$EML reported their 1H FY23 Results this morning.
Their Highlights:
• Group Gross Debit Volume of $49.4 billion, up 55% on PCP, reflecting the benefits gained from the Sentenial acquisition
• Group Revenue of $116.6 million, up 2% on PCP, largely due to a significant increase in interest income of $7.1 million
• Underlying Gross Profit3 up 5% on PCP, driven by increased high margin revenues from Sentenial and interest
• Group Underlying EBITDA4 of $13.4 million, a decrease of 50% on PCP, largely reflecting increased underlying overheads as we continue to invest in EML’s European businesses
• Group Underlying NPATA of $0.7 million, down 95% on PCP, reflecting the same factors which reduced EBITDA
• One-off, non-cash impairments of $121.3 million against the PFS Group and the Sentenial Group
• Group net loss of ($129.9 million) largely reflecting the non-cash impairments
• Continued strength of Balance Sheet and Cash position, with cash balance up 7% to $79.2m on PCP and underlying operating cashflow conversion of 102%
• Underlying EBITDA guidance reaffirmed
• Execution of the Company’s transformation strategy, including progress with remediation activities in the UK and Ireland, streamlining the organisation and launching a new campaign in Human Capital Management
My Takeaways
First, I acknowledge that I should have put this one down a long time ago, and it is quite close to the bottom of my conviction list. (And it is much more fun writing up results from $WTC.) All that said, these results present some evidence of stabilisation.
The impairment was inevitable, given everything that has happened over the last 2 years. Reversing that non-cash item out, statutory NPAT loss actually narrowed over the PCP.
Revenue growth was achieved thanks to higher interest rates generating interest income.
We are now seeing the full effects of the extra costs of overhead, representing all the resources that have been added to improve governance and regulatory compliance - employee expense up to $40m from $30m. Plus they are burning a steady $15m, ($30m/yr!) on professional fees, of which I assume a lot is lawyers. There is also a large bucket of $15m other expenses, which includes a variety of elements including risk and compliance. So the costs of risk and compliance appear to be spread over a number of categories and are representing a very material sum.
After everything, cash increased, thanks to the offloading of some financial assets.
These are just a few quick reflections. I'll be recording the call at 10am AEDT, as I'll be watching the Richard White concert live. I am very interested to hear what Emma Shand has to say, particularly in the Q&A. She has been on board long enough to have her arms fully around this. Whether I stay or finally go will rest on this, I expect.
Disc: Held IRL (0.75%) SM (2.9%)