Just a few quick notes following our meeting with Oleg while they are still fresh in my mind. I would encourage you to watch the recording if you missed it (see meetings page).
I'll be honest, I last looked at this company a few years ago and pigeon holed it as a serial capital raiser, always bleeding cash and always on the cusp of something big. Yes, the technology seemed cool, but what could a tiny ASX company really bring to the table when you (i assumed) have some huge military-industrial giants likely in the same space?
So the first thing to note, taken Oleg at his word, is that Droneshield is the global leader in this very fast growing space. It sounded like they were well ahead of competitors, with a decent first mover advantage and a far more holistic product set.
Contract negotiations -- especially with defence agencies -- can be very protracted, but then tend to be very sticky. Given their existing partners in this space, they seem to be very well placed to win a lot more work here. Indeed, Oleg certainly suggested that they expected a lot more orders in the coming years.
Another noteworthy fact is that they have essentially doubled revenues each and every year in recent times, and Oleg suggested that they would again get close to doing that in FY23 (ends Dec31) -- although there can be a month or so delay between contracts signed and revenue recognised. He said that things could triple in the following year.
What really stood out was that they achieved cash flow positive status in the 3rd quarter and expect this to be the case each and every quarter going forward. With $7.5m in the bank, assuming this is true, they should avoid any capital raise. And while it's true that the global economic picture isn't pretty, this is a business that is seeing some strong tailwinds -- such is the state of the world :(
Oleg mentioned that the cost base was pretty well established and could handle 10x revenue here -- at least from an engineering perspective. There could be some additions in terms of sales. The use of contract manufacturers to help provide some elasticity to their own capacity seems smart given the lumpy nature of orders. It was also prudent, it seems, to bulk up on inventory given chip and component issues in the global supply chain.
At present 70% or so of revenue is hardware based, but Oleg expects that SaaS subscription revenue will grow to about 50% in the coming years.
Assuming (conservatively) that they do $15m in sales this year, the company is on about 3x sales. Doesn't seem that onerous for a CF +'ve company with expectations for continued strong sales momentum.
I don't own at present.