation costs and isolating post-disposal impacts. This is summarised in the table below - green is growing, orange is flat to backwards.
- Expecting EML to meet or exceed underlying EBITDA FY24 guidance - at the half year mark 53.3% of the mid point guidance has already been met.
- Continued strong interest income revenue - interest rates likely to remain higher for longer, which is a good tailwind for EML revenue
- Strong cash generation
- Upside from cost remediation efforts as costs remain high and management is very focused on this.
- Risks of another (stupid) acquisition will be remote for at least the next few years (we would hope).
- By getting rid of PCSIL and Sentenial, EML is essentially back to being the company it was prior to the acquisition - it was a much-loved growth company. As both acquisitions were entered into when the EML price was $3.75 (PCSIL, 31 Mar 20 announcement) and $3.89 (Sentenial, 30 Sep 21 completion) (1) the core business has still been growing, and (2) we have the tailwind of high interest rates, it would appear that a re-rating to perhaps ~$3.00 is not an unthinkable scenario now.
Risks
- Sentenial sale does not complete - low risk, it would seem
- Another stupid acquisition - low to none, for the next few years perhaps
- Further Board instability - low, given how the Board has stayed the course in the last year
- New CEO - always a risk (think Emma Chand), but EML is on a much clearer and firmer trajectory now for the Board to stuff up the appointment.
- Growth stalls due to macro factors - medium risk if Central Banks overreach and cause a major recession. an inherent risk.
At peak, my paper loss was close to 85%, and I was completely anchored to the loss. It took a lot of effort to un-anchor this negativity.
I now feel EML is back on the right path again and the growth ahead looks bright. My conviction for EML has now turned from negative to high, enough to top up 2x and bring my average cost down to a reasonable $2.31. Whether this was a right move will be revealed in the fullness of time!
Discl: Held IRL and in SM
1HFY24 Summary Slides