Straws are discrete research notes that relate to a particular aspect of the company. Grouped under #hashtags, they are ranked by votes.
A good Straw offers a clear and concise perspective on the company and its prospects.
Please visit the forums tab for general discussion.
Bit of a long bow but who knows what comes of this. My understanding the trials with Telstra were underwater cables out of Darwin and urban fibre network in Melbourne. Maybe the 5G haters could provide an opportunity. Possibility? or clutching at straws? I’m unsure.
held IRL
09/09/2024
Given their capital rising and, again, not hitting their guidance I am significantly reducing my valuation.
Perhaps naively, I still see the potential here, however maybe it'll be a longer and bumpier road to get there.
So lets assume:
2028 Revenue (~13% CAGR): $50M
GP Margin of 60% and Opex of $24M (extrapolating the low end of their guidance)
=> 2028 EBITDA: $5M
Assuming 285M shares and a P.EBITDA of 10X
=> 2028 Share Price: 0.19
Discounting at 10%
=> 2024 SP: 0.13
So I only following their guidance for the Opex and assuming significantly less revenue growth
I'd consider adding more to my position at around 0.09c as I feel the risk/reward is good at that level. However, if the total revenue for FY25 is less and $35M I will sell and cut my losses on this one.
20/03/2024
Re-running the numbers to align with the lower end of their new multi-year guidance gives:
2028 Revenue: $70M
(effectively pushing the revenue out by another year, or alternatively as dropping their revenue CAGR to ~20% from 2023 results)
Dropping their GP margin to 63% and assuming 2028 OPEX of $29M gives:
2028 EBITDA: $15M
Assuming 274M shares and a P/EBITDA of 10 =>
2028 Share Price: 0.55
discounting at 10% =>
2024 Share Price: 0.38
Yet again, it seems cheap IF they can deliver what they say, however if they keep dropping their guidance, well... In addition, they are borderline on needing a capital raise.
If either of these (capital raise or lowering of guidance) happen in the next year I will no longer use their estimates as part of my valuation - instead will us more conservative assumptions, but for now I am prepared to give the new CEO the benefit of the doubt as he finds his feet.
Also - despite me giving them a lofty valuation - I am currently not buying. I will hold until I see how this next half plays out.
Older
Upon revisiting this - I don't see any reason to change. Will be interesting to see these year results to see how on track for this they are though. All signs seem positive, let's see if the numbers actually come in.
Based on their guidance of 70-100m revenue in 3 years I have assumed 70m revenue by 2027 so taking the lower end and giving them longer to get there (this corresponds to a CAGR of ~30%).
Assuming constant GP margin of 65% and a 20% CAGR in operation expenses (to 29m which is 50% higher than their estimate) gives $17m in EBITDA (works out to be 24% of revenue)
Applying a 10x multiple to EBITDA and assuming 270m shares in 2027 gives:
2027 share price: 0.63
Discounting back at 10% ->
2023 price: 0.43
So it is at a good price IF they can achieve what they say.
Previous Price Target $0.23 - March 24
Revised Target - $0.15
Bear - 10% Revenue Growth
Base - 15% Revenue Growth slowing to 10%
Bull - 25% Revenue Growth slowing to 10% in line with bottom end of forecast
I just got off the AVA call.
Key takeaways:
Mal emphasized that FY24 was a transitional year, completing restructuring, launching new tech/products, and setting a firm foundation for FY25. It was a tale of two halves, with things accelerating in the final quarters.
Margin drop was due to a shift in segment mix -- Detect has the best margins, but strong growth in Access was why group margin eased back. Should normalise going forward.
Detect is really the core business, and Mal described this as a program or project based business, one that can have long lead times (3-12 months)
A $100 million pipeline, particularly strong in the Detect segment, is noteworthy. Mal repeatedly emphasised these leading indicators and you can see from the latest outlook table that they continue to expect high revenue growth against a relatively fixed costs base
At the mid point, you have ~62% revenue growth expected in FY25 and an EBITDA of ~$20m -- a 42% operating margin.
(interesting to hear Mal say "I know you've heard this before")
Aura AI-X has been transformational since its launch, contributing to improved detection and lower false alarms. The strong sales of over 100 units and Cobalt 2’s 48% growth in Access orders demonstrate successful product adoption and integration across segments
There was discussion about H1 traditionally being weaker than H2, with specific references to Q1 (northern summer) and Q3 (holiday season) slowdowns, aligns with their operational cycles.
Illuminate’s expected move to break-even or profitability in FY24
There was a noticeable shift toward emphasizing predictability in revenue, seen in their focus on bookings, pipeline, and backlog as core metrics.
Its a fractured and competitive market, and AVVA is trying to distinguish itself by focusing on the tech and aligning with bigger customers.
Company well funded, no expectations to raise capital. Board happy to commit to paying 30% of EBITDA as a dividend, which they think leaves ample room for growth investment.
Could FY25 finally be the year where things take off? Cost base and operating segments now set, good momentum in orders and sales.. Maybe. If they get anywhere near guidance you'd have to assume something of a rerate.
A do or die year for me.
An ad for this product randomly appeared in my google feed (let's not get into why google thought I might be interested in buying fiber optic sensing equipment)
https://www.hawkfiber.com/
This is the main companies website https://www.hawkmeasurement.com/products/fiber-optic-sensing/ - looks like it is a new direction this company is foraying into.
Not sure if anyone else has looked into on this company or its product in comparison to Aura Ai. It is a private company unfortunately...
Curiously, they state the following:
I think the underlined has just been poorly worded - all systems will ignore false alarms PROVIDED they know they are false.
Anyway, I think would be good to get Mal's view on this company, and their claims next time we meet him.
Q4 Update
The Good
The Not So Good
Watch Status
Valuation Status
What To Watch
tl;dr -- It was a good final quarter, but H2 revenue was at the very bottom of guidance issued in April and FY revenue was up only 5.6% for the full year. EBITDA was positive (but unquantified) in H2, compared with -$900k in H1. Positioned well for accelerating growth -- according to the company -- but no guidance given at this stage.
Here's the key figures:
My view: good to see a decent lift in sales orders and the partnerships with some big clients seem to be progressing well. Nice to see some cross-sell wins, and extensions to previous contracts. But material growth remains elusive.. Still, at 1x revenue (pre market open) it's not exactly priced for much growth. With the *potential* for good operating leverage, and some major trials in the pipeline, FY25 could be the year we finally see some good earnings growth.
If not, I'll concede defeat and move on.
AVA has managed to scrape into it’s FY24 sales guidance of $30.2-34.2m (Core Revenue) with $30.2m… wow, some sweety palms around the board room on that number. Was it luck, skill or creativity on interpreting sales recognition, not sure, but the order back log lifted from $8.3m last quarter to $8.5m, which suggests that sales flow is solid even if there was some pull forward.
Order intake (the key KPI other than sales) bounced back to $9.0m for Q4 following the dismal Q3 of $6.8m which was probably the best news. Also good to see was that Detect made up a solid $6.5m of that, being the highest margin part of the business, it’s growth is the real driver of profitability.
On profitability, well not quite, positive EBITDA in H2 tells us that full year will be negative following -$1.1m EBITDA for H1 and I am sure that had the full year figure been positive Mal would have let that little factoid slip! The last item on the Strategy & Outlook is a nod to profitability “Scalable cost base generating positive EBITDA”, I just hope this isn’t in priority order.
Updates on the UGL contract suggest positive credential outcomes in receiving Safety Integrity Level 2 (SIL2) certification. Important for this customer and possibly opening up others.
The Telstra supply agreement was disrupted “slightly” by their restructuring (mass sackings), which has just plan killed deals in other companies I am connected with, so it’s nice to know that it’s still progressing.
So, in all, it’s a bit of a relief of a result from my point of view, if sales order intake had been under $8m and they hadn’t just scrapped into their FY target sales then I would have considered my investment to be under major threat. Jury is still out, but this is a step in the right direction.
The market will be voting on the result shortly so grab your popcorn…
Disc: I own RL+SM
A new contract win. Not a lot of detail, but the ASX announcement is here
AUD$700k isn't huge, but not insignificant either. The more interesting thing is that the counterparty -- Johnson Controls Inc -- is quite a big company. It's listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol JCI, and valued at $45 billion.
From what I can see, it is extensively involved in the management and security of various types of critical infrastructure, including electricity substations. But I cant find an exact number. The related segment generated around $2.8b in revenue in FY23, so I assume it's a lot more than the number of sites associated with the AVA contract. Moreover, it looks like they manage a significant portfolio of infrastructure assets and buildings.
Johnson Controls manages a large portfolio of buildings and infrastructure, with a substantial focus on security. The Building Solutions segments contribute significantly to the company's revenue, driven by a wide range of security and building management products and services.
If they like what AVA provides, there is potential to substantially broaden their use of the Aura tech. And it seems there's an increase in intrusion and vandalism at sites across the US.
I wont extrapolate too much, maybe this is just a bespoke, one-off type deal. But it's encouraging.
The market, of course, is like "meh" :)
@Strawman personally I think the SP is loss of confidence in management although tax loss selling might be part of it… what would help is management loading up on cheap as chips shares to show a bit of confidence and skin in the game! If they don’t buy in at 1 x sales, why should anyone else?
Blimey -- AVA really can't catch a bid.
It's very thinly traded, so maybe I shouldn't put too much weight on the drop today, especially in the absence of any news (at least any that is ASX disclosed).
Anyway, shares are basically trading on 1x sales! And that's with the business reaffirming guidance at the latest quarter for a 20% lift in H2 sales (at the midpoint) and positive EBITDA. Not to mention the much touted operating margin expansion Mal reckons he can deliver.
This thing is either super cheap, or management's grand plans are built on nothing but unfounded hopium..
Time will tell, but I'm continuing to hold for now.
The SPP has closed oversubscribed ($1.34m Vs $1.0m) and the board has decided to allow for that oversubscription rather than scale back, which is good.
However, they only needed 34 shareholders taking up the maximum $30k for the SPP to be fully subscribed, so while I welcome the fact AVA got the cash they need, it's not a massive vote of confidence. It also helped that trade in shares bottomed at the $0.13 price (only a few trades below this), they would have struggled if the share price fell below it for even a few days while the SPP was open.
Conclusion - ok support at $0.13, company has a little more cash than they say they need and now the market can get back to thinking about the real value of the company rather than anchor on the SPP price.
Disc: I own RL+SM
Agree @Strawman, it’s a mixed result.
I was very disappointed at the sales order intake which is the guide we have been told they use and should use. The emphasis on YTD order intake is a disturbing attempt to distract from the quarter on quarter drop from 12.0 to 6.8m or -46% and on a 12 month rolling basis the growth is 11.4% which is below the YTD comparative of 15% but I will note that previous quarterly updates have focused on YTD, so it is at least consistent.
After I got over the initial shock in the drop in order intake I checked the chances of them reaching the target $16-$20m in sales for the half and hence reach their FY24 $30-$35m target range and it looks possible. Given order backlog only dropped $0.6m in the quarter ($8.9 to $8.3) then Q3 sales should be $7.4m (0.6 order drop plus 6.8 new orders), leaving $8.7m in sales required to hit the $30.4m bottom of the guidance range.
If the estimated $5.3m of open orders expected to land in Q4 happens this leaves $3.4m of new orders required in Q4 that are filled in Q4. This seems reasonable and the $8.7m sales in the quarter is not much above the previous 2 quarters of $8.3m (Q2) and $7.4m (Q3). Its a step up from $6.0m in Q1, but if they have the momentum they say they do then it’s not an unreasonable expectation.
It’s going to be lumpy, no illusions on that but the play book seems to be in tacked and as such will participate in the SPP.
Disc: I own RL+SM
Not a terrible Q3 update from AVA, but not great either.
Sales orders are up 15% comparted to the same time a year ago, and they have $8.6m in order backlogs (2/3rds will be converted to revenue this financial year).
The company still reckons it will do $16-20m in H2 revenue (the wide range due to the timing of project delivery). They did $14.2m in the first half of FY24, which means the full year figure will be between $30.2m-$34.2m. That's exactly what their 3 year outlook calls for, and the outlook is unchanged from what they said in March.
Still, this picture is worth a thousand words:
Growth may be 15% for the FY-to-date in sales orders, but it was Q2 that did all the heavy lifting, and the most recent quarter is down on what they did in the previous corresponding period. Detect was underwhelming due to project timing, and Mal said he expects to finalise various opportunities in the last quarter.
So, it's great to see they are on track to hit their guidance, but what we really need here is an acceleration in sales. You have to give some slack for the variability of revenues, but the market probably wont move much until there is some very clear evidence of growing traction.
[HELD]
Investment Thesis
AVA Risk Group is a tiny Australian company selling leading security solutions globally, with three product segments that offer integration and cross selling it has a highly scalable business opportunity of the existing operating base and with a new sales-oriented CEO and structure that is starting to see traction as it enters a growth phase on a global scale. The Detect segment presents the outstanding opportunity, with high margins and SAAS like flow on revenue component and possible licencing options, the growth opportunity and leading AI tech allows for rapid capital light scaling of the business and significant operating leverage if the go to market execution is done well.
The current value doesn’t factor in the growth and operating leverage opportunities with the market highly sceptical of planned growth. If the company executes at the low end of expectations a value 3.1x current price ($0.13) and 5x at the high end offers an asymmetric outcome as diversified sales channels and ability to scale down operating costs provides downside protection.
Factors in thesis:
· Sales Restructure: Move into a focus on sale of the products developed, integration of sales channels from 3 product focused businesses to a single business in 4 regional groups. Focus on sales numbers and results to promote. Opportunities in Australia and UK where presence is soft, US large opportunity (Jim Viscardi), Europe opportunities.
· Product scalability: Sell what we make – don’t bespoke, Rod Wilson (CTO) – integration platform the three business solutions, commercial team working on integration with external products also. R&D spend is ongoing, but focus on scalable products.
· Technology: solid, Machine Learning (AI) continuing, the Aura Ai-X solution provides a market leading solution and is based of internal data for ML/AI continued improvement in ability to detect with minimal false alarms.
· Capital Raise: 3-4m raise to provide working capital for growth is needed given the high growth rates targeted. Low net debt (400k) is preferred, but access to debt at reasonable rates is limited due to the geographically dispersed nature of the business operations and sales. Working capital management will need to improve even with the additional capital.
· Management: Good pedigree but relatively new and only just starting to show some wins in terms of contracts. Projected sales targets have slipped (walked back) – taking this as a reflection of new management enthusiasm and implemented changes taking more time to flow through to results than expected, but further slippage will be an orange or red flag depending on circumstances.
· Metric: Growing sales order intake and ultimately revenue will tell me if things are on track and is what management are focused on. Provided margins hold up and opex only increases in low single digit %, then things are working as planned. Working capital and cash are important, but from a capital management point of view, so I am giving them some rope in the short term and wouldn’t freak out if another small cap raising occurred next year if it was just to support WC for rapid sales growth.
Valuation ($0.40)
The bear case ($0.13 & 11.0% IRR) valuation looks at what justifies the current price, with the business significantly underperforming it’s FY24 to FY26 financial targets to provide an 11% IRR which is equal to the discount rate used.
The base case ($0.40 & 23.5% IRR) assumes the FY24 to FY26 financial targets are meet at the low end of guidance while the bull case ($0.64 & 34.5% IRR) assumes they are meet at the high end of guidance.
Management expect GM% to be able to reach 65%, which if the Detect segment continues to dominate sales is quite reasonable, but the valuation is based on 62-64% margins.
Management also anticipate operating expenses to remain relatively flat for a few years until they need to step up again to support additional growth. This is included with Opex as a % of sales dropping sharply from 77% in H1 FY24, operating leverage is a key value driver with sales growth.
The vast amount of capex is for intangible assets, this along with working capital requirements will have a significant impact on free cash flows for the next few years until operating leverage is able to outweigh them with sales growth. Due to this and currently being in losses, the value is based on cashflows several years out, so interest rates movements will amplify market valuation ranges for the next few years.
Comment
I have held AVA since 2021, attracted to the FFT product (now Aura Ai-X) and the opportunity it offered as a high margin and scalable business, which only now seems to be getting the traction needed and under a new CEO. The delayed sale of the service division and it’s gross windfall for management at the expense of shareholders was a disappointment, but it’s low margin and ability to use the sale to focus on and further develop the Aura product was, in my view, a good strategy. The services business was security transport, not asset protection, so didn’t fit into the product portfolio like the current products do and offer cross selling opportunities.
No one likes a capital raise, but this one is needed and it has given me the time to think deeply about the business and not rush a decision. I have done a small top up at $0.13 in case the share price is well up on close of the SPP and it’s over subscribed. I intend to subscribe, but will keep my mind open and consider other opinions until the close, plus buy if the price drops below the offer.
Disc: I own IRL & SM
So what did we think?
Some of my notes from the meeting.
In regard to the Telstra deal:
In regard to the capital raise:
In regard to the tweaked 3-year outlook:
Miscellaneous:
I think Mal gets it -- he needs to deliver some tangible results, but believes that after his first year the company is now well placed to execute. Let's see!
[HELD]
Cap raise inbound!
Let's wait until we see the details, but i suspect the cost of capital could be up there. And if it's just for 'working capital purposes it's more difficult to swallow. Perhaps another situation where a line of credit would be more appropriate? Anyway, getting ahead of myself.
We will see.
AVA in a trading halt prior to cap raise, it is absolutely absurd capital allocation to pay a meaningless dividend and then raise a couple of months later....will be very interested in the purpose....it better be a good one or this will go on the exit list for me (despite all the promise of a really good product offering)
The Good
The Not So Good
Watch Status
Valuation Status
What To Watch
A good part of today's results were known, following the company's Q2 update less than a month ago.
The best parts being strong sales order growth of $12m in Q2. (And I guess the company reckons this is a pace they can maintain given they thought to annualise this in today's preso..) This has been underpinned by some large value contract wins, and there's a healthy sales back log to give some confidence in a decent second half.
The recent Telstra deal was highlighted, and although it was a botched announcement, it's clearly a deal with some interesting potential (albeit one that the company isn't able to quantify).
Still, the detect segment saw a decline in revenue of 8%, following a weak first quarter. As AVA said at the time, that was mainly due to some timing issues with bigger contracts in Q1, and we did see a very strong Q2 in this segment, but overall it was a weaker half compared to the pcp. AVA reiterated it expects a strong second half here. I hope so.
Part of the issue with AVA in recent periods is that one segment seems to always zig when another zags. And it was the Access segment that did all the heavy lifting this half, and that was largely an stocking event associated with the distribution deal with dormakaba.
But Detect is the biggest segment and that meant total EBITDA dipped back below neutral and continued R&D and inventory expansion saw a $1.8m drop in cash -- there's now only $1.8m in cash left. They said the cost base will stabilise at the current level, but the risks of a capital raise are perhaps higher than I first expected.
The biggest new news for me was a revised 'outlook' scenario, which they have now aligned with financial years.
Before it was this:
Now it is this:
So essentially the same, but clearly the real expansion in operating margins is not expected to start showing up until FY25.
Using the mid-points above, you get only a 5% EBITDA margin for FY24, and basically nothing at the lower end. Yes, things start to look very good after that, but they're basically saying to not expect much this FY. Beyond that, you just need faith these targets are somewhat reasonable.
Maybe they are, and I'm sure they're put forward in good faith, but until we see good evidence in the financials there's a good amount of faith that is required.
Later in the deck they again reiterate the target for $70-100m in revenue over the next 3 calendar years, with minimal cost increases. And given what they have above for FY26 ($57 -- 71m), and with a good chunk labelled as 'adjacencies' (ie. currently untapped applications of their products), I'm a bit nervous there's a fair amount of "hopium" in managements outlook.
Maybe they're right to be optimistic, and there really is good growth in sales orders, but we're yet to see this translate into anything exciting in the statutory numbers.
There is potential for some acquisitions to help the company reach it's goals, and that can be good cover for a capital raise, but this type of growth isn't always accretive to shareholders and has all kinds of risks. I don't think their GJD purchase is doing much for them yet.
There's clearly some big potential for AVA, and I know that building the foundations for growth always take longer than you think to build, and for that to deliver accelerating sales traction, but this one really is testing my patience. Especially with some recent communication blunders.
Hopefully we can get a better picture of things when we speak with the CEO next month.
H1 revenue up 4% to $14.1m
Full-year revenue guidance of $30m-$34m (7-21% growth)
Management seems bullish going forward with the growth of the business
At Half end, the cash balance declined by $3.5m to $1.78m- noting $4.8m in net receivables, assuming costs stay flat, a gross profit margin of 64% and with H2 revenue guidance of $16-$20m, H2 profit should be in the range of -$0.7m to $1.88m. I got on the call and the CEO and CFO believe they have enough cash, I tried to ask 2 questions on the likelihood of a capital raise in the coming 12 months and if so would they raise via debt or equity, and the investor relations person ignored both. Considering the lumpy nature of revenue one bad half/ quarter could result in some dilution.
Not a lot of extra info here:
All we can surmise is that the contract is "significant". But it seems there is no minimum spend, and AVA are at pains to avoid mentioning any specific financials.
Maybe there are some commercially sensitive aspects to the deal, but this is frustratingly vague...
AVA has signed a major supply agreement with Telstra, where it will provide its tech to monitor the group's fibre optic network.
AVA will connect its tech to parts of Telstra existing fibre optic network -- effectively making the cable one giant sensor that can be used to monitor and protect the network.
No financials given, other than Telstra has 650,000km of cable. It seems installation should be reasonably easy and low cost -- you're basically adding some detectors to existing cable nodes.
The deal comes after a 10 month of collaboration and trials, and open up a new and significant market for AVA (there is 5 billion km of fibre cabling globally).
So it feels like this is big news, but can't really say for sure without knowing much about the commercial terms. We have a meeting with the CEO in March, so hopefully get some more detail then.
[HELD]
You beat me to it @Bear77 -- agree the update is generally positive, and while we need a solid second half for the company to land in its targeted revenue range ($36-45m), they seem to be suggesting that is very much in play with a "substantively stronger" second half. In Mal's words:
They'll need second half revenue of $22m to hit the lower end of their target range.
In the first half they have secured just shy of $20m in new sales orders (37% growth), with the second quarter representing 61% of the first half total and representing yoy growth of 39%. There's $8.9m in backlog to be fulfilled this calendar year, most of which is project delivery work -- this compares to a $5.2m backlog at the end of FY23.
This suggests (i think) that most of the sales order intake is converted to revenue relatively quickly (ie they added $19.7m in new sales orders in the 6 months to Dec 31, but the order backlog only increased by $3.7m. (someone please sanity check this assertion!).
Still, the reality is that H1 revenue is only 10% higher than H1 FY23, and is at the very bottom of the guidance they issued in October ($14.2-15.2m). The access segment had a great half but this was helped by stocking orders from their channel partners -- we'll need to see some good end-customer sales before we really know how their new Cobalt locks are being received by the market. And Illuminate was flat, albeit with a good improvement between the first and second quarters.
For me, the main game is with Access and Aura Ai-X, which has accounted for roughly 2/3rds of new sales orders. And they really do seem to be seeing some good sales traction there. Group targets aside, even if they 'only' get $18m in H2 revenue, that'll still be annual growth of 15% at the top line. (the previous second half did $15m in revenue, so I dont think that's too much of a stretch target)
Holding gross margins and fixed costs steady -- which is what management have essentially said to expect -- under that scenario you should still get an EBITDA figure that is more than double what we saw in FY23 (from cont. operations) and an operating margin expansion from 7% to ~12%.
The market obviously remains somewhat sceptical (if it wasn't the share price should be easily above 20c imo). But for me I consider the thesis still on track and shares good value. The next 6 months will be telling.
AVA today announced, after market close, that they had won a number of important contracts relating to its fibre sensing business.
In aggregate, it says it is expecting more than $10m in sales orders for Q2, which would be a record for the company and a big improvement on the $8m-odd generated in Q1.
Maybe this will help shake shares out of their malaise when trade resumes tomorrow?
ASX announcement here:
multiple contracts won for ava risk groups aix fibre tech1703050260pdf.pdf
Valuation purely numbers based - upside here could be 15%+ growth in sales over the long term. I think worse case scenario would be at least half that, my numbers saying 6.5%. Split the difference at 11% gives my current valuation on P/S.
52-week low today.
I think it's pretty indicative of the current small-cap space sentiment that any neutral or mildly positive news is taken as negative and incredibly suspicious by the market.
That other "though shall not be named" investing forum that rhymes with "big bopper" seems like it's going to spontaneously self-combust any second due to other-worldly level negative vibes.
Management of a lot of my portfolio such as AVA are desperately awkward trying to navigate announcements through this sentiment/minefield and are cocking up communication strategies compounding the whole vibe.
Maybe they should all just release quarterlies and nothing else.
Takes about one second for any announcement to be turned toxic by the mob.....lol.
#merrychristmas
This is a bit better -- a $2-3m contract with UGL Ltd for the groups Aura Ai-x product. It includes a 2 year support services agreement and is for a Sydney transportation project.
ASX announcement link here
Barely warrants a post, but AVA have announced a 5 year support agreement with Sydney Trains valued at $500k.
It's associated with their perimeter detection product, which Sydney trains have been using for some time already.
So it's good they extended the agreement, it's nice to have recurring revenue locked in (and I'm sure it doesn't take much work/cost to deliver on given the nature of the product) but it's very small in the grand scheme of things. Will need a lot of these kind of deals if they are to get close to their aspirational targets.
The announcement was marked as market sensitive, which I thought was a bit odd. It feels too small a contract to be sensitive, and if it is, I'd have hoped to have seen a lot more of these sized deals announced!
Have been away from me desk all morning, but I got an alert while I was on the go that Ava's first quarter update was out. A quick check of the price (as you do) and saw it was about 5% higher -- "must be good news", I thought!
Anyway, just got back in the saddle to have a look at the update and noticed the price is now down 7%.
Not sure how many times I need to be reminded how irrelevant the market price signal can be for small, illiquid stocks. In this instance (at the time of writing) we're talking about a price move that has been affected by less than $50k worth of trades, and where the high and low of the day ranges from 19c to 21.5c
Anyway, having now read the actual update, and thought for myself (as opposed to letting the market tell me what to think), I think the news is respectable.
I'll let you read the finer details yourself, but the big picture takeaway for me is that although sales order intake was basically flat ($7.7m vs $7.8m in the pcp, and $7.7m in Q4 FY2023), the Access segment (locks) finally saw a good bump as product certification was received for their Cobalt Lock range and Ava's partner Dormakaba stocked up, and the contraction in the Detect segment (fibre optic perimeter detection) was seemingly a timing issue with new orders expected to close in the current quarter.
(The illuminate segment was again disappointing with AVA again citing difficult economic conditions in the UK. The expectation is for FTY growth here -- we'll see i guess)
So adding that all together, the revenue outlook for the first half is for $14.2-$15.2m, an 8% lift on H1FY23 at the midpoint.
What we really need here is for all the segments to fire at the same time -- But it seems one always seems to zig when the others zag. As Mal told us earlier this year, this is a lumpy business.
Nevertheless, Ava seems to be winning new customers in the detect segment, they now have new products and distribution in America and Europe and, for what it's worth, management remain very optimistic for the full year:
"..management expects that second half revenue will substantively exceed the first half."
Take from that what you will, but given the margin assumptions AVA have previously released, it looks very likely that they will at least double FY23's EBITDA. Frankly, with FY revenue of $35m and a 14% operating margin, EBITDA could grow by 150% or so.
Anyway, thesis seems to still be on track.
HELD.
$AVA has announced a new contract by its Access segment.
Full text
BQT Solutions secures orders with key distribution partner dormakaba for new Cobalt series locks
Ava Risk Group Limited (ASX: AVA) (“Ava Risk Group” or “the Company”) is pleased to advise that the Access division has secured the first major order for the supply of its new Cobalt series locks to dormakaba AV under its global framework agreement. The Company will supply over $1.3m of the new Cobalt 2 locks into North America with delivery expected to occur during Q1 and Q2 FY24. These orders demonstrate the market opportunity for the Cobalt series locks and highlight the strength of our key distribution partners. Cobalt locks deliver unmatched performance, outstanding durability and address two of the biggest issues in door locking - the ability to align a misaligned door and to release when requested, even with excessive load on the door.
Ava Risk Group CEO, Mal Maginnis commented: “We are pleased to expand our relationship with dormakaba to the North American market and appreciate their continued confidence in our products and our company. We view these orders as a testament to the quality and superior performance of the Cobalt series locks and are confident of further orders from our global distribution partners.”
My Observations
Another not-strictly-material announcement from $AVA, who are clearly making sure the market is aware of every significant sale.
That said, the Access segment is the smallest of the three segments with FY23 sales orders of A$3.9m, so the announced $1.3m order is a decent piece of business for the year for this segment, and you'd expect a similar quantum of new business each quarter if this segment is going to pull its weight.
Other positives are that the sales order is for the new Cobalt series of locks launched earlier this year, and the sale is via the dormakaba distribution partner into North America, demonstrating that the partner has got into action with the new product line.
So good news; however, as someone else here has commented, with the appearance being that any significant sales order is getting an ASX annoucement, periods of radio silence may generate concern with some holders. So that potentially puts $AVA on an announcement treadmill.
Disc: Held in RL and SM
I spotlighted them in my article this week (https://www.goforgrowth.co/p/10-growers-in-fy23-part-3). For the strawman community most of the article will be common knowledge. I'll just paste here want I think is important over the next 12 months:
Another contract announcement for Aura Ai-X
Relatively small (A$1m), like the one announced recently, but great to see some traction for the product since its launch 6 months ago.
Held.
New contract announcement.
Not strictly material, so an annoucement wasn't required, so I guess management consider the value of the business isn't recognised in the SP. Text of announcement follows:
--------
Ava Risk Group secures multiple EU Airport detection contracts for Aura Ai-X Ava Risk Group Limited
(ASX: AVA) (“Ava Risk Group” or “the Company”) is pleased to advise that it’s new Aura Ai-X fibre optic sensing technology has been selected to protect a critical group of European Airports.
With a total value of approximately US$0.5 million (A$0.8 million), the contracts for Satu Mare and Sibiu Airports in Romania and another Western European hub are for the supply of detection software and equipment as well as a five-year contract to provide software upgrades and support. Delivery of the detection software and equipment is expected to occur during Q1 FY24.
These contracts confirm the market opportunity for Aura Ai-X, which features an embedded deep learning engine to enhance system performance by referencing algorithm upgrades backed by the Company’s global data library.
With unrivalled performance and exceptional event classification accuracy, Aura Ai-X delivers a leading Probability of Detection (POD) combined with the lowest Nuisance Alarms Rate (NAR).
Ava Risk Group CEO, Mal Maginnis commented: “Securing these contracts is a vote of confidence in what we believe to be the most advanced perimeter intrusion detection technology on the market. We are confident that Aura Ai-X will fast become the solution of choice for the smart protection of critical infrastructure worldwide.”
Disc: Held RL and SM
I went to update this valuation too but on re-reading it, I don't think my view has changed much, other than the recent results acting to strengthen my conviction a little.
Normally, I'd be tempted to increase some of the estimates, but given the current price (18.5c!!), the fact is shares are already well below what I think is fair value.
So I'm basically going to hit 'update' and leave it at 30c, again.
Original text from Feb '23:
>
11 months ago i gave AVA a valuation of 30cps, which assumed FY25 revenue of $40m and a 20% EBITDA margin as key inputs.
Last month AVA provided this as a "pathway" for the next three years
.. aspirations are great and all, but it's worth remembering that things don't always go to plan. But, as an exercise, I took the lower end of all assumptions (and the higher end of cost estimates) to get this:
Note that this gets you to only a 17% EBITDA margin, vs their target of 25%.
Still, IF they do that, you'll get a 15% annualised annual return from current prices (20.5c) so long as shares trade on at least an EBITDA multiple of 7x (that'd roughly be a PE of 15 or so) in 3 year's time.
(If you wanted to take the upper end of their forecasts, you get a FY26 EBITDA of $41m -- but I wouldn't be comfortable basing any valuation on that)
My point is that there's good value here even if they come in at the very bottom of targets, and the market only gives shares a very low multiple.
At the same time, $70m in FY26 revenue is still 37% CAGR in top line growth for 3 years. If they get more like 15% CAGR, EBITDA would remain pretty close to par if costs rise as outlined.
So even if you try and be ultra conservative when using their provided targets, you still need to be confident of some very good growth.
So trying to take all of this into account, as well as the new reality of higher rates and lower growth multiples, i'm going to go with a FY26 revenue target of $60m, and use the midpoint of their gross margin and operating cost targets (62.5% and $27m, respectively) to get a FY26 EBITDA of 10.5. Let's call that $5m in net profit and assume 260m shares on issue -- so EPS would be 2cps. Let's apply a 20x PE and discount back by 10%pa to get a valuation of 30c.
Back to where we started!
Like I said last time, the true intrinsic value is probably 20% either side of that (assuming things don't really fall apart, which I doubt). But under this scenario there's way more upside than downside.
You can watch the recording for today's briefing here (passcode: B3@&hDEJ)
Some notes from the call
Ava's FY23 results seem good to me. The market disagrees :)
The highlights from their results update:
If you look only at new revenue from the detect segment (an additional $3.8m in revenue), and ignore Illuminate which added $6.8m in revenue following the acquisition of GJD which was acquired in August last year, you still have a 20% lift in revenue. Indeed, around a third of orders for Detect came from North America, which saw a 20% lift in orders received over the year.
In fact, sales orders were up 36% if you ignore the GJD acquisition (up 71% in total). This is a great leading indicator for revenue growth.
Access was disappointing as the company awaits key product certification for the Cobalt 2 locks. Once received, the company expects that to open high quality distribution channels. We'll see.
Gross margins were essentially flat, which ain't bad given the shift in product mix (Illuminate products are lower margin), but the operating margin (ex restructure costs) was up 3% to 7%. A good demonstration of the operating leverage potential. They maintained their slide that highlights ambitions to growth the EBITDA margin to 14% next year, and up to 25% within 3 years. Also had the $100m sales target, which Mal talked about when we chatted with him recently. Very bold aspirations, but not unreasonable in my view.
At the bottom line there was a $1.1m net loss for the year due to higher depreciation and interest charges associated with GJD purchase. (compared to $0.7m in the prior year, ex discontinued operations).
Cash flow was negative for the full year as the business bulked up its inventory in response to supply chain issues. But op Cash flow was positive in the second half of the year. The company has $3m in net cash, but given receivables from recent orders, non-cash depreciation charges and working capital movements, I don't see a big risk of a capital raise.
At a current enterprise value of $46.8m, the EV/EBITDA ratio is 23.4x. That does not strike me as high given the pace of growth in revenue, sales order intake and the demonstrated scalability of the business.
I missed the briefing this morning, but will try and track down a recording and post here.
Full ASX presentation is here.
[HELD]
The Good
The Not So Good
What To Watch
Strawman Meeting Notes:
Some notes from the 4th quarter update today
Looks like AVA will deliver revenue bang in the middle of guidance, somewhere between $28.4 and $28.7m (guidance in April was for $27.6m - $29.6m.)
That means the second half has delivered about $15m in revenue -- 10% up on the first half of FY23 and up 50% on FY22 H2 result.
Sales orders also growing OK -- excluding the GJD which was acquired last August, sales orders increased 13% for the last quarter and were 36% higher over the full year. (up 71% if you include GJD)
Breaking things down across the various segments:
The Detect segment (this is the area that does the fibre optic sensing tech) saw $5.1m in new order intake. For the year, the order intake was $20.7m (an increase of 55%) which was in part driven by the new Aura-AiX product. Still, order intake was $6.4m in Q3, so that's a drop quarter on quarter.
The Access Segment saw a 50% lift in new orders from Q3 to $1.1m, but was down 17% for the full year. Not great, but apparently things have been held up by attaining product certifications in various channels.
The Illuminate segment was very "meh", generating just $1.5m in new sales orders in the last quarter and $6.3m for the full year. The company blamed challenging conditions in the UK.
Sales orders tend to be pretty lumpy, as can be seen above, but I am encouraged to see the Detect segment -- by far the largest -- making some progress. There's been a real dearth of announcements, so it seems this is a story of a lot of small wins, rather than any single large contracts.
If AVA are to hit the lower end of their 3 year aspirational target ($70-100m), they'll need to do at least 35%pa top line growth from here. We need to see increased momentum on an organic basis if they have any hope of doing this. We're speaking with the new CEO tomorrow, so it'll be good to get some more detail. And the full year results will be out in another month, and I'm pretty keen to get a sense of what margins look like.
Disc: held.
This is more a note to myself.... but i thought i'd share the research on the sales / bd new hires:
I've started looking into Ava in the last week or so and I noted that there was mention in various communications, particularly in the Strawman presentation, that R&D investment is sufficent and that further emphasis on global business development was required.
Based on my research on LinkedIN / Sales navigator I see only 4 new Sales / BD headcount in this FY:
Sketch Mohan - National Account Manager - BQT - 2 months
David Macey - Federal Sales - FFT - 10 months
Andrew Holysz - National Sales Manager - FFT - 3 months
Mark Glasser - Regional sales Manager - BQT - 8 months
On the one hand, these new hires will not have a signifcant impact on COGS assocaited with the various 'good-news' reporting we've seen over the last 6 or so months, on the other, it will be interesting to learn how they continue to both penetrate better into existing markets and start to leverage the complementary elements of their various offerings as a differentiator as time goes on.
Disc: Not held
Ava’s update has been covered by the community so these are just some notes for myself
The Good
The Not So Good
What To Watch
I am forecasting total cash flow from operating activities of 2.5m for FY23, with Capex at 1.8m, and FCF coming in at 700k for the year.
With scale, I think they can achieve improvements to FCF over the next few years, so I am forecasting 1.5m FCF in FY24 – with 1.5m increases annually thereafter until FY27.
With interest rates at higher levels, I am increasing my discount rate from the standard 8.4% I use to 10%. I reach a company valuation of 71m – divide this by shares outstanding and I land at a current valuation of 0.28c.
Pleased with the latest from AVA.
The number of new sales orders was 47% higher, thanks in large part to the acquisition of GJD. However removing this still shows a 15% jump in the sales intake for continuing operations.
Statutory revenue was up 50% to $13.6m (looks like about 16% higher without GJD). And EBITDA margins rose to 9% to $1.2m (the pcp was messy due to divestment of Services division and IMoD contract, but excluding these the EBITDA margin was 2.5% for continuing operations last year).
All segments delivered growth. And the business seems to be scaling well.
Operating cash flow was -$2.2m due mainly to changes in working capital (increased receivables and inventory due to increased orders and recently completed projects), and also added R&D. There's still a bit of padding on the balance sheet with net cash balance of $4.4m, after subtracting $2.7m in borrowings.
AVA reiterated that over the next 3 years they expect $70-100m in revenue at 25% EBITDA margins. Even at the lower end of that range, and assuming 20% EBITDA margins, that's $14m in EBITDA, or 6x higher than the current annualised level.
If they do that, you'd get a 10% average annual capital gain so long as AVA trades at a EBITDA multiple of 6x or above at that point. At the upper end of guidance, EBITDA comes in at $25m.
Anyway, aspirations are one thing, delivery is another. As of this point, shares are trading at roughly 26x annualised EBITDA.
But i see a business that is growing well, with improving operating margins (and stable gross margins), industry tailwinds, and that is likely to be self-funded (in the absence of an acquisition).
Held.
Without repeating what other straws have posted I remain bullish with AVA risk.
Key reasons :
Add the rock solid balance sheet and dividend payout ratio of min 35% of EBITDA remains a top 5 position in my RL and SM portfolio
EquityMates is all aboard the AVA express, courtesy of @Strawman himself. Summed up for the layest of laymen. Will we see an influx of fresh money? You heard it here first!
In all seriousness, I applaud the public conviction.
Decent result from AVA it seems.
Revenue from continuing operations expected to be up 50% to $13.6m (guidance was for $13-15m)
Sales order intake up 16% if you exclude orders from GJD acquired in August 22, but 47% if you include. Existing FibreOptic and access control businesses saw sales grow 15% and 21%, respectively. Good momentum into north American energy sector with more sales expected. New CEO says they expect continued growth and operating leverage in second half. Received "strategically" important orders for AuraIQ.
Next half we'll get a full 6 month contribution from GJD, but on a pro-rata basis AVA is on 2x sales.
Growth continuing, strong balance sheet, CF positive, undemanding valuation and doesn't seem to be facing any real headwinds. Valuation, undemanding.
Held.
AVA Risk Group - Trading Update
Doing my due diligence on AVA Risk and feel the need to illustrate this from their last investor presentation. Yep, it is old news from the end of August, but as it had not been explicitly mentioned I thought I should add it in.
They are only barely profitable when you factor out the IMoD contract - which makes any valuation based on their current P/E questionable.
Saying that I still chose to add them to my RL portfolio, but I will be keeping an eye on their profitability (with large contracts like IMoD factored out) going forward.
Disc: Held
$300k to install Aura IQ in combination with a fire detection system at a iron ore terminal in Brazil. Due to occur first half of calendar 2023.
Client is a joint venture between Anglo American and Prumo Logistica.
Again, not overly material, but good to see some orders coming through and that the sales pipeline remains strong.
AVA risk group just announcing another contract for aura IQ in Brazil
This isn't overly material in it's own right (in dollar terms), although new deals are always welcome.
Where it's noteworthy is that this is the third implementation for this facility, and is replacing another system. That is, the customer gave it a go, found it superior and is extending its use -- all after only a few months since the first system was installed.
And, as the statement says, more sales are expected down the track.
We know from speaking with Ian Olson from Pointerra that the energy sector is very cooperative in the US (they don't directly compete and there is a large sharing of ideas and solutions). I can imagine this will become an important reference site for AVA in the US utility sector.
Disc. Held.
AVA delivering on their promise of fibre optic expansion.
I have just been doing some numbers based around them executing and meeting their 3 year target of achieving $70-100M in revenue, whilst increasing their costbase at a much lower rate. At the recent AGM they said they expect this to be a fairly linear increase year on year and not a dramatic step change in any period. See straw for my assumptions and workings but my value for the next three years comes in at
June 2023- 18-26c
June 2024- 40c
June 2025- 50c
These values are based on the increase in EPS that I expect will occur if they successfully execute their plan and hit their targets. I have not incorporated a multiple expansion in this value and are using a PE multiple of 8, which is what I think the company is on currently.
Looking further out these price targets might be a bit high but they all depend on AVA meeting their revenue targets and keeping their cost base constrained. AVA management seem enthused and confident that they can achieve these goals and I am backing them to do this until they prove otherwise!
I am using this basic model as an semi-annual guide to check against to ensure they are still hitting their marks.
I first came across AVA through strawman, and really only got properly interested after the recent company meeting a month or so ago. My interest and valuation revolves around this slide and the associated commentary from management about their buisness units. They think they can increase revenue by 2-300% while only increasing the costbase by 50-70% over the next 3 years, if they can do that then they should be worth a lot more in the future than they are now. But the question is how much more!
So far for FY23, they have upgraded guidance for H1 for revenue to be between $13-15M and have said that Q2 was better than Q1 and H2 is expected to be better than H1. So I am running a high and low scenario for FY23 - Low: $30M revenue and High $40M (probably a stretch but possible). Projecting further out I just guess $60M for FY24 and $80 for FY25 to be a bit conservative, but these are really just ballparks for now.
I am assumming a Gross margin of 65% (historically ranges between 65-75%) and their cost base to increase from $10-12M currently to $18M in FY24 and $24M in FY25. Closer to a 100% than the guided 50-70% increase to be conservative.
I have struggled to find what proportion of their EBITDA falls though to NPAT. From the 2022 annual report they have:
-$2.5M of debt and I am assumming 5% interest- so repayments come in at $125K/yr, largely immaterial to the calculation
-$17.5M unutilised tax losses are available for use. Based on them making $10-15M EBITDA then the tax bill will be around $3-4M, so will take a few years to use up the previous tax losses. They also have some foriegn tax credits ($10M) but I have ignored these for now.
-Depreciation and amortisation in 2021 and 2022 for the continuing operations was $1.8 and $1.7M respectively. I am assumming these will be similiar in FY23 and will scale at a similiar rate but will revisit this when the next report is released.
So from my best estimates in FY23 the ITDA should add up to be around $5M, based on what I think EBITDA will be means that to get from EBITDA to NPAT is between 50-70% conversion rate give or take, so I will just work with 60% for all years.
The numbers look pretty reasonable for 2023 and value really depedns on whether they hit the low or high side of revenue numbers. Going forward I don't have high confidence in these numbers but I think the ballpark they re in is about right and if they keep delivering in there day to day buisness units and also get a few more of the 90% margin licence deals to come in like they have spoken about then the 2025 numbers don't seem to crazy.
Maintaining costs and scaling revenue what a combo!
I would appreciate people tearing this apart and telling me why some of my assumptions or what I have done is garbage
Looks like Rob Broomfield is retiring.
I'm not sure of his exact age, but he started his degree in 1978 so i'm guessing he'd be around 65. He's staying on for a further 3 months, will be doing consulting for a further 12m and the Chairman had a lot of nice things to say about Rob in the announcement -- so it all seems very amicable. He also said he remains a "committed shareholder"
Given they already had a replacement lined up, I'm assuming the board knew this was coming.
Rob will be replaced by Mal Maginnis, formerly the president of Rapiscan Systems, an airport security firm which did close to A$1b in revenues in FY22. Mal has 35 years experience in the security sector.
It seems the team at AVA have some history with Mal, having known him for some time. I've also heard from a broker that Mal was the person who recommended the recently appointed global head of sales Jim Viscardi -- whom he worked with at Rapiscan. So the chemistry between sales and Chief Executive is well established
The remuneration package seem appropriate for the role and size of the company. $330k pa fixed (Singapore dollars, which is about $360k AUD). Plus he gets 1,000,000 shares vesting annually in 3 tranches over 3 years -- about $185k at today's share price.
He'll get another 500,000 shares per year for 3 years, if the share price is 20%, 40%, and 60% higher from his start date.
ASX announcement here
Let's see if he can kick some goals.
Really enjoyed the meeting with Rob. I find him a well-considered person and enjoyed hearing the insights into the progress of the company.
I think with the AURA IQ product, if it works like it's promoted to work, then the sales will come from word of mouth. The professionals at the mine, like the engineers, need annual CPD and they usually go to an annual conference somewhere to get it. The conference organisers usually ask the delegates for papers to present and, sooner or later, someone will present how AURA IQ has increased productivity at their mine. I think that will be the catalyst for a flood of enquiries. A successful proof of concept trial is key, but it sounds like they've almost cleared that hurdle.
I also see massive potential coming from the databank of information they have to mine and train their systems.
Happy to keep my toe in the water with AVA both IRL and SM.
A few notes from the management call:
AVA reported revenue of $19m, in line with what they suggested at the last quarterly update. That's a 25% drop from last year, even when you exclude the now sold services division, but it's a 12% improvement when you take out the license fee revenue for the Indian Ministry of Defence (IMoD) and covid grants.
nb: We shouldn't easily dismiss the IMoD revenue from previous years, but this type of (extremely high margin) license revenue is always going to be lumpy. So stripping them off does offer some insight into 'core' operations, which pretty much seem to be chugging ahead nicely. Hopefully we see a few more significant license fee deals -- and in fact there's one due to start in Latin America this year -- but we shouldn't extrapolate too much from them.
It was also good to see the gross margin lift to 65%, especially in light of the current macro backdrop. This was a feature of more sales from the higher margin FFT segment. So overall, again focusing on core, continuing operations, gross profit was 14.1% higher.
Moving further down the income statement, added expenses saw EBITDA drop 10.4%, with the operating margin moving from 5% to 4%.
This was because R&D, sales and marketing, office and travel costs were all higher -- about 63% higher to almost $3m for the full year. That feels like a lot, but all told it's an extra $1.2m and this expense is to help penetrate into new markets and underpin future growth.
Indeed, revenue for North America, which is the stated priority region, saw revenue double for the year.
Operationally, the business is investing further in machine learning processes to help improve the efficacy of detection systems, and increase the attractiveness of long-term support contracts. Indeed, AVA has 52 support contracts signed -- up from just 4 last year. This will hopefully become a good source of recurring revenue and improve client retention by ensuring they are getting the most out of installed systems. In fact, they have 2,500 customers in their existing install base, so there should be a good deal of low hanging fruit here.
There wasn't much on the new Dormakaba agreement, other than there was "significant momentum" in performance as of the end of FY22.
Management did warn that although they had navigated global supply chain issues successfully, they expected the situation to remain challenging in FY23.
Although the company distributed $38.8m back to shareholders during the year (due to the sale of the services division), the balance sheet remains in excellent shape with $15.2m in cash and no debt.
All told, we have a business that looks to be at a decent inflection point. With the company now firmly in the commercialisation phase, and with some encouraging momentum, there's good potential to scale from here -- something that should multiply any top line growth. And, importantly, this is cash flow positive, with a strong balance sheet.
$66m market value (at time of writing) gives a 3.5x sales multiple, or EV/EBITDA of 64.
I'll dial into the results call and update on any insights.
disc: held here and in real life
AVA has announced that it has secured 2 new contracts to supply and install its Fibre Optic Intrusion Detection system within the US Energy sector. In total, these contracts are worth US$800k and will be fulfilled in the current quarter.
For context, these sales represent about 6% of total technology sales for FY22.
The first contract is for US$500k and is a rollout for a second site from an existing customer. When the first order was announced in June, it represented a record energy sector sales order.
The second is for US$300k, and is for a new customer.
Always good to see an existing client deepening their relationship -- it's a strong signal they are happy with the value prop.
Also encouraging to note that AVA reckons it has identified other critical assets in this space and are currently pursuing these. Here's hoping the expanded resourcing in North America continues to pay off.
AVA has acquired UK based GJD Manufacturing, a security equipment designer and manufacturer focusing on intruder detection systems.
The equity value of the deal is A$7.82m, of which 60% will be paid in cash ($4.7m using the current cash reserves of $15.2m), and 40% in AVA shares (11.8m shares worth $3.13m, or 26.5c per share, with shares being in escrow for 12-24 months).
in FY21, ending September 2021, GJD did A$7,95m in revenue and A$1.6m in EBITDA. So the purchase price was 4.9x EBITDA.
You can dig into the details here, but it looks like the idea here is mainly to gain access to GJD's distribution and customer network, with AVA able to compliment the existing product set with FFT and BQT products.
At a high level, it seems a reasonable multiple was paid, there's less than 5% dilution, and no discount to the market price for shares. It's hard to get a clean read on AVA's normalised EBITDA after the divestment, and while the business is still driving towards scale, but a simple pro-rata of the first half results would suggest there's a significant multiple arbitrage here, and so using equity to fund 40% of the deal seems like a prudent move. Especially to help align the incoming management team, and it helps keep the balance sheet in a very sound position.
The real question is just how much sales of AVA products are boosted through the improved access to the UK and European markets.
Released at 4:10pm
On a Friday
On the last trading day of the quarter when most small cap crappy companies with crappy quarters are waiting to the last second to release their crappy quarterly reports
I knew this would be negative the moment I saw it
There are positives though:
I just wish two things of any company's management:
AVA has *finally* secured its fist Aura IQ contract with a "leading global manufacturer of conveyor systems" (this is the product that monitors conveyor belt systems -- see here)
The contract, however, is tiny, clocking in at $300k, although noteworthy in the sense it is commercially ready and something of a milestone.
CEO Rob Broomfield said "Additional contracts...are progressing through procurement processes and are expected over the remainder of calendar year 2022".
The company has previous said that this is a $50m pa opportunity (annual sales are presently around $20m).
Interesting to see this news being released the day after a 10% spike in the share price..
Full announcement here
I just watched their presentation on coffee microcaps and in the Q & A they said that the first commerical order for the Aura IQ fire integrated product is now in the final stages and they are hopfeul that it will be signed before the end of the financial year. They also said that they had a good pipeline of orders for Aura IQ that are at various stages. Nothing really knew was mentioned but commentary was fairly positive for the 4Q numbers.
AVA Group chairman, David Cronin, bought an additional $100k worth of shares today.
He now holds 33.3m shares, or 13% of the company.
Ava has won a $0.7m contract to supply its intrusion detection system to a major US energy facility (see here). It should be fulfilled this year, and I estimate it represents roughly 4-5% of pro-rata sales wins for FY22.
So, relatively, it's fairly material in size, and also noteworthy for being the largest win in the energy sector -- an area the company is targeting and has so far won $1.8m in sales year-to-date.
Excluding divested operations, the company remains on track to generate in excess of $21m in revenue this year with 66%-odd gross margin -- a roughly 20% lift from FY21 when ignoring the IMoD contract -- and is presently being valued at $46m by the market.
On the eve of the approval of the 0.03114c capital return and what i assume will be a quarterly business update i continue to top up at prices of 26-27cents.
Looking forward to see business updates and whether long awaited revenues are materialising.
Growth in revenue of 20%+ per annum will no doubt revalue AVA as the year unfolds and the fact its profitable goes well in these turbulent times.
Having endured the pull back in MP1 today the markets across the globe have no tolerance for subpar growth when prices of companies reflect growth targets of 20% plus.
AVA isn't valued in the same way and thus upside on positive news may occur as a result.
Ava last week released a trading update (see here)
Q3 FY22 sales orders were $2.8m, and on a year to date basis were $13m, which is 17% higher than a year ago (excluding Indian Ministry of Defence). Seems pretty good, but the 3rd quarter itself was underwhelming -- but by exactly how much is hard to say. For reference, they reported $3.2m in Q3 revenue last year...but revenue is not sales orders.
What I've found confusing is the switch between reported revenue and confirmed sales orders in different quarterly updates. I really can't stand it when companies lack any consistency in their reporting -- at least not without good reason, and clear explainers! Plus we have the divestment of the services division, and the Indian Ministry of Defence license fee to try and account for.
For example, in the recent first half, AVA had sales order intake of $10.2m (the addition of the latest quarter's $2.8m is what gives them the $13m YTD figure). But in the first half, revenue from the technology division (ex IMoD) was $9.1m. Similar, but not exactly the same.
In this 3rd quarter update, they only discuss order intake, and make no mention of revenue. And certainly nothing that gives us a clear Q3 FY22 vs Q3 FY21 comparison. Maybe I'm missing something (?) so let me know if anyone else has a clearer read!
Anyway, moving on...
AVA has a confirmed sales backlog of $5m, of which $2.6m is expected to be realised in the 4th quarter. So that's $15.6m in confirmed sales order for the full year. Plus whatever else they can win and book during the quarter.
Again, not sure how that compares on a like-for-like basis with last year, in terms of sales orders. In terms of actual reported revenue, AVA did $16.9m the Technology segment in FY21 if you strip out the IMoD.
So i'm finding it hard to get a read on the nitty gritty here. Any help would be appreciated!
The BQT segment did show a good lift in sales orders in Q3, but this should be expected as their partners bulk up inventory. FFT, on the other hand, showed a big decline -- something they explained by a seasonal slowdown and timing of orders, with the 4th quarter expected to return to the first half run rate. Still, this was the weakest quarter for FFT we've seen for some time, roughly 1/3 lower than the previous corresponding quarter (but that's just guessing by squinting at the provided chart -- no actual figures provided!).
Zooming out, Ava reiterated guidance for $31.3-33.3m in FY22 Revenue. BUT, some of the FY revenue is from the now divested services division. Revenue related to the remaining technology segment is expected to come in at $20.2-22.2m, and that compares to $24.7m in FY21 (a 14% drop at the midpoint). HOWEVER, no revenue is expected from the IMoD license this financial year, so if we normalise for that, and treat FY21 revenue as $16.9m, we have a like-for-like revenue growth of 25%.
That being said, management did insert a pretty big disclaimer, saying "forecast revenue is contingent on the fulfilment of orders expected to be received during Q4 and that supply chains remain unimpeded."
So, yeah. A lot of if's and but's there, and it's all pretty muddy to my mind. I definitely think there's a lot of improvement that could be made in terms of shareholder communication. (Or maybe i'm just not smart enough to tease it all apart better)
Still, if I'm right (and i may be way off base here), we have a business whose core operations are experiencing very solid growth, which have a very decent runway, and with the potential for some other big kicks -- such as another license deal similar to the IMoD (which is essentially 100% margin), the dormakaba agreement, and the long touted AuraIQ product..
Indeed, the company said it was confident of receiving their first order for Aura IQ "in the near term" -- but as others have noted, this has been promised before... Supposedly there were some delays as the company looked to integrate this system with existing fire control fibre, and this work has been finalised and the approach validated at the end of the quarter. Ava says that "based on the successful integration, purchasing approvals within the global mining company have recommenced and are expected to be completed within Q4.
We will see!
Based on what Rob told us at during the Strawman meeting, we can expect the cost base to remain unchanged, and that we'll get something like a 66% margin on core technology segment operations. So if we see continued growth, the current 3%-odd EBITDA margins have the potential to expand considerably. And, unlike a lot of growth companies, the business is cash flow positive with a strong balance sheet.
You're looking at a business currently on a forward price to sales of 2.6x -- which is a pretty crude yard stick. But my valuation of 30c still feels about right given what i think are reasonable assumptions.
As I'm currently unable to view the ex capital return date would someone be kind enough to tell me the last day we can purchase to be eligible for the return?
Thanks kindly
I hope you found the discussion with Ava's CEO Rob Broomfield useful (recording here if you missed it).
Some key takeaways for me:
I might have missed a few other things, so please feel free to add any observations.
Full disclosure, i own AVA on SM and in real life and I plan on adding to my position. So I'm biased, and would really welcome any bear case arguments.
Overall, i think this is a business with an outstanding, long-standing and aligned management team, with a strong balance sheet, growing sales, capital light structure and attractive economics.
Sales will be lumpy though, and given covid, the IMOD contract and Services divestment, this full year probably wont be that exciting. But in the years ahead i see significant growth opportunity. I have a conservative valuation of 33c (20% above the current price), but there's more upside over the next 3-5 years if they execute well.
Moving average down price range:
Buy at $0.42
Sell at $0.49
market cap at 37c is about $90m. But this one is clearly a case for enterprise value - profitable and with loads of cash after the divestment. Shareholders net 42m from the services division divestment, plus the remaining business will still have ~15m cash on hand after the capital return. So the EV is approximately 90m - 42m - 15m = 33m. Some risk on the tax implications given they did make a great profit on services division (but held 21m in carried forward losses)
Even without much future from IMoD (they only have about A$4m left in revenue, but there might be upside in maintenance, extension etc) I think this is good value for a company with no debt and two mature technologies, in good spaces with proven demand.
Say the business loses all revenue from IMoD and the new entity is roughly breakeven. They have a cash cushion and can weather any COVID supply chain issues if they post another weak Qtr (potential buying opportunity?). No need for dilution, no threat from debt, all equals solid downside protection - tick.
From there they will need to defend the base and continue making sales (its not SaaS I have to remind myself), but I could easily imagine this plus sales picking up from pipeline of mining clients for Aura IQ, their data cabinet security system etc. My 75c valuation is based on some of this occuring, seeing NPAT of roughly 3m and a PE of 30x (which they'd get with that sort of growth). Enough for the stock to double, second tick.
I like that the chairman holds 32m shares (~15%), not a lot of options outstanding, they're responsible with the register. What does smell a little is the CEO and now CFO leaving in past 12-18 months. But then the CEO retired and CFO could easily have left after missing the promotion, but will watch in case they were the driving force of success.
The real question for the strawman is what will happen to our strawman portfolio holdings upon capital return :) will you return the cash to holders portfolios? If so I will start reversing the virtual truck :)
Finally an update from the ATO on AVA's proposal to return $39.2m back to shareholders.
Unfortunately, the ATO was only prepared to treat $7.567m of this as a capital return (a mechanism that would allow shareholders to defer any tax). That's equivalent to $0.03114 per share. They will seek shareholder approval for this at a special meeting on the 22nd April.
As such, AVA will distribute the rest of the money as a special dividend of 13c per share. Sadly, this will be unfranked (they simply don't have any franking credits to distribute given they have barely had to pay any tax due to the use of carried forward losses).
The record date for the dividend payment is 28th of February, which means anyone on the share register at that stage is eligible. Given the settlement period, that means you need to buy shares no later than the 26th to be eligible.
Obviously, a full capital return would have been the most tax effective method of returning excess money given AVA's situation, but there's little they can do if the ATO isn't going to play ball. Still, the fact they are returning this capital, and are not tempted to invest it on an acquisition or new capex shows a good bit of discipline to my mind.
This was a solid result from Ava (see here)
The group's technology division -- now the core focus after the divestment of the Services business -- received confirmed sales orders of $4.9m, a 63% improvement on the previous second quarter despite some covid related impacts. Year to date, Ava's tech division has generated $10.2m in the first 6 months of the year, a 42% improvement.
The FFT segment was the key driver of the improved result, with significant growth in the US market, up 150% year to date. Military installations and solar farms were called out as especially strong.
The company also has a confirmed order backlog (awaiting fulfilment) of $4.2m -- the majority of which is expected to be realised in FY22. Note that this excludes the Indian Ministry of Defence (IMOD) contract, which the company doesn't expect any material contribution from for the remainder of the year.
The new Dormakaba agreement came into effect at the start of 2022, and an initial order is expected before the end of January. I expect the blue part of the chart above to become more meaningful as this starts to ramp up.
The balance sheet remains insanely strong with $55m in cash and no debt, although $39.2m of this will be returned to shareholders (about 16c per share) as soon as they (hopefully) get a favourable ruling from the ATO. As a business delivering free cash flow, even after the return of capital, the balance sheet will be in very good shape.
The company also reaffirmed guidance of $20.2-21.2m in H1 revenue and EBITDA of $2.2-2.5m. This will include 3.5 months contribution from the divested Services segment. Still, removing this and accounting for the 16c cash return, you have a high margin, fast growing, profitable, well funded technology business, with an attractive market opportunity, that's probably on a Price to Sales of roughly 3x.
Will be good to get a "clean" set of results, but the business just seems good value to me.
The global agreement with Dormakaba announced today, was foreshadowed at the AGM and has been a stated strategic goal.
While there was already an agreement in place, it was limited to just a few countries and generated less than half a million per year. This new agreement opens up all the markets that Dormakaba operate in, including new ones in Europe and the US. (Dormakaba's website says they operate in 130 countries)
Details of the revenue share weren't disclosed, but obviously AVA is taking a cut to gross margins in order to leverage Dormakaba's distribution. In principle i think that's a smart move. As management have said, they expect operating expenses to remain steady, and will only need to fund extra working capital for production and inventory.
The alternative would have been a big ramp up in new offices and staff costs, higher risk and a longer timeframe.
Sales are expected to start as soon as next month.
Disc:held
AVA Risk Group ASX:AVA
Q1 FY22 update:
Watching for any updates closely:
Disclosure: Not a holder at the moment, technically looks like it may struggle to hold the $0.425 support level, so I am watching for an entry closer to $0.365.
It wasn't a great quarter for Ava, with revenue for the first 3 months of FY22 down 7.7% on the 'normalised' first quarter of last year (removing impacts of large contracts, FX and covid impacts) to $15m.
That's down ~12% from the statutory Q1 result from last year, which came in at $17m (73% higher than Q1 FY20).
Group EBITDA, including the now divested services division, was just $2m, compared with $7.7m last year. That's in part due to the gross margin dropping from 49% to 38% as a result of Indian Ministry of Defence (IMOD) license fees, and weaker margins in the services business.
Looking ahead, the company gave first half guidance for $20.1m-$21.2m in revenue and $2.2m-$2.5m in EBITDA, that's compared with $35m in revenue and $12m in EBITDA for the previous corresponding period.
It's a BIG drop, but there's a bit of nuance needed here.
The current quarter will only include 18 days worth of contribution of the services division -- a segment that delivered ~$10m in revenue for Q2 last year. So on a like-for-like basis, completely stripping out the services division for the first half of last year and the current year, the first half revenue guidance represents first half sales in the remaining technology segment of $7.6m, down from $16.6m last year.
That's still a big drop, but the first quarter included zero licensing fees from the IMOD (last year it generate $7.8m in total for the group). Big deals like this and the Australian Department of Defence will naturally lead to some lumpiness.
The good news is that the order intake for the core Future Fibre Tech (FFT) business was up 53% on last year and up 8% on a strong 4th quarter of FY21. The order backlog was also up ~50%. Again stripping out the IMOD contract, FFT quarterly revenue just reported was up 40% from a year ago, and 23% above last year's quarterly average.
The BQT segment was impacted with site closures due to covid, but here the outlook is also encouraging -- especially with their licensing agreements. This model gives them less revenue per sale, but is much more scalable and yields 100% margins, and allows them to leverage of partner networks.
Overall, i can't see any structural issues with the business and in fact see AVA as well positioned to capture further growth. They have a strong position in a large and growing global market, with long-standing, top tier blue-chip clients, a highly scalable business model, with an expanding use case, aligned management a rock solid balance sheet.
All that being said, we need to see some good sales momentum build in the coming year.
AVA Completes Divestment of Services Division
Sale price of US$46.4 million (A$62.6 million) with anticipated net cash proceeds of US$31.1 million (A$41.9 million) after closing adjustments, and payment of management incentives and FY2021 accrued bonuses
Net cash investment return to Ava Risk Group of circa 587%
Ava Risk Group now comprises of leading security sensing solution provider Future Fibre Technologies, and high security access control and electronic locking provider BQT Solutions
As announced on 30 August 2021, following the completion of the Transaction Ava Risk Group is expected to hold $40.2 million in excess capital. The Board’s intention is to use the excess capital to undertake the following capital
management strategies:
1. Capital Return to Shareholders: $39.7 million (circa 16 cents per share); and
2. On-Market Buy Back: $1.0 million, which has commenced (refer to ASX announcements
for updates)
file:///C:/Users/Canad/AppData/Local/Temp/02437551.pdf
AVA Risk Group reported FY2021 results:
• Revenue increased by 41% to $65.0m
• EBITDA improved by 116% to $16.0m ($8.3 million from FTT and BQT technology)
• NPAT improved by 178% to $13.7m
• Net operating cash flow increased by 195% to $17.6m
• Cash as at 30 June 2021 of $17.3m with no debt and divestment of Ava Global Logistics for ~A$42.4m in Oct 2021
Following up on Ricks post below regarding AVA Risk Group divesting its services division.
The services division is why the company is valued with low multiples in the market.
They seem to be on the right track to creating a more lean and tech-centric business.
Although, the services division generates a huge chunk of revenue for AVA; 18m but this only translates to a 3.8m EBITDA. We expect revenue to decrease in the upcoming year which would make the company look unatractive at first glance.
PE for 1H21 is ~6.8x (includes service division)
Estimated PE for FY21 would be ~12-14x (excluding service division)
Current market cap 104M
For FY2021, 17.2m in cash plus upcoming sale of services division of 42.4m after adjustments.
Disclosure: held
AVA CEO Rob Broomfield interviewed on Ausbiz today on the FY21 update:
Bad Half, Good Year:
AVA’s trading update today focuses heavily on PCP and YOY comparatives which look good but hide a very poor Half on Half comparison. None the less they have landed very close to the forecast in my valuation and without further information on a likely sale value of the Service Division, I will leave my valuation as is for the moment but would like to shout out @Rapstar for his valuation thoughts which are quite sound. Any variance to my IV is about future growth potential which is guess work.
Update Key Points: (unable to attach announcement due to file size…)
· FY21 Sales $64.8m (+41% YOY), EBITDA ~$15.3m (+107% YOY), EBITDA Margin ~23.5% (+46% YOY), 17m cash and no debit.
· Tech Division (FFT + BQT) $24.7m (+17% YOY), but this means that Q2 revenue was $8.0m Vs Q1 revenue of $16.7m (-52.5%). $5.8m in Backlog and Delays were cited, of which if added still leaves H2 sales down 17% on H1. FY22 success will be based on the up and coming Aura-IQ system revenues which is going through proof of value programs. $50m of sales pipeline over 3 years is expected to start contributing in FY22… We will see.
· AVA Global Logistics Division (Service Division) $40.1m (+60% YOY), Q2 revenues of $21.7m Vs $18.4m in Q1 show QoQ growth of +15.7% and save the year. However this is the division that is up for sale and management incentives to sell (about 1/3 of the net proceeds) it have been extended until 30 June 2022. After management incentives and cost of sale AVA will probably realised around $30m for this division or about 1/3 of current market value.
· Cash position of 17m is an increase of 4m on the end of H1 which shows the business remains FCF positive but again H2 generated about half the FCF than H1.
The bull case remains that they get a good price for the Service Division, Aura-IQ system revenue takes off and grows strongly and they are able to replicate the IMoD licence fee revenues to some extent going forward.
The bear case is mostly that the bull assumptions don’t happen, which means AVA’s Tech Division becomes competitively week and fails to grow.
The market likes the news (+12% as I write), but an update is always welcome and AVA may have been beaten down a bit with tax loss selling… I continue to hold
Coffee Micropcaps Presentation
Hang around for the Q & A - interesting colour regarding the pipeline.
AVA Services main competitors are, or should I say were, Brinks and G4S. Brinks acquired G4S for $860 million. G4S had adj. EBITDA of $115 M, which tranlates to a valuation multiple of 7.5 times.
AVA Services are on track for EBITDA of at least $8M in 2021, and would be worth more than $60 million going by the valuation multiple Brinks paid.
Getsmart outlined the numbers. But some of my observations are:
1) Revenue was not broken out for technology and services business. I suspect the technology revenue fell, and the services business grew over the quarter, given the change in gross margins outlined below. They stopped breaking this number out in Quarterly reports back in Q2. Bit of a red flag for me.
2) Gross margins fell to 43%, meaning the services busness is performing strongly in comparison to the technology business.
3) AVA said: "The Company progressed commercial negotiations and expects to enter new contracts to deploy Aura IQ to multiple sites during Q4 FY2021." This is the litmus test for management, and the future prospects for the business. AVA will be a sell for me if there are no contract announcements by June 30........
DISC - I HOLD
$1.8+ million Multi-Site Rail Contract Award
Ava Risk Group Limited (ASX: AVA) (“Ava Group” or “Company”) is pleased to announce that its world leading Aura Ai sensing solution has been selected to be deployed for a multi-site program to upgrade security at certain major rail facilities in South America:
Disc; I hold....
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02357253-3A564166?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
I have sold my small holding in AVA. My half-year reporting review provided me with some questions that presented new risks that I don't completely understand or are not aligned with my thesis. There is some serious upside and downside potential for Ava Risk Group but I can't say which is more likely at this point. I only like to hold if I have high conviction and I don't at this point so I am selling on that basis.
Risks/problems causing negative views:
Yet another announcement that needs amending because of a mistake. Makes me wonder if management has it all together? Do they miss the finer details? Are they taking other shareholders seriously? I counted 5 errors since 28 July 2020. All since the old CEO left.
Emails to investor email account bounces. Online form to contact the company doesn't work.
New details I wasn't aware of or fully accounted for:
Valuation - the guessing game:
Selling of the services division at a 10x EBITDA multiple (figure based on what I've seen thrown around as reasonable):
EBITDA multiple of 10x for services (1HFY21 services EBITDA x 2 x multiple) = $3.8 x 2 x 10 = $76 mil.
Take away potential management profits @ 32.7% over USD$5.3mil($6.8AUD) = $53 mil valuation of services division to share holders
Cash at bank = $13.4 million
Market valuation of Technology = 135-13.4-53= $68.6 million
Here is the problem for me, taking out IMOD I think this is very expensive and hoping for the best with Aura IQ. If another IMOD comes along this is super cheap....
What would I miss by selling?
Conclusion
Given the current market turbulence and my lack of conviction I have sold out. However, this is not a sell and forget. As things pan out I will be more than happy to jump back in as my concerns are answered. I just can't tell if this is a massive winner or loser at this time and price...
H1 FY21 Results out and are as flagged mid-January (others have quoted), additional information & points of note:
· IMOD contract saw sales in India grow 241%, about 40% of the growth YOY – not a surprise
· Europe accounted for 47% of growth YOY and remains the largest market at 44% of sales. I suspect this is linked to the 101% growth in the Logistics business.
· USA sales dropped 50% and now account for just 7% of sales – disappointing.
No change to valuation, FY21 full year forecast is under baked but until we see more contracts like the IMOD, there are gaps to fill for future sales
Half Yearly Report
AVA released their half yearly report this morning
Highlights:
Revenue up 72% to $35M
Licence fees from IMOD project make up $7.7M of above
Profit up 1,071% to $11M
Special dividend of 2cents/share payable March 10th
Strong balance sheet with $13.4M cash
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02347126-3A562418?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
Correction statement to February 2021 Investor presentation
Ava Risk Group Limited (ASX: AVA) (“Ava Group” or “Company”) wishes to advise of a typographically error on Slide 13 of the investor presentation released to market yesterday. The 3rd bullet point which read “Total contract value estimated at US$11.9M+ (A$16.7M+)” should have read “Total contract value estimated at US$11.9M+ (A$15.6M+)”. The error was due to use of a prior, rather than current USD/AUD exchange rate. Management apologies for the error.
INVESTOR PRESENTATION INCLUDES PRELIMINARY H1 FY2021
HIGHLIGHTS:
STRONG REVENUE GROWTH
• FY2020 revenues $46.1M, increased by 46% over PCP
• 1H FY2021* revenues $35M, increased by 70% over PCP
HIGHLY SCALABLE MODEL
• Multiple new customer wins in both Services and Technology Divisions
• Significant conversion of repeat customers upgrading products on multiple sites
• FY2020 generated $6.0M net operating cashflow, 1H FY2021* generated $8.2M
STRONG COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE'
• Highly defensible competitive position, breadth of product range, performance and blue-chip customer base
• Experienced leadership team, with broad global industry knowledge and deep market sector understanding
GLOBAL EXPANSION OPPORTUNITIES
• Expanding technology and services sales efforts into several new attractive markets globally
• Highly competent global sales force with significant pipeline of known technology projects, and increasing addressable customer spend for provision of valuable logistics services
• Thousands of products installed in more than 70 countries
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02336851-3A560484?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4
DISC: I hold in strawman and TRW
Ava Risk group has reported net operating cash flows of $4.4m for Q2 -- up $0.7m from the proceeding quarter and up $4.6m from the same time last year.
$2.6m was from the Indian Ministry of Defense (IMOD) and the same amount is exected in the current quater. After this, most of the contract value will have been paid but the business should remain cash flow positive.
AVA has $13.4m cash at the bank.
14-Jan-2021: As @Rapstar has mentioned here in both the AVA General Forum and in his "Services Division" Straw for AVA today, AVA is held by DMX Capital Partners, a division of DMX Asset Management. Their monthly newsletters are free to access from here: https://www.dmxam.com.au/monthly_archive.html
I do see that in their September 2020 newsletter that they've said:
Management meetings
We are pleased to share below a summary of our notes and insights taken from meetings with management of several of our disclosed portfolio positions. We share these insights to showcase four of our holdings where we feel our discussions with management have highlighted some interesting aspects to the business, that are perhaps not well understood by the market.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVA Risk Group (ASX:AVA)
Meeting with David Cronin (Chairman) and Rob Broomfield (CEO)
As previously noted, FY20 was a big year for AVA, as it delivered an impressive turn-around. In speaking with management, we were keen to focus on FY21 and whether that momentum could be sustained. Key insights are discussed below.
In summary, we took a lot of confidence from our meeting with AVA. Its Services division has significant momentum, and when sold, we think has the potential to generate sales proceeds to AVA of $50m to $60m (before Management profit share is accounted for). Its technology business will grow in FY21 underpinned by the IMOD contract. AVA’s fiber technology offering perhaps hasthe most upside, and its potential least appreciated by the market, but we acknowledge it will take some time for this potential to play out.
--- end of excerpt --- [to read the notes/insights from DMX's other 3 company management meetings (with PTB, EGH & UCW), click here.]
While I can't find any reference in there (or in any of their newsletters) to AVA extending their own management performance plan termination date to June 30, 2021 (from Feb 1, 2021), I'll take @Rapstar's word for it; it sounds right. I do note that they (DMX) stated: "With the Services business due to be sold in the next 12 months, Management are looking to target an EBITDA sale multiple of 9x to 12x, given the capital light nature of the business. AVA are happy to take a commercial approach in relation to the timing of the sale in order to maximise the sales price."
Onwards and upwards then.
During the past 12 months, DMX have mentioned AVA in their February, May, July, August, September and October newsletters - all can be accessed from here.
Their December newsletter had not been uploaded to that webpage when I typed up this straw, but I expect it will be shortly, once they publish it.
[I hold AVA shares.]
Services Division performing strongly and on track for EBITDA of $8.4M for FY2021. Given management are hoping fro a sale price of 9-12x of EBITDA, a sale price of $75 - 100 M is hoped for. Management will pocket 33%, so shareholders can expect $50-70 M in captial returned........18- 26 cents per share.
Management are hoping for sale by June 30, 2021, as per DMX September monthly report.
Relentless selling
If anyone wants to find out why AVA is trending down, one of the subs is selling heavily
They are a little known company in Dubai called "Alkasab United Company"
I couldnt' really find much about this company though.
I hold but the selling by the substantial holder is getting me a bit worried. I did top up recently around 0.53.
30-Oct-2020: IMOD Project Update
Indian MOD Data Network Protection Project Update
Ava Risk Group Limited (ASX: AVA) (Ava Group or Company) today provides the following market update and clarifications with respect to the large-scale supply of FFT’s SecureLink technology to protect data communications cables for the Indian Ministry of Defence (IMOD):
FY2020 Recap:
Q1 FY2021 (unaudited):
Updated Forecast:
Historical A$ amounts are based on actual USD/AUD exchange rates achieved. Forecast $A amounts are based on the current USD/AUD exchange rate at time of release. Actual final A$ amounts achieved may differ depending on exchange rates achieved at the time.
[I hold AVA shares.]
Smashing result announced. Key takeaways:
1) Revenue up 73% on pcp.
2) EBITDA of $7.7 Millon, up 522% on pcp.
3) CASH UP 50% FROM JUNE 30 2020, to $11.6 M.
Services Division - Revenue of $8.1 Million, down from $7.7 M in Q4 2020. However, gross margin expanded to 33% , with expansion plans for Asia flagged. Bad news fo rthe Strawman classic - Incentive scheme extended to June 30 2021, so a sale of the Services division will not occur during the Classic :(. Noting the the busness is likely to sell for around 8x EBITDA, he servies division is worth about $51 million at the current EBITDA rate.
Technology division is generating high margins courtersy of the IMOD contract. Maangment flagging a healthy pipeline of opportunities. Something to watch closely as the IMOD contact phases out in Q4.
CEO, Rob Broomfield will be presenting today at a Reach Markets event - register here.
The promo says: "This week we will hear from: Rob Broomfield, CEO at Ava Risk Group Ltd (ASX: AVA), a fast-growing Australian RegTech firm, with an exciting recent win in the banking and mining sector."
I am keen to see Rob present - I think it may be his first presentation as CEO.
AVA Risk released an investore presentation. In it there was a FY2021 guidance, Strangely, the announcment was not marked as market sensitive. Perhaps there is an earlier announcement, but I am yet to find it. Here are the key takeaways:
1) Forecast Q1 2021 revenue: +$15.5m - up 58% on pcp.
2) Positive cashflow for Q1 2021, and an improvement on the $0.9 M reported on pcp. It will likely translate into $3-4 millon in positive cashflow for the quarter.
3) Repeated the IMOD $11.7M revenue forecast to be booked in FY2021 - remember, this is 100% gross margin licencing fees.
4) AURA IQ pipeline is reproted to be +$49M, with another 6 proof of values deployments underway. Forecast recurring revenues for this new product in FY2021.
5) $14.6 M backlog as at June 30, 2020. It was just $6.0 millon a year ago.
AVA Risk are on track otearn +$60M in revenue this FY, and around 15-20% profit margins. IT still looks remarkably cheap at this price.
DISC - I HOLD ( a lot)
Key takeaways:
1) $4 M positive cashflow for the quarter !
2) Company again highlights it has 100% margin revenue of $10 million forecast for FY2021 (no one seems to be listening!)
3) Services division reported strong growth in Q4 - previously reported.
4) Technology divison reported winning a defence contract (no value provided) and advised there are several "Proof of Value" trials for its Aura IQ conveyor health monitoring solution.
5) Gross margins were above 50%, despite the services division GMs running at 25%.
Very profitable 2nd half of the year, resulting in $5.7 M free cashflow generated for the full year, or 2.3 cents per share.
If AVA can execute on sales of its Aura IQ product, it looks very cheap at the current share price.
AVA Risk report their Services Division report seperately, as they are seeking to sell this non-core division ove rhte next 6 months. They reported the following performance:
1) $9.7 M revenue for the quarter, achieving $25.1 M in revenue fo rthe full years, representing 57% growth in revenue.
2) Threefold increase in clients over the year.
3) Gross margins increased to 25% from 21% over the year.
4) EBITDA of $2.3 M for the year.
5) Merger of largest and 2nd largest competitors creating opportunity to expand market share.
The group is on track to achieve $40 M in revenue this FY, and to double EBITDA to around $5 million. This would value the business at around $20 Million at a 4x EBITDA multiple. Given AVA has a market cap of around $40M, the sale of this business could unlock a lot of value, given the core technology business is high margin, high growth business, with $23 million in revenue.
Highlights:
1) Q4 revenue beat by 17%.
2) FY2020 estimated to be $45M, $2M above previous guidance.
3) FY2020 EBITDA forecast to be $6.8M (noting the ITDA will be around $2.4M). Meaning profit after tax of $4.4M.
4) Big news: Scott Basham, CEO has resigned. Rob Broomfield, COO of the technology divison will take over.
5) Technology Division is experiencing order delays due to COVID-19, with staff WFH on reduced hours & pay, but some improvement over June.
Great result, but losing Scott, after turning the ship around, is a loss.
If AVA can continue to grow revenue, and execute, they are very cheap at these prices, however, there si some uncertainty as a result of Scott's departure.
•Strong management team surpassing expectations in a short time
•Management has 5.8% stake with significant increased insider buying recently
•Provide a number of different products, servicing multiple markets and customers in multiple countries
•Possess a strong moat/competitive advantage with their patented products and tech
•Strong balance sheet and fundamentals – gross margins of 19% (services division) and 79% (tech divisions), trading at 1.1x annual revenue and 2.6x gross profit with an EV of $34,858,000.
•Zero debt
•Profitable
•High-quality B2B customers - recent contracts with Australian DoD and Indian Ministry of Defence and other current customers including NATO, US Dept of Homeland Security, Lockheed Martin
•Strong tailwinds with cyber terrorism on the rise and the U.S. implementing strict cyber security measures, rolling out as early as next year, for anyone along the supply chain dealing with defense contracts
Having so quickly reached positive cash flow and profitability under new management, Ava Group appears to be hitting an inflection point. High growth potential and undervalued.
Disclaimer: I hold a small position in AVA